User talk:Ruby2010/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ruby2010. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Thank you for the barnstar and comments on my BLP, it's much appreciated! Crystal Clear x3

The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:45, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Well done with all the Fringe articles! I'm very surprised at the amount of content you've been able put out. And with real life things getting in the way of stuff, I'm happy that there are people still writing good episode articles. :) Sceptre (talk) 17:21, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

I can't take all the credit for the Lost articles; there are others such as thedemonhog who wrote some other articles, especially for seasons five and six where I did little. But I do realise how much the Doctor Who episode FAs (such as today's) have been used as models by other FA writers... Sceptre ^(talk) 22:20, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

I hope that my comments at your FAC nomination haven't dispirited you. When I look back at them I'm reminded of a (possibly) apocryphal tale I was told when I joined Sperry Univac as a young systems analyst.

A senior manager tasks one of his subordinates with producing a report on some new thing or other. A week later the report appears on his desk.

"Is that the best you can do?" says the manager to his underling?

"Well, no, if you give me another week I'm sure I could improve it."

A week goes by, and the underling submits his amended report. Once again he's called into his manager's office, to face the same question:

"Is that the best you can do?"

"Well yes, it is, and I don't think anyone could have done any better" replies the underling.

"OK, I'll read it now." Malleus Fatuorum 01:50, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

I've made tweaks as per your comments, if you'd care to revisit I'd greatly appreciate it. Thanks for the review! Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 17:34, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the barnstar! Sorry for the late response by the way; I've been very busy, even after I returned from my vacation (which is why I haven't really worked on any articles in a while). If you wonder why I haven't given you a barnstar yet, just wait until either the season 10 or season 13 topic drives are done. :)

On 13 July 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article List of accolades received by The Young Victoria, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that costume designer Sandy Powell earned her third Academy Award for the 2009 film The Young Victoria? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Calmer Waters 16:04, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

I think Chuck Versus the Cliffhanger just got failed for featured article, with the main criticism being that it was hard for non-Chuck viewers to understand it. As an experienced user and non-Chuck viewer, would you mind looking through the article? Thanks. --Boycool (talk) 02:22, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

If you don't want to, just tell me, and I'll move on. Thanks. --Boycool (talk) 17:35, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for your advice. The quote is taken directly from the source, where it was already italicized and bolded. As for the photo of Chris Fedak, if I can't find a better one, would it be better to remove it altogether? By the way, congratulations on your FA promotion. --Boycool (talk) 02:47, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

I hate to bother you, but would you mind looking through the "Production" and "Reception" sections one more time and telling me if it's ready for FA? --Boycool (talk) 16:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

How important were the DVD tidbits to Over There (Fringe)? Because, according to Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Beginning of the End (Lost), a commentary translates to about two sentences on Wikipedia. Will there really be a lot more revealed on the DVD than in Fedak's interviews or at Comic-Con? --Boycool (talk) 19:35, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice, but I'm going to choose not to take it in this case. Nothing personal, I've just seen the season multiple times and don't plan on buying it. Without your constructive criticism on Chuck Versus Santa Claus, I probably wouldn't have made it this far anyways. Happy editing. --Boycool (talk) 01:54, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Much appreciated; I've adressed all of your comments. Crystal Clear x3 05:16, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

I have adressed your comments on the three sources's publishers and left some comments at your own FLC Crystal Clear x3 21:38, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

I've better clarified the linking/Box Office Mojo comments. Crystal Clear x3 22:14, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

No problem, your list deserves FL status =). I'd also love to leave feedback on your FLCs as well! I actually have another accolades list at FLC now: [1] Crystal Clear x3 00:05, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

And congrats on your first FA article! Crystal Clear x3 00:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

I've adressed your comments at the 127 Hours FLC; I ran into some problems with the sourcing via official websites. Crystal Clear x3 06:33, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Just finished leaving comments over at that FLC now. The most brought up comments of mine were overlink and IMDb being used as a source. Crystal Clear x3 05:02, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

I've left my support after making some minor changes (regarding the box office totals) to the list, hope you don't mind. Crystal Clear x3 00:04, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

	Congratulations!
	Thanks for all the work you did in making Over There (Fringe) a Featured Article! Your work is much appreciated. In the spirit of celebration, you may wish to comment on another Featured article candidate... or perhaps review one of the Good Article nominees, as there is currently a backlog. Any help is appreciated! All the best, – Quadell (talk)

Hello, Ruby2010. You have new messages at Talk:Make Room for Lisa/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Queenieacoustic (talk) 16:12, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the barnstar for Murder of Julia Martha Thomas! I'm glad you liked the article. Prioryman (talk) 22:42, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

By the way, I have nominated the article for FA status - please see Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Murder of Julia Martha Thomas/archive1. If you have any feedback it would be very welcome. Prioryman (talk) 19:41, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

