I've fixed all the citation needed tags. Many of them were on sections that were summaries of the upcoming subheaders, but I addressed it as requested. Some of these changes will probably have to be transcluded to Cuniculture in the future but I'll get to that later this week. Reconrabbit02:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I didn't want you to think I've forgotten about the rabbit show page. I've just been quite busy recently. I want to give the article a lot of focus when I am able and heavily expand it. I think it deserves a lot of attention and I hope to be able to do so this week. I already have some sources in mind as I have quite a few books on rabbits. Congratulations on the Domestic rabbit page! Thank you,
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fume hood you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JMF -- JMF (talk) 16:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Reconrabbit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1-Bromo-2,2-dimethylpropane, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hello, Reconrabbit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Super Lesbian Animal RPG, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1960s in fashion, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1960s in fashion, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
On 7 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fume hood, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the energy cost of a single fume hood in Singapore can be up to $9,300? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fume hood. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fume hood), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Thanks for creating the article. He was best known as Rodney Alan Greenblat during his time as a visual artist. I think the article should be moved to that title.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
@Netherzone:, I created it at that title, but requested it to be moved to Rodney Greenblat because there are a lot of existing redirects there. I'm not so familiar with the requirements for common name titles that have middle names. If it's better that way, I can ask around and request a move back. Reconrabbit11:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Not sure what is meant by this. Google N-grams shows that over the course of his career, he was mainly known as Rodney Alan Greenblat for over 25 years, but more recently has been called simply Rodney Greenblat. See link here: [1]
His website shows his name as Rodney Alan Greenblat. See link here: [2] as do all his social media.
Google search shows 103,000 hits for "Rodney Alan Greenblat" and 88,500 hits for "Rodney Greenblat".
My sense is that WP should honor what the person calls themself - and - what the majority of sources say.
I don't know that much about "lots of existing redirects" (possible the article was previously deleted?) but I do think that "Rodney Alan Greenblat" is indeed the correct title for the article. Perhaps you could ask the administrator who made your requested move if they could undo the current redirect?
Hello User:Reconrabbit:
Thank you very much for adding the edit to the Titmouse, Inc. regarding Star Wars: Galaxy of Adventures. Would you have a chance to review the edit requests I posted on March 21 regarding a few other Titmouse projects? It has been in the COI edit request queue for nearly four months. Thank you so much for considering this request! Best, JillTMouse (talk) 23:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello JillTMouse, I was planning on doing so but got sidetracked by one of a hundred different things here. There was one thing that was keeping me from putting the new info in to the article from your edit request - the constant use of "In 2022, [...]" to start sentences. Ideally the history should be written in a readable chronological order but not be presented like a timeline. I'll go into detail on the talk page with some recommendations. Reconrabbit11:55, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you again for all your help for this article—and I learned a new way to display multiple sources in a citation! TwoScars (talk) 20:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Liebigs Annalen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 19:03, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
I have changed and republished the draft of Sergey Smbatyan.
Hey @Reconrabbit, thanks for your help, I have republished the draft, made changes there by your guidance and the reference article that you have sent. Could you please review the submission? Thanks for your help. Grigor Khachatrian (talk) 15:39, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Your draft reads much better now. I made some small changes to better comply with style. Also, there are several concerts and details from his life that need to be verified with references. For details such as his early education, his own website would be acceptable (WP:ABOUTSELF). Otherwise all of these details should be verifiable by someone not familiar with subject, especially so because this is a biography of a living person. Reconrabbit16:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in the July 2024 GAN backlog drive
The Reviewer Barnstar
Your noteworthy contribution (14.5 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 160 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. Vacant0(talk • contribs)10:57, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Dominic Ferris resubmission
Hello and thanks for working with me on my Dominic Ferris submission here. As requested I've supplied citations where you tagged "citation needed" and replaced Broadway World and Discogs citations. I've also deleted some content where no reliable source was available. Hope you'll take another look soon – thanks again! PSPazW (talk) 12:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
I made three edits to the UArctic wiki page (the latest three from September 9th) but this was before I created an account and saw that I should declare my conflict of interest. Should I delete these edits? i will make sure to just propose edits in the talk section from now on. --Evmcha (talk) 10:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Ideally edit requests would be the best way to propose changes. For the first two edits, since it's as simple as updating numbers I would classify those as uncontroversial edits and see no problem with leaving it as is. If you want to be thorough, you could delete or revert the third edit and make an edit request on the talk page with the template {{edit COI}}, though it may take a while to be implemented. If you are comfortable with that IP address being known and associated with your account, you could also add the following to your User: page. {{User shared IP address|193.167.223.48}} Reconrabbit13:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
You will need someone else to take note of Sanaya FM and write on it at length before you can write anything about it on Wikipedia. Otherwise all you are doing here is promoting something for your own benefit. Maybe once Sanaya FM is as notable as Radio City, you will be able to have an article here. Reconrabbit16:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Question from GunklePosh (11:50, 21 September 2024)
Hi there, ReconRabbit.
