User talk:STBotI/Archive2

I work for the organization that owns the copyright and I am authorized to publish it on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wisniesw2 (talk • contribs) 23:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! When the bot tagged Image:Maewhitman.jpg as missing licensing information, it warned Wikialexdx instead of the original uploader (Calibara). Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 04:49, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As it should have - from the deleted history:

15:13, September 22, 2007 . . Wikialexdx (Talk | contribs | block) 152×200 (23,120 bytes) (Mae Whitman close up picture.)

The warning was for the old version. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 11:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I should give the bot more credit. Never mind. Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 22:15, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm getting to the rationale, but I'm busy with something else now, so please don't rush me. --Coconutfred73 20:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to write an article on the book but it was hastily deleted. Can you help? Thanks. Yours truly, --Ludvikus 01:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted within 15 minutes or so of my posting. Yours truly, --Ludvikus 02:15, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? Check this out: Mikhail Khostov‎! --Ludvikus 02:51, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• What are you talking about? Check this out: Mikhail Khostov‎! --Ludvikus 02:52, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are just driving me mad! How many times have I to say that you will have to wait for few minutes before sending me messages! I am just editing. I abhor receiving senseless messages!!! --BF 02:01, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the Brenda Song picture i did not know about the consequences.Prepelos 1:16,23 October 2007 (UTC).

I have taken the picture myself and I was wondering how to credit me or the school, please help me.Dr. Mandellez 17:30,23 October 2007 (UTC).

Done. --Al Ameer son 14:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The rationale was PRESENT at the time of upload: see. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 13:19, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's my image. I took that picture myself. How can I fix the copyright tag to show that it is my own image? The Legendary Ranger 14:03, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Choose an appropriate license from Category:Image copyright tags; a good choice would probably be {{GFDL-self}}, or, if you want to release your photo into the public domain, {{PD-self}}. Another option is Creative Commons licensing, available under several variations via the tags in this list. Once you have decided how to license your photo, replace the warning template there now with the template for your selected license. Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 02:46, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on User talk:Hyphaze, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because User talk:Hyphaze provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting User talk:Hyphaze, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 21:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, the bots are warning each other now? Why are we humans here, again? :P Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 02:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have tagged my image as having no fair use rationale. Therefore, I have duly written a rationale at the licensing section. If there is still any problem, fell free to leave a message at my talk page. Thanks. ~Chemicalrubber 03:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image got tagged for using the non-free logo tag and not having a fair-use rationale. No images that have that tag write a rationale. Write on my talk page (humans only) if I'm mistaken. -Theanphibian ^{(talk • contribs)} 06:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

excuse me. I believe I did add copyright information for Brent wilson. that image was foundoin Google Image search. It's a free image. JazzlineB 22:21, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why is my explaination on fair use not proper? Its a screenshot, its low resolution, and its used in an article as an example... what other explaination do you require? is there a checklist somewhere i can fill in the blanks or explain each point? its also a screenshot of free software that is not for profit... Eeinfo2008 (talk)

Dear STBotl,There si no fair use tag with that logo.If there are any more complications please be specific. G27 (talk) 11:27, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just put it on there cuz the picture on there now is an insult to Ricky. I got it off of www.imdb.com. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielsfan17 (talk • contribs) 23:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me, I have already seen and corrected it. Happened by accident, I saved too early. --Euro Mok (talk) 13:33, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got it from billboard.com

This bot is very annoying. I violated nothing, and I did nothing wrong, so leave me alone. --Mikco 22:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering where do you put a rationale? I'm new to uploading! Can you reply on my talk page.--Hiltonhampton 15:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I put the picture up Josh Winning (who is my boyfriend on his 22nd Birthday) I put another one putting what you asked for but don't know how to delete the other one. so if you can do that for me that would be great.... Have a wonderful day!!!

Rianon Burnet 21:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help. For some reason when i tried to upload it again as a JPEG and i gave a good description and rationale... I am still not able to view the image or anything. Do you know what could be happening?Tyemason (talk) 19:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear... STBotl... you are right, I'm not sure about the copyright issues with the picture. I have removed the picture from the page "The Dawning", but I'm not sure how to remove the whole image/image page... could you do that? thanks, Adair —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adaircairell (talk • contribs) 21:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded an image explaning fair rational use. Please contact me if it needs something. Article:Saint Seiya: The Lost Canvas .See you ~Tintor2To 13:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wim_eijk both pictures are from the Dutch wiki website. Can you capitalize the last name: Eijk instead of eijk?

I took it myself. I clicked the damn "Own work" link, it didn't add it to the article like I thought it would. I don't know the GFDL template link to add to it. --PDTantisocial (talk) 12:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reminder, but I only transferred the same picture from Wikipedia Chinese. I have listed the original page (zh:Image:MTR (logo with text).svg in the image description. The same image appeared on the Chinese version of the article as well. Would that also be "non-fair" use? - LR4087 (talk) 14:55, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop rushing me. I have a smei-fast internet connection and can't do everything lickity-split. --Coconutfred73 (talk) 02:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

this image is from a press pack, and is allowed to be used on the internet, how do i state this? Morpeth_Harriers.jpg, please don't delete it, it is not copyright

hello.. I'm new here in wikipedia.. please don't delete the picture of Marian Rivera. I got it from www.marianrivera.net and it's not copyrighted.