User talk:Tectaal

Hello, Tectaal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Tim Vickers (talk) 19:15, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{help me}} to tim the "external links" conceal where they send too. how do i change that? i tried adding a space which then "broke" the link and made the words visible but then noone can click it to go to the link. so how can i make it appear? Tectaal (talk) 19:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

• Please add new requests at the end of this page, not the start. I moved this.

• The format for an external link is;

[http://www.google.com This is Google]

...which will appear as...

This is Google

I hope that this answers your question. Please use a further {{helpme}} if you need it, or click here to speak to helpers.  Chzz  ►  19:52, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

n

looks good too, thanx Tectaal (talk) 09:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Tina Kimmel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Codf1977 (talk) 12:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article How the Stats Really Stack Up: Cosleeping Is Twice As Safe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no assertion that the paper is notable; it has not been covered by reliable sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 13:37, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article How the Stats Really Stack Up: Cosleeping Is Twice As Safe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence to suggest that this article has any notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Accounting4Taste:talk 16:25, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you dont like her stance on circumcisiion and dont want her name famous. so i hit ctrl a and gave in: sd person but if even an innocent article on co-sleeping summarising it before talking about the author is planned for deletion then that is a clear indication... the fact that w. wish to delete that too proves w. are acting suspicious to hide information.Tectaal (talk) 09:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, actually, no -- I'm merely doing it because I don't think it belongs here for reasons that have entirely to do with Wikipedia policy. But if it makes you feel better to think that, you go right ahead. Accounting4Taste:talk 14:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the article met all five conditions. "because I don't think" that does not suffice.Tectaal (talk) 08:01, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that How the Stats Really Stack Up: Cosleeping Is Twice As Safe meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How the Stats Really Stack Up: Cosleeping Is Twice As Safe. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last seven days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Accounting4Taste:talk 14:21, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tectaal (talk) 08:03, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

in israel not only "occult" sites ie astrology are blocked from public internet access but even the functions of the "foreskin" are grouped in sex ed and denied public internet access. my edit to w. "foreskin" listing benefits and purposes from medical journals was removed within hours and ignored the doctoral citations. in the dark of night you are defeating me but as the famous opera song goes "vanish night and stars when dawn breaks i will conquer" and as buzz-light-year said "evil will never achieve victory."Tectaal (talk) 07:57, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Foreskin. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Jakew (talk) 08:49, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]