User talk:Open3215

Welcome!

Hello, Open3215, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Herostratus (talk) 06:54, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved this out of main article into your userspace, it is now at User:Open3215/Bhaskar Mukherjee prefix:Wikipedia:Deletion review. This text was not place in the proper place.

What are your trying to do here? Can I offer you some assistance? Herostratus (talk) 06:54, 16 March 2011 (UTC)w[reply]

postings from User:Open3215/Bhaskar Mukherjee prefix:Wikipedia:Deletion review moved here: Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:09, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If outstanding contriubution is a criteria for deletion, let find the policy of wiki clearly. Some way there is one biographical source, IBC, England in where the name of Bhaskar Mukherjee included. It is not the fault of biographer tyhat some one either spam or not spam select his her name. There are so many name which wiki kept without having sufficient reason to maintain. Dr. Bhaskar Mukherjee have enough contribution to the field and have very excellent scholarly publication so far. A teacher or a research have recognization by his articles, work etc. not but attending various seminar only. Let wiki decide which policy is correct before delete any page. I feel they are paying biasness towards some one on whom they personally have no knowledge. IN THE LAST 15 YEARS NO LIBRARY PROFESSIONAL IN INDIA HAVE AN ARTICLE IN JOURNALS LIKE JASIST, IF IT IS NOT ENOUGH, Dr. Mukherjee have also works in Library & Information Science Research, IFLA Journal, Scientometrics, Journal of Academic Librarainship. His work has been published by Chandos, Cambridge. Is all are not sufficient to understand Dr. Mukherjee'w work is not spam. I don't know who are the people put such non-sence comments before delete. So, strongly recommend to reistead the page by admn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Open3215 (talk • contribs)

Before attempting to recreate this article, please read over the notability guidelines for academics, they are significantly stricter than other biographical articles. If you disagree with these guidelines, suggest changes over at the talk page there. This article has been deleted several times and a discussion was completed with a number of concerns brought up. The latest version of this article did not address those conerns, particularly how often this person's articles have been cited by other scholars. The bar is significantly higher for academics, thats just the way it is. Repeated recreation of this article is not going unnoticed and its not going to change either the notability guidelines or the opinion of other editors who have issues with this article. The attempt to circumvent Wikipedia creation protection on the article by putting it in all caps also did not go unnoticed. If you feel this person can meet notability guidelines, create the article under your user space and then ask for help. Another editor, maybe and admin, maybe someone else, will review it and help you get it to a point where it can meet notability guidelines if possible.--RadioFan (talk) 12:04, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on BHASKAR MUKHERJEE, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhaskar Mukherjee. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. RadioFan (talk) 11:25, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Open3215. You have new messages at RadioFan's talk page.
Message added 12:09, 18 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, Open3215. You have new messages at RadioFan's talk page.
Message added 11:00, 22 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]