User talk:Partofthemachine/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Partofthemachine. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi there. I saw you changed a long-standing redirect into a stub article, and then someone proposed its deletion. Since the topic has been stale for 15 years apparently, it's unlikely the article has WP:POTENTIAL. If you want to re-create it, please discuss it on the relevant Talk pages. If you need any help, please don't hesitate to reply on my Talk page. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 16:06, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Carrot official. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of unicameral legislatures".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 18:34, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:IPhone Calculator.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:01, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IPhone Calculator.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (Ring me) 00:48, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

This is almost completely unsourced. As in, it's not missing references for a few statements, it's missing references for 99% of all text. Please don't put this into mainspace until sourcing requirements are met. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

I realize this notice should not have gone to you but to the editor who created the unreferenced version. Copying there. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Italian football clubs established in 1967 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:05, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:X1/dshjfhjfjhdkfjhdsfjhkdfjfdjhkfdfdhdsfhjdkdfhjklfdhjkdf, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:29, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Partofthemachine,

Please review Wikipedia:Redirect#Purposes of redirects. It is not helpful to make a redirect for every possible misspelling of a name. And if there is an article on Alexa Dectis, it makes no sense to create a redirect at Alexa Dectis (actor) because readers will just search for her name, Alexa Dectis, and are unlikely to add "actor" to their search terms. Redirects should be for alternative names & terms that readers might search for, not more complicated versions of their names. Wikipedia:Redirect has a lot of helpful information that will be useful if you choose to spend time on this editing task. You might also visit Redirects for Discussion where editors discuss whether questionable redirects should be kept or deleted. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:58, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Partofthemachine, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 05:59, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

will restore Talk Page Access so that user may request unblocking here. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:18, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Partofthemachine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

(Note: This is largely copied from a previous appeal that I was not able to post on the talk page.)

I would like to take this opportunity to appeal the indefinite block I was given in April 2021. The reason I was blocked was primarily because of two factors. First, I nominated a largely legitimate user subpage for deletion because I disliked the user that created it. I now recognize that this was immature and a waste of editors' time. Second, I created user pages and user talk pages for new users even though this was not necessary, because those users can create pages of their own. Because it has now been over a year since I was blocked, I request to be unblocked per WP:SO. Partofthemachine (talk) 21:12, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Accept reason:

No objections to giving this user another chance. Graham87 06:43, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

You forgot the part from your UTRS ticket where you described what constructive edits you would make. No unblock request is complete without that. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:52, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

(Again mostly from the UTRS ticket.) I will engage in making mostly the same types of edits that I was making prior to April 2021 (aside from the ones that are considered unconstructive obviously), such as grammar fixes, topics related to programming and mathematics, and AFD discussions. Partofthemachine (talk) 01:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

• Inclined to unblock. @Graham87: What say you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:21, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Yeah I guess there's no harm in giving an unblock a go. Done. Graham87 06:43, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm LaundryPizza03. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Technobabble, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:00, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

While buzzfeed.com is not considered reliable, Buzzfeed News is.

Just an FYI. Cheers. Mr. Swordfish (talk) 21:12, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect "I invented email" guy and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 5#"I invented email" guy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Clovermoss (talk) 02:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

		Short Description Barnstar
		I know we didn't see eye to eye with the Indigenous science article a couple months back. But after reviewing your edits I got really interested in the short description wikiproject. It has been so much fun! Thanks for introducing this to me and for all the work you put into Wikipedia. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 08:53, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

PS Look into applying for AutoWikiBrowser privileges, it makes doing these short descriptions at scale a breeze. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 08:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

This is the only message I will leave here. I have very politely asked you to stay off my talk page. That is a perfectly normal request and on Wikipedia it is expected to be respected. I have been around on Wikipedia for a great many years and there are 629 people watching my talk page, there are 24,059 links to it and 2,733 editors have contributed to it. In 16 years you are only the 4th person I have asked to stay away. Take my advice, you have already invited sanctions and you are continuing to step on our policies. Enjoy your editing but do try avoid being a Wiki policeman until you have a lot more experience. Maybe Chris troutman is the person to ask, he's as experienced as I am - perhaps more so. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:09, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Partofthemachine, Kudpung is right when he says that the norm on Wikipedia is that when an editor bans you from their talk page, you stay away forever. I, myself, have been banned by two other editors from their talk pages (each about five years ago) and I respect their requests. If you have questions ask me but leave Kudpung out of this. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:51, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

I don't know why you think I have an issue with doing that. Another user requested that I avoid his talk page about a year ago and I haven't commented there since. Partofthemachine (talk) 03:56, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

This is the last comment I will make about this situation: I don't have anything against Kudpung, and I agree that he was right in discouraging the user in question from starting an RfA. I just think it would have been better if he had just linked to WP:NOTNOW instead of saying he would need to wait 3 years before even thinking about becoming an admin. Partofthemachine (talk) 23:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Elizium23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Masonic conspiracy theories, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 20:17, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Masonic conspiracy theories, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 20:45, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

