User talk:Textorus/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Textorus. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to One man, one vote may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the affected parties would still have enough power in that chamber to stop any further damage).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:29, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your interest in the article and for the correction to the Sydenham House link. I hadn't noticed it had been mistakenly linked to the wrong building. I would like to discuss your removal of the reference to Amalia Broden's illegitimacy, however. You describe the reference as "pedantic and dumb". I don't understand your use of either of those words in this context. As Bettley makes plain, Amalia had an extremely "complex" past, of which her illegitimacy, in the context of her times, was clearly a part. I'm not at all certain that this, and other uncertainties in relation to her social position, in a country as class-conscious as pre-war, Georgian England, were not contributing factors to the marital difficulties Tilden experienced. I appreciate we're perhaps straying into Original Research here, but I would point out that Bettley chooses to reference her illegitimacy, and her complex past, in the section of his monograph which ends with the statement that Tilden was "unable to reconcile his homosexuality with his new married state" (Page 9, Lush and Luxurious - The Life and Work of Philip Tilden). As an aside, I don't think an edit summary that describes another's editor's wording as "pedantic and dumb" quite conforms to our Civility principle. I'd be interested in your thoughts on the substantive issue. Best regards. KJP1 (talk) 17:43, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Firstly, apologies for splitting this conversation up - in retrospect, it might have been better to have placed the whole thing on the Tilden Talk page. Secondly, thanks for your very full response - it is appreciated. Thirdly, I do indeed see the point that you make: that Tilden's homosexuality was the main, if not the only, reason for his discomfort in his marriage is almost certain; his wife's illegitimacy, or any other factor relating to her complex past life, can only have been subsidiary, at most. It remains interesting, however, not least because both Philip and Amalia were so untruthful about so much in their lives. Whilst this is understandable in the context of their times, it sheds interesting light on their psychologies, as well as making it damn difficult to write accurately about either of them! I think your suggestion of an expansion of the article, in which this can be explored further, is much the best and I shall set to this when I have time. Tilden certainly merits more than the Start article he's got, and Amalia more than a "gratuitous slur", although this wasn't my intention and I am not sure that a reference to illegitimacy would be seen as such, in our more enlightened times. Best regards. KJP1 (talk) 16:54, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry - forgot we were conducting the conversation across both Talk pages. The below reproduced from mine:

Humm, a groundplan of Chartwell. Not sure I've ever seen one, on-line or off. Have checked the two books specifically on the house that I have - Churchill and Chartwell, Robin Fedden (Pergamon Press, 1968) and Churchill and Chartwell, Stefan Buczacki (Francis Lincoln, 2007) - and neither has one. Nor do any of Sir Martin's magisterial volumes, although the companion volumes might but I don't have the one which covers 1922, the year in which Churchill purchased the house. The only other book specifically on the house that I know is the National Trust guide, written by Mary Soames, but I don't have this. NT guides frequently do have floor-plans, however, and I've just ordered the book, so, when it arrives, I'll let you know. I could probably scan and e-mail an image if there is one, but I couldn't upload it to Wikipedia as it'll be copyright. The building history is fascinating and Tilden and Churchill fell out badly over what the latter believed to be architectural shortcomings in the design and construction of the house.

Incidentally, as I write this, I am reading the following in Buczacki's book (p. 118), "In 1914 (Tilden) married, itself an awkward event for a homosexual; but it was compounded by the woman being considerably older than him and of mysterious and exotic antecedents" (my bold italics). I might just put that reference back in!, although on what Buczacki bases the statement, I don't know. KJP1 (talk) 17:27, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

P.S. Some nice interior shots here [[1]]

And good floor-plans in the guide that came today. I can scan them but your uploading suggestions are probably beyond my very limited techinical capability. Let me know. KJP1 (talk) 21:29, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Westminster system, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Third party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Am not sure if I'm violating some unspoken rule not to comment here, so I apologise in advance. Anyway, I noticed you edited the Malta article because Malta is not mentioned in the Wikipedia "Treaty of Paris" article. However, the actual treaty of Paris [Wikisource: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Paris_(1814)], does mention Malta at Article VII. How do you think it's best for it to be referenced?

Thanks reuv ^T 18:42, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Republic of Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Easter Proclamation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, although the hemline theory is a very interesting one, there are probably rather more reliable sources than an old 1954 newspaper article. You could possibly add it as a link to Hemline index as that needs more references. It IS a rather niche theory, although one that catches popular imagination - but is now largely viewed somewhat skeptically. [2], [3], [4], and rather a lot of other (largely skeptical) Google hits for "hemline index". I used to believe it too, but as I've learned more about fashion history, I kinda agree that it's an urban myth. Generally, there are rather better external link candidates for the fashion articles than bitty little 60-year old newspaper clippings. Mabalu (talk) 11:00, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Also, respectfully pointing out (although I am surprised that an editor who has been around since 2006 needs to be told so) that edit summaries (which I just chanced to notice) naming other editors as being "out of line" and accusing them of claiming ownership are not particularly WP:Civil. Instead of simply reverting without explanation, I took the time to explain personally to you my reasons for the reversions above, including offering links to more recent sources about the subject and suggesting an alternative home for your link. I note that McGeddon (quite properly, IMO) removed the links after you reverted my edits and also suggested another alternative home for the link. Mabalu (talk) 16:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Also, in your own choice of quotes: ""People have to drop the idea that every little tidbit is precious. Crap is crap. Yank it." Mabalu (talk) 16:57, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

