User talk:PartheshPatel

Hi PartheshPatel! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rutvik Oza.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! abhishek singh (talk) 12:28, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rutvik Oza.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Cerebellum (talk) 21:58, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

some advice: try condensing it to the most important work. DGG ( talk ) 01:15, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rutvik Oza.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson (talk!) 02:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Oza Rutwik, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Please provide WP:RS to back the text or stop reverting the edit. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:40, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 18:38, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Oza Rutvik shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 18:40, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Rutvik Oza. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:16, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bollywood Hungama seems to be an appropriate source for verification. Duly referred to. --PartheshPatel (talk) 16:25, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bollywood Hungama does not even source half the entries you're adding. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:31, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm seeing you've added Oza to many film articles without any proper sourcing. These have all been removed. What is your connection to him? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:43, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Added only the credits that are mentioned at Bollywood Hungama. Is it now acceptable? --PartheshPatel (talk) 16:54, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's better. You still have not explained your connection with the subject. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:05, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Rutvik Oza has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:53, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]