The article Readlink has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTMANUAL and fails WP:N.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 10:10, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Readlink is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Readlink until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 16:04, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Partofthemachine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:5th Reserve Battalion, CEF, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Partofthemachine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Electric Universe (pseudoscience), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Partofthemachine,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 03:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 03:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Category:Templates that must be substituted has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^Clyde!_Franklin! 00:26, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Not sure what you meant by "involved editor" - you weren't referring to me were you? Doug Weller talk 09:45, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

I meant the editor who was mentioned in the thread, User:Zahamey. In hindsight I could have phrased that more clearly. Partofthemachine (talk) 17:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello Partofthemachine. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Voice of the People Party (Meghalaya), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply in draftspace. Thank you. Salvio ^giuliano 10:06, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Template:Display Servers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:32, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Template:Display managers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:34, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

The page XVisitors.com has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:47, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello. I'm leaving you this message to let you know that I've removed your Good Article nomination at The Low End Theory. It appears you have not substantially contributed to this article before nominating it. While "drive-by" nominations have always been discouraged, there is now a consensus that they are subject to removal without review. The relevant discussion can be found here, and any further questions can be posted at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations. I see that you're a fairly experienced editor, but I would suggest nominating articles where you're the primary contributor so you can get a better grasp of the Good Article process. I wish you luck if you choose to do so! Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello Partofthemachine. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of 2006 Vegalta Sendai season, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. BangJan1999 00:36, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to User talk:94.175.67.165: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. –DMartin 05:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

You are creating a massive Streisand effect with your G10 nominations. Please reconsider your G10 tagging and deletion requests for user and user talk pages that have not been edited for years, it's just shining a spotlight on them and feeding the trolls.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:29, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Keep in mind that many of these pages show up in the search results for these users. Partofthemachine (talk) 00:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

You have to be specifically looking for them, and even then, G10 rarely applies as the pages created are not attack pages (which makes G10 inapplicable), it's the user names that are disruptive. If you want usernames from over a decade ago removed, they would need to be globally oversighted, but again the Streisand effect comes into play. With your most recent declined request, you've now created an MFD, which puts the name smack in the forefront and across multiple recent change lists and logs. While I understand your intentions, you are accomplishing the opposite of what you're trying to achieve.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:25, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

See Talk:Mikhail_Tolstykh#Edit_request why this is wrong to use in Wikipedia. NadVolum (talk) 21:19, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello Partofthemachine. Please, avoid adding {{Sockpuppet}} tags yourself. As the template documentation explains, this template should only be applied by Administrators or Clerks as part of the Sockpuppet investigations process. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 16:13, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Partofthemachine,

You've been asked by MarioGom, not to mess around with sockpuppet tags on User pages but you are still editing them. I think you should just heed Mario's words and let them be, they don't need modification by you. And I don't think you should be editing the Long-term abuse list either but I'll leave that matter to the clerks and CUers. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:15, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Partofthemachine,

I have a request to ask. When you are tagging pages for deletion, please post a notification on the talk page of the page creator letting them know of the deletion tagging. I see that you use Twinkle, which is great, but check your Twinkle Preferences and make sure that the box stating "Notify page creator" is checked off. It should then be checked off every time you tag a page for any type of deletion, CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/MFD/etc. but it doesn't hurt to double-check and make sure it is checked. It's just best practices for editors who do patrolling so I'd appreciate you adopting this habit. Many thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:08, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

I generally do, but this particular draft was created by a long-term abuser that creates drafts with nonsense text (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gsthae with tempo!), and they clearly already know that their pages are eligible for speedy deletion. Partofthemachine (talk) 21:44, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Thierry Coquand at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

On 14 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thierry Coquand, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Thierry Coquand won a SIGPLAN award for his eponymous proof assistant Coq, which was used to find a formal proof of the four color theorem? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thierry Coquand. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Thierry Coquand), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

In this diff I reverted edits to your user page since they seemed to be offensive. I just wanted to let you know, since it would be rude of me to revert edits to your Talk Page without letting you know. If you, for whatever reason, want to restore those edits, please feel free to do so. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)^{My Talk Page} 15:38, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

FYI, this is a persistent sockpuppeteer known as WP:LTA/CRZ. All of their accounts should be reported to WP:AIV on sight. Partofthemachine (talk) 15:39, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)^{My Talk Page} 15:40, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Do you want me to semiprotect your user talk page? PhilKnight (talk) 15:49, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

That would probably be for the best. Partofthemachine (talk) 15:52, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

I have now semiprotected your page. PhilKnight (talk) 15:59, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

I've opened a sockpuppet investigation into this, and the suspected sockmaster is MKJKEK. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/MKJKEK. Thanks for helping to revert the content removal! 747pilot (talk) 00:40, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

I appreciate your enthusiasm, but before you tagged Eric Lerner with pseudoscience banners, did you read the talk history/archives and those of the plasma cosmology article? There is a long recurring debate going back to about 2004. Jon (talk) 02:05, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Please read the edit summary on my most recent edit to Talk:Eric Lerner. Plasma cosmology (and for the record, the talk page for that article has the exact same CT template) does not have the explanatory power that the Big Bang cosmology does, which is why it hasn't been the subject of serious research for decades. Partofthemachine (talk) 03:30, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

