Please do not add the name of his wife, as it is a privacy violation. The presumption in favor of privacy is strong in the case of family members of articles' subjects and other loosely involved, otherwise low-profile persons. cookie monster 755 08:37, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I saw you put a notice on 2025 Sydney Harbour Bridge protest questioning the notability, and I get that you're probably questioning WP:LASTING, but the particular note you used suggests the reason the subject may not be notable is because the current sources are all trivial mentions. The article has over 20 sources that are all fairly in-depth about the topic so I am not sure it makes sense to be there? -- NotCharizard 🗨 10:11, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This message is being sent to let you know that you have been edit warring Wikipedia:Edit warring with a user on the Central Coast & Newcastle Line, Blue Mountains Line, Gosford and the South Coast Line articles about the service topic section, and considering if Gosford is a suburb or a city, by reverting someone’s edits that isn’t disruptive or vandalism and that does provide an improvement to the topic with valid and truthful context, that does mean you are starting an edit war with the user 2405:6E00:25E:E5A2:D4CA:4BBB:10D:8EFA, i hope you are aware of Wikipedia’s policies. 2405:6E00:25E:E5A2:D4CA:4BBB:10D:8EFA (talk) 05:20, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think you and I both wrote an article for Playlunch at the same time! I checked, there wasn't one, I wrote a draft, and then when I tried to move it to mainspace you had made one. I added what I wrote to the article you made. -- NotCharizard 🗨 10:26, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
TarnishedPathtalk 08:07, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- The talk page does not state that this article includes contentious topics. If it's just one person opposing the inclusion of this material, why can't we include it per WP:5P5? Qwerty123M (talk) 08:33, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not just me opposing inclusion and discussion has only been going for 1/2 a day. WP:IAR is relevant to situations where doing something would improve the encyclopaedia, which is not my assessment and hence my opposition. My main argument is that we at least give this some time to determine if it's anything more than a blip in the news cycle. TarnishedPathtalk 08:51, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Homosexuality in Australian rules football. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 07:22, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to 2025 Australian federal election. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:17, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2025 Australian federal election. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You are constantly failing to use WP:PREVIEW and are creating duplicate arguments that require others to cleanup your work. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:45, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- I sincerely apologise for these errors. I understand the problems I have caused and I acknowledge that I should have read your complaint better. I only saw the top lines of text and not the custom text you added. I usually use the preview function and correct my edits accordingly, but on that page it is just too large to scan the whole article quickly for errors. It's difficult for me to notice the duplicate citation parameters on big articles because unlike these templates say, I can't see a yellow line of text pointing out these errors on the 2017 wikitext editor and I don't usually see a difference in the functionality of citations as I have intended them. I can't help but feel like you have broken the guideline that says you should assume good faith. Just remember that even through the errors I make, I am still trying my best to improve the encyclopaedia. I suppose I just need to learn some effective tactics to more easily notice these issues. Qwerty123M (talk) 08:07, 10 September 2025 (UTC). Updated at 10:00, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- I always do my best to WP:AGF but this has been a repeated and ongoing problem which have done yet again. PLEASE be more careful… —Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 07:32, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to 2025 Australian federal election. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 07:31, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You do Chloe Hart and alexia pesce on ABC News (Australia) 2403:4800:846D:7201:345A:86A4:8EE2:47E8 (talk) 10:56, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- I do not have a source. If you are stating that, I will just take your comments on face value as original research which is prohibited on Wikipedia. Qwerty123M (talk) 10:58, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- If they have been saying that a new presenter will join while on air, that still does not make it a suitable claim to add if there is no citation from an external source. Qwerty123M (talk) 13:16, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Guardian Australia. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 09:17, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- What error did I make? I didn't add anything to a citation, just changing an existing parameter and changing prose slightly. Qwerty123M (talk) 09:23, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- As you have been REPEATEDLY told, you need to use WP:preview. Had you done that you would have seen the large message at the top of the screen stating
Warning: Guardian Australia (edit) is calling Template:Cite web with more than one value for the "work" parameter. Only the last value provided will be used.
. This is now at least the 5th time you have been advised of this issue. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 09:27, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2025 Australian federal election. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 09:20, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Playlunch (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFL.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Qwerty123M. Thank you for your work on Sydney YIMBY. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work! I just added a link to Sydney, since there are other places with the same name. Have a wonderful day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Mariamnei (talk) 07:47, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please be careful with info on the Freya Leach page as she is a living person, as is Kobi Shetty, who you falsely claimed was both an MP at the time, and an incumbent.
Also landslide is not a 'loaded' word -- Wiki defines it as "an election result in which the winning candidate or party achieves a decisive victory by an overwhelming margin, securing a very large majority of votes or seats far beyond the typical competitive outcome." Given the fact that a notional 2-party-preferred result had Freya on less than 25%, she lost in a landslide. Aesurias (talk) 21:58, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
