Sorry for comment deletion, but I have seen administrator Ryulong do this all the time.Miesbu 16:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thank you for your valuable guidance and wisdom —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cerf62 (talk • contribs)
--nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 21:26, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, I would like to nominate you as an administrator, would you consider doing the job? Tim Vickers 18:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
It's no big deal, just a few extra functions. We're going to need more admins with an interest in CSD when IP page creation is re-enabled! Have a read of Wikipedia:Administrators and tell me what you think. Tim Vickers 18:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
OK, no problem. I think personally that all editors we can trust not to vandalise and to act in a responsible manner should be admins, but I recognise that my criteria are a bit wider than most. The idea of adminship being an "award" is one I'm unhappy with, it's just a software upgrade after all. Anyway, all the best and happy editing. Tim Vickers 02:34, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
It was supposed to be in userspace, not mainspace. Oops! I restored it to the proper place. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 12:14, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Don't give him another chance, block him indefinatly! Do you not understand that he insulted me?Green Kirby 04:02, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
I was trying to clean up the vandalism. I saw pagemove vandalism, and I reverted it. Then I tried to request the that redirect for deletion.--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 12:33, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey I noticed your user pages are getting hit with a lot of vandalism would you like them to be semi-protected for a little while. Gnangarra 13:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I appreciate you trying to keep this discussion civil, but if I get accused of libel and vandalism for just correcting the spelling of one word....if I don't stand on principle here, there will be no copy editors left on Wikipedia. -Animesouth 22:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey I'm trying! Sorry about being mean to the bot, I was only preparing myself for the upcoming Hate for the Sake of Hating Day, and I guess I took it out on a robot... Thanks for fixing the fair use on the picture! Tubeyes 12:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you fixing my user page when it vandalized. I noticed you already had several anti-vandalism barnstars, so I decided that one for sheer diligence was needed. Keep up the good work. Also, you are qualified to recieve a service badge:
You can change it a ribbon, book, or userbox if you like. Thanks again! Asarelah 17:56, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Um, could you stop reverting everything I edit? Just because you can't find it on Google doesn't make it untrue. Tilting their heads slightly to the left 14:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you corrected something I edited on the Michael Jordan article, and then sent me a warning about neutral writing. I just wanted to let you know my perspective on the whole thing. I was simply trying to clean up over-qualification of a superlative by taking out "one of." The fact that 'widely considered' is included in the sentence removes any doubt about neutrality--it's a factual statement that "Michael Jordan is widely considered the greatest basketball player of all time." It's not a violation of neutrality to include pop opinions in Wikipedia, as long as they are labeled as such (i.e. "widely considered"). It would be a violation of neutrality to say "Michael Jordan is the greatest basketball player of all time," but that's not what I did. I have no animus towards you, and I respect the fact that you take your hobby so seriously, but you came across as a little overbearing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.79.132.178 (talk)
Oh ok I see now. Sorry for bugging you about that, no need to check the history. :S (Terra Xin (talk) 16:40, 20 November 2007 (UTC))
Thanks! :) Take Care...NeutralHomer T:C 00:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! Mysdaao talk 13:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
shown bad faith by editing the discussion and moving my comments from where I put them. Jerem43
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=174172590&oldid=174170706
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=174176255
Jeremy blamed my relocation of his comment from the top of my report. He said my valid relocation is too problematic to file another report, then I gave him the same opportunity. --Appletrees (talk) 12:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Please think about "good faith". I forgot the signing, and in case, a bot might've usually filled that kind of missing info.--Appletrees (talk) 13:10, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I am having a hard time understanding some of what you've written, but I'm in no way trying to insult your English. It's far better than my Korean, German, or French will ever be. Your addition at the top seemed strange, and it seemed like you were doing it to intentionally annoy him because he did it to you. I'm sorry for not assuming good faith, but that's what it seemed like to me. Whatever you're intentions were, it was inappropriate to add your own unsigned comments at the top of what he had written, especially in the same format as the rest of what he'd written. I moved it, and I'd move it again if you replaced it in the same manner. That's the end of my involvement here. --Onorem♠Dil 14:02, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
It's very kind of you even to consider doing this for those folks. I'm going to email you a copy of the last revision to the page prior to the MfD, and you may use it for the purpose you've described. I don't want to restore it anyway on WP, since it does appear to be advertorial. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 13:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey Onorem,
I sent you an e-mail on Tuesday about an interview for my thesis on Wikipedia. Let me know if you'd be able to participate. I'd really love to talk with you about your experiences!
Jkomoros (talk) 17:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
At this time, I'm not planning on having an e-mail based survey as part of my research, although if that changes, I'll be sure to let you know! Thanks for your wish of good luck!
