User talk:PrimeHunter/Archive 11

This is an archive of past discussions with User:PrimeHunter. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi again, Happy New Year! Thanks for helping out with my previous TWA-related query - would you happen to know if/where The Wikipedia Adventure's code repo is? It mentions the scripts were open sourced, and I was guessing they would be up on GitHub somewhere but I'm struggling to find them. Thanks again -- samtar ^whisper 13:57, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

I looked around a little and found Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure/Index#Guide tours. I don't know whether there is more. The author would be the one to ask. PrimeHunter (talk) 16:07, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

You're a star thank you I've left the author a message -- samtar ^whisper 16:12, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker). Hi Samtar. User:Ocaasi was the Project Manager for TWA back in 2011 or 2012. Are you porting TWA to VisualEditor now? That would be great! Jake Orlowitz might be more accessible now at: User:Ocaasi (WMF). Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 01:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Hey Jens! I wondered what you made of that non-existence proof. PD seem to be going out of their way to insult everyone who interacts with them. And as far as inclusion of the material in Wikipedia goes, it of course does not matter if that proof is valid, invalid, or simply nonsense, as long as there are no reliable sources which support its conclusion. But I figured that if the proof were tractable then it might be of interest to you. I follow most of the individual statements, but don't follow the logic, though it's been a long time since I've done any number theory. Does it make any sense to you? -- ToE 21:31, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

I haven't examined the details and prefer not to deal with it. PrimeHunter (talk) 11:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thanks for helping everyone on the help desk. Tom29739 (talk) 15:39, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! PrimeHunter (talk) 05:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

PrimeHunter,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Peppy Paneer (talk) 13:56, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Hi PrimeHunter. I was trying out an Android at 4:07 on Friday and I guess I accidentally clicked archive at the same time I saved an edit at VPT. The archive link is very small on the Android and very close to the submit link. To that end I have now set 1CA to "1CA off by default" since I rarely use 1AC and only on my own Talk page.

As an aside, why does the VPT archive go to the "wrong" archive when using 1CA? 1CA just sends things to the latest archive increment in the archive script on the particular Talk page. PS: 1CA=One Click Archive. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 01:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

@Checkingfax: I have never used OneClickArchiver and don't know anything about it. The author is blocked indefinitely. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:51, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

1CA is pretty nifty. I think the blocked author was a consultant for 1CA and made a parallel version to implement his/her version of how it should work. Too bad s/he got blocked. S/he used to be a very prolific helper on Wikipedia. That is all I know about that situation except I did glean s/he was blocked for mis-using multiple accounts. Sorry for the commotion I caused at VPT. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 02:08, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi PrimeHunter.  I have a question concerning templates.  Is it permissible to subst the  "User Wikipedian for" ( {{User Wikipedian For|year=2015|month=5|day=1}} )  template?  The purpose would be to change the colors to something other than the normal (purple) color.  Just to be clear, I'm talking about substing it, saving the page, and then editing the actual wiki code for the template right on my own user page; it would not in any way affect the template for anyone else.  I need to know if there is a policy prohibiting it (or a guideline discouraging it). Also if it is permissible, does that generally apply to all or most templates designed to be used by users in their own user space? Thank you.
Richard27182 (talk) 11:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

@Richard27182: There is no problem in that. You have a lot of freedom in your userspace and can generally do this there. Templates sometimes have undocumented parameters you can see in the template source. The source of {{User Wikipedian for}} says:

| border-c = {{{border|#8d40b3}}}
| id       = [[file:Noia 64 apps karm.svg|42x42px|link=<!-- leave empty as this userbox should not link to anywhere by default for privacy reasons -->]]
| id-c     = {{{imgbg|#d9bfe5}}}
| info-c   = {{{bgcolor|#f0e6f5}}}

Code like border-c = {{{border|#8d40b3}}} means you can override the default color #8d40b3 by using the parameter |border=. Same for imgbg and bgcolor. Here is an exampel using named colors but you can also use hex triplets like the default colors:

This user has been on Wikipedia for 10 years, 5 months and 5 days.

