User talk:Shellwood/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Shellwood. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   18:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for your diligent fighting against vandalism on Wikipedia! EggRoll97 (talk) 13:47, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

@EggRoll97: Thanks a lot for this. I'm glad to see that you have started reverting vandalism too. Keep it up! Shellwood (talk) 22:56, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Just giving you a heads up that he removed my level 2 warning earlier. Figfires^{Send me a message!} 23:01, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Do you want to handle the reverts and I'll warn the accounts and IPs? -- Mr X ^☎️ 11:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

@Mr Xaero: I'm afarid it is not very helpful to warn them in situations like this. We just have to keep on reverting until the page is protected. Shellwood (talk) 11:57, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

@Shellwood:If we go through the backlog and provide warnings, we might be able to stop some of this mass vandalism Mr X ^☎️ 11:58, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

@Shellwood:, thanks for the assist on that article. Mr X ^☎️ 12:09, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

@Mr Xaero: You're welcome! Shellwood (talk) 12:23, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:52, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

@Shellwood you reverted an edit I made on Cantonese. I did not source the information from any website but from my personal knowledge since my relatives originate from China, HongKong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lcs ylz (talk • contribs) 19:30, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

@Lcs ylz: We dont build articles here based on personal opinions or experiences, see WP:OR. Please dont make these kind of changes again. Shellwood (talk) 19:39, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

@Shellwood Re: Margaret Sanger. OK, I suppose. It's not a big deal; it's already mentioned in the next graf. I just thought it worthwhile to hoist that info in thumbnail form to the start of the article, because it's one of the major points someone would want to know about her at a glance. I came to the article, for instance, to fact-check that point in particular. Far from being destructive, I thought I was helping the next person like myself to come along and verify that point in haste. 162.221.175.130 (talk) 16:15, 13 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.221.175.130 (talk)

Hey! All other articles of similar kind have been reviewed by various wikiusers, however this one some how got missed [1]. Can you please review it so that it is officially on the go! TIA! (Regent007 (talk) 00:01, 9 June 2018 (UTC))

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You revert edits faster than me every time!!!! ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 00:46, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

@Abelmoschus Esculentus:Thanks a lot for this, keep up the good work! Shellwood (talk) 09:30, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Xx236 (talk) 09:29, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

@Xx236: Hello there and thanks for bringing light into this. The whole thing looks very suspicious and I cant seem to find any information about this park. The AfD debate you opened is well justified. Shellwood (talk) 15:01, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for being awesome!

Amb1985 (talk) 21:43, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing Patrick Tissier, Shellwood.

Unfortunately Kudpung has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Unattributed machine translation from fr.Wiki

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:06, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I just saw you undid my editing on Nolan's bio. I think i explained why i did what i did, why did you undo? Moved the information here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_Christopher_Nolan

All the best, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.176.244.75 (talk) 11:05, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Alright, I have undone my revert. Shellwood (talk) 11:10, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

		Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For completing over 50 reviews during the 2018 June Backlog Drive, please accept this Special Edition Barnstar. Thank you for helping New Page Patrol and keep up the good work. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 19:01, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

I wanted to follow up on the page Albert Schröder. I just want to politely clarify that the article is false and was being done so for the purposes of a University project. Following it being flagged as a hoax I immediately flagged it for speedy deletion as I do not want it to remain on wikipedia. I wanted to thank you for the time you have spent to fact check the work on wikipedia. The thesis I am working on in University has been to document the increase load of false or misleading information that has been created on the web. Over the past few months myself and two undergraduates have been stress-testing information sites of varying reliability in order to gauge how efficient and fast that site’s administrative community is at eliminating and fact checking false information. My apologies for unnecessarily taking up your time however hopefully the results of my research may hopefully, in the future, be applied to better help the curating community in combatting the spread of disinformation online. Infinityplatinum (talk) 5:53, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

@Infinityplatinum: Please don't repeat this experiment here again. Even though your thoughts may have been sincere Wikipedia does not allow such testing, see WP:HOAX. Shellwood (talk) 10:36, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

@Infinityplatinum: This was disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate a point and if you do anything like this ever again, I will block you indefinitely. Deliberately putting false information on Wikipedia is vandalism - do not think you are the Frank Abagnale of Wikipedia (and even Frank admits he was stupid and paid the price for his actions). Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:19, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

I blocked for 24 hours because they violated WP:3RR. Their unblock request shows they were editing in good faith, if disruptively, so a vandalism block is not appropriate. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:16, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

