User talk:PPEMES/Archives/2019/September
![]() Hello, PPEMES. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Landgraviate of Alsace. In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:18, 7 September 2019 (UTC) Category:Phaleristics has been nominated for discussion![]() Category:Phaleristics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 22:14, 14 September 2019 (UTC) Category:Catholic priests convicted of failure to report of sexual abuse has been nominated for discussion![]() Category:Catholic priests convicted of failure to report of sexual abuse, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:19, 23 September 2019 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Processional pole (September 28)![]() This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was:
Nothing much has changed since the last time. I don't see WP:SIGCOV needed for a separate article from Procession, like it was said. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
|