User talk:Reconrabbit/Archive 7

This is an archive of past discussions regarding User:Reconrabbit. This archive spans the period of time from 2 May 2025 to 1 July 2025.

Hi! I'm trying to update a page and so far I've not gotten it right. I've re-read getting started links, and I'm sorry if I missed the answer to this question there: Is setting up the page copy in my sandbox the best way for me to show you, as my mentor, the copy beforehand to determine if it needs more fixes? The last thing I want to do is post something incorrect or out of compliance with Wikipedia style guidance. TIA! --Mx-STEM-editor (talk) 16:15, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

One of the best ways to create an article is to make it in your sandbox (User:Mx-STEM-editor/sandbox), and once it is done, submit it to Wikipedia:Articles for creation so someone else can approve of your work and leave helpful feedback. It is a great way to learn the ropes! GGOTCC 04:43, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the help! I just submitted the draft. Because it's currently a live page, will the new draft be reviewed as a completely new Article for Creation? Mx-STEM-editor (talk) 21:03, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

@Mx-STEM-editor Your welcome! If you submitted a draft to AfC, it will be reviewed and someone would leave feedback. Usually, the article is passed and is moved into mainspace (ie. like any other Wikipedia article), or declined with some advice. Does this awnser your question? Looking at your draft, I recomend you to read Wikipedia:Citing sources to understand how to cite sources. You can also do that with the 'cite' button on the upper left. GGOTCC 21:08, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

@GGOTCC, you have the magic! I'd tried and tried to get the references to style correctly in my sandbox draft to no avail. I tried again after your note and voila! All have been updated now and I commented (hopefully correctly) on the page noting so. Thanks again! Mx-STEM-editor (talk) 04:55, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

I created my account to publish a new theory on the Roman Dodecahedron, but am not sure this is the proper venue. Can you advise? If not, can you suggest one?

Thanks, Joe Kugelman --JoeKugelman (talk) 01:50, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Sadly unless your theory has been published and is discussed by independent researchers or outlets it is unlikely to be accepted as a Wikipedia article. Original research isn't accepted here, but there are plenty of venues elsewhere on the Internet, such as arXiv, stack exchange, etc. -- Reconrabbit 14:43, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

On 24 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Riverine rabbit, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the riverine rabbit was thought to be extinct for more than 30 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Riverine rabbit. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Riverine rabbit), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

1=Launchballer 12:03, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Before editing should I always have a source? --Uppanoman (talk) 04:23, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

If your edit changes/adds information not already supported by a pre-existing citation, yes. GGOTCC 02:47, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi there! I'm new to editing Wikipedia and currently working on building my user page.

I've read some of the guidelines, and I'm trying my best to align with them. I recently added a short introduction about myself, as well as a link to a theory I'm developing (hosted externally on OSF).

Would you mind taking a quick look and letting me know if my user page looks appropriate and compliant? I really appreciate any guidance you can offer. Thank you so much! --X.Fu Theory (talk) 12:46, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

Since it does not look like you have constructed your user page to appear like an encyclopedic article, I see no problem with showcasing your work in this manner. User pages primarily serve to inform other editors about you and potential avenues for collaboration. Yours looks better the way it is now than how it was in the previous revision on 28 May. -- Reconrabbit 14:11, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

I would like to add more to my bio, --Larry barford jr (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

I recommend you go to this page: Talk:Larry Barford Jr. and write there what you want to add to the biography. It helps if you have a source like a news article to support the new info. I saw you tried to add "retired police officer" so I used this article from the Star Democrat to support it: https://www.stardem.com/your_voice/retired-howard-co-police-officer-larry-barford-jr-headed-to-new-jersey-motorsports-park-on/article_017800c4-c0af-11e1-9b36-e35e007aebb1.html -- Reconrabbit 20:32, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

On 1 June 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Swamp rabbit, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the swamp rabbit (pictured) is both territorial and a great swimmer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Swamp rabbit. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Swamp rabbit), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:02, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi do you know why editors remove my Wikipedia source ? --Илья Заманов (talk) 19:05, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Sources should not use Wikipedia because anyone can change it. It is WP:CIRCULAR. I hope you continue editing with other sources. -- Reconrabbit 21:33, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Feedback Kuwait --Cilantbajwa555 (talk) 03:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

