User talk:OnlyNano/Archives/2024/February

This is an archive of past discussions with User:OnlyNano. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi there! You might want to read the page linked in the title of this message. Welcome to Wikipedia! Remsense留 23:17, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the help! That's quite a nifty page! '''Wiki''' (talk) 23:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

(As such, I recommend you remove the specific mention of your school and request its removal from the edit history here.) Remsense留 01:30, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

I put it there as it's not the name of the school I am at now, just a wilderness therapy program I went to a bit ago. I would say it's not enough information to identify who I actually am. OnlyNano (talk) 17:52, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi OnlyNano! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! TheTeam219 (talk)

Hello OnlyNano,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Duelbits for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CoconutOctopus talk 17:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I migrated the page contents to Draft:Duelbits, so everything's all set. OnlyNano 17:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, you reverted my edit about buZ blurrs death on his page. His family posted an update today on his instagram account about his passing (https://www.instagram.com/p/C2kfRGrrvHD/?igsh=MW82a3o1cmV5dDNrOQ==) Could you please undo the change please. Thanks 85.23.153.123 (talk) 17:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Sadly, I am going to have to say no. There are no reliable sources (such as news articles) pointing to that he died today, except the Instagram link. We'll have to wait until a reliable source that confirms his death date. Regards, OnlyNano 17:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Is there anything you want to explain here? Don't wait too long. Drmies (talk) 19:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Hey Drmies, I'd urge you to look at my user page, here, for the public network notice. The school I attend has a single IP address for several public computers.

Please note: I use a public WiFi network, with multiple other devices which may use or edit Wikipedia articles. I confirm that I am familiar with Wikipedia's policy on using multiple accounts and this account will not be used for sock puppetry.

The account username reveals to me their personal identity, so I will have a discussion with school admins about this. OnlyNano 19:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

How can we resolve this issue, as I hope my contributions show that I have no mal-intent... OnlyNano 19:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

So it's a pure coincidence that you are reverting the edit of a schoolmate? Drmies (talk) 19:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

I'm going to try and explain everything in one message, and just move on, I don't see the value in arguing over this, and I feel like some pretty large accusations are being thrown at me.

1. Why would I create an account on Wikipedia, contribute almost every day, making all constructive edits, just to throw it all away by making a sock puppet account that gets banned in minutes.

- Why would I revert my own edits? I believe you could check admin logs (if possible) to show that both accounts were logged in at the same time, so at least I would have to have two computers...

2. I put a public IP warning, which should show there are other, possibly older, accounts, though I don't know who has a Wikipedia account, of course.

3. My school is not a large school, I heard when they were banned, and talked to school administrators, so (hopefully) it will not happen again.

TLDR: I have done all I can to try and prove this isn't me, and I hope my average of 33 edits a day in my first 21 days can prove something, that I am just here to edit. All I want to do here is contribute, and have fun doing it. I've really enjoyed being on Wikipedia, and I would hope this issue doesn't harm the passion. I humbly request you trust my word, and maybe offer some advice (on my end), on how I can get this to stop, beside talking to administrators, and talking to other students. OnlyNano 16:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

OnlyNano/Archives/2024 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "NickysTheThickiest". The reason given for NickysTