This is an archive of past discussions with User:Tezero. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Welcome!
Hello, Tezero, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Plc.4 Mie Haed, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Plc.4 Mie Haed. Coppertwig (talk) 22:39, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Acroterion(talk)18:09, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Blip Blip Bleep, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mr mark taylor (talk) 01:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rnb (talk) 00:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Blip Blip Bleep, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Rnb (talk) 01:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello, in regards to your request that a Nirvana Userbox be created, I have spent some time changing colours, and you may like to refine it to different shades of your liking, however I believe to be successful in creating a sufficient userbox, as is shown below. Green1Blue2 (talk) 02:18, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
There's no need, since grunge is a subgenre of alternative rock. For song and album infoboxes, it's best to keep it as simple as possible. "Grunge" alone is fine for all Nirvana albums and song article infoboxes. WesleyDodds (talk) 02:11, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
My December (song)
If you had read the link I provided, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My December (song), that would explain why it was originally deleted. The other link, WP:MUSIC, provides the guidelines for notability of songs and music within Wikipedia. I cannot speak for Nirvana and the Beatles, however, I presume they pass WP:MUSIC.
Hey, on No More Sorrow you reverted my edit to keep the page. Why is this? All the information present on the article is in the album therefore the article isn't needed. Thanks Jakisbak (talk) 20:33, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Blessid Union of Souls
I disagree with your approach to the BUOS article. Adding information is only valid if it is cited properly (esp when disputed). I have been watching this artcile for a while now. It is a comprimise version based on two competing claims to the band. While I personally believe Eliot Sloan's band will prevail, it must be with evidence. Please properly cite information that changes the neutral tone of the article. NeuGye (talk) 03:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
I do appreciate your contribution to the article. MySpace is not a vaild source as anyone can add anything to a MySpace page. If you find other sources that allows expansion of the article (maybe on the new Sloan website that I replaced his MySpace link with) then feel free to add it. I just ask that you help me keep any information about Jeff Pence's claim to the band until it is settled. Lets try and keep it unbiased and neutral so that we do not create facts. Thanks again. NeuGye (talk) 17:25, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
The Beatles' genres
A consensus was developed after lengthy and difficult discussion to include only "rock" and "pop" genres because they had too many genres to list them all, and "rock" and "pop" are the most generic. Please don't change without obtaining a change in consensus. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 22:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Rock music WikiProject
I'd like to invite you to join the newly-formed Rock music WikiProject. There's alot of Rock-related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help us get this project off the ground and a few Rock music pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks! --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 18:45, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
MTM
Linkin Park isn't in the scope of the alternative scope, go and check the metal or the rock project.
I suppose, I'm just saying it isn't on any user pages, so why keep it? But you can if you want, it is your userbox Ctjf83Talk20:03, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted articles
Yeah, I hear ya man. I sometimes scour the CSD category to save articles. One example would be Nothing Is Sound Tour. Can you believe someone actually wanted to speedy that? Anyway, thanks for dropping by. I like your userpage, and the tag at the top is pure genious! Hilarious. --Pwnage8 (talk) 01:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Re: Mewtwo
It's actually your other smaller edits I was trying to work out in cases where the original prose came across a bit better. Given the amount you did in one burst in that second-to-last one though the pokemon fix got lost in the shuffle in a few bits.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:17, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Er, to word that a bit better it would work better if you did the edits in bursts so any that we disagree on can be tweaked and noted easier.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:20, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank ye kindly. Also I appreciate the help with the articles. I've been flying solo on most of the SC character articles and that's been wearing me down like crazy <.<'--Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:27, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Pretty much my userpage says it all, namely the bulk in the Soulcalibur FA topic project section (which I think at this point might be better as a GA topic project instead...). It's not all that bad save for articles that lack notability getting merged for the time being into the character list and dealing with annoyed fans that come clamoring as to why their fave character isn't represented when everyone from [insert various fighting game here] is.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
BatterWow (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Re:Secret page
Here you go:
{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};"
| rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[Image:Missing barnstarPn.png|100px]]
| style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The "I Cheated" Barnstar'''
|-
| style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This user has '''Cheated''' trying to find[[User:RyRy|''' RyRy </span>''']]'s Secret Page using the search bar! Can you find the real Secret Page? .<small>''Ver. 2.5''</small>
|}
Me again. The redlink-removal was fine; thanks for doing it. I'm struggling with the background section: could you have a bash at it? Frankly, I don't even know what to write. I'm going to write up the reception section and find more ratings for the infobox. Then chart rankings, a summary of the article in the lead and a general polish; it should make GA pretty soon.