For a minor, can they have a page for their self to share with friends? Im asking for my son. --Joseph Aloiv (talk) 09:44, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

I would advise against it. If your son really wants to share something about themselves through the Internet, there are social media designed for that. Even if your son was notable enough to have a Wikipedia article, wp:an article about yourself is not necessarily a good thing. -- Reconrabbit 14:27, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

		The Minor Barnstar
		Your noteworthy contribution (3.5 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 190 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 14:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I'm Sadie, and I am new to Wikipedia. Do you think you could help me? Good! How do I make a new page? --SadieStacyLOL (talk) 23:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Have I addressed all your issues in the Pinmonkey GAN? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I'm just easily distracted. Working on it now. -- Reconrabbit 15:19, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

The article Mountain cottontail you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mountain cottontail for comments about the article, and Talk:Mountain cottontail/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rusalkii -- Rusalkii (talk) 20:23, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

So basically, I was editing a wiki page for an English female woman named Suzi Perry, and I changed the birthday to the exact day, but then I looked at the page a couple minutes ago as I'm typing this and my edit has been removed by someone else. I used a source Famous Birthdays but it didn't work. I tried The Famous People and it worked, but someone changed it back to May 1970, even though it was the correct birthday! I need help. I don't know where to start. SadieStacyLOL (talk) 02:21, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Having an edit removed can be frustrating but in this case it is to protect the accuracy of a page about a living person. Famous Birthdays is a blacklisted website because it has no editorial oversight and has been used for spam. It is not clear if The Famous People has any similar editorial team. The best place to get an accurate birthday from someone is their own social media usually if it is not in a biography somewhere. So, if you find something on Suzi Perry's instagram or X profile where she celebrates her birthday, that could be used as a source. I hope this helps you. -- Reconrabbit 16:59, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed an omission in a Wikipedia page for the PDSA.org.uk. I think it is important to add some relevant information found on their webpage. People MUST be receiving certain benefits plus give a donation to have treatment for pets. --Restakk (talk) 11:27, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello! The People's Dispensary for Sick Animals page on Wikipedia should only include relevant information about the organisation that has been published by independent sources. Thus unless these certain benefits and donation requirements have been described by, say, BBC News, this information would be inappropriate to include. People looking for this specific information would do much better to look on the actual PDSA.org.uk website. -- Reconrabbit 17:01, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi, on Coco Gauff's page it does not list that she made the French Open Final in 2022. I just want to add that edit. Or can you do it? --Bel Belen Burns (talk) 23:35, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello. Coco Gauff's page says this: She reached her first major final in women's doubles at the 2021 US Open and reached her first major singles final at the 2022 French Open. What do you want to add that is missing? -- Reconrabbit 23:44, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

I need help finding sources, and I can't find legal sources on Wikipedia, and I think it's stupid. Why can't Wikipedia let us use every source on the web? --SadieStacyLOL (talk) 01:08, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

@SadieStacyLOL, ther have been hundreds if not thousands of discussions on Wikipedia to decide if certain websites can be used or not. Genealogy sites have to do a lot of work to be correct, and the ones that just let anyone say they are related to someone else are considered unreliable here. I found the discussion where editors decided that Geni.com could not be used: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 465#RfC: Geni.com, MedLands, genealogy.eu I don't know what good sites are out there besides newspapers.com and NewspaperArchive.com -- Reconrabbit 12:25, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

take Chris Nelms off page Grady odom owner was to 2025 He passed April 2025 Ownership was transfered to me for the rest of 2025 Sherry Odom Abbott Asherryo (talk) 17:59, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

I'd love to do that but I need a newspaper article or something so I know that's true. I looked it up and all I found was that Ennis Grady Odom passed, not where ownership went. -- Reconrabbit 18:04, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Need changes to Georgia Championship Wrestling owners. Ennis Grady Odom owned to April 2025 changed to Sherry Odom Abbott from April 2025 to present.. Chris Nelms was promoter not owner. --Asherryo (talk) 18:08, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

@Asherryo I did my best but can't write any more past Ennis' death without something more than word of mouth. Georgia Championship Wrestling -- Reconrabbit 18:16, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

With Secretary of State Georgia has put me as owner.