@Ritchie333: I hear what you say, but the content is still there. Labeling the band as "a white colonialist one" solely on the basis of their band name is baseless and OR. No sources or comments from the group themselves on issues like colonialism or politics in general can be found, so it is safe to say that this slur should be removed from the article at once. Shellwood (talk) 10:49, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Please stop reverting totalitarian to authoritarian. 1) You’ve provided a link from Vox, which is a very UNRELIABLE news source largely due to its bias to the left-wing. 2) Cameroon’s President has granted himself unlimited power over any laws including constitution, dictator for 42 years and continuous suppression of Anglophone population, by international standards, Cameroon can be regarded as totalitarian regime. 59.102.33.100 (talk) 06:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Provide support for your claim that Vox is an unreliable source, simply screaming "left wing biased" won't help you. And a source that supports your claim that Cameroon is a totalitarian state. Shellwood (talk) 06:25, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

I am a former ip editor (i can email you my former ips).Can you please nominate the Shirin Oskooi article for deletion (i can't i'm not confirmed). She is not notable and we can't have articles on this site for every reality show contestant. Please. Someone changed her redirect to an article and she is not notable at all. thank you ip 9+ — Preceding unsigned comment added by JasonJudsonOd (talk • contribs) 03:54, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello. I just want to let you know that in the coming version of Huggle (3.4.5), there will be a new feature of editing pages directly inside Huggle using an edit form. The edit form functions same as the web one. The default shortcut for this is E and the shortcut for "Edit page in browser" (which previously was E) has changed to Alt+E. If you want more non-automated edits or you prefer editing pages in the browser, you can swap the shortcuts of the above. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me or Petrb. Thank you. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 01:56, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Hey there. I noticed on the 27 of April you reverted an edit by 2A02:587:3A14:9400:F4E9:AC74:9B81:D708 and kept the edit from being viewed publicly. I don’t mean to snoop around, but why was this edit not shown, pages are vandalised all the time, what made this one special? I’m sure you had good reason, I’m just very curious Ducktech89 (talk) 04:10, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

@Ducktech89:Hi, I can't remember the details on this one but as you can see here[2] it was a serious BLP violation. Shellwood (talk) 04:22, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

I'm not sure this is vandalism. Though I admit I almost reverted too. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:33, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

@Suffusion of Yellow: Thanks for the notice, it was legit after all. Shellwood (talk) 22:43, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Shellwood, I'd like to offer up my sincerest apologies. I came back from summer camp a couple days ago. I guess I was missing being at camp because I, along with a couple other friends, found my camp's page on Wikipedia and started to edit in a bunch of inside jokes into the page. At the time, I didn't fully realize that what I was doing was wrong, but I realize it now, and I'm very, very sorry. Wikipedia is a great site with a great mission, and by vandalizing one of its pages, I put Wikipedia's integrity at risk. I also wasted your time and caused the page to be shut down for a couple days, leaving it locked to other people who might have legitimate edits they want to add. Again, I'm very sorry for intentionally spreading false information on Wikipedia and hope you can forgive me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.251.211.221 (talk)

@PlyrStar93: For what its worth, I was curious about continued vandalism from User talk:2601:199:8180:AB1:3D21:DFB2:6413:3BCB and checked to see if the user was reported. The edits tonight from this IP have been reverted by the three of us. It seems that no Huggle messages concerning the addition of a link to the History of the Knights Templar article in Aroostook Band of Micmac have been delivered to the user, only warnings with respect to the edits the user made to International Romani Union. The IP may soon have enough warnings to be reported anyway but I am surprised by the absence of messages concerning changes to the Aroostook article. You may know there is some legend about Knights Templar successors making contact with this tribe about 90 years after the Templars were dissolved but that is not mentioned in either the Aroostook article or the History of the Knights Templar article. It is a far-fetched theory in any event, apparently with only a few minor coincidences to support it. There is also no mention of Romani in the Knights Templar article. I don't know where that came from but it looks to be totally invented and a reference to something in modern times. In any event, it seems strange that no Huggle messages were delivered for several reverted edits to the Aroostook article Donner60 (talk) 04:20, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

@Donner60: Huggle will not add new warnings when it reaches lv4, and edits made by the IP at Aroostook Band of Micmac were made after lv4 warning issued. -★- PlyrStar93 _{→Message me. ←} 04:23, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

@PlyrStar93: Yes. Of course. I should have counted or looked at the times. After many years of doing this and paying some attention, I went into a brain fog. The edits from the two articles were intermittent and I jumped to the conclusion that only edits to the one article were being delivered. Sorry to bother you both with my idle musings. By the way, I have seen both of your edits for quite some time and at least this will give me the chance to tell you that you both do a great job at reverting vandalism. Donner60 (talk) 04:29, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

IP now blocked. Donner60 (talk) 04:36, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

(edit conflict) No worries. FYI the block this IP was evading appears to be this, unless they've got an even older account. Older warnings (i.e. the ones for Aroostook Band of Micmac and others) should have been given to other IP talk pages within the /64 CIDR. -★- PlyrStar93 _{→Message me. ←} 04:38, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your help in stopping the disruption at Grand Duchess Anastasia Nikolaevna of Russia and elsewhere. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:11, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

@Ritchie333: Thank you! Shellwood (talk) 16:28, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Shellwood, thanks for your recent edit on a dab page I'm working on. I appreciate your new page patrolling! If you have time, could you please let me know how to fix it and submit it? I always find these a bit of a bamboozle, so that's why I copied from one I made earlier. I can ask on the Teahouse if that's better, just thought I'd check because you had seen the page today. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Richard_Vogt With thanks for everything you do! SunnyBoi (talk) 05:23, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

I would like to know why I have been edited and removed as a Notable Student from Chai Sirisute and Dan Inosanto Pages? I am a Senior student and certified instructor and have actively trained (and continue to) with both gentlemen for over 30 years each. Am I missing something? https://thaiboxing.com/instructors/ https://inosanto.com/?page_id=76 Sincerely, Kevin Seaman As You Think, So You Become! 23:02, 19 July 2018 (UTC) CompetitiveEdge — Preceding unsigned comment added by CompetitiveEdge (talk • contribs) 23:02, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) In short, you're not notable enough. Please read our notability guidelines.--5 albert square (talk) 23:21, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Shellwood, can you block User talk:200.124.194.231, he/she keep on removing content from FIFA World Cup anthems and songs article. Krishfiji^Talk 16:21, 20 July 2018 (GMT +12)

@Krishfiji: Hi, I'm not an admin so I don't have the ability to do that, if necessary consider filing a report to WP:AIV. Shellwood (talk) 04:24, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

I have added information which is supported by sources, and I never delete anything, can you, please, tell me what is the wrong with my edit ?هارون الرشيد العربي (talk) 12:41, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

@هارون الرشيد العربي: There is currently a disagreement on adding that name. Please try and seek consensus on the talk page before making such edits. Shellwood (talk) 12:50, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

@Shellwood: Thank you, I did not make a false edit, I have supported the edit with references and maps which had been drawn by non-Arabs, and as I told you before I never made any deletion or something wrong to the page , Please take this into account. I think it is wrong to punish other opinions by removing them from Wikipedia; which is maybe one of the basic sources of a lot of normal people.

Hi Shellwood--I'm doing an assignment for an English class, and instead of writing a research paper, the professor has asked us to edit an existing Wikipedia article. Fear not, I already have a degree and two advanced degrees, and I've had research papers published. I have a deep interest in the plague, and see an opportunity to add to your article in the background section. There also is a stub page on the 2014 outbreak, and I think that could easily be incorporated into your article. When finished, I believe we will have created a stronger article. Can you let me know what you think? Lisaromanopalacios (talk) 23:30, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

@Lisaromanopalacios: I'm not really sure why you approach me on this matter, I have never made any contributions to that article nor am I an expert on the topic. I suggest you post your questions on the article's talk page, but beware that users may be reluctant to do your homework for you. Shellwood (talk) 09:11, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

I made a mistake. Sorry to have bothered you. Lisaromanopalacios (talk) 15:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Should we request oversight? ~SML • TP 22:47, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

I swear those pictures were the most disgusting thing I’ve ever seen after I want to thank you for trying to get rid of them. I never want see any idiot do that again. A.R.M. 23:51, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For reverting that “person’s” image, especially in my talk page, thank you. ~SML • TP 03:25, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

@Sixty Minute Limit: You’re welcome! And thanks for the barnstar. Shellwood (talk) 10:43, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Shellwood, please report at AIV and ask an admin to revdelete the racist and sexist edits, like in Rachel Roy... Thanks!

