User talk:Python eggs

Hey Python eggs! I'm currently planning the launch of the WikiProject Beijing, depending on if enough other editors would be interested in such a project. I saw you have edited the main Beijing page recently or in several times in the past and therefor might be interested. If you are, please sign: User:Poeloq/WikiProject_Beijing. As I am posting this to quite a few editors, I am not watching your page and would ask you to reply with any comment or questions on my talk page. Cheers, Poeloq (talk) 21:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I reverted your revert. Its confusing with those anononomous edits, I know. It was correct though, as of http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/phoenix/main/index.html it is still some time til it lands on Mars. AndersL (talk) 23:40, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It will take some time till the Earth receive the confirm signal. But it has landed. Python eggs (talk) 23:41, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NASA TV still has about 7 minutes on touchdown; it has just entered the atmosphere. [1] -- RattleMan 23:46, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NASA TV use Earth-received time, which is 15m20s behind Spacecraft Event Time, They use ERT because NASA is only a watcher for the event, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia unlike NASA TV. Python eggs (talk) 23:49, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you keep moving China's railway stations back to pinyin system for the cities whose English names are not pinyin. I disagree and raised the question at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese). I hope you can participate in the discussion there. Thanks. --Neo-Jay (talk) 18:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your insistence on using pinyin for the names of Chinese cities in non-Han areas suggests that you are a Han Chinese yourself. Or is there some other reason for this behaviour?

Bathrobe (talk) 07:15, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sofi_Collis.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -Nard 22:27, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Voyager_1_trajectory.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:43, 27 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:43, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I had added a category (Siemens Transportation Systems Projects), for as Beijing Line 10s signaling system is supplied by Siemens AG. However this category was removed, unfortunately without stating a reason. In my opinion the supply of equipment worth in general several million EURO should be worth a categorization, however I understand that only one line supplied might not qualify. Can I have a reason for deletion, otherwise I would like to open the addition for discussion. Thanks :) --Azchael (talk) 15:55, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose, if add, that category should be added to line 10's article. but personally i don't think it is a good idea to have categories like this. Python eggs (talk)

I agree, if there would be a Line 10 article, it would make more sense there. Maybe I should split the Beijing Subway article up. Have to check what other info I can find on the Metro Line 10. Regarding the category itself, I see it as an information aggregation. I had been looking before on ways to identify the original constructor / supplier of e.g. the electrification system of a specific line. Technic interests me and a few others I know :). There are so called reference databases available at, e.g. Siemens (which I used as a cite reference for several articles), but on the one hand is the information presented there more a press statement and lacks the information present at Wikipedia, and on the other hand, after I found one system I would like to know which other systems the same supplier has delivered. On Wikipedia I do not have this information aggregation at the moment and I hope to create it with this categorization. Later to be added by Bombadier and Alstom. The value itself as well as the technical point of view verify for me the categorization and it helps to aggregate a good market overview. But I agree, that for a real use of this the Beijing Subway page is too general and should be split, if that makes sense from the information point of view. Let me look into that. --Azchael (talk) 21:21, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain your recent High-speed rail reversion of 2008-08-31T07:58:52 on the article's talk page, where I have already initiated the discussion. Thank you. --Danorton (talk) 04:57, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you are bold in your editing, but you seem to be disregarding Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Instead of discussing your changes, you went ahead and edited the article again without consensus. I reverted it because its failure to conform to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. If you are having this same difficulty with a number of articles, others here will be happy to offer suggestions on how you can contribute without making others feel that you are being tendentious. You only need to ask and discuss. Thank you. --Danorton (talk) 03:26, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you have again restored your text in High-speed rail without discussion and you have reverted my edit with the summary "revert vandalism," I have created a Mediation Cabal case for resolution assistance (link to case discussion). --Danorton (talk) 05:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you agree with the solution about the debated paragraph in High-speed rail? If so, could you please indicate it here on your talk or here so we can close the mediation case, and if not, could you please tell what, in your opinion, is still wrong. Thanks! --Twinzor ^{Say hi!} - Do I suck or rock? 02:49, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the solution. Python eggs (talk) 05:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is a common practice to retain user talk pages indefinitely, so I ask that you please not delete your user talk page content like you have in the past. When you feel that this talk page is too long, instead of deleting, please archive the history, instead. More information on how to archive your talk page is at Help:Archiving a talk page. Thank you. --Danorton (talk) 06:00, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a possible answer just before it'll be lost from the page, so I want to draw your attention to it. --Tardis (talk) 19:38, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:China Railways.svg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 18:09, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Larry Crumpler, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