PrimeHunter (talk) 12:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi PrimeHunter.  Thank you for your prompt and very informative reply.  I'm glad you mentioned about being able to use added parameters in the normal use of the template to obtain the desired effect without even having to subst the template; in fact that's how I'll probably do it in this case.  But it's also nice to know that, in those cases where substing and editing the template wikicode (in my own user space) would be necessary, it would be OK to do.  Again, my thanks and appreciation.
Richard27182 (talk) 13:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi PrimeHunter.  (For the sake of full disclosure, I just want to mention that I'm asking one or two other administrators this same question.)  In a Wikipedia article about a motion picture, how closely can the plot summary duplicate the plot summary from the Turner Classic Movies website.  Is it OK if it reads basically the same with some words changed here and there?  Or would that be a copyright violation?  I'm asking because I noticed that (as of this writing [11:45, 16 February 2016 (UTC)]) the Plot section of the Wake of the Red Witch article is extremely similar to the plot summary for that film on the website TCM.COM (click READ THE FULL SYNOPSIS).  (There is actually a reference to the TCM website at the end of the Plot section.)   I doubt that it's a problem, because the Wikipedia article has been that way since December of 2008; and I imagine that if there were a problem it would have been detected and corrected by now.  Nevertheless, I'm curious.  Thanks; I appreciate your time.
Richard27182 (talk) 11:45, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Interface Focus, February 2012 cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form http://goo.gl/forms/ZyYQm6uu7e. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Proceedings of the Royal Society A, March 2012 cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Proceedings of the Royal Society B, March 2012 cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Philosophical Transactions A, 28 February 2012 cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Proceedings of the Royal Society A, March 2012 cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Proceedings of the Royal Society B, March 2012 cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

This is the same problem that you fixed for Poi, with the edit link. Thanks for your help. (I've never seen any of these problems before a few days ago. Did something happen to WP's script to make these screw up?) Milkunderwood (talk) 02:14, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

@Milkunderwood: It's a recent issue. The box at the top right of Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Edit section links in article links to phab:T124356. You can purge by yourself. See WP:PURGE. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:00, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I looked at that WP:Purge page when you first mentioned it, relating to Poi. I'm a passer-by, not a dedicated WP editor - I don't even know what "transclude" means, and don't want to know. I stumbled upon two of these things in a row, and it's not my job to fix WP's markup language screwups. Not your job either, of course. I'm happy to leave them be. Sorry if I seem to have a bad attitude - I do fix a lot of easy things as I come across them, but purging is outside of my pay grade. The real issue is, it shouldn't be happening at all, for you, me, or anyone else to have to clean up. With Poi, it wasn't an editor making a mistake, it happened (as far as I could see) from a bot. I don't do bots, either. I come here not to write, with a very few years-old exceptions, but just to look stuff up and read. You say it's a recent issue. If I were you, I'd kick it upstairs for massaging instead of fixing one page after another. Milkunderwood (talk) 05:50, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

@Milkunderwood: I have purged India ink. One way to do it is to add ?action=purge to the url. I have enabled 'Add a "Purge" option to the top of the page, which purges the page's cache' at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets. Then I can purge a page with a click. phab:T124356 basically is "upstairs". PrimeHunter (talk) 09:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. You understand my point is that it shouldn't be happening at all to start with, rather than providing a fix that non-editors (much less noobs) would have to grapple with. It's whatever in the markup language itself that's making this happen that needs to be fixed; purge is just a workaround for individual articles. If it's a recent issue - and it does appear to be - somebody coded it badly. That's what I meant by "upstairs"; users have no interest in phab:T124356. There shouldn't even be a gadget - it ought work correctly internally, all by itself (just like it used to). Neither you nor anyone else wants to go around purging pages, much less trying to explain to users like me how to do it. Milkunderwood (talk) 18:12, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

