User talk:Terveetkadet

Your recent contribution(s) to Wikipedia are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks!

I am going through your images and finding that all of them do not have source information. As a Wikipedian, I wish to extend to you the tools that you need in order to properly contribute to Wikipedia. Therefore, I would like you to review Wikipedia's image usage policy, image copyright tags, and fair use and what does and does not apply. Right now, all of your images require this information -- if you are unable to provide it, the images will have to be removed from Wikipedia. (If you do want them removed, I can remove them for you as I have that ability as an admin.) I look forward to working with you. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 21:53, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I never knew that "Hard Times" was a Cro-Mags cover. Cool. It's time I heard that band. Wyatt Riot 13:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated this article for deletion - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rüms. --Brianyoumans 23:36, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article Die Mannequin has been or soon will be deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a subject but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. NawlinWiki 12:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article Care Failure has been or soon will be deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a subject but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. NawlinWiki 20:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I have nominated the articles Die mannequin and Care Failure for deletion via AFD. I'm doing this only indirectly because of the unfriendly message you left on my talk page; I came to your talk page to leave a message, saw the message about these pages, and went to look at them. Deleting pages may not be the most valuable contribution, but I feel that it is an important thing to do; if non-notable material is not removed, then Wikipedia will become a miscellaneous collection of junk and not an encyclopedia. I also do other things; I frequently improve articles instead of deleting them. --Brianyoumans 18:40, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is Wikipedia policy to assume good intentions on the part of other editors and not to engage in personal attacks. I try to do so myself. Lots of people get signed and then get dropped before ever producing an album; I think we should wait until this band meets our requirements before having an article on them. See WP:Notability (the section on music) for reference. --Brianyoumans 19:21, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is clear that you have good intentions, however it is equally clear that you are sadly misguided... Fredio54 (talk) 17:58, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop disrupting Wikipedia by creating spurious AfDs. If you continue this disruption, you are liable to be blocked from editing. Demiurge 23:25, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Demiurge 23:25, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination for Hunayn bin Ishaq at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunayn bin Ishaq has been closed as a speedy keep. In the event that you are not happy with my decision to do so, you may wish to take the nomination to deletion review. However, as noted by Demiurge, disrupting Wikipedia by creating dubious AfD nominations is behaviour which is likely to result in sanctions. Please reconsider your actions. Very best wishes, Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Let me have a look at the history between you and Brian and I will give you my opinion on what, if anything, you can or should do about it. It will only be an opinion, so I'll try and list the other options as well, even the ones that I don't think are a good idea. Cheers ! Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I find Brian's "list of articles I've deleted" a bit odd. Still, I suspect that I've deleted (well, tagged for deletion with WP:CSD tags or WP:PROD tags or nominated at WP:AFD) more articles than I've written, and I've written a lot more than seven articles. Lots of articles get deleted every day. If you look at the deletion log, you'll see that about 100 articles were deleted in the last hour. Likely even more get deleted on school days.

As far as Die mannequin is concerned, MER-C (talk • contribs) tagged it with {{db-band}} speedy deletion, NawlinWiki (talk • contribs) removed that and added {{prod}}, and Seraphimblade (talk • contribs) added {{prod2}}. I suspect that even if Brian had never seen the article, someone would have sent it to AfD, along with Care Failure. As for the others, Brian might have created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rüms, but that isn't what got them deleted. Writing articles on cult local bands is always difficult, given that WP:MUSIC is pretty strict. Proving that a band is a "prominent example of a local style" (or whatever the exact words are) is pretty difficult.

If you really feel that Brian Youmans is stalking you, then you should have a look at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. A request for comments would be the first place to start. As an alternative, I'd suggest that you should keep a copy of the articles in your user space (so User:Terveetkadet/Die mannequin, User:Terveetkadet/Care Failure). Just cut and paste the whole article into the "userfied" copy, removing the category labels at the bottom. You can also ask an admin to undelete and userfy the ones deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rüms. Then keep adding references and links as you come across them until you're pretty certain that they won't be deleted again and go to Wikipedia:Deletion review and get them reviewed. If you just recreate them, someone will add a speedy deletion tag because speedy deletion criteria G4 is "recreated an article which was already deleted".

I have to say that I don't think dispute resolution is going to achieve much, and that you'd be better off doing more research and going to deletion review when you are ready. I don't suppose this is very helpful. Nil carborundum! If I can be of any help, or you want an outside opinion on anything, please let me know and I'll do my best. Cheers, Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Would you mind withdrawing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adamu Tesfaw ? There isn't much point in leaving it open, and it would look better if you withdrew it. Just add a note saying that you withdraw the nomination. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your thoughtful and incisive questions on my editor review! I appreciate the opportunity to answer them. Please feel free to review the answers and comment if you like. Seraphimblade 15:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your conversations with other editors on your talk page about Brian Youmans' allegedly disruptive behavior. I have to say that I've found his edits hasty and backed up with questionable logic that defies established guidelines. Endless blue 03:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

