User talk:Samsparky

Please stop removing so much content without even bothering to explain yourself(!). El_C 09:35, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to correct the al-Ahbash page because it was obviously written by someone who is not part of al-Ahbash and who needs some advice about what we really preach. I will try to edit again and this time I will put in references from ahbash websites. Is that good?

Firstly, I have a copy of a letter signed and sealed by al-Azhar university endorsing the teachings of Shaykh ^Abdullah al-Harariyy. http://www.aicp.ca/islamic-lessons/english/youth/the-islamic-education-series-book-5/book-review-by-the-university-of-al-azhar/

Also, recently, the vice president of al-Azhar university in Egypt visited al-Ahbash in Australia and endorsed them as well as partnered with them and offered them scholarships to study in Egypt, which they have been doing.
http://www.darulfatwa.org.au/en/the-historic-visit-of-al-azhar-ash-sharif-to-australia-2015/

samsparkySamsparky (talk) 10:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Al-Ahbash. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I knew that you will come back to this eventually. This is precisely why you requested to get the protection lifted. The edit you are trying to make has been discussed in a great length on the Talk Page. Please, don't make changes without discussing it. Thank you. McKhan ^(talk) 03:08, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I need an independent review - not mezzo - not mcKhan - someone who can look at the issue objectively and recognise that I'm simply adding an up to dATE REFERENCE. Samsparky (talk) 05:11, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, you are indulging into single-purpose edits as well as instigating edit-warring here. We have already discussed those references on the Talk Page in detail. Please, stop vandalizing the page by pushing your POV. We are not going to go through the same cycle again. Enough is enough. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Al-Ahbash. McKhan ^(talk) 21:09, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Al-Ahbash. The minions of Sockpuppets using the NPOV tag makes no sense specially when they are all trying their super best to push their own POV. Each and everything has been discussed on the Talk Page over and over and over again. Please, stop pushing your agenda of POVs of publicizing, marketing and sanitizing the Al-Ahbash on Wikipedia. McKhan ^(talk) 03:35, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Softlavender (talk) 04:40, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First, do not try to use the dispute resolution noticeboard for a matter that has already been resolved by a Request for Comments. The RFC establishes consensus. It is not appropriate to try to use DRN in order to filibuster against consensus or bludgeon the process to override or ignore the RFC.

Second, you are likely to be topic-banned from the subject of Al-Ahbash or blocked from editing if you continue forum shopping and disruptive editing. You have been cautioned. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:32, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]