I often purge pages for different reasons. This recent issue is just one of them. I find it handy to have a one-click purge option. If the software always worked 100% correctly then purging would still be useful sometimes to update a page after a used template has been edited. For performance reasons, all pages using the template are not updated immediately. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:12, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Journal of the Royal Society Interface, March 2012 cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello PrimeHunter! I saw your recent post to the Help Desk, and it prompts a question. First, let me admit upfront that I don't have Rollback. And one of the reasons I've never bothered with it is because I don't want Rollback links in page histories, Contribs page, or Watchlists! In short, I'd only want to see the Rollback link on a 'diff' page. So, with that in mind, what would the requisite common.css code need to be if I just wanted to see Rollback links on diff pages (only!) look like? Thanks in advance! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

@IJBall: In your CSS:

.mw-special-Watchlist .mw-rollback-link {display: none;}
.mw-special-Contributions .mw-rollback-link {display: none;}
.mw-special-Recentchanges .mw-rollback-link {display: none;}
.action-history .mw-rollback-link {display: none;}

I added Special:RecentChanges. PrimeHunter (talk) 09:12, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Awesome! Thanks! This makes it a lot more likely that I'll request Rollback, at least on a trial basis. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

For helping me out at VPT. :) QEDK (T 📖 C) 15:49, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! PrimeHunter (talk) 15:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks PrimeHunter for fixing my account! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khafre78 (talk • contribs)

I can only take credit for adding it to the names reported in phab:T119736. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello! The following is WikiProject This Special Day's articles for improvement's daily selection: Skvader Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Snipe hunt • Jenny Haniver Get involved with the TSDAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Share this message with other editors Posted by: w.carter-Talk 00:19, 1 April 2016 (UTC) using New improved MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of WikiProject TSDAFI • [April Fools!]

Hello, PrimeHunter. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 16:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

	The Special Barnstar
	For extending a hand at VP (without payment ) to everyone. QEDK (T ☕ C) 16:52, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! PrimeHunter (talk) 16:55, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello PrimeHunter, how would one go about matching a particular url from a body of text using regex? See Wikipedia:Help desk#List of Essential Mix episodes. For eg., if I wanted to remove both [http://core.thomaslaupstad.com/bbc-radio-1-essential-mix-2010-09-04-swedish-house-mafia-at-creamfields-2010/ Mixes] and [http://er7radio.net/?p=3699 Mixes] in this version, what would be the regex to find everything between "[http://" and "Mixes]" and replace it with white space? - NQ (talk) 18:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

@NQ: Search for \[http.*Mixes\] and replace with nothing. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Great! doesn't seem to be as complicated as I thought it would be. Thank you. - NQ (talk) 09:26, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for joining in on TEA's talk page. I am having a good break from WP after Wikiburnout, and am concentrating on the other things in my life that also were the reason for my withdrawal from ArbCom elections. At present my circumstances mean I would not have been able to do justice to that job at all, which would have been grossly unfair to the community had I been elected.

I do not have the patience at present that I usually have, and cannot be a positive influence in helping this editor, who has reappeared on my talk page. I think they have a limited understanding of WP, and would benefit from their hand being held a little. I hope you may be able to guide them in the correct direction. I'd like to be able to help them myself, but cannot summon the patience genie from its bottle right now. At least I know what I cannot do!

Another few months and I will be back in the saddle again. Too much work at WP:AFC can leave one exhausted, wikipedially. Is that even a word? Fiddle Faddle 16:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

@Timtrent: I have offered help at User talk:Tracy ann essoglou#Women's Action Coalition. PrimeHunter (talk) 18:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. I think you may need a lot of patience here. As you have seen, TEA seems unable to get past the "The draft is gone" stage and does not examine the facts of the actual article's presence. She seems keen on somehow blaming me for something, which, in my present state of lack of patience, I fear I may become a tiny bit sharp over, were I to reply. Fiddle Faddle 21:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Immense to you both! I have published knowledge of WAC because I am the author of the first and only full chapter covering the movement; Louder Than Words: a W.A.C. Chronicle in But Is It Art? The Spirit of Art as Activism, editor Nina Felshin, Bay Press, Seattle, 1995.