If you're still looking for a solution to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Florida#Leon County Census figures in error, you may have luck with the original censuses, linked at the top of User:NE2/incorporation. --NE2 01:37, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited USCGC Dallas (WHEC-716), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Saint Vincent and La Soufriere. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chattahoochee and Gulf Railroad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norfolk Southern Railroad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Bonsoir Textorus ! J'ai traduit en français l'article "Save Our Children" cet été et c'est à ce moment-là que j'ai dû laisser le message dont tu me parles. Malheureusement, j'avoue que je ne me rappelle plus de ce que j'y demandais (la honte !). En tout cas, je te remercie de ta proposition d'aide ! Et je tiens à souligner que, même s'il n'est pas parfait, ton français est très bon (et bien meilleur que mon anglais) ! Amicalement, 31.39.53.205 (talk) 18:32, 27 November 2014 (UTC) (fr:user:Konstantinos)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Brenner_v._Scott#Judge_Hinkle_is_losing_it..._.28commentary.29

96.59.130.9 (talk) 05:21, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Textorus. You have new messages at YSSYguy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Temple-Nugent-Brydges-Chandos-Grenville, 3rd Duke of Buckingham and Chandos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Natal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Operation Sea Lion may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• a feeling that was reinforced by his and [[Wallis Simpson]]'s 1937 visit to Germany. However, (despite [[Operation Willi|German approaches]], "The Duke never wavered in his loyalty to Great

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:35, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Majorat, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. MiguelMadeira (talk) 11:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC) --MiguelMadeira (talk) 11:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Walter Raleigh page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Demographics of Georgia (U.S. state), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unitarian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mary Rose, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thank God. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Politics of Monaco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Autocrat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dot Moore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Registrar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Unfortunately I agree with you that the page needed to be deleted, as there was no version in the history that was even remotely clear from copyright concerns. I have deleted the article and replaced it with a terrible substub. If you know anything about the person, would you like to expand it a bit? Thank you and happy editing, —Kusma (t·c) 20:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Per Help:Minor edit, please do not mark the insertion or removal of content as minor, as you did here. Thanks. 137.205.238.57 (talk) 12:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Since you have no talk page, I'm replying here. Thanks for the note; I apologize for the oversight. Many if not most of the edits I make these days are indeed minor ones, so my mouse gravitates towards that checkbox. Textorus (talk) 05:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lowndes County, Georgia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atlantic and Gulf Railroad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lady May Abel Smith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prince Gustaf Adolf. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Seaboard straight line of your palm ad.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:03, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?

1. Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
2. Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
3. Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.

This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:21, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Abigail Adams may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• to my self to take him into my parlor and teach him both to read and write."{cn|date=June 2016}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:48, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Dominicker couples circa 1900.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:Family of Dominicker descent ca 1918.jpg
• File:Holmes Co Couple -2.jpg
• File:Holmes Co couple ca 1920.jpg
• File:Michelangelos David cropped.jpg
• File:Mother and 3 children Holmes Co.jpg

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Senator Johns discusses plans 1963.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Textorus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

lol, yeah, sorry, once I used it once I just couldn't quit. Good catch Psiĥedelisto (talk) 04:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clan Sinclair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Clair. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. I reverted your revert of Benbruskin's edit because the source B. gave does directly support what B claimed. You probably just looked at the first graf, which says "From the wisdom of a U.S. Capitol policeman he worked with 20 years ago". It's true that that doesn't say Matthews was also on the force, only that he "worked with" someone who was. But further down it says, as part of the material excerpted from CM's book, "My first job when I came to Washington three decades ago was as a .38-caliber-toting officer of the U.S. Capitol Police." Search the page for "police" - you will find it about two thirds of the way down. Jeh (talk) 00:00, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

You're right, I stopped at the first paragraph. My bad. Thanks for reverting. Textorus (talk) 00:50, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ricky Ricardo, Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keith Thibodeaux. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Randy Shilts 1987.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Billhpike (talk) 19:41, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Textorus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shirley MacLaine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Western (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Textorus:

I cannot argue with your edit, but I can argue about your reasoning and your snarky tone. You wrote in the edit summary, “’infamous’ does not mean what you think it means, people. go look it up[.]” Whoever wrote the original text used the term “infamous” correctly. One definition of infamous is “well known for some bad quality or deed.” Since it was used in the context of illegal gambling operations run by local organized crime, the Free State of Galveston is infamous. However, “infamous” is inappropriate because it promotes a tone inconsistent with an encyclopedia. As it turns out, you were wrong about the usage: the article employed "infamous" correctly. Please try to be more civil in your comments. cheers, Oldsanfelipe (talk) 14:11, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of languages by total number of speakers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tagalog (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