imo, the guy needs to get a better hobby than going around deleting stuff. I'm glad that the Die Manequinn/C.F. articles survived his attacks, otherwise I would have been disappointed when I came to Wikipedia today looking for info on them. 216.234.58.18 (talk) 16:45, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ditto, Brian is a sad individual who clearly needs to get a life and something to do. Fredio54 (talk) 17:54, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Well done for creating this article - I must get round to filling the albums section out for this band (I did Best Wishes and Age of Quarrel some time ago). Also interesting to note that A.J. Novello is a member now - I did the Leeway (band) page (well, started it anyway) so will have to put a bit about that in there too. Keep it up! Bubba hotep 14:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, I just managed to get the article for John Joseph linked in a Sick of It All album article because he did guest vocals, see Life on the Ropes. Cheers :) Bubba hotep 09:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated Beowulf (Los Angeles band), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beowulf (Los Angeles band) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated Care Failure, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Care Failure and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

You may be interested to know that WikiProject Punk music has recently undergone a major revitalization. Please visit the project page to see our new look and check out some of our helpful new features, such as the Assessment Department and the Collaboration of the week. There are also a number of tasks on our Things to do page that you may be interested in helping with.

We are currently holding a roll call to help gauge how many active project members we have. Please visit the project's talk page and add your signature to the roll sheet to express your continued interest in the project. Also, if you have not already done so, please take a minute to add your name to the Participants page along with a brief summary of your punk-related interests, so that other project members will be better able to collaborate with you. If you do not add your signature to the roll sheet by November 30, 2008 your name will be moved to our list of inactive members. We may also take the liberty of removing the project userbox from your userpage if it appears there, to prevent you from automatically appearing in Category:WikiProject Punk music members. Of course you are free to rejoin the project and re-add the userbox at any time if you would like to become active in the project again.

Thank you and we hope you will continue to support WikiProject Punk music!

You are receiving this message because you have previously identified yourself as a member of WikiProject Punk music, either because your name appears on the Participants page or because you have placed the project userbox on your user page. As a courtesy, if you have left the project, retired from Wikipedia, or simply no longer wish to be an active project member, please remove the userbox from your user page. This will remove you from Category:WikiProject Punk music members and help the project to keep its active membership list up-to-date.

--IllaZilla (talk) 01:05, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bryce Harper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Turgan ^Talk 02:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've started an article on Canadian hardcore punk if you're interested in helping. ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 13:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Youth Youth Youth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 03:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You recently posted a comment onTurgan's talk page in which you said "Why don't you get a life and stop trying to delete pages about baseball when you clearly are clueless about baseball?". It is more helpful in editing Wikipedia to be civil to other editors, no matter how much you disagree with their edits: in fact this principal is enshrined in the Wikipedia policy. You may like to consider this in future. It is also worth pointing out that Turgan's edit to which you objected proposed an article for deletion because it did not show notability for its subject. Subsequently the article was edited so as to show notability, and so it was not deleted. This is how Wikipedia functions: it is quite correct to question the notability of a subject if an article does not show it, and quite correct to satisfy the question by improving the article. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:16, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Like I cared Terveetkadet (talk)

Hello, Terveetkadet,

You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.

The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ^{☎ call me!}

(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:50, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on UIC (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 16:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:59, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that you do not have the right to prevent others from "interfering" with your work. As the article stands now, I doubt that it will survive a deletion discussion, especially if your references are more of the same. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 18:02, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, UIC (band), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UIC (band). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 18:25, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no interest in contacting you Terveetkadet (talk) 19:29, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Blanchardb. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Salvio ( ^{Let's talk 'bout it!}) 18:35, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks... I'll try to but User talk:Blanchardb is being obnoxious besides wanting to destroy my work... I'd prefer if that person would stop editing my page... Terveetkadet (talk) 18:56, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:OWN; a page isn't "yours". If you submit something to wikipedia, you are agreeing to release it into the public domain, where it can be freely edited by anyone, in any way, for any purpose. If you find that articles you have created are being nominated for speedy deletion, that's usually because they don't credibly indicate the importance of the subject. I would recommend that you take a look at WP:GNG, which is our general guideline of what makes a subject notable enough to be worthy of an article. I appreciate it can be difficult to get started, so if you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 20:00, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 20:32, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UIC (band). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:17, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Maddison Gabriel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only notable for briefly appearing in news because of 'child model'. WP:1E applies here. Was previously deleted for same reason (and nothing seems to have changed).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Christopher Connor (talk) 03:00, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Maddison Gabriel, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maddison Gabriel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Mbinebri  ^{talk ←} 21:18, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Turgan. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 21:40, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:04, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User_talk:Mbinebri. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:27, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey -FASTILY ^(TALK) and (talk→ BWilkins ←track) , my goal is not to disrupt or vandalize wikipedia at all... But I think I have the right to say what I think of people trying to destroy pages I created if I don't use profanity, which I didn't... I think those deletionists should live with the consequences of their acts: that people will be angry and will let them know Terveetkadet (talk) 20:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, you have no right to comment on contributors; ever. See WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. Not being a WP:DICK means that you have to WP:AGF. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:35, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But I can comment on their ACTS, I can comment on the fact they're trying to destroy something. That I can. And sorry, but I really couldn't care less about WP:This and WP:That Terveetkadet (talk) 20:39, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You only comment on their acts after assuming good faith first. If you don't care for Wikipedia's policies such as WP:OWN, WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, then I guarantee that you'll soon be blocked, and then you won't have to worry about them. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:46, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(talk→ BWilkins ←track) , I ask you not to talk to me anymore. I don't wanna hear from you anymore as I don't appreciate the way you talk to me. I think I have been nice with you and you're being rude with me. I would prefer not to deal with you anymore Terveetkadet (talk) 20:48, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24hrs for for a violation of WP:NPA, contrary to multiple warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You'll also be wise to note that my comments on designbyd before my conversation with you here. I figured you were wise enough to act accordingly - apparently not (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Terveetkadet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I ask to be unblocked since this block is a personal attack by (talk→ BWilkins ←track). He keeps his self-righteous preaching, even going as far as commenting for me on another user's page for which I left a "thank you" note. Me and (talk→ BWilkins ←track) clearly don't get along, he has been rude with me and I asked him not to talk to me anymore. I'd prefer dealing with another editor. Still, when I commented about the fact that I didn't like him stalking me on another user's page, he responded by blocking me. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) is not objective when the subject is me, so he shouldn't be allowed to block me

