User talk:RevampedEditor

GiantSnowman 19:04, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RevampedEditor,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 09:22, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello RevampedEditor, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Happy editing, Abishe (talk) 22:02, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 22:02, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~ ~ ~ Greetings of the season ~ ~ ~

Hello RevampedEditor: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Spread the love; use {{subst:User:Dustfreeworld/Xmas3}} to send this message.

--HirowoWiki (talk | contribs) 04:05, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I don't know what's up with swapping the infobox layout, but the one you're leaning towards is objectively harder and more confusing to access when editing the page. If you look at all popular footballer pages (Lionel Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo, Neymar, etc.), you'll see that they all have the same infobox layout. What's the point in doing it your way? VasilT (talk) 17:23, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In my humble opinion, those examples you cite (and again, Ronaldo and Messi as examples for everything, wiki or not, kind of tiring to be honest) seem to make for a more scrambled infobox. But hey no worries, nobody owns anything around here! And i apologise for my edit summary, you did not accuse me of REMOVING but REVERTING; i did revert, but it was in good faith.

Attentively RevampedEditor (talk) 17:45, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable. I'm bringing them up because they are pages that receive more attention in general and are expected to be exemplary. Either way, I wouldn't say that having each parameter in the infobox on a new line is scrambled, more so the opposite. Thanks and keep up the good work. :) VasilT (talk) 18:16, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 August 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jorge Costa, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 15:35, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]