I couldn't agree more with your splendid edit summary here! The whole article has suffered from this terrible affliction of too many bl**dy words as if the nature of the event has somehow infected us all with the need to go into this weirdly pompous wordy mode ... trying out for Court Correspondent jobs maybe? I only popped in to try and find out who sang something (and I failed too) but the appalling writing has kept me riveted. There are some brilliant editors working on it too, and I know that it will stabilize in a few days anyway and be OK in the long term but, blimey. ... so I'm going to try very hard to leave it alone for a bit. But sheeesh. Well done & cheers DBaK (talk) 11:52, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Appreciate ya, @DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered:. BTW, if you google up the Order of Service for the wedding, it contains the names of all the performers and pieces of music. Textorus (talk) 22:20, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Florida Panhandle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Santa Rosa Island and Blackwater River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Köppen climate classification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Please note that mdashes are always unspaced on wikipedia per Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Dashes, and footnotes are placed immediately after punctuation with no intervening space per Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Punctuation and footnotes. Thanks. DrKay (talk) 08:58, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

@DrKay: Thanks for your concern about the quality of Wikipedia editing, but the ones I fixed were Ndashes. I don't remember doing anything with footnote placements today. Textorus (talk) 09:22, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

They were just done inadvertently here. I wouldn't worry about it; these are obviously very minor points. DrKay (talk) 09:57, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

@DrKay: I never worry about such things, because I know legions of punctilious folks like you are on the job 24/7 to maintain Wikipedia's high standards. I do what I do best, and you do yours, and it's beautiful, isn't it? On behalf of the whole Wikicommunity, thanks for your service. Textorus (talk) 10:24, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Wabash RR herald 1938.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Will Rogers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Textorus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yoakum, Texas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roundhouse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

I agree with your comments re source material on Wikipedia.

Take a look at a recent administrative hijacking at the article "Mann Gulch fire" on the Talk page. The existing article has languished without proper sourcing for years and years. (I refrain from using links, or my Username, so as not to provoke any further attacks on myself, or your Talk page)

One of the hijackers (in alliance with a "Grandmaster Editor" [sic] had this to say in support of his position: "I also spoke to a fatality's older brother, now deceased, who visited the death scene shortly thereafter, and also refuted the tale. This is far more comprehensive research than your book report" [i.e. sourced material from Maclean, Norman (1992). Young Men and Fire. University Of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-50061-6.[1]]

If you are interested here is what was removed, fully sourced, with ample citations:

--38.126.242.222 (talk) 22:37, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. I agree that Wikipedia rules are often maddening, and that Wikipedia cannot be taken as the last word on any subject whatsoever; at best it is only a springboard for further research. The way some editors apply, or disregard, the rules is even more maddening, all too often. And the biggest problem is that there is no adult in the room, so arguing a point against a determined one-track-mind editor is a futile waste of time that could be spent much more happily in all sorts of ways, in or out of Wikipedia. That's why I also say on my userpage that "this editor does not give a fuck." After a dozen years of frustration and disappointment in this place, I just edit now for grammar and clarity, mostly, when I have time; I'm retired, have no clock to punch, and am certainly not getting paid to work here, so there's no point letting stuff get to me, because the whole concept of "anybody can edit" is fatally flawed to begin with. And that's all I really have to say. Textorus (talk) 23:30, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your thoughtful response. I will leave you with a link to an article that perhaps you are familiar with: Tom Simonite's "The Decline of Wikipedia" (2013). Best wishes. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/520446/the-decline-of-wikipedia/

--38.126.242.222 (talk) 18:08, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barbara Billingsley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 02:30, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi. The page is now protected, so we have three days to discuss/resolve this dispute on the talk page. I suggest we do this before elevating to WP:DRN or WP:RFC. Since this is at its heart a content dispute, I don't think WP:ANI is appropriate at this time. ---- Work permit (talk) 14:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the barnstar. Editing on wikipedia and finding yourself involved with disruptive editors is very tiring. Having the opportunity to work with editors like you is what makes it all worthwhile.---- Work permit (talk) 15:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

		The Civility Barnstar
		For outstanding patience and professionalism when faced with patently bad behavior at The Vineyard Beverly Hills-- Work permit (talk) 15:31, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Epilogue: The page came off protection and Roxy undid his edit. My faith in the goodness of man is restored, at least for a day :)---- Work permit (talk) 02:46, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the update. But who knows whether it's a sign of repentance, or just another maniacal chess move? Whatever. I'm over it. Textorus (talk) 03:52, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Forum non conveniens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Venue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christian views on marriage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Couverture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Letters Patent, 1947, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Statute of Westminster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:47, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of conflict in Anglo-Saxon Britain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Æthelberht and Pope Gregory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

The article Emmett Till Antilynching Act has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Proposed bills rarely pass notability criteria. Coverage of this is simply of the routine kind...at this point, so this would fall under WP:NOTNEWS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pan-American (train), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dixie Flyer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:59, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:02, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Textorus. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.