User talk:PocKleanBot
This bot has been withdrawn and is no longer operatingA minority of editors have expressed views that they disagree with the basic principle of this bot. This bot has therefore been voluntarily withdrawn by its author. - PocklingtonDan 20:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC) spamidea is good, implementation bad. Spamming all editors that ever made some change to an article, bad. I had never been interested in Ball many people have never edited other than doing vandalism revertion. Spamming them is bad (will this extend to other articles? I 've touched several thousand articles doing vandalism revertion and I don't want to be noticed anytime a cleanup tag is slapped into them. -- Drini 03:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
This is a automated to all bot operatorsPlease take a few moments and fill in the data for your bot on Wikipedia:Bots/Status Thank you Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:44, 12 February 2007 (UTC) Automated message to bot ownersAs a result of discussion on the village pump and mailing list, bots are now allowed to edit up to 15 times per minute. The following is the new text regarding bot edit rates from Wikipedia:Bot Policy:
Also, to eliminate the need to spam the bot talk pages, please add Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard to your watchlist. Future messages which affect bot owners will be posted there. Thank you. --Mets501 04:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC) |