What do you need to change it? Asherryo (talk) 18:20, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

A newspaper article, state register, press release, or anything published that says you're the owner. I looked up Georgia Open Records and couldn't find anything. This site is always going to be slower than the news so if there's nothing published you will have to wait or have someone write a short notice some-where. -- Reconrabbit 18:38, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

How do I add the page from secretary of state georgia ? --Asherryo (talk) 19:08, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Is it a website? Do you have a search or a link or any way to find it? -- Reconrabbit 19:15, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

This is available as a (published) primary source, apparently. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:14, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Mountain cottontail at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Therapyisgood (talk) 20:08, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

https://quickshare.samsungcloud.com/nJP7epf6F9F6 --Asherryo (talk) 20:37, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hispid hare you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sophisticatedevening -- Sophisticatedevening (talk) 23:22, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

The article Hispid hare you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hispid hare for comments about the article, and Talk:Hispid hare/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sophisticatedevening -- Sophisticatedevening (talk) 13:25, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

i am encountering semicolon instead of commas in most pages. i am wondering to keep them unchanged or change it to comma. --Kiji-Jiki (talk) 16:02, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Hey, I have resubmitted the article. I added sources for the ownership directly from the companies website. Please let me know what other areas of the article need extra sources! I’d appreciate it if you’d let me know what to improve, and what to add.

Thanks, Thisisatestaccount1234567890 (talk) 23:21, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

I thought I'd try to make a Wikipedia page for the (what I think is interesting) story of Untether AI (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Untether_AI). I'm very new to Wikipedia and just getting used to how things work and had missed how careful I needed to be with citations at first. So after my first submission came back because of improper citations, I tried adding better citations (like an IEEE symposium). When that came back, I thought I'd be more careful about titles, publishers and names (i.e. I found I can use first2 and last2 to name a second author). So now I think I've got some pretty good independent sources, and I think I've got the format in pretty good shape. But still the citations aren't up to the mark. I saw there was a button for my "mentor", so I thought I'd try asking you for help. Would you have any suggestions as to some next steps?

Thanks in advance. --Rhg2 (talk) 23:20, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello. Thanks for reaching out. I believe the problem you are running into is that much of the literature used is considered by the reviewers as not being independent of the company. I'd also say that it lacks some context, especially as to what their product launch actually was. If I was reviewing, I would consider accepting this draft rather than declining it, especially since the coverage by Betakit and EE Times appears to be substantial. The trouble is that you're using sources like Business Wire (Yahoo Finance is just a reprint of that same Business Wire story) and an IEEE presentation by people who are employed by Untether AI, when there are better sources out there, including a wealth that have been published on AMD's acquisition of the company. Here's something from Reuters for example back when they launched the 240 Slim: https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/startup-untether-launches-ai-chips-2024-10-28/ that provides a good deal of context around the chips. -- Reconrabbit 00:21, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

		The Minor Barnstar
		Myles, Thank you for your prompt assistance in assisting me in re-reviewing an article. I appreciate you taking the time out of your day to help a stranger in-need. I hope to run-into you again. Cheers, ~Mark MWFwiki (talk) 23:41, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. I try to support the members of the community however I can. There is not a lot going on in my neck of the woods both digitally and physically. -- Reconrabbit 00:22, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

		Women in Green Editathon May '25
		Thank you for participating in Women in Green's 8th editathon! Your review of Brave Bunnies is another step forward for our coverage of women's works on Wikipedia. --Grnrchst (talk) 20:06, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for reaching out. I would love to know where to find the recently edited pages and the draft pages. I would love to start from there --SuperUliss (talk) 16:54, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello @SuperUliss. Are you looking for pages that you have recently edited, or all pages that have been edited around the world? There is a list of recent changes at this page: Special:RecentChanges, and a list of drafts at this page: Special:AllPages/Draft:. Note that a lot of the "drafts" are left over from pages that have since been published. -- Reconrabbit 00:40, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much! However I cannot find the thing that I am specifically looking for. I created a page about an author (Sasha Perugini), unfortunately I cannot access my previous account as I left my job and have't access to the email anymore. It is unfortunate as I wanted to continue working on the page. I you had some tips for me to continue working on the page I would highly appreciate it. SuperUliss (talk) 15:03, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

