Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thabo Makhetha-Kwinana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, PrathuCoder!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alan Corey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Chlidonophoridae. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:47, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Chlidonophora chuni, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
I appreciate you taking the time to edit Wikipedia, but this is not helping. Concerning your edits on Valorant, please take a moment to read Wikipedia's guidelines on video game articles, see WP:VG/MOS.
We don't add an in-text link to a website for people to download the game.
You've linked the characters. None of these exist yet. Maybe create them before creating so many redlinks?
I don't think in-game game modes deserve their own article at all
We don't use "you" in articles, see WP:YOU ("Radianite Points are another in-game currency which allows you to upgrade animation levels or get extra colors for a skin. You need not pay money to get it, It comes from agent contracts.")
Lore is written from an in-universe point of view and is WP:PRIMARY sourced
@Soetermans Ok and thanks for correcting my edits. I'm new on wikipedia and I have unfortunately missed out on these things. But I think that red links make other wikipedians know that there are no articles and they can help create them. Also, as you said, lore is primary sourced but it is published by the official site itself. I didn't add theories but fundamental things that are approved by everyone. This makes something encyclopedic and I thought it can be added. PrathuCoder (talk) 14:11, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi PrathuCoder, thank you for understanding and welcome to Wikipedia! Please, don't let my critical tone scare you off! You're very right, a WP:REDLINK doesn't necessarily have to be avoided in articles, if there's a possible article on the subject.
Concerning game modes, if they just appear in one game, my guess is that won't ever be notable. However, certain game modes found in many games do have their own articles, like deathmatch or Last man standing (video games).
Again, welcome to Wikipedia. I see you've already received praise for editing articles on biology-related stuff, so great job. If you have any question, feel free to ask. I'll try to check your talk page, otherwise you can use the templae {{reply|'username here'}}, and I'll get a notification (or another user will of course too). Kind regards, and happy editing. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK13:36, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I wasn't totally scared of your critical tone but thanks for understanding me too. Agents in valorant have a bunch of abilities (4 to be exact) and they need to be explained (You're not familiar with it so go to the official site and see a couple of agents and you'll get it). And wikipedia always likes to use summary style so this is obviously the better option than making one huge gigantic article. This will take time but who cares (It has so many reliable sources to make it faster)? But could you speak a little bit about the lore part? (Its primary sourced but its accepted and official, thus encyclopedic (but debatable), (Maybe fandom is better for it?)). The game modes could be made one article (A middle between over-summary-style and one huge long intricate article) but if I get large amounts of information I could make them separate.
Note I haven't linked or formatted anything except the official site because you're an experienced wikipedian and I hope you can understand it and because I don't think the talk is important to be of good quality but the articles. PrathuCoder (talk) 15:25, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Soetermans: I would like to be keen to make sure my articles to this topic are not something fan related (Like lore theories or something opinion based). I wouldn't like to be a burden to you but If you could help me it could be great for creating articles for agents. But this article is actually quite suited for fandom more than wikipedia but keeping it encyclopedic would avoid deletion. (It has not happened to the main Valorant article so I think I'm on the safe side). PrathuCoder (talk) 15:34, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Wasell thanks for informing me. I' getting better at this (See the difference between Chlidonophoridae and Chlidonophora incerta). I'm still a new wikipedian and I'm all ears for information from others like you. This was something very important and I thought every taxon has to be italicized. But, do I need to italicize the titles for taxa above genus like family? Also, does taxa above genus mean family and onward or does it also include supergenus and subfamily? PrathuCoder (talk) 12:30, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't overlink
Please don't link words that most English speakers know such as "Germany" "American", "album", etc. See wp:OVERLINK. Also, linking a word to the same article, "Proadiantus" results in the word being bolded, but not linked. Such links are not good practice. See wp:linking. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 13:01, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks for the revertion of incorrect linking. But in pages like Proadiantus, I want `Proadiantus' bolded everywhere, so I linked it. Many others use this and none debate about it. Yet, thanks for the information as I am quite a new wikipedian. PrathuCoder (talk) 13:09, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Deslongchampsithyris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
Likely notable, but relies on a single source throughout, and citations are unclear (please cite inline, not in headings).
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chlidonophorinae and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, PrathuCoder. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chlidonophorinae, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Ampulicidae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sessile. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi PrathuCoder! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 year.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members.
