Welcome to my user talk page! If I left you a message, please respond on your talk page, and I'll be sure to reply there. Otherwise, start a new section on the bottom of the page and I'll reply as soon as I can!
Hello, I must ask, why did you remove my latest edit to Grenada station? It shows the evolution of the station; one of them shows the first station before getting the 2nd floor addition and the first depot in 1894.
Grenada Station 2nd floor addition April 26, 1926Grenada Freight House 1894 picture taken from where First St. ends at the tracks, facing southwest from the collection of Cliff Downey
There is not enough room in the prose for more than one image, since there is only one paragraph in the history section. Having 5 images in that section was causing formatting issues. If the prose is significantly expanded, more images can eventually be added in. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:15, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your vagueness makes it impossible to discern what you mean. At this point, it's indistinguishable from trolling. Numerous high-quality articles including many GAs and FAs use that template. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:53, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You fool. Yes thwey use that template but not in thew manner that you are using it. Also, I don't believe you. Post some links. The inline version is ALWAYS used with a bullet point. Are you blind and as thick as two short planks! 161.29.202.46 (talk) 00:58, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
MOS:LAYOUTEL does not agree with your claims or edits:
It lists two situations for using inline templates: "Inline" templates are used when box-type templates are not desirable, either because they result in a long sequence of right-aligned boxes hanging off the bottom of the article, or because there are no external links except sister project ones. In many articles, specially shorter ones with infoboxes, the right-aligned boxes problem will occur for viewers in desktop mode. That is why I used the inline template in Central West End station, Stadium–Armory station, and other articles.
Regarding this edit, that MOS section explicitly allows having the commonscat either in the last unelated section, or as the only item in an external links section. I chose the latter because of the right-aligned boxes issue (in this case, images).
It does not specify whether or not the template is to be used with a bullet point. The example does use a bullet point, but it's ambiguous whether that is simply because the example is already part of a list item. The template documentation does not specify either. Lacking explicit guidance, there's no compelling reason to make edits just to change it - and none of your edits have been to add the bullet point anyway. If you feel strongly about it, Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout would be the place to start a discussion.