Decline reason:

You've already said, I don't care about WP:COI, WP:OWN, WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF or WP:MINOR; however, you should at least consider WP:NOTTHEM when you're trying to get unblocked. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:35, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• (ec) Note to reviewing admin: please view the editor's various recent talkpage comments elsewhere, plus the vast # of warnings in the last 24 hrs alone. A recent comment on User_talk:Designsbyd was the last violation that led to the block, not the one above. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:35, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Terveetkadet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I asked to be unblocked cause a large part of this comes from a conflict between me and (talk→ BWilkins ←track) and already asked (talk→ BWilkins ←track) not to talk to me anymore as we clearly don't get along and I swear that I have no intention of talking to (talk→ BWilkins ←track) anymore so there won't be problems like this anymore on my side. I will not talk with users with which I don't get along so that should settle the problem

Decline reason:

You may not care about our policies on user conduct, ownership of articles, and so forth, but the rest of us do. Throw WP:BATTLE in there too. As MuZemike said below, Bwilkins actually went pretty easy on you, I would have issued a much longer block. If you plan to appeal again, please remeber to focus on your own actions instead of blaming others for your block.Beeblebrox (talk) 05:35, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not going to weigh in on your unblock request, but you were blatantly attacking other editors by name-calling [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], and [8]. In fact, you have been doing nothing except harassing others and insulting them. Your currently block is more than warranted, and I am surprised, given from your previous conduct, that it was not longer. –MuZemike 22:53, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, what you need to understand is that these are all open talk pages; there is nothing prohibiting other users from making other remarks, provided they are within proper decorum (with respect to [9]); it is within your right to also remove remarks from your own talk page. If you prefer private one-on-one conversation, you can accomplish that by using email. –MuZemike 23:00, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This talk page is becoming very long. Please consider archiving. (after the block expires of course) Beeblebrox (talk) 05:38, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Śmierć Kliniczna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A7 -- This article about a band does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 05:37, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pic of Phillippe Aumont. Do you have anymore photos of baseball players you could share? I was hoping for a gallery on your personal page, but I don't see one. Oaktree b (talk) 23:50, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rachel and Amanda Pace, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages America and Private Practice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jessica Paré (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Gazette

John Kastner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Gazette

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dbcells.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:32, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Skip The Foreplay, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Metro and La Presse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neighborhood Watch (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neighborhood Watch (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SimonP (talk) 15:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Terveetkadet! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 12:17, Sunday, July 10, 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Terveetkadet. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article UIC (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. I searched for sources but found nothing. Even http://www.allmusic.com/artist/uic-mn0000810991 is lacking.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:57, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UIC (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UIC (band) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was about to give you a warning but then I checked your edit history and saw that you have been around for a while and so maybe your edit to Rachel McKinnon was intended to be helpful. I've removed it but I'm not going to give you a warning template. Instead, I just want to let you know that Wikipedia policy is to only include the birthnames/deadnames of trans people when they were notable under those names. In most other cases, including the deadname can be considered a form or harassment or even doxxing. It is not hard to find what are claimed to the deadnames of even only moderately notable trans people online because people with a grudge against either specific trans people or (quite often) trans people in general delight in publishing them solely for the distress and annoyance which they can cause. Such hateful screeds do not count as reliable sources. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:28, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DanielRigal (talk) Deadnames? Whats a deadname? And whT,s "doxxingh ?

The article Parti Chevreuil has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No demonstrated notability. Party formally existed for three months.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Kawnhr (talk) 15:56, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]