User talk:Remember

I'm here if anyone wants to talk. Remember (talk) 16:16, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! NYC Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon! April 22nd!

Sure We Can and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite you to join us for: 2022 Earth Day Edit-a-thon 2pm - 4pm EST (April 22nd) online via Zoom and in person This Edit-a-Thon is part of a larger Earth Day celebration, hosted by Brooklyn based recycling and community center Sure We Can, that runs from 1PM-7PM and is open to the public! See this flyer for more information: https://www.instagram.com/p/CcGr4FyuqEa/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

-- Environment of New York City Task Force

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:52, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind words and the award! I don’t have as much time to work on Wikipedia but I greatly appreciate you continuing to give positive support for my efforts. It’s this type of appreciation that keeps this whole crazy project running! Cheers! Remember (talk) 09:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Virtual twin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:26, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Added more sources. Remember (talk) 18:24, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings in Charleston, South Carolina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Charleston, South Carolina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:53, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying me. I disagree about the notability but I won't fight it. Whatever the community decides I am fine with. Feels like this should be a discussion about lots of various pages at once rather than picking them off one at a time. Regardless, happy to defer to community consensus and thank you for the update. Remember (talk) 22:11, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual twin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:04, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping to make this happen! Cheers. Remember (talk) 21:20, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vusion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, lacks any references or sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 23:20, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Juho and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 22 § Juho until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. KnightMove (talk) 10:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Bitter Southerner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails notability standards

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—David C. Hall—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. UCO2009bluejay (talk) 21:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dean Smith has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm _Talk 02:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 19:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your newly inserted content has been reverted and the reason has been explained to you. The solution is not to simply reinstate the same content over and over again.--77.22.105.99 (talk) 18:33, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have already explained the reason to you about why it should be included. And please take discussions regarding an article to the talk page. Not to my user page. And it would be helpful if you weren't anonymous in order to have conversations. Remember (talk) 19:34, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jerusalem cross. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 04:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

dude you are edit warring with me and removing content and not discussing it on the talk page. Happy to get other admins involved. Remember (talk) 04:09, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very valuable this virtue you volunteer! Valiantly, I vow to vigorously venture forward, fueled by this valued victory! Remember (talk) 14:01, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2024 Justice Department Resignations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page is an inferior version of 2025 Trump Justice Department Resignations, both of which were created by Remember. The sandbox tag suggests this was hastily moved from the user's sandbox, and they then decided to change the name. The other version seems to have worked off of this one, as this one uses a smaller set of the same sources and sentences.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 02:17, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete. It was made in error. Remember (talk) 02:18, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please take a look at the Jerusalem Cross article and give your thoughts on recent issues again. Or happy to have other editors involved that you think could be helpful. Remember (talk) 23:10, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Guantanamo Migrant Operations Center, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Guantanamo Migrant Operations Center, a facility for holding undocumented immigrants to the United States, is set to have its capacity expanded from about 130 to 30,000? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Guantanamo Migrant Operations Center. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Guantanamo Migrant Operations Center), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

1=Launchballer 12:02, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! What’s the 1 for? Remember (talk) 12:12, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 2024 Justice Department Resignations has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 17 § 2024 Justice Department Resignations until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 20:52, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2025 U.S. Department of Justice resignations, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that seven U.S. prosecutors resigned in protest over the Eric Adams corruption case? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2025 U.S. Department of Justice resignations. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2025 U.S. Department of Justice resignations), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:02, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Targeting law firms and lawyers under the second Trump Administration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ed Martin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Guantanamo Migrant Operations Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Reed.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, wanted to let you know I just tried to brevify the section header while keeping its meaning clear. If you think it was a bad move, go ahead and change it back.--Kizor 04:17, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the comment. I’m cool with your changes. Thank you so much for helping out on this! I really appreciate it! Remember (talk) 05:24, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for adding quotes to Deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia. I just wanted to ask you to format them according to the Manual of Style:

1. Long quotes should be put in a blockquote, e.g. put the quoted text and the citation in a {{blockquote}} template

   {{blockquote|Quoted text<ref>citation</ref>}}

2. An ellipsis should be written ..., not …. If it represents omitted text, put it in square brackets: [...]
3. Don't use curly quotes