I have zero familiarity with Wiki and am utterly sympathetic to philosophical and technical complexities, exhaustions and misery of dealing with WIKI-illits like myself.

Questions: 1) As published author can I contribute to entry that appears? 2)If not can I sugest to Taylor Kuhn (who I only know from interview that she edit using her more accomplished entry to that which has been accepted? 3) Does WIKI still 'possess' a copy of Taylor Kuhn's submission?

Thank you both! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.175.70.91 (talk) 18:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I believe updates need to be made to MediaWiki:Duplicate-displaytitle and MediaWiki:Restricted-displaytitle, because a page like User talk:Amortias is not showing up at Category:Pages with disallowed DISPLAYTITLE modifications. I think it's due to the non-ASCII characters used for sorting on the MediaWiki page itself, and the categories don't sort those extra symbols.

The fix would simply be changing those characters to alphanumerics. Does this sound right? — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 01:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Scratch that, it did appear. Sorry to bother you. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 01:07, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

@Andy M. Wang: Category:Pages with disallowed DISPLAYTITLE modifications takes time to autopopulate. User talk:Amortias showed up after I made a null edit. In some circumstances like a purge a page can have a category at the bottom without the category displaying the page. A null edit updates the required link tables. I'm not sure why all pages sort under N. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Looks like there are numerous titles that will not show up until edited. Would it make sense to sort pages of particular namespaces (such as User space or others you might see fit) to a different cat/subcategory? The category is starting to get unwieldy. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 17:05, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

@Andy M. Wang: Pages show up when they are edited or some time after a used template is edited, or when the link tables for the page are updated for some other reason. I have made many attempts [1] to sort by namespace but none of them worked. The magic words like {{NAMESPACE}} don't work normally in MediaWiki:Restricted-displaytitle, probably because it's a MediaWiki message evaluated in a special way. The current code says [[Category:Pages with disallowed DISPLAYTITLE modifications|{{NAMESPACE}} {{PAGENAME}}]] so userspace should sort under "U" but that doesn't happen. phab:T135949 and gerrit:290071 say the MediaWiki software itself will soon add pages to a tracking category. I don't know whether this category will allow namespace dependent sorting but the software should be installed here later today so we can soon test it. There are other options like fixing the userspace cases with semiautomated removal or commenting out of all DISPLAYTITLE but let's wait and see. PrimeHunter (talk) 18:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I removed an automated message from Twinkle (from me) about the template temporarily used for testing. Well-meant, but wasn't appropriate for an editor your caliber. Good intentions :) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 05:36, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

@Andy M. Wang: No problem. I have only heard that concern for user warnings and not notifications about deletion nominations. I have deleted it. The new category feature has been installed. I directed pages to the existing category by creating MediaWiki:Restricted-displaytitle-ignored. The feature does not make namespace dependent sorting and I can see no way to do it in the category but I have added a link to only display articles.[2] PrimeHunter (talk) 10:14, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

There must have been another update that makes the red error display in preview only. On the category page, I removed how to find the articles via links to "Wikipedia:Page name" because I don't think links happen in preview. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 05:11, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

@Andy M. Wang: Yes, this was decided in phab:T135949 and implemented in gerrit:290073 which went live here yesterday. I have added a new search to the category page.[3] PrimeHunter (talk) 10:01, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

	The Technical Barnstar
	For solving my text edit window font size problem! Kerry (talk) 12:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! PrimeHunter (talk) 12:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello PrimeHunter!

Data : just an example.

• I have superseded the content of the page (1) in the page (2), using this element : {{...}} (and not this element : {{subst:...}}) .

