Share to: share facebook share twitter share wa share telegram print page

User talk:Phantomsteve/Archives/2015/February


Thanks for that! What's weird about G7 in my opinion is that it goes against WP:OWN. Imagine someone writes an amazing article, then submits it for CSD under G7, wouldn't that be detrimental for the encyclopaedia? Just my curious thoughts on it, and why I usually don't use that one. Thanks again and have a pleasant week, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 15:38, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2015

The Signpost talks with the creator of a grant proposal to create an on-wiki exclusive space for women to discuss issues.
Hundreds of posted jobs offer money to edit Wikipedia. These jobs appear to be thriving, with tens of thousands of dollars changing hands each month.
Media fallout continues from the January 29 decision in the mammoth Gamergate arbitration case.
The American heartland appears to dominate the Report this week, with Chris Kyle leading the Report.
Three featured articles, five featured lists, and thirty-nine featured images were promoted this week.
One case has been closed, two cases remain open, a third is undergoing a review, and three clarification or amendment requests remain open.
A small band of dedicated editors seek to improve articles relating to a less lively topic. If you haven't yet guessed, this week's focus is WikiProject Death.
The Signpost has arranged to mirror Tech news from the Meta-Wiki.
A new Signpost feature.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
98 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C White Knight Chronicles (talk) Please add more sources Add sources
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Time Dance (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Ash, Devon (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Marcus McLaurin (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
19 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Para Para Paradise (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
19 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start White Knight Chronicles (series) (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Brian Thies (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Cleanup
6 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: C Hunjan (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Cleanup
324 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Dolphin (emulator) (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Cleanup
445 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Twinkle Twinkle Little Star (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Expand
47 Quality: High, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: GA White Knight Chronicles II (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more sources Expand
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Margaret Slade (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Expand
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Glossary of American comic book tropes (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Marvel Next (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
19 Quality: High, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: GA Said Ali al-Shihri (talk) Unencyclopaedic
21 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Andrew Smith (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Merge
3,912 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Theodore Roosevelt (talk) Merge
24 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub BT Wi-fi (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more sources Merge
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Forensic Science Society (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Wikify
44 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Icewind Dale: Enhanced Edition (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Wikify
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Walter Van Tilburg Clark (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Wikify
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Yuan Ke (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Smokescreen (Marvel Comics) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Braythorn (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Marvel Absurd (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Marvel Age (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more sources Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Selby (comics) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
46 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Hitbox (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Lloigoroth (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub César Ferioli (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2015

Please take this survey about the Signpost.
Also: GLAM-Wiki Conference; Ombudsman Commission announced; Slovak Wikipedia now has 200,000 articles
Edina edit war illustrates disconnect between new and experienced editors; Wikipedia is "astroturf's dream come true"; Canadian government investigating even more Wikipedia editing; academics on Gamergate as "clash of civilizations"?
Two articles, three lists, and twenty five pictures became featured.
Wikipedia presents itself as a repository for the world, and while that is a noble sentiment, it is still true that, Conservapedian complaints notwithstanding, the English language Wikipedia is very often the American Wikipedia, and never has that been more apparent than this week.
This week, we bring three of the most recently created WikiProjects to come into being on the English Wikipedia. While many long-established projects are becoming inactive, (as we have covered before), that doesn't stop new ones forming every now and then to cover a topic that a group of editors feel should be better cared for.
This week, we feature subjects that are about love of all kinds.

Requesting To Restore the Page "My Movie Productions"

Respected Sir,

      I am Komma Vineeth Kumar, I created a wikipedia page named My Movie Productions. I am requesting you to restore the page as that is a copyright company in India. So, I expect that you will restore the page soon.
                                                                              Thanking You,
                                                                                                      Yours Faithfully,
                                                                                                   Komma Vineeth kumar.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by KommaVineethkumar (talkcontribs) 12:04, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for contacting me. When the page was deleted, it was not because someone thought that the company did not exist.
The reason why it was deleted is that there is no indication that it meets the criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. The article did not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject.
It is of course possible that there is some significant coverage at independent sources which can verify that this new company is important or significant, but as a film production company that is about 5 months old, and with (so far) two productions on YouTube (and another one, a "main film", due to start filming in April), it is perhaps too early to be able to show that it is a notable company yet.
There is also the problem that the way the article was written reads like promotional material. Wikipedia is not a promotional vehicle for new companies or films - it is an encyclopaedia for subjects which are already notable.
The only information about the company that I could find were on your own website/Facebook/Twitter/YouTube - none of which are considered independent and/or reliable sources; I could find no press coverage, or other coverage other than your own work - and as you are one of the people involved directly in the company, you have a clear conflict of interest.
As such, I see no reason why the page is about a subject which should be in Wikipedia at this time, and so I will not be restoring the page. Regards, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:12, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2015

