User talk:PC78/Archive 2015

This is an archive of past discussions with User:PC78. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Scarisbrick (surname), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.scarisbrick.org.uk/name.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Sorry - I must have missclicked I did not even know I had done it. Best wishes, (Msrasnw (talk) 22:54, 11 May 2015 (UTC))

No problem, there's no harm done. Thanks for letting me know. PC78 (talk) 06:38, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Chinese has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 10:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Category:Biography articles without persondata, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:43, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Template:Infobox SMS station has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox Station. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Nima Farid (talk) 17:51, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

I thought you might know what this is about. See the editor's recent contribution history. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:12, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

No idea. Looks a bit odd and I don't know what they means by "safe version", but so far as I can see they mostly appear to be reverting their own contributions. Hopefully you can get a response from the user in question. PC78 (talk) 13:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Listed buildings in Scarisbrick, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cladding and Keystone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charlesworth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Charlesworth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I'm not sure what this edit achieved. It would appear from the lack of red changed text that all you did was add 142 spaces. If that was the case, and I'm sure there is a good reason why, perhaps a slightly clearer edit summary might help other editors attempting to understand your motives? Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 09:20, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

@Martin of Sheffield: Sorry, but it was such a trivial edit that I didn't feel it was necessary. I added the spaces for the benefit of anyone copy & pasting the template syntax, so they don't have to be added manually when filling out the parameters. PC78 (talk) 16:28, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

That's OK, I thought there would be a good reason. I just spent a couple of minutes hunting for the change to see what had been altered. Spaces don't show up! Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 18:45, 4 December 2015 (UTC)