• The page (1) contains this category : [[category : Example]].

Question : What can I do for that category to seen it in the text editor of the page (2) (note:I can't rate it manually in the text editor of the page (2) when there is a lot of pages).

Same question with another way : what is the code that can modify the [[category : Example]] on the page (1) to rendre it seen in the text editor of the page (2).

Mr. Yassinosse ☚╣✉╠☛ 16:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: Yassiiiiine also posted the same question to my talk page and to the Help Desk. Answers should probably be placed there. Dismas|^(talk) 16:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Hei PrimeHunter! You removed my suggestions to Palindromes. The chapter None-English palindromes is very poor, I think. If You google "Risto Rekola" You will find many articles (in Finnish, of course). My book Ikävää, väki? is at the moment the most popular at eKirjasto (library) in linguistics and Naaraan in poetry in Finland. "Unnotable?". And when You say a Finnish palindrome it's a palindrome still, 'cause Finnish is phonematic language.84.248.53.209 (talk) 14:13, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Name

Hi, at Template:Infobox equestrian event, I can't figure out how to add an alt description for the picture so that it's hidden except in the edit window. I added the parameter fine, but it won't hide like on other infoboxes. White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 22:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

@White Arabian Filly: alt text has a function in rendered pages so it must be part of |image=[[File:...|alt=...]] in calls of the template. Some infoboxes build the file syntax from multiple parameters but Template:Infobox equestrian event expects the image parameter to have fully formatted file syntax so the template should not have an alt parameter. Callers can make their own alt if they want. The infobox here has image = [[File:Pur sang arabe - Haras de Kabyuk (Bulgarie).jpg|200px|alt=A white horse]]. Your browser may display "A white horse" when you hover over the image. Screen readers for blind users may read it out. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:53, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Ah, I see now. Thanks! White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 20:18, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!Mmyers1976 (talk) 15:17, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the guide at the teahouse HamedH94 (talk) 15:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

I added an old version of the awards list to List of Pixar awards and nominations (feature films) for the consistency of the tables in the list. And now that the awards list does not affect Pixar's list, I removed footnotes from Inside Out's awards list. Hope everything is sorted now. FrB.TG (talk) 13:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

@FrB.TG: You are badly breaking the history revisions for no reason. See for example [4]. I'm at 3 reverts so I'm not reverting you again but if you don't restore </onlyinclude> in [5] then I'm bringing in others. See also Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. The code has no effect on the article itself so I don't understand your obsession with removing it. If you do remove onlyinclude tags then please remove both the starting and ending tag since it gets worse when you only remove the end. I also oppose the code duplication in [6] instead of using transclusion. There is no good reason to force editors to maintain almost the same content in two places. A minor table formatting difference is not a good reason to me. If problems are fixed or content improved in one of the places then the other will often be overlooked. Also note you have to give attribution per Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia when you copy content. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:17, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Alright, how's it look now? FrB.TG (talk) 14:36, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

@FrB.TG: Thanks. It looks good now. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Dear Sir,

My name is Mukesh Chaurasia, I work for Edelweiss Tokio Life Insurance as Manager, Digital Marketing.

My company has no Wikipedia page, to create the same I have requested to write an article for my company.

I have also shared the references to justify the wiki presence of Edelweiss Tokio Life Insurance.

It’s almost 5-6 weeks but no one has picked the article.

I found your contact while seeking help, I request you to please guide how to proceed to get edelweiss tokio life presence on Wikipedia.

About Edelweiss:

Established in year 2011, Edelweiss Tokio Life Insurance Company Ltd is a new age IRDA approved life Insurance company in India. It is a joint venture between Edelweiss, a leading financial company in India and Tokio Marine, one of the fastest growing life insurance companies in Japan.