My brother asked me to help create a Wikipedia article for his daughter, my niece.
I watched a few Youtube Videos but I'm sure there is still plenty more for me to learn.
I am IMPRESSED to have been assigned a mentor -- and since I write quite a bit (elsewhere) this is likely to be more than just a passing fancy for me!
SO, I'm glad to have been introduced to a mentor with such a COOL USERNAME . . . and hope my questions, when they surely must arrive, will be good ones.
Talk to you soon, I imagine!
GunglePosh (Eric aka Gay Uncle Posh) --GunklePosh (talk) 11:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
I'm glad you think I have a cool username. I'll provide any guidance you need. Right off the bat, what you should know is that to avoid getting in trouble you should be as transparent as you can be with what you are trying to do. If you're going to write about your niece, you have a clear conflict of interest (in that you probably have a positive outlook on your niece and what she is doing in the world). The first thing you should do is copy the following and put it on your user page: {{UserboxCOI|1=Your niece's name}}
Hi, I've just had a message back saying there was a conflict of interest with my account. I set it up purposefully to be able to edit the Theatre of Small Convenience account. I don't have another account. I'm a volunteer on the board of trustees and wanted to be able to put the new website address up when we've established it. The website listed no longer exists, I'm working with the former owner of the Theatre who is quite ill to create an archive. The ownership listed is wrong. I'm not sure why there is a conflict of interest because I'm volunteering for the organisation that runs the Theatre, I'm just trying to update factual information that is incorrect. I find this site a bit difficult to navigate to be honest. Can you advise on how to proceed? Many thanks
Loz --FlushedDarling (talk) 10:56, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Even though you might not be paid for editing Wikipedia, it's still considered a "conflict of interest" since your close connections with the Theatre and the former owner could lead you to bias. Having a conflict of interest isn't necessarily a bad thing, and of course there's always going to some stumbling when adapting to the neutral-point-of-view writing style expected here and I don't fault you for it. Looking at the way things are now, your change to The Theatre of Small Convenience hasn't been undone, and all I would recommend is that you add the following: {{UserboxCOI|The Theatre of Small Convenience}} to your user page. Will follow up if anything else needs addressing. Reconrabbit12:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
On 30 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Liebigs Annalen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that scientists publishing in Liebigs Annalen were subject to criticism and attacks by editor Justus von Liebig? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Liebigs Annalen. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Liebigs Annalen), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
I'm happy to help. I was informed of this through the Wikimedia Discord. If there are any other templates that have such unusual characteristics as a fixed access date then point me to them and I will do my best to help. Though I have been told there are more efficient ways of doing this through Wikidata, I am not such a techno-wizard to know how to do that (aside from using {{cite Q}}). Reconrabbit14:19, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
You were very diligent in making changes to the Rabbit article, going ever beyond the changes and suggestions requested in the GAN review. In appreciation, you deserve this barnstar, in recognition to your scrutiny, precision and diligence for your work on the article and helping it reach GA-status. Keep up the good work. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 06:53, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
For your contributions to bring Rabbit (estimated annual readership: 1,200,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Sdkbtalk16:42, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