I don't want you to be freaked out about it, that's why I'm posting here. I reverted your little genre-removing rampage from a few days ago. I think it's best we leave it alone until an actual consensus on this issue is reached. If all of a sudden the genre field returns, it would look awfully silly for those articles you selected to not have it. --Pwnage8 (talk) 05:56, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Yes. I noticed you removed the genre from Green Day (because it's in my watchlist) a few days ago, but I thought nothing of it until I looked at your latest contribs yesterday and found all those genre removals. --Pwnage8 (talk) 00:01, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Deoxys
Deoxys was one of the few Pokemon articles left around for a while to specifically discuss if it had enough information. It was shown that the NASA mention was the only thing real world about it, and that it was not enough to hold an article. If you wish to resurrect it, please open a discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pokémon. TTN (talk) 17:11, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, the subject came up on Pikachu's GA re-assessment page with Artichoker. Truthfully it's something I've been leaning too to keep the article in style with others on wikipedia.
Although I didn't agree with initial decision to bring this to FAC, it's there now. Since I am an active participant with Pokémon-related articles I would like to help address any concerns brought out at the nomination page. It is OK if I add myself to the list of nominators? Artichoker[talk]00:21, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I notice that it looks like you're a new editor, and new to GA nominations. I've left a note on the GA nomination page about the review. If you have concerns about the prose, then it should have been placed on hold for the nominator to address the prose issues, or you could correct them yourself, rather than simply pass the GA nomination. If you have any questions about the GA process, feel free to ask. Peanut4 (talk) 02:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
No worries. Make sure you also transclude the review onto the article talk page, and place an "In review" tag under the nomination on the Wp:GAN page as per the instructions to avoid multi reviews of the same article. Peanut4 (talk) 02:24, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Well, I'd like to get Everything in Time and Boom Box (album) to GA and get the whole topic (see my page) to FT status. Unfortunately 2 FAs out of 9 articles is 22%, below the 25% limit for FT (and I think this limit might rise in time). I'd like to get a third album to FA status so the lot can be promoted as a Featured Topic, rather than a Good Topic, as it's not difficult to attain. Whether the third FA is an album that there is a lot of information out there about, like Tragic Kingdom, or an album that would naturally have a short article, like The Beacon Street Collection, is still undecided.
I have been doing a little on Just a Girl as we do have a lot of charting material (which is currently in my sandbox) for all seven singles; I think I'll brush up all seven articles. If you'll continue to work alongside me, I'd be very grateful. It's nice to have a wiki-friend. -- Escape Artist SwyerTalkContributions17:23, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Hmm... well having a look at other featured albums, I don't know. The line about musical styles under the "Music" header looks awkward on its own, the production and tour sections could be longer and the singles section looks messy. We could perhaps submit it to peer review? What do you reckon? -- Escape Artist SwyerTalkContributions21:38, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
The singles section was cut down because having all the chart positions apparently made a difficult read and I cut a lot per the GA review. I still don't like the way it looks. Frankly, I prefer it with all the charting info. Seven singles were released; the section could be a lot longer. As for the tour, do you reckon the image of Live in the Tragic Kingdom should be used there? In fact, the whole section could be expanded and put into two paragraphs: one for tour, one for video release. I think it would make the section look better. Do you want to submit the article for peer review (now or after the aformentioned changes)? -- Escape Artist SwyerTalkContributions01:53, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Oops, clocks went back last Sunday. I'm actually UTC. By intro I meant the little paragraph at the top of the peer review explaining what you're looking for from people's comments. I thought you might have something to add. -- Escape Artist SwyerTalkContributions00:48, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
I really need the liner notes of Everything in Time. There's so little information out there. Frankly I don't have a clue where songs like "New Friend" are from. I'm reluctant to buy the album solely for the notes. I might trawl charity shops or something.
As for Live... my first header would be "Background and Production": you could do a really long section on TK, its success and its singles. Then talk about the tour (sources at TK). Put critical reception below tracklisting (per all the other articles) and cite the extras using sources already at TK. Oh and the track listing would be better in a table (like the one at TK). I'll look for more reviews for you. :)-- Escape Artist SwyerTalkContributions15:27, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
BTW, I got the idea that discographies must contain video albums per a comment by Gary King here. Then rst20xx turned up to point out that existing discographies don't have them. I think we may have a little leeway here. If you want to dump Live to work on Boom Box then it's up to you, but it would be a shame. -- Escape Artist SwyerTalkContributions15:52, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
The credits section I've just put into Everything in Time is from the allmusic page and is based on the format at Tragic Kingdom. If you have a look through the diffs, it's easy to see my process. I'm going to close the peer review and do some formatting over at TK. I'll give it a last-minute brush up before asking you if it's suitable for FAC. -- Escape Artist SwyerTalkContributions14:12, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Sorry so late to get back to you
I know you cuz I was in the sandbox and saw your comments.
