User talk:Sladen

Please excuse the note on a matter unrelated to editing, but I happened across your user page (quite honestly through a mis-click) and had a have a giggle at the implication that Class 66s are high speed rail :D Danners430 _{tweaks made} 10:18, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boring test tunnel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boring test tunnel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~ BlueTurtles | talk 10:30, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bridget Eickhoff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Both of these own shares of intel, does this classify as ownership in the Ownership infobox PageMaintaince (talk) 13:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PageMaintaince, Tom94022: don't have a view point (at this time). Had been reverting the remaining (seemingly…) non-constructive edits by Special:Contributions/Frazer00, that had not already been reverted by other edits. There were also some removals of |key_people=; do those need rescuing? —Sladen (talk) 13:48, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yes those need archiving/rescuing PageMaintaince (talk) 14:08, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]