Go Phightins! shares his thoughts on admin attrition and the size of the administrative backlog.
The Australian ("Wikipedia not destroying life as we know it", February 11) and Times Higher Education ("Wikipedia should be 'better integrated' into teaching", February 10) reported on a recent study performed at Monash University, titled "Students’ use of Wikipedia as an academic resource – patterns of use and perceptions of usefulness".
The authors of this report inform us that the "goal in the Revision Scoring project is to do the hard work of constructing and maintaining powerful AI so that tool developers don't have to. This cross-lingual, machine learning classifier service for edits will support new wiki tools that require edit quality measures."
Darwin Day is observed annually on February 12 to commemorate the life and work of scientist Charles Darwin. Here is a selection of images of life on the Galápagos Islands, where Darwin made key observations leading to his scientific theory of evolution by natural selection.
This week saw the 57th Annual Grammy Awards (#13 on the Top 25) held on 8 February dominating the traffic chart, as music lovers checked out Sam Smith (#3) picking up four awards, Beck taking album of the year, and performances including Sia (#9), Madonna (#11), and Annie Lennox (#16). But Valentine's Day (#1) proved the perfect time for the release of Fifty Shades of Grey, with the movie coming in at #5, the book of the same name at #2, and the primary actors at #14 and #15.
Five pictures, six lists, and seventeen pictures were promoted
The most significant item on ArbCom's agenda this fortnight has been the closure of the Wifione case and subsequent fallout, although the fallout from GamerGate continues to linger.

Ivan Rusilko/Dr Ivan Rusilko Page Deleted

Hello, I'm writing to ask for reinstatement of the article for Dr. Ivan Rusilko that was recently deleted, citing 'unambiguous promotion' as the cause for removal. Would you be willing to "userfy" the recently deleted article so that it can be revised to meet Wiki's content standards? Thank you for your consideration. MichaStone (talk) 05:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Before I deleted the article, I checked the provided sources/references. Several of them did not work, and most of those that did work were either press releases (which are not considered to be independent), or from sources which did not appear to meet the reliable source standard, or consisting of WP:Interviews of Ivan about himself - which would be neither neutral nor independent.
As such, I saw nothing that would be able to be "saved" from the article as it stood. The various contributors appear to have a close personal connection with Rusilko, and as such are creating an article for the wrong reason - they should not create an article for their friend or employer (see conflict of interest).
Personally, I see nothing in the deleted article that would justify userfying it, and so on this occasion, I am declining your request. Regards, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 18:21, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

A report from the external research firm Lafayette Practice has declared that the Wikimedia Foundation is the "largest known participatory grantmaking fund." Several concerns have been raised with the report, the phrase being used (participatory grantmaking), the now-former Wikipedia article on that phrase, and an alleged conflict of interest by WMF staff members.
Doc James tells us that "The one good thing that has come out of all of this is that Wikipedia’s content passing a major textbook publisher review processes is some external validation of Wikipedia’s quality."
Andrew McMillen's February 3 profile of and his quest to rid Wikipedia of the phrase "comprised of" has been one of the most widely circulated and commented upon media stories about the encyclopedia recently.
Eleven articles and twenty pictures were promoted in the week covered by this report.
The Gallery is an occasional Signpost feature highlighting quality images and articles from Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons based on a particular theme, as well as an article you could help improve. This week, we feature subjects that are "far from home".
An odd juxtaposition this week, as interest in Fifty Shades of Grey coincided with the observance of the Chinese New Year and the annual festival of penance, Ash Wednesday.
A monthly roundup of Wikimedia-related research
This week's project is on a youth activity, one of the largest in the world; its project is commensurately large, containing around 136 active editors. It's WikiProject Scouting, a group of editors whose remit is everything relating to the Scouting movement, which has around 42 million members worldwide and celebrated the centenary of its founding only eight years ago.
Editor's note: the Blog will be a recurring Signpost section that will highlight a recent post from the Wikimedia blog, run by the Wikimedia Foundation. This week's installment is written by Philippe Beaudette, the Foundation's Director of Community Advocacy, and focuses on planning for the future of the Wikimedia movement.

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

A report from the external research firm Lafayette Practice has declared that the Wikimedia Foundation is the "largest known participatory grantmaking fund." Several concerns have been raised with the report, the phrase being used (participatory grantmaking), the now-former Wikipedia article on that phrase, and an alleged conflict of interest by WMF staff members.
Doc James tells us that "The one good thing that has come out of all of this is that Wikipedia’s content passing a major textbook publisher review processes is some external validation of Wikipedia’s quality."
Andrew McMillen's February 3 profile of and his quest to rid Wikipedia of the phrase "comprised of" has been one of the most widely circulated and commented upon media stories about the encyclopedia recently.
Eleven articles and twenty pictures were promoted in the week covered by this report.
The Gallery is an occasional Signpost feature highlighting quality images and articles from Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons based on a particular theme, as well as an article you could help improve. This week, we feature subjects that are "far from home".
An odd juxtaposition this week, as interest in Fifty Shades of Grey coincided with the observance of the Chinese New Year and the annual festival of penance, Ash Wednesday.
A monthly roundup of Wikimedia-related research
This week's project is on a youth activity, one of the largest in the world; its project is commensurately large, containing around 136 active editors. It's WikiProject Scouting, a group of editors whose remit is everything relating to the Scouting movement, which has around 42 million members worldwide and celebrated the centenary of its founding only eight years ago.
Editor's note: the Blog will be a recurring Signpost section that will highlight a recent post from the Wikimedia blog, run by the Wikimedia Foundation. This week's installment is written by Philippe Beaudette, the Foundation's Director of Community Advocacy, and focuses on planning for the future of the Wikimedia movement.
Prefix: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia

Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya