User talk:Scohoust

This user may have left Wikipedia. Scohoust has not edited Wikipedia since 20 August 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives

January 2007

But I dont understand what you have against gay people? And then how you get rewarded for it is beyond me.

Saw you RC patroling and thought you might like to know about VandalProof. - Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 11:24, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you'll find it both good for references, reading and the average reader. Sexy, it is :-) James.Spudeman 19:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Take another look! Purge el-cache. :-) James.Spudeman 19:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at this sexy little number :-) James.Spudeman 12:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can't imagine why anyone would want to harm this woman. I guess there are vandals everywhere. Thank you for your quick catch. Ilena 20:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting vandalism from my user page Amos Han 23:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, i've gone and done it again! Cetirizine expansion has begun; feel free to contribute if you like :-) James.Spudeman 14:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I'd like to give you this barnstar as I've noticed you were reverting vandalism when I was patrolling the RC using VP, as a vandalism fighter myself it can be hard and I'd like to reward you for your strong edits of vandalism reverting on loads of articles.Tellyaddict 17:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thanks. TigerShark 17:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I have also had lots of times that when I have thought that it was after the last warning. Just one of the things that happens when you are trying to stem the flood from multiple vandals at the same time. Thanks again! Cheers TigerShark 17:29, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At 18:20, 2 March 2007 you reverted my correction to the Miss Amp entry back to a vandalised one. A look at the picture should tell you that the entry that you reverted it to is incorrect. The original entries by Jmylotte on 1 February are in fact accurate, and the subsequent revisions a lame attempt at humour. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.139.240.126 (talk) 23:17, 3 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

No problems. What's the best way of tackling the fact that the entry for Miss Amp is continually being vandalised by an anonymous user? As soon as I correct it, it is reverted back to a vandalised version. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.139.240.126 (talk) 00:42, 4 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Scohoust, I looked back in the article history, and I noticed you were a one-time vandal-reverter. I'm guessing/hoping you've got Snow Patrol on your watchlist. There's an edit skirmish brewing, and it's from an anonymous IP (as opposed to a reg'd user) who must not be able to read, and doesn't understand the difference between band origin and bandmember origin(s). I might trigger a 3-times-revision rule, and this fellow keeps sliding his IP#, so he won't be affected by this ... I will, though. So, if you could please, check on this article, and make sure the information stays correct. I've put all pertinent commentary on the Talk page. -- HawkeAnyone 19:59, 7 March 2007 (UTC) Also, feel free to delete this posting here on your Talk page after viewing. Thank you.[reply]

hey.... how did i do that???? i wasnt searching fer any kind of information on shaurya chakra.... I'm a 1st time user & i have no idea how to remove articles.... y wud i do that??? i hope u arent joking bout this but trust me i havent removed anything from anywhere. i dont even know how to do it.... do reply

I have taken the "List of Companies" problem (what to do with an entire class of articles that get repeatedly submitted for deletion en mass?) for debate to two different places. This really needs to be solved once and for all (we can't keep debating the same stuff for eternity). Would you take a look at either the discussion on the Village Pump or the relevant wikiproject? Aditya Kabir 15:39, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scott - just to let you know that I've added rollback to your account. Please make sure to read Wikipedia:Rollback and Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback, and only use it for reverting vandalism. Any issues, let me know :) Alex Muller 22:47, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiology task force is looking for editors to help build and maintain comprehensive, informative, balanced articles related to Cardiology on Wikipedia. Start by adding your name to the list of participants at Cardiology task force Participants. ECG Unit (Welcome!)

-- Addbot (talk) 00:08, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

T.F.AlHammouri (talk) 12:46, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit) Get free access to research! Research tools and services Resource Exchange Reference Desk Discover open access Free Resource Guides Book Sources Journal Sources Bibliographies Free newspaper sources Online archives Find Your Local Library tips Find Your Source tips How to find sources Citation tools guide Outreach The Wikipedia Library Bookshelf (meta) Universities and Libraries Archivists Publishers Wikipedia Loves Libraries Wikidata source metadata Get involved Get free access to sources Read the Books & Bytes newsletter Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers Be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar Teach Library Interns Become a Coordinator Learn about TWL ...Support Open Access...

The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

• Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
• Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
• If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 20:23, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. Feel free to participate in the journal.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

• Publish an article to the journal. Even a medical student like you can make a submission.
• Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
• Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
• Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
• Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
• Join the editorial board.
• Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
• Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
• Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
  • Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
• Technical work like template designing for the journal.
• Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updateswijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org.
• Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

Diptanshu^Talk 06:31, 12 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.[reply]