Jkomoros 19:51, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey there, thanks for catching that vandalism! Much appreciated! :) GlassCobra 14:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
An article you prodded has been contested by the original article creator and subsequently listed at WP:AFD. If you still have any opinion about the article, please feel free to weight in at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baint. --Allen3 talk 13:38, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
BATTY BOY —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fellowger (talk • contribs)
Hi, Onorem. On the World wrestling professionals page you stated that my article is lacking 'notability'. What exactly does this mean, as I stated in the tags that it is 'a South African wrestling promotion'?
David --Ajstyles tna roh (talk) 13:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for keeping such a vigilant eye on the vandals and reverting my user page so quickly! Much appreciated :-) --Storkk (talk) 13:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Well, I saw that he/she had a lot of warnings and a few blocks, and they are told not to delete the sandbox header, so I thought naturally it was just petty vandalism. But fair enough, I see what you mean.
regards; Cf38 (talk) 17:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi Onorem
Sorry for vandalising your user page. My friend paid me.
Nice page though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tdawe (talk • contribs)
Ohhhhh, snap! :D - Arcayne (cast a spell) 13:16, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
What's up with that? Why are the links in the Colleen Brady page "so called" in your opinion? IrishLass (talk) 14:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads-up on that.--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 16:00, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
very much for cleaning up my userpage several times! --Oxymoron83 16:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
You discussed and pointed out my reverts over the SofV's edits that I, shall we say, had issues with over the misunderstanding of how the pages were found. That issue was worked out but it brought the revert issue to my attention and I'd like your opinion. Earlier I reverted edits to The Shield back to a more concise summary per User:Xihr. Then I, in 100% good faith/experience removed some extra / (forward slashes) from some break indicators as part of clean up. Xirh reverted the removal of the slashes. I asked why and got the following [1], to be told to only make constructive edits. Now, this comes down to the point you made about reverting legitimate edits. I would like you opinion. KellyAna (talk) 01:54, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
I've made some tender little folk upset lately. Any ideas on who the vandal was? - Arcayne (cast a spell) 13:15, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
And yet again, I thank you. :D --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:40, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the squacketball afd!!!Archer3 (talk) 16:04, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Please stop reverting the La Plata High School wiki page, as your information is wrong, not cited, and incorrect. This school was established in 1927, the picture is a picture of the school. All of the other information is correct, you are not even bothering to read it, what you are doing, sir, is vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSilentJanks (talk • contribs) 19:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
why'd you delete A City Warning? They meet WP:BAND. They have a RECORDING CONTRACT therefore they are notable. City warming (talk) 12:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
sorry to bother you, but i was casually browsing wikipedia like you do, and i decided to amuse myself by looking up slang words, again like you do, and i curiously typed in "brap" and i came to an odd to say the least, divert to an angel page. interested, i went and had a look at the history and it said you were the last to edit the page, and it seems that you reverted it back to this divert. now i have no doubt this is a valid edit, and even if it was last edited back in july 2007 (a long time ago now), i was just wondering if you knew what brap meant, and its references to popular culture at the moment. if you are, then wouldn't it be a wise idea to at least add a disambigued note at the top linking to the slang page? if you aren't entirely sure what it means, then just have a look back at past edits on that page, you will find it correct. i just wanted to ask for reasons why you kept that page on a divert, just incase there was a fully valid reason before i started to edit the page. Thanks again, Random articles (talk) 14:37, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
For intervening on my Talk page. There's a group of editors on the Waterboarding whose behavior has been less than exemplary, and they've followed me home. I would hope that of all the pages on Wikipedia, I could expect to avoid an edit war on my own Talk page. I'd appreciate it if you'd look in on the Talk:Waterboarding page every now and then. Thanks again. Neutral Good (talk) 01:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
how do you know the rumour was not true?
Do you even know who Noel Fielding is? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.237.179 (talk) 14:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out deletion use on user pages, wasn't aware of this but will follow your advice. I've got a small issue with one contributor who has listed on Dec 23, 2007 some rather inappropriate comments on my Shaun Wilson page. Can you take a look at the x4 "stewarthill" edits and advise what the Wiki policy is on these matters to stop further disruptions. With thanks. Doug Church. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug church (talk • contribs) 15:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for helping clean up that guy's vandal welcomes. =) --slakr\ talk / 04:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
It is actually the official site that is formatted as soapcentral.com and why the bold is as it is. It is respectful to the site we reference. KellyAna (talk) 04:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Dude (and I hope I'm right saying dude) you're are really a good guy!! KellyAna (talk) 05:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
I need several people to come to the "Horton Family" to help us decide if changes in the articles are to be made. Will you come and help us? Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horton_family Genevieve-Tamerlaine (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 05:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Spring Thomas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:29, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