I'm aware of both your edit summary and what you believe, which is why I thought discussing it here would be better than engaging in edit-warring. Not that PC has all the answers either, but I always find it interesting when folks talk about explanatory power, yet we have all these pesky 8σ and Hubble tensions, Lithium problems, mature JWST galaxies at z > 10, missing dark matter, missing baryons, missing dwarf galaxies, missing halos, missing Pop-III stars, too much early LSS, too many free parameters, and so on. But that's not what's really at issue; I think you should re-read the 2006 arbcom decision. If anything PC is an attempt at an alternative theoretical formulation (with a very small following) rather than any attempt to subvert or reject science per se. The folks who were black-and-white labelling and condemning things without discussion were variously cautioned, blocked and banned, regardless of whether they were right. This is also why I now focus on articles about wine and musical instruments :) — Jon (talk) 22:35, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Category:Italian football clubs established in 1960 has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. S.A. Julio (talk) 16:26, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page True vertical depth, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi there i need help with something do you mind helping me? DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 22:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

I'm willing to help you, but I would have preferred it if you had just stated the specific thing you want help with in your initial message. Partofthemachine (talk) 22:39, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Partofthemachine,

Just an FYI but redirects are done differently on category pages than on article main space pages. See Category:Proto-punk songs and look at the code on the page. If this code isn't used, then the categories show up on the Empty Category list to be deleted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:10, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Matticusmadness has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Linking TROUT into the ‘The Destroyer of the Wiki’ Barnstar. So simple, but so so brilliant, that I wish I’d thought of it myself. Well played. MM (Communicate?) ^(Operations) 11:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

I thought i was trying to edit without publishing, the code is the main thing I'm interested in understanding. Sorry, both edits were purely immature, albeit rhetorically 2603:6000:AD00:3D13:142C:ED7A:569D:FF44 (talk) 05:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

WP:SANDBOX. Partofthemachine (talk) 05:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

You can also click "preview" instead of "publish". Partofthemachine (talk) 05:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Hey @Partofthemachine, thanks for reverting vandalism! I wonder if you are interested in our ongoing study for anti-vandal patrollers. The study aims to evaluate AI models that power recent change filters, Huggle, SWViewer, and many other anti-vandal tools. Your feedback can be really helpful! If you're interested, please check out our recruitment page for more information. Thank you for your consideration! Tzusheng (talk) 03:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi Machine, I tried to add the LN sources (I have them if you need) on one of the articles but the table kept showing on the manga section. P.S, those edits were not vandalism and I'm aware that you reverted them. --2603:7000:4001:8BBA:5C9E:E3A6:39CC:69A7 (talk) 18:50, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi. These two terms do not mean the same thing. The former usually refers to a social group with unusual beliefs or norms. The latter refers to an idealized public image of a person. The category cult leaders is for the former, not the latter. StephenMacky1 (talk) 20:34, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Worse yet, Partofthemachine, you need to refer to WP:BRD. You are already headed towards edit warring on two different articles. Feel free to discuss rather than face WP:ANEW. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Partofthemachine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My university's wireless network randomly assigns users to IP addresses, many of which are hard-blocked. This makes it inconvenient to edit. Partofthemachine (talk) 01:21, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You haven't provided your IP address so this claim can be looked into. If you don't want to post the IP publicly, please use WP:UTRS to provide it privately- or just contact a checkuser directly, please see WP:IPECPROXY. 331dot (talk) 08:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The redirect Gluglug has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 16 § Gluglug until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:38, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

The redirect Libiquity Taurinus has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 16 § Libiquity Taurinus until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kuroko Shirai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuroko Shirai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Deauthorized. ^(talk) 18:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Why have you reverted my edit on the IEA? The previous source is the NY Times, the source I used was a journal published by the American Association of University Professors. Alexanderkowal (talk) 22:19, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

On 30 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Iribe Center, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the University of Maryland's Iribe Center was partly funded by a businessman who dropped out of the university? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Iribe Center. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Iribe Center), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Partofthemachine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of longest Jeopardy! winning streaks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:10, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Partofthemachine. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of longest Jeopardy! winning streaks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:49, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

The redirect Alozno Church has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 4 § Alozno Church until a consensus is reached. Bearcat (talk) 19:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 08:59, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

The redirect Jokestress has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 29 § Jokestress until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

The redirect David Szymanski has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 10 § David Szymanski until a consensus is reached. Di (they-them) (talk) 18:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

The redirect FitMC has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 4 § FitMC until a consensus is reached. E_F⁵ 22:41, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi, your AfD closure was improper as it short-circuited the rename that was supported by a lot of the people voicing so at the AfD - Per instructions - Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Procedure_for_non-administrator_close_(nominator_withdrawal) - if all other viewpoints expressed were for Keep and doing so does not short-circuit an ongoing discussion. Raladic (talk) 03:48, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Category:Execution sites in England and Wales has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 16:35, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Category:LessWrong has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 21:06, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

The redirect Have you tried turning it off and on again has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 28 § Have you tried turning it off and on again until a consensus is reached. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 17:31, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Category:Duns Scotus has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 19:13, 13 May 2025 (UTC)