User talk:Sda030

Hi there - thanks for your message. Our coverage of CASEL is currently all at the Social-emotional learning article, so, at present, that is the article that someone seeking information on the organization needs to look at. I agree that CASEL itself would merit a standalone article, and I've tagged the redirect appropriately - if anyone would like to work up a full article on the organization, that article can replace the redirect. Tevildo (talk) 21:27, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Your ideas for improving School timetable reflect your thoughtful analysis of the subject. Terrific work! Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 04:30, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of educational theorists, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 07:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Buidhe, I had originally moved the list from Outline of education where I felt it was too detailed and unreliable to be placed. I have no personal interest for it. However, I kept it as a separate page to avoid hurting whoever made the list originally. I have later removed names there which are already listed more appropriately at List of educational psychologists or Category:Philosophers of education. So the few who remain are probably "deletable". So perhaps just delete the page?

That said, I think we need to be a bit more careful in switly removing lists from the articlespace based on this criteria, without a proper discussion, as many categories and lists are developed based on the contents of the articles, not from an external reliable list. There are thousands of categories and lists that lack reliable, independent sources, which are nonetheless useful because they point to articles that do contain reliable, independent sources. Sda030 (talk) 15:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sda030. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of educational theorists, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sda030. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of educational theorists".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:06, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Assessment software has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:49, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]