I'd like to try it out at FAC, after Friday. Would you be willing to co-nom? DrKiernan (talk) 17:02, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

In the lead, what do you think is missing? DrKiernan (talk) 20:42, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Oh yes, we need to add Frederick at least; I'll do that. DrKiernan (talk) 16:51, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

As of now, I am not really going to be around Wikipedia anymore. I wish you the best of luck here and with your FLCs. You're a great editor and I hope you keep up the great work. Crystal Clear x3 08:55, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the nice message you left on my talkpage Crystal Clear x3 21:20, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Ruby2010. You have new messages at Talk:Simpsons Bible Stories/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Ruby2010. You have new messages at Talk:Sunday, Cruddy Sunday/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Queenieacoustic (talk) 11:05, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Ruby2010. You have new messages at Talk:The Bart Wants What It Wants/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Queenieacoustic (talk) 10:29, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Ruby2010. You have new messages at Talk:The Bart Wants What It Wants/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Queenieacoustic (talk) 21:51, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

The article The Man from the Other Side you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:The Man from Another Place for things which need to be addressed. GRAPPLE X 03:10, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

		The Special Barnstar
		Bye! And thanks for being a friend. Good luck with the Lost and Fringe articles! That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 08:14, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

The article The Bishop Revival you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Bishop Revival for comments about the article. Well done! GRAPPLE X 18:35, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:13, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Ruby2010. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Triple Crown/Nominations#Ruby2010.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The article Of Human Action you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Of Human Action for comments about the article. Well done! GRAPPLE X 20:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

The article Fringe (season 2) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Fringe (season 2) for things which need to be addressed. I did what I could, but my lack of experience with the show means I'm not exactly the man for the job.GRAPPLE X 22:20, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

The article Fringe (season 2) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fringe (season 2) for comments about the article. Well done! GRAPPLE X 03:12, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your review and comments on You're Gonna Love Tomorrow! I've made the edits you noted. Akcvtt (talk) 20:25, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of accolades received by Sense and Sensibility (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of accolades received by Sense and Sensibility (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 21:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

On 20 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article List of accolades received by Sense and Sensibility (film), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Emma Thompson earned twelve accolades for Sense and Sensibility, including the Academy Award for Best Adapted Screenplay? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of accolades received by Sense and Sensibility (film).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 16:03, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for leaving some feedback over at my FLC Black Swan list! I have addressed your comments. Crystal Clear x3 01:02, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi Ruby, I have reviewed your DYK nom for Academy Award for Best Costume Design at Template:Did you know nominations/Academy Award for Best Costume Design and I noticed that a goodly portion of the list is uncited. Could you finish the citing and let me know at the nomination page when you are done? Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:56, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

On 29 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Academy Award for Best Costume Design, which you created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Academy Award for Best Costume Design.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:13, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello Ruby2010! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 03:43, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

	Congratulations!
	Thanks for all the work you did in making Princess Sophia of the United Kingdom a certified "Good Article"! Your work is much appreciated. In the spirit of celebration, you may wish to review one of the Good Article nominees that someone else nominated, as there is currently a backlog, and any help is appreciated. All the best, – Quadell (talk)

On 3 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Princess Sophia of the United Kingdom, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Princess Sophia (pictured), the fifth daughter of King George III, once remarked her life was so "deadly dull" that she wished she were a kangaroo? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Princess Sophia of the United Kingdom.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

		The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		Many congratulations are in order, as your wide-ranging contributions to Wikipedia have resulted in more than fifty of your newly created or expanded articles appearing on the Main page, in the "Did you know?" section. I particularly enjoyed your recent hook about Princess Sophia's wish to be a kangaroo. Moonraker (talk) 01:39, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

On 7 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Duke Ernest Gottlob of Mecklenburg, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 1768, Duke Ernest Gottlob of Mecklenburg received an inoculation against smallpox alongside the future King William IV of the United Kingdom? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Duke Ernest Gottlob of Mecklenburg.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

There was no need for a long discussion. I passed this article to GA. Well written, broad in coverage, focused with no copyright problems. I would lose the pics in the cast section before nominating to FA though.--Amadscientist (talk) 05:44, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

I've reviewed it here. Gotta say, it's very well written. Thanks, Aranea Mortem ^{(talk to me)} 16:05, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

On 12 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sophie, Princess of Prussia, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Sophie of Isenburg married Prince Georg Friedrich the same year the House of Hohenzollern celebrated its 950th anniversary? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sophie, Princess of Prussia.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 08:03, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