WP:ACADEMIC, WP:ONEEVENT. Unimproved since 9/07 tagging.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. THF (talk) 15:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Larry Crumpler, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Very short stub which fails to cite significant coverage of the topic in reliable sources or to convincingly assert its notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Skomorokh 06:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Omegle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ridernyc (talk) 18:17, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Long term abuse/SummerThunder, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long term abuse/SummerThunder and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Long term abuse/SummerThunder during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 21:18, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Exploration of the Moon, People's Republic of China.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:China Railways.svg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:China Railways.svg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:China Railways.svg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Wubi (disambiguation), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wubi (disambiguation). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. 3^0$0%0 1@!k (0#1®!%$ 14:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Zhang Shuguang. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Wuhan-Guangzhou High-Speed Railway. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:42, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. --Closedmouth (talk) 09:27, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think your move was unwarranted, please see Talk:Jinghu High-Speed Railway. Jpatokal (talk) 11:16, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 December 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Wuhan–Guangzhou High-Speed Railway, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 01:51, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Shiwu Passenger Railway. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:16, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article 780 Armenia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. iBen^discuss 06:08, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:20080403 7558 P021484.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:39, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Python eggs! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 311 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Zhang Shuguang - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the creator of Template:Lichun and other solar term templates! It is year 2010 now, and those templates seem to be outdated if nobody update them by adding the data of some more upcoming years. I don't know how to determine the time of solar term with accuracy up to minute. So I would like to ask you to add more years to the templates. --Quest for Truth (talk) 12:30, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It won't get outdated in one year. I'll try to update it some time later. Python eggs (talk) 16:53, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added 4 more years to {{Lichun}}. Can you have a look at that? I will add more to other templates soon.--Quest for Truth (talk) 14:16, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright. Thanks. Python eggs (talk) 14:32, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The official blog of Omegle has been deleted. Please update the article. -- Marawe (talk) 08:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Huygens' distance from Titan.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:03, 18 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:03, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you wrote the article about Yi. I find that the prose isn't that good. Probably needse to be rewritten completely, in fact. I think I'm just going to do that, if you don't mind. Thanks, Kayau Voting IS evil 06:16, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on TLBB, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:11, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Zhuang Lefeng.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:23, 16 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:23, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Featured portal review/Mars. -- Cirt (talk) 21:01, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[2] [3] Why do some people talk about Jinggang instead? And by the way was Guangshengang originally just Guangshen? 61.18.170.190 (talk) 15:12, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"gang" = Hong Kong, "jing" = Beijing, "guang" = Guangzhou, "shen" = Shenzhen. Officially, these are two separated lines: Beijing–Guangzhou (Jingguang) and Guangzhou–Shenzhen–Hong Kong (Guangshengang).

Hello, I wondered if you could please help me show how to use the JPL Horizons On-Line Ephemeris System to find the solar terms. I know all the solar longitudes (15 degrees each), but I wish I would find them for Moldova (and not just add to the UTC). Please help. Best regards. --Layimu (talk) 16:09, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On this web page: http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons.cgi Set "Ephemeris Type" to "OBSERVER", Target Body to "Sun (Sol)", Observe Location to Geocentric and Table Settings to "31 (Obs eclip. lon & lat)", choose preferred time span, and then click "Generate Ephemeris", and then find those rows the ObsEcLon column is divisible by 15. Python eggs (talk) 18:25, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so so so much! Layimu (talk) 06:04, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article High-speed rail, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 17:00, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I did cite a fairly reliable source. There is no evidence indicate whether the UIC figure is more reliable than what I cited. Python eggs (talk) 18:26, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't provide a source for removing the US - and the UIC are reliable so per WP:Verifiability we have to take them at their word, I think the reason its included is that some of the Acela track is at 150mph which is very close to their minimum of 250km/h.

With regards to your source for the China section on High-speed rail for better or for worse this is a "Western" dominated project, you need to bring a source to the table that people outside of China are likely to have actually heard of. So something like Xinhua, China Daily, or the top newspapers in Shanghai, Beijing and Guangzhou. English language is better too, but Chinese is fine if there isn't an English source available. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 18:56, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Back in 2007, there was already a few hundreds km of upgraded line capable for 250 km/h running in China. UIC seems seriously overestimated the United States (To be precise, only a very short section of the 362-km Acela route is capable for 241 km/h running) but underestimate China. I haven't did much research for their European data, but based on their data on these two countries, it can't be considered as "reliable". Anyway, please discuss in Talk:High-speed rail, not here. Thanks. Python eggs (talk) 19:07, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right :). -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 20:04, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Zhenzhou-Xi'an High-speed Railway. Since you had some involvement with the Zhenzhou-Xi'an High-speed Railway redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). HXL's Roundtable, and Record 02:34, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article could use a bit more content to make DYK. Can you help? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fastest trains in China is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fastest trains in China until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DS - fax 01:24, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your addition of Fastest trains in India as that should be done by the AfD nominator if they wish to combine nominations. Also, you did not follow the rest of the process as the AfD page was malformed and the necessary tag was not added to the article. I have no opinion on whether or not the list should be taken to AfD (with this if the nominator so wishes, or separately if you/someone else wish to initiate one). cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 18:21, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you undid my figure, but I don't know why. Your references were about two new lines in operation, but failed to mention the total length of HSR in China. And mine, came from the same site, had the exact figure and more updated than yours. So if you don't give me a sound reason in the following days, I'll change it back. Derekjoe (talk) 12:35, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The official 8000+ km figure is about 200+ km/h lines. Here on the table, only 250+ km/h lines included. Please read Talk:High-speed rail, lots of discussions there. Python eggs (talk) 13:48, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An excellent move to have the Template:High-speed rail by country, but there's no easy way to reach it from either High-speed rail or High-speed rail by country. Is that deliberate, or just an oversight? (reply here, please). Tim PF (talk) 17:29, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I find it's not easy to keep both table with the same data. Python eggs (talk) 17:36, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

True, and even harder for it to be changed if it is not easy to find to edit. It's not impossible to find, it is just not easy. Tim PF (talk) 21:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How to edit a template should be a must knowledge for Wikipedia editors. There're plenty of them. Python eggs (talk) 06:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But unlike many templates, such as Template:Mark 3-derived, this one does not have a "v.d.e" in the top left corner. Tim PF (talk) 07:37, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want "v.d.e." in the corner, why not add them yourself? I am more than happy to see them, but I dont have time to find out how to add them sorry. Python eggs (talk) 07:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to, but couldn't figure out how to do it either. Ok, thanks, Python Eggs. Tim PF (talk) 16:27, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so that's how it's done. Thankyou. Tim PF (talk) 22:49, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating the article to reflect the current reality. However, when you remove something from the "Planned" section, please put it in the "under construction" section, if it has started construction.Olyus (talk) 15:27, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/SummerThunder, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/SummerThunder and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/SummerThunder during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 07:40, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CRH.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 20:32, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I'm taking a look at this. There is a template that I should be able to use to do all 60 odd uses in one sweep. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 22:00, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• 60 uses? Wow. That would make it the most used non-free file on the project. I doubt it would qualify for many of the uses. For example, China Railways CRH1. It's just not necessary for every thing within an organization to be blazoned with that organization's logo. Consider comparison case; Amtrak, logo File:Amtrak Logo.svg, used just once despite having a large number of sub-articles. Also, you (Eraserhead1) added a rationale for China Railway High-speed, but the image isn't used there. What is used is File:ChinaRailwayHighspeed.svg. We should be using the SVG equivalent. I think this image could be deleted. --Hammersoft (talk) 22:22, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If the rationales aren't enough, then you are more than welcome to go through and find which ones aren't justified. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 22:49, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Rather than adding it to a dizzying array of articles, I would encourage you to carefully consider each use before adding it. Is the logo really necessary for X article such that the article can't be understood by the average reader without it? Or, is it just decoration? --Hammersoft (talk) 22:59, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point. It seems that the 'what links here' list at the bottom of the image links to a bunch of pages it isn't included on, how annoying, so the 60 figure isn't accurate either :(. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 23:01, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Near as I can tell, the image is used only at High-speed_rail_in_China#Service (and decoratively at that; that type of use isn't supported when there's a linked main article), and at Rail transport in the People's Republic of China. I removed it from three uses where it was used as an icon (WP:NFCC #8 failure). --Hammersoft (talk) 23:13, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moved over to the other image and added rationale. I suggest we get the png image deleted. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 23:20, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop blanking articles like you just did here. If you consider it a violation of copyright, at least attempt to establish a consensus first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.117.233.162 (talk) 01:30, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 非死不可. Since you had some involvement with the 非死不可 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). 174.117.233.162 (talk) 02:16, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you reverted the change I made to the name of the Lanzhou-Xinjiang Railway article without explanation. I have started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese) on the naming convention of railways and expressways. Perhaps you can review the other comments and give your input. ContinentalAve (talk) 13:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I find that the image "Total Solar Eclipse Paths: 1001–2000" in Solar_eclipse#Occurrence_and_cycles (reproduced on the right) covers way too long a time span and hence does not provide much useful information, other than where eclipses have not occurred.

A span of 20 years, such as 2001–2020 paths or a composite of, say, 100 years centred on approximately the current year (1961–2060) from images on NASA to World Atlas of Solar Eclipse Paths may be more readable.

No doubt you have put in a lot of effort to composite the NASA images, so before I change the image, what do you think?

Thanks, cmɢʟee☺τaʟκ 11:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So we can post it quickly onto the front page it would be nice for there to be some more sources for the first day in service section. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've added quite a few sources, but it would still nice to see a few more if you have the time. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 22:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be on the first train G1 from Beijing South to Shanghai Hongqiao. You can follow my Twitter as I'll post pics once onboard. All my pics of this trip will be released in the latest version of CC-BY license. Python eggs (talk) 00:11, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain your rationale for moving Harbin–Dalian Passenger Railway to Harbin–Dalian High-Speed Railway. I moved all of the articles to a X–Y Passenger Railway format in order to maintain consistency. In Chinese, these lines are referred to as 客运专线, which roughly translates as "passenger dedicated line" or "passenger railway" but nowhere do I see the words "High-Speed." In contrast, the Beijing to Shanghai High Speed Railway is correct because in Chinese it is actually named 高速铁路, the words 高速 clearly indicating High-Speed.

Also, explain your rationale for reverting all of my moves for Qinshen Passenger Railway and such. Please take a read at Wikipedia:NC-CHINA#Transportation as the new naming convention is to name the articles with the termini stations, aka Qinhuangdao and Shenyang, not Qinshen.

Please explain your rationale and/or conform to naming conventions set by WP:NC-CHINA. Thank you Heights^{(Want to talk?)} 20:21, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No. In Chinese, it is controversy. If you search for "哈大高铁" on Google, tons of results will be returned, and many of them from official sites like xinhuanet or gov.cn. Chinese government is switching from "客运专线" to "高速铁路". Python eggs (talk) 03:01, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Various sources now say that the former Beijing-Guangzhou line is now the Beijing-Hong Kong line, in Chinese it is now called 京港高速铁路, if you see Chinese Wikipedia, Baidu, etc. http://money.163.com/09/1224/08/5R9N2DGH002526O5.html You seem to point out that a railway line can not be international however this simply does not make sense. Trains DO and will run straight through to Hong Kong (West Kowloon station). Even articles for that specific section of line between Guangzhou and Hong Kong have been created (see Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link). Isn't that a legitimate international railway line, if you constitute Hong Kong as a separate administrative region? The Beijing Hong Kong High Speed is simply the old Beijing Guangzhou High Speed + this new Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong XRL. Many sources use Beijing Hong Kong high speed and you cant simply try to hide and pretend it's still terminating at Guangzhou.

Also I'd appreciate it if you leave some form of discussion or talk page first before going in and reverting my edits at your own will as I simply don't do that to yours in order to avoid my actions being interpreted as an edit conflict. But I would appreciate some form of discussion first. Heights^{(Want to talk?)} 22:01, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate your not removing links without reason or comment. I am re-inserting the following link on the Qinghai-Tibet Railway page and appreciate it you leaving it alone or having the courtesy to discuss first or give reason for removal.

• Does the Qinghai-Tibet Train Help Travelers Acclimate to Lhasa's Altitude? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.7.72.98 (talk) 03:15, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Titan.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 22:24, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beijing–Guangzhou–Shenzhen–Hong Kong High-Speed Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CRH (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Beidou navigation system.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mars Exploration Rover, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:03, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article YZ-25B has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet notability guidelines. Search for sources turned up info on YZ25B Binocular Indirect Ophthalmoscope, but not on a Chinese railway passenger coach

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 21:17, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 非死不可. Since you had some involvement with the 非死不可 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 04:53, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for retaining the older templates for the Chinese calendar template series.

Lestatdelc (talk) 17:09, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:List of minor planets/navigator has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  01:36, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Xuāntǒng (宣统) (era name). Since you had some involvement with the Xuāntǒng (宣统) (era name) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:26, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Xuāntǒng (宣统). Since you had some involvement with the Xuāntǒng (宣统) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:26, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Xuāntǒng (宣統) (era name). Since you had some involvement with the Xuāntǒng (宣統) (era name) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:26, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Xuāntǒng (宣統). Since you had some involvement with the Xuāntǒng (宣統) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Xuantong (宣统) (era name). Since you had some involvement with the Xuantong (宣统) (era name) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Xuantong (宣统). Since you had some involvement with the Xuantong (宣统) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Xuantong (宣統) (era name). Since you had some involvement with the Xuantong (宣統) (era name) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Mars, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Mars (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Mars during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 06:27, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article YTHT has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP: GNG. I could not find any sources to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HyperAccelerated (talk) 06:01, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A bunch of stubs with no citations that date back over a decade. I believe that you put together the original list of stations along the line. Would you have any hint of an idea of sources detailing these stations and which ones might still be operating? Thanks for any clues or info Gnisacc (talk) 20:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]