What was the title of the page you were working on, or the name you used to edit Wikipedia previously? Drafts are deleted after 6 months, but they can be retrieved upon request. I cannot find a specific page titled "Draft:Sasha Perugini" or Sasha Perugini to make this request. -- Reconrabbit 15:43, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm so very grateful for your help! I found the page, but it's still in my other account sandbox (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:EduLexIntC/Sandbox). I have also wrote to wiki to ask them how to change email on my old account. What would you suggest me to do in order to get the page published? SuperUliss (talk) 12:40, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

I do not know the policies of Italian Wikipedia (every different language is an independent project). Likewise I can't help with the requirements to "move" an article from the Sandbox title to a "published" article. In English Wikipedia, we require that you have 10 edits and maintain an account for 4 days to publish new articles in the main space. -- Reconrabbit 13:49, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

should i keep editing wikipedia on an amazon kindle --Delta097 (talk) 05:41, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

You can edit Wikipedia using whatever device you want. -- Reconrabbit 12:19, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi Ferien. I hope you are well. How do I add an image to my Wikipedia article? Many thanks --Cjemason (talk) 23:04, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, thank you. I am well. You can add images to Wikimedia Commons if you own them by releasing them under one of the Creative Commons licenses that are allowed on that site, and those images can be used on Wikipedia.

I will advise that your draft may not meet the notability criteria we expect out of the subject of a Wikipedia article, given that the song released just yesterday. Typically there needs to be significant independent coverage of the work for it to be considered notable and therefore publishable. -- Reconrabbit 00:25, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello Reconrabbit! I was planning to update census information for a small village, but I'm wondering how to cite it properly since it is a spreadsheet. There are only 4 options when I want to cite manually, and none match the format that I want to use. Thanks! --Solimagon (talk) 15:32, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Where did you get the spreadsheet? That would be the best thing to cite. If it is a government or census website, you can use {{cite web}}. -- Reconrabbit 21:06, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

I did get the spreadsheet from a census website, so I'll cite that instead. Thank you! Solimagon (talk) 21:56, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Vladimir Grachev "Formation and academic degrees" section has instances of Grachev. can i change them to he. if its ok, i will only add them as part of other edits. --jiki (talk) 15:10, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

That makes sense, I would combine all of these sentences into one paragraph. That way, "Grachev" only needs to be stated once, the first time. -- Reconrabbit 15:28, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

i did some edits solely for converting. rethinking other edit summaries and rules. i will combine all sentences and replace them. now clarified. jiki (talk) 18:03, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tres Marias cottontail you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 23:25, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

The article Tres Marias cottontail you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tres Marias cottontail and Talk:Tres Marias cottontail/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 00:05, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

The article Tres Marias cottontail you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tres Marias cottontail for comments about the article, and Talk:Tres Marias cottontail/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:05, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for participating in the Articles for Creation June Backlog Drive! We've done amazing work so far, dropping the backlog by more than 2000 drafts already. We have around 2400 drafts outstanding, and we need your help to get that down to zero in 5 days. We can do this, but we need all hands on deck to make this happen. A list of the pending drafts can be found at WP:AFCSORT, where you can select submissions in your area of interest. Thank you so much for your work so far, and happy reviewing! – DreamRimmer ■ 01:34, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Volcano rabbit you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 11:22, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Reconrabbit for accumulating at least 25 points during the May 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 17,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:40, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

The article Volcano rabbit you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Volcano rabbit and Talk:Volcano rabbit/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 09:01, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

The third round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 June. This round was again competitive, with three contestants scoring more than 1,000 round points:

• BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,314 round points, mostly from articles about athletes and politicians, including 20 good articles and 48 did you know articles
• Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,197 round points, mostly from military history articles, including 9 featured topic articles, two featured articles, and four good articles
• Sammi Brie (submissions) with 1,055 round points, mostly from television station articles, including 27 good articles and 9 good topic articles

Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far, while the full scores for round 3 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 4 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 1 featured picture, 9 featured-topic articles, 149 good articles, 27 good-topic articles, and more than 90 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 18 In the News articles, and they have conducted more than 200 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nubra pika you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 00:06, 1 July 2025 (UTC)