	You did it again!
	Another round of congratulations are in order for all the work you did in making Sense and Sensibility (film) a certified "Good Article"! Thank you; your work is much appreciated. All the best, – Quadell (talk) 12:27, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Ruby. You've very helpful in the past by reviewing articles related to the Empire of Brazil era. If you're interested, please join the Empire of Brazil task force. I hope I'll see you there. --Lecen (talk) 16:29, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Take a look at the article. Railer-man (talk) 01:01, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi there, thanks for your helpful comments on the FAC! I think I've dealt with everything you've asked for now. I'd really appreciate any feedback on the review. If you've thought of anything more I could do to improve the article please let me know and I'll get right on it. cya Coolug (talk) 08:31, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi Ruby, I hope you're well. My name is Aaron and I'm one of the Storytellers working on the 2011 fundraiser for the Wikimedia Foundation. For this year's campaign, we're interviewing as many of the very active and productive Wikipedians as we can to broaden the range of appeals we run come November. I wonder if you would want to tell me more about your experiences editing and writing here? If so, I'll ask you your personal story and I'll ask you some general questions about Wikipedia. Please let me know if you're interesting by emailing amuszalskiwikimedia.org. Thanks! user:Aaron (WMF)

Hi Ruby!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 15:07, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

The September 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 16:45, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed you've reviewed lots of GA nominations. Would you be interested in reviewing the Kate Beckinsale page? Thanks, Popeye191 (talk) 15:12, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello, I've begun reviewing Amber 31422! I've left a few inital comments over the lead and plot section and hopefully will finish it up tommorrow. You can find the review at Talk:Amber 31422/GA1. Regards, Glimmer721 ^talk 02:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Shame 2011 film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:21, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

If you're going to use Reflinks to add details to fill in references, please could you alter the dates to the correct format afterwards and not leave it for others to go back over and edit? Thanks. - SchroCat (^ • @)

I could have sworn I saw this done in a Fringe article before, but do you know if there is a template to cite DVD commentary? Glimmer721 ^talk 15:30, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Although it's not perfect, {{Cite video}} is currently the best option; though I've been considering working on a replacement for use for commentaries and special features and the like. GRAPPLE X 16:00, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, both of you! Glimmer721 ^talk 16:40, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

I apologize, i've been very busy lately, but I'm going to renominate it and i hope you review the article NoD'ohnuts (talk) 00:20, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Voting for WikiProject Film's October 2011 project coordinator election has started. We are aiming to select five coordinators to serve for the next year; please take a moment from editing to vote here by October 29! Erik (talk | contribs) 12:06, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

The students still have till November 14 for the nomination, and they are working on it. You are more then welcome to drop by the article's talk now, introduce yourself and offer any suggestions! PS. Thanks for helping out! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 03:18, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Well, I do not think that it can be sourced. You must have seen the film.--77.49.189.116 (talk) 23:01, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Can I link to the film through YouTube?--77.49.189.116 (talk) 23:05, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

If I find a list not including him?--77.49.189.116 (talk) 23:33, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

I have responded to your concerns at Talk:Love, Loss, and What I Wore/GA2.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:01, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

I have replied to your replies.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:48, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

I am disappointed that this article was promoted after the nominator refused to obtain a copy of the script. I don't see how an article about a play can get to GA level without the nominator obtaining the script. Sorry I didn't notice this renewed GA so I could renew my comment on this. All the best. -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:28, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Ruby2010! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the edits at death panel. I want to get it to GA then FA and get a four award on it. If you have any tips on edits I could make, it would be great if you could leave them on the talk page thanks. Jesanj (talk) 04:27, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip on the talk page. I added a double image template in the lead and I added a multiple image template here: Death_panel#Support_after. I plan on adding another multiple image template in a different section. Jesanj (talk) 20:09, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

I was wondering, how much of a summary should the episode template have on the articles for a season of a TV show? I've been improving Doctor Who pages and noticed that they only contain a sort of preview summary for the episodes. Series One is the best of these, yet it still has this (except for "Dalek"). If I were to improve these, would I give an overview of the concept of the episode or actually reveal the ending? What is there now is neither. Thanks, Glimmer721 ^talk 21:33, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll work on that. I'm also guilty of adding too much detail. Glimmer721 ^talk 22:14, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Also, I was wondering how I'd structure the series 5 article, which is the series I'm working on. The first section is called production, but the first two paragraphs are about the changes in the production team and then about the numbering issue. The rest is about filming. I was thinking I should move it and the "Casting" and "Trailers" section (which I'm planning to expand to include all publicity) below the episode list, but split it up into smaller sections. I'm not sure where the first two paragraphs should go. I also have a lot to add eventually about writing and filming/sets. I'm just not sure where to put all of it. Glimmer721 ^talk 01:54, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

I think I'm going to have the first two paragraphs, about the change in cast/crew and numbering, before the list of episodes, which will be before the casting, and move the rest to a production section which I will expand and will go after the casting section. I'll see how that works out. The article was rearanged to correspond with the others (except series 1), but I perfer the layout of the first series article. Thanks for your tips, Glimmer721 ^talk 17:08, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 15:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)