• And on Talk:Caitlyn Jenner. Maybe all this child's edits should be revdeleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C58:607F:F8F1:0:82BC:74DD:AF10 (talk) 12:36, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I monitor them, since their 4th and final warning the vandalism seems to have stopped, hopefully for good. Shellwood (talk) 12:44, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

I added a hidden hero company why did you delete that stuff DhawanB98 (talk) 18:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

@DhawanB98: Such information is not to be put on a category page. Shellwood (talk) 18:20, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Why did you undo the inaccurate reporting about Micki being Catholic and being Oscar Pistorius' aunt ? I have confirmed that both these are not true with a very good friend of hers. She is currently out of the country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.226.203.168 (talk) 17:34, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

This graph was using the legacy Graph extension, which is no longer supported. It needs to be converted to the new Chart extension. Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (Purge)

Hello Shellwood, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

June backlog drive

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.

New technology, new rules

• New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
• Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
• Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.

Editathons

• Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

The Signpost

• The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

---

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

I was about to revert one of NicholasCum (talk · contribs) edits, but it resulted in an edit conflict because you were also on the same case and trying to revert. Great job otherwise, but I'm still laughing. CommanderOzEvolved (talk) 03:18, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

The reason why I removed the portion of the neoliberalism article because it was, well, to be honest quite stupid. r/neoliberal is not a subreddit that has enough traction to have it be included on an article about an important concept like neoliberalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goonsbee (talk • contribs) 01:57, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Oopsie. He's a fictional character. I presume you followed my lead... Need a flag on Huggle to identify the difference! I'll undo your revert to Sonny Corinthos. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 01:49, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Yeah my bad, thanks for the revert. Shellwood (talk) 01:52, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

On Friday, Bill Wattenburg's sister posted of his passing on her facebook page. Is her Facebook page considered a reliable source? Subsequently, I also found a media news site that mentions his passing.

http://richliebermanreport.blogspot.com/2018/08/415-media-flash-bill-wattenberg-dies.html Ravi.Fremont (talk) 09:40, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ravi.Fremont: Please read WP:BLOGS. Shellwood (talk) 13:16, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	for keeping articles clean and always beating me to the punch!!! JC7V-constructive zone 06:12, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

@JC7V7DC5768: Thank you very much for this! Shellwood (talk) 06:55, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

What is this, Shellwood, am I just following you around to get my mandatory minimum for blocks? It's really too easy that way. Drmies (talk) 02:15, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

@Drmies: What are you talking about? Shellwood (talk) 02:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

I'm talking about you reverting vandals. I don't even have to go to AIV to look for vandals to block. Drmies (talk) 02:20, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Have you thought of running for adminship? Makes vandal fighting a lot easier! Λυδαcιτγ 09:42, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

@Audacity: Hi and thanks for your message. I have never considered running for admin and since 99% of my activities here are restricted to just one area I dont think I would stand a very good chance in becoming an admin based on the recent RFAs. The community is very demanding on its candidates. But I do occasionally miss having the ability to protect pages and preform other administrative functions related to countering vandalism. Shellwood (talk) 04:03, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello to You too,
If You are short on time, please, read this:
I have no idea what made You thinking or percept my edit as "unconstructive". Would You please explain it, at least shortly? --Albord2005 (talk) 07:17, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

if You have some time, You could read this:
i guess reverting 100s of unknown users edits of unknown articles made with unknown purposes is a rrrrreally hard job to do and I respect it very much, no doubt here! But... I'm sorry if my talk or edit appears to You as unconstructive or worse, but if You would even slightly knew the material (like reading a couple of paragraphs or else) You wouldn't offend me in a such polite-like but very much "act-before-you-think" way. My Apologies again but I rrrrreally don't like thinking that somebody with authoritative and "final-say" moderating rights is thinking that i'm not thinking.
all the best--Albord2005 (talk) 07:17, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting this guy. I just went through most of his edits and all he is doing is deliberately introducing fake stats on album sales (mostly on Metallica articles). Just thought an extra eye would help! Cheers. Robvanvee 10:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts for reverting and protecting enwiki from Vandalism PATH SLOPU (Talk) 15:21, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

@Path slopu: Thank you kindly for this, you keep up the good work too! Shellwood (talk) 15:27, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

The following spam report is invalid and the removal is necessary. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spam/Local/en.hazratsultanbahu.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.182.150.208 (talk) 19:03, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Further to that the links i have taken action were applicable to do so since the information in present day no longer holds true. the website can be verified to be safe, spam free etc. thank you i hope you will realise this and take note and do the necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.182.150.208 (talk) 19:07, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Make proper explanations in your edit summaries before blanking sections. Shellwood (talk) 19:10, 24 August 2018 (UTC)