What I meant by an index box is when you start a new page, you have the box that contains the contents of the page , how do you do a content box?
Many thanks--Jonas Todd (talk) 02:47, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Message from WikiProject Punk music
Hello!
You may be interested to know that WikiProject Punk music has recently undergone a major revitalization. Please visit the project page to see our new look and check out some of our helpful new features, such as the Assessment Department and the Collaboration of the week. There are also a number of tasks on our Things to do page that you may be interested in helping with.
We are currently holding a roll call to help gauge how many active project members we have. Please visit the project's talk page and add your signature to the roll sheet to express your continued interest in the project. Also, if you have not already done so, please take a minute to add your name to the Participants page along with a brief summary of your punk-related interests, so that other project members will be better able to collaborate with you. If you do not add your signature to the roll sheet by November 30, 2008 your name will be moved to our list of inactive members. We may also take the liberty of removing the project userbox from your userpage if it appears there, to prevent you from automatically appearing in Category:WikiProject Punk music members. Of course you are free to rejoin the project and re-add the userbox at any time if you would like to become active in the project again.
Thank you and we hope you will continue to support WikiProject Punk music!
You are receiving this message because you have previously identified yourself as a member of WikiProject Punk music, either because your name appears on the Participants page or because you have placed the project userbox on your user page. As a courtesy, if you have left the project, retired from Wikipedia, or simply no longer wish to be an active project member, please remove the userbox from your user page. This will remove you from Category:WikiProject Punk music members and help the project to keep its active membership list up-to-date.
Ah ha ha... I knew some people would try and find my secret page by cheating.. Luckily, I took precautions against it!! Good luck in creating your own secret page ;) TopGearFreakTalk12:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Easy!
Ha ha, did u think it was hard at all? Founding 'our secret page? No.. I did it with Opera 9.6. That browser has a zoom (+) version and i used it.Rogerchocodiles 15:48, 23 November 2008
For being the first user (i was but im talking about other ones, my signature doesn't is important)
The song is not notable enough to have its own article. You haven't asserted any reason as to why it should not be redirected. According to many lengthy discussions at WT:ALM, songs that do not comply with notability standards are to be redirected to the main album. NSR77T01:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
The only thing I want to change is the fact that the two sound samples push the text down, rather than the text fitting around them (so to speak). Any ideas? Then hit it with whatever hammer you like and start a joint nom. -- Escape Artist SwyerTalkContributions21:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Just a note, on the FAC page, it's usual to let the person who brought up a concern strike it when they feel it's dealt with. I'm letting you know so you can go back and remove the ones you've done, thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk14:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Yes, either Raul or SandyGeorgia does it. Basically it passes if there are no outstanding legitimate objections. I can't see any outstanding objections there - we've addressed virtually everything - so now we just have to wait it out. I've heard Sandy say before that she waits for several to be ready to pass so she can pass them all together. Something about the number of tabs she needs open.
I'm finding Everything in Time difficult to track down. I need someone with the liner notes/the liner notes themselves. The article is really short at the moment, at 16KB. In a paragraph I moved to the talk page because it was unsourced, it said the liner notes contained tonnes of info about the songs so I don't want to put it up at WP:GAN before then. Do you know anyone with a copy of the album? -- Escape Artist SwyerTalkContributions22:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
BTW, reckon your guv'nor will be impeached? You forgot to log in once on TK's talk page and I had a look at the geolocation. Funniest story I've heard in ages. It's cool to know an Illinoian. -- Escape Artist SwyerTalkContributions23:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
The entire article, and for that matter , the entire series of "...in music" articles is in sad shape from a verifiability standpoint. I've been trying to improve the 1995 article by finding citations. It would help a lot if other editors adding information would provide references. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 15:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
I have an idea
We improve Boom Box (album) to GA standards. This will mean more citations (needs about 15 - 20), expanding the lead and hitting it with a hammer. Then nominate it at WP:GAN.
List Tragic Kingdom at WP:FAC with an explanation for why it was not passed last time. Ask everyone who comments to leave the word "support" in bold somewhere, including those who commented last time.
In a horrifically boring session, review every single other article listed under "Music" at WP:GAN. This will mean EIT and BB get reviewed quickly, clear a backlog and will earn us major kudos points. There are 24 currently in that section and between us it shouldn't take that long.
I have replied to your comment on the Featured Article page. Also, I have the subpage watchlisted, so no need to alert me when you reply. Thanks! (ESkog)(Talk)18:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
"Anthony's a sex symbol. You see the thing is for the girls they're like 'oh Anthony he's so beautiful! And his muscles and his hair and oh golly he's so sexy!' but with me its like [with men] 'DUDE YOU'RE SO AWESOME...WOW DUDE. WOW!" - Flea