Thanks! — W.andrea (talk) 01:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Will do! Remember (talk) 01:45, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Targeting of law firms and lawyers under the second Trump administration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BlueSky.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kilmer Armado Abrego Garcia was deported to El Salvador in March 2025 due to an "administrative error" by the U.S. government? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abrego Garcia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed citations from Irve Tunick because you've cited iMDb and Wikipedia for the subject's film credits, which is against WP:IMDB and WP:RSPWP. There are better sources for his credits outside of these two sites. MimirIsSmart (talk) 04:55, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review! Happy to get new sources for the IMDb stuff. Do you know what is considered a RS for old time radio/tv/movies? I checked perineal sources and it said you can use IMDB but happy to use something else. But I don’t know when I ever cited Wikipedia for something in the article. Remember (talk) 10:58, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was for the "Tunick wrote Murder Inc" sentence which I removed the citation from. MimirIsSmart (talk) 12:11, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! Thanks! Working on fixing up citations now. I have sources for films (AFI) but TV and old time radio are harder to come by. Remember (talk) 12:15, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Irve Tunick at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 16:17, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!!!Remember (talk) 17:46, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Irve Tunick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James J. Walker.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Irve Tunick, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Irish and Intonation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 June 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Targeting of law firms and lawyers under the second Trump administration, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that more than 500 American law firms signed an amicus brief opposing their government's actions against law firms in 2025? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Targeting law firms and lawyers under the second Trump Administration. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Targeting of law firms and lawyers under the second Trump administration), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:03, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Remember, congrats! You've worked really hard on that article. I've been meaning to stop by to say so, and this was a good prompt to finally do so. FactOrOpinion (talk) 00:09, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! It’s nice to see that the article made it (I was doubtful for a bit). And thank you for all your help on this article and the Abrego Garcia article! You’ve been doing a lot of great work and dealing with a lot of difficult editors with a lot of patience! Keep up all the hard work! It’s very much appreciated! Remember (talk) 00:42, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think the John P. Morris would feasibly be able to pass a good article nomination? It’s well-sourced, but I’m unaccustomed it, so I feel I should get an opinion with the other major editor. Roast (talk) 22:35, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Guerreroast: Honestly, I don't know. While I have gotten some stuff through GA and FA before, I'm not a great judge of whether an article is ready to make it. I generally just put it up as a candidate if I think I have gotten the article to a good place and then keep working through all the criticisms that people provide. User:Wehwalt is a great editor to ask about these things. I often go to him with similar questions. Remember (talk) 22:01, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 June 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Irve Tunick, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Irve Tunick said he wrote about 700 to 800 scripts in his first 15 years of writing radio scripts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Irve Tunick. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Irve Tunick), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!

You are invited to the event Wikicurious: Rewriting the Canvas on Wikipedia. The event will be taking place on Wednesday, July 2, 2025, 5PM to 8PM, at the Bechtler Museum of Modern Art in Charlotte, North Carolina. This free event is open to all. It is especially designed for people interested in Black American music and modernist visual art, and for peope who are curious about using Wikipedia to learn about these subjects, about getting started editing Wikipedia, or just meeting other Wikimedians. If you are interested, please sign up on the event page AND on their Eventbrite page.

You received this message because you are on the global message delivery list of the North Carolina Wikipedians, probably because you signed up on our user page or because you attended one of our events. If you would like to remove yourself, please e-mail me or remove your username from our global message delivery list.

Thanks so much -- I hope to see you in Charlotte! -- Gaurav (talk) 19:39, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 July 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Detention and deportation of American citizens in the second Trump administration, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Trump administration researched whether it could incarcerate American citizens abroad? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Deportation and detention of American citizens in the second Trump administration. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Detention and deportation of American citizens in the second Trump administration), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 7,615 views (634.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Unlawful Impersonations of ICE officials is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unlawful Impersonations of ICE officials until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chetsford (talk) 02:20, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying me. Cheers. Remember (talk) 02:40, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to an October event series focused on improving content about Dorothea Dix Hospital and creating a Wikipedia page for Dix Park. Join us for one or all three of the following: online kickoff October 5, in-person tour of the Hospital site at Dix Park on October 10, and an online editathon with a special guest from the State Library of North Carolina on October 19. Instructions on registering for the tour and joining us for the editathons on Zoom are included in the Meetup page.

You received this message because you are on the global message delivery list of the North Carolina Wikipedians, probably because you signed up on our user page or because you attended one of our events. If you would like to remove yourself, please remove your username from our global message delivery list or e-mail me for help.

Hope to see you at one of these events! -- Gaurav via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:41, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There's a new class action suit, Venegas v. Homan, filed by a US citizen who was detained twice by ICE despite showing his Real ID, and where both detentions occurred when ICE entered private property without a warrant. Hopefully there will be some reporting about it before too long. Hope all's well. FactOrOpinion (talk) 22:05, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update! Do you think it is notable enough for how own article? Remember (talk) 22:08, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't think it's notable yet; hard to tell whether it will become so. It was just filed yesterday, so there's not a lot of reporting, but here's a Bloomberg article via MSN, and I saw reporting from a couple of local news media (1, 2). Are you aware of any other suits for false detention? I'm also wondering whether the class will be certified in this case. FactOrOpinion (talk) 22:34, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I don’t know if any other cases but I’ve been tied up in real life so I haven’t been paying attention as much. Remember (talk) 23:12, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I probably wouldn't have known about it, except that I read some Bluesky accounts, and Kyle Cheney, a legal reporter at Politico, pointed it out. It made me think of your Detention and deportation of American citizens in the second Trump administration article, whence my note here. If I get around to it, I'll add something about it there, or feel free. Hope you're tied up with something good/interesting/... rather than tiring/frustrating/... FactOrOpinion (talk) 23:30, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I’ll definitely try to monitor this and it’s definitely related to the article! Remember (talk) 00:08, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]