Best Regards,

Risingguns 007 (talk) 08:44, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi PrimeHunter:

This is Re: editing the Golomb sequence article and I attach your response below. If it isn't stated that it is the [b]smallest[/b] unique integer that satisfies this condition then this seems to be a possible sequence as well:

n = 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a_n= 1 3 2 2 2 3 4

On the OEIS it says that 'it is understood that a_n is taken to be the smallest number > a_(n-1)' This is not obvious from the definition on the page currently and certainly caused me some problems which is why I was spurred to make the change.

Do you have access to a proof/argument that says that the problem statement as is implies that a_2 must be == 2 or am I missing something/misunderstanding something?

"(Undid revision 728582945 by Asyepifanov. It means that for a given n, there is only one possible value of a_n. It's not necessary to specify "smallest". OEIS:A001462 has a comment about it but it's not a required part of the definition" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asyepifanov (talk • contribs) 10:23, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Asyepifanov (talk) 10:37, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

@Asyepifanov: The opening sentence in Golomb sequence says: "a non-decreasing integer sequence", so a_n ≥ a_n-1 by definition. a_n says how many n's the sequence must have and since the sequence is non-decreasing, they must be consecutive and come before larger numbers. After a₁=1 is defined, that directly gives the whole sequence. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

@PrimeHunter How stupid of me. Thanks for the clarification, you are correct.

	The Technical Barnstar
	For providing a solution to the !@#$%^& bolding on my watch list page. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! PrimeHunter (talk) 22:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks @PrimeHunter for the info.––MML Ruler (talk) 21:00, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

I want to create one copying the French one, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Caves#Can anyone create an infobox from a French one? creating new cave article. What do you think? Doug Weller talk 07:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Went ahead at User:Doug Weller/draft/Template:Prehistoric caves. Doug Weller talk 14:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi! I mean that most English palindromes aren't palindromes acoustic. "Eye" should actually be written "ai". "Easy" is a palindrome acoustic ("iisii"), but You write the phonem /i/ with three different letters. Été is a French phonemic word like nearly all Finnish and Estonian palindromes. If You record English palindromes on tape and listen them backwards, You can't understand what they mean. --Risto hot sir (talk) 14:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

@Risto hot sir: The concept of acoustic palindromes is not well-known in English as far as I know. A later section might mention them but the article lead shouldn't give the impression that a written palindrome is a special kind of palindrome. It's the normal kind and the kind which is meant when you just say "palindrome". PrimeHunter (talk) 20:33, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

The roman languages, like Latin, Spanish and Italian are much more phonemic than English. The magic of Sator Arepo... is based on not only writing but pronouncing, too. English palindromes actually are formed of ancient writing mistakes under French influence. The Normans hardly spoke English. There's no logic writing "iivils liv" as "evils live"! You have just used to this as children. Risto hot sir (talk) 08:17, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	for your helpful guidelines. English Wikipedia is good place when it has good users like you. health and wealth.. Amir Muhammad 15:19, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! PrimeHunter (talk) 19:49, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

I will try it.ving

Ving rhames (talk) 21:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello PrimeHunter, I appreciate your response on Google Knowledge Graph, thanks very much.--Jamzy4 (talk) 06:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Ving rhames has the same username as actor Ving Rhames. I wouldn't necessarily expect you to know who that is, but he/she needs to be informed of a possible username violation.

Then again, this could be him, but he/she doesn't seem intelligent enough or good enough at English.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:46, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

I just didn't know how to do this, [7] I'm not familiar at all w/ wikidata editing, thanks again--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:53, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

	The Technical Barnstar
	Thanks for your help you deserve it! VarunFEB2003 12:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! PrimeHunter (talk) 13:02, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome! VarunFEB2003 15:02, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

	The Technical Barnstar
	Thank you for helping me at VPT VarunFEB2003 07:30, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks again! PrimeHunter (talk) 10:26, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Welcome again! VarunFEB2003 13:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your response to my Teahouse questions. I'm having fun learning how to navigate as a new Wiki user! KIRTIS (talk) 11:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, PrimeHunter. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Notifying all named accounts who have edited this article this year. There is a discussion of whether this article should contain foreign language palindromes. If you would like to comment the thread is Talk:Palindrome#Non-English_palindromes_2 Meters (talk) 21:02, 3 October 2016 (UTC) Template:HD/YKG has been nominated for merging with Template:HD/GKG and Template:HD/Bing. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Pppery 15:12, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for correcting my archiving edit on Talk:Russell Peters. However, it seems to have gone awry, as older comments are present when they should not be. Mind taking a look? Verified Cactus (talk) 00:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

@VerifiedCactus: The archive bot looks for a timestamp in a signature to see whether sections are old enough to be archived. It apparently doesn't accept timestamped Sinebot messages. You can archive the sections manually. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, will do. Verified Cactus (talk) 00:42, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi PrimeHunter.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Californication has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 11:35, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

I am not sure if this is the right place to put this, sorry if it isn't. Thank you for answering my question but I was unable to find wikidata item under tools or anywhere else, sorry I am very new to Wikipedia.

	The Help Desk National Hero Award
	Your work and contributions at the Help Desk are exemplary. With intelligent and most helpful inputs, you are truly a Help Desk National Hero :) Keep up the great work! ❤️ Lourdes 17:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! PrimeHunter (talk) 18:37, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, PrimeHunter. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Can you please explain the contradictory definition by Pomerance/Wagner? https://math.dartmouth.edu/~carlp/fibinttalk.pdf According to the Pomerance/Wagner pre-print cited at OEIS https://oeis.org/A061446, the primitive part is always the product of primitive prime factors. This product dividing the symbol phi(n). Most of the time phi(n) is the primitive part depending on the form of n. This agrees with Chris Caldwell's definition, where he says the symbol phi(n) is the primitive part(or Primitive factor, ie not the primitive part).

But I have the identical problem with windows. The identical problem appeared simultaneously on two different pieces of hardware with two different OSs. User talk:Deisenbe — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.85.204.85 (talk) 19:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

No I didn't follow what was in the threaded instructionsT. he thread is now dead, but I did see it first. I'm not going to clear my cache and erase every single password. That cure is worse than the disease. I'm just using another browser (Dolphin) which seems to work fine. deisenbe (talk) 20:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Now login on Safari works fine. I did not empty the cache. deisenbe (talk) 03:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Well it only worked once. I'm using the Dolphin browser with no login problems. deisenbe (talk) 15:23, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Today it worked again. No idea what's going on.

There is no way to delete a "cookie" in the Safari browser on iOS. However, it occurred to me (didn't find this online, though I didn't look exhaustively) that you can delete passwords individually, which I suspect amounts to the same thing. So I'm deleting all saved passwords for wikipedia and related sites. Strangely, there are duplicates. I'll let you know the results.

FYI, iOS has no directories in which to save or delete cookies and other files. There is no File Explorer. Each app has its sandbox and it can create and delete anything there, but cannot delete files in any other app's sandbox. There's no such thing as a disk cleanup.

(Of course there are directories, but you need a developers' password to see them or do anything with them. That's paternalistic Apple. And there are "memory cleanups" which amount to about the same as a disk cleanup, since iOS has no physical disks, and if there are virtual ones they're invisible and inaccessible to Users, like me. Google Drive and Dropbox are apps that will give you a familiar directory structure, although the interface with iOS - the apps - is flaky.)

Sorry if I'm wasting your time. deisenbe (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

I don't see anything even close to that, following the instructions there. From the date of the posting, that version of iOS is several generations obsolete (and never used, Apple pretty much forces you to update). deisenbe (talk) 00:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Ok. Now I'm confused. Is W:/2016ALBUM/ the title for the Deadmou5 album, allowed or not? Karst (talk) 17:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

@Karst: I'm also confused. MediaWiki treats it in a confusing inconsistent way. W: is an interwiki prefix for the Wikipedia in the same language as the wiki you are currently at. For example, at wikt:de: it goes to de:. WP:NC-COLON says:

• Article titles cannot begin with an interwiki or interlanguage prefix, or namespace alias.

W:/2016ALBUM/ apparently falls through a crack somewhere when it's used at the wiki W: points to. Some features work as expected, some in another way as expected, and some not at all. It displays as /2016ALBUM/ in Category:Deadmau5 albums. Here in user talk [[/2016ALBUM/]] produces a subpage link 2016ALBUM. In mainspace where subpages are disabled it works as a wikilink to W:/2016ALBUM/. Special:Prefixindex/W: lists articles starting with "Main Page". W:/2016ALBUM/ displays W: in the title but not the url. [[Talk:W:/2016ALBUM/]] doesn't work (I didn't nowiki that). Talk:/2016ALBUM/ works but doesn't display W: in the title. It's a big mess. I suggest another name like "W /2016ALBUM/" with this:

PrimeHunter (talk) 18:37, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

That sounds like an excellent option. If only to prevent future reverts. Karst (talk) 13:52, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Barring further objection, I make my case, and I'd like to re-implment my edit

My edit was to avoid a regular table with it's visible grid lines, and to preserve the "simple" comma delimited list style and yet allow easier review and comparison of the component numbers

With all due respect, addressing your edit summary points:

1. I thought of that and already tested copy/paste works just fine at OEIS-- you made an assertion w/o even testing
2. How does it look bad? I need reading glasses and a tabular array, w/o HTML grid to preserve the "simple" list style, retaining the commas, is easier to see and compare the numbers, versus your revert looks like some pile-on representing visually some single mega-quad-jillian google-google number to the eye "7,663,2121,..."
3. Screen reader, Window built-in "assist", sees/reads the same comma delimited list as before, why what does your screen reader see/read?? Or is that only another assertion?
4. Wait, what random width-- try reloading the page with table-- it comes up neat and tabular in my browser/Chrome-- or is that your attempt at misunderstanding the use of non-breaking-space to ensure table columns have extra clarity between the numbers? To minimse that run-together effect of the original list

WurmWoode^T 00:37, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

@WurmWoode:

1. I did test it. If I copy your table in Firefox and search it in OEIS:A074282 with Ctrl+F then it fails. I have to compare the numbers one at time. It's the same if I copy the list from OEIS and use Ctrl+F on your table. People copying the data elsewhere, for example to a primality testing program or a text file, are also likely to have problems. A list is harder to use when it's not actually a list.
2. A comma-separated list looks bad with varying spaces between elements. A table aligns columns but there is no connection between numbers in the same column so there is no need to align them. The list has one space between each element. That's the normal way to write any comma-separated list.
3. I don't have a screen reader and said "probably". Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Tables#Accessibility indicates screen readers have special table navigation features but your table is not meant to be navigated as a table since it's just an unusual way to present a list. Commas to separate table cells also seems very odd but I don't know how screen readers treat it. There is also a risk that some of our reusers will place it in a table with visible borders which will make the commas look awful.
4. The 5×6 table layout is unrelated to the data. There is no logical reason to use 5 rows or 6 columns, or any other number of rows and columns. These are "random" table dimensions for something which is just a list with 30 elements. The user's browser will adjust a real list nicely to the window width so you don't get a lot of blank space, or have to scroll horizontally on a narrow mobile device.

We probably have OEIS lists in hundreds of articles. I have never seen anybody place them in a table before unless the table format is used for something relevant to the list. I think many others would also oppose it but you could ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:27, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

THANK YOU! The pink highlighting was OK, but the effect that change had on my keyboard made it impossible to edit in Explorer (something to do with the Scroll Lock, I'm told). I'm also told that Explorer is on the verge of being obsolete (or over it), but I'm an old guy, so I'm sort of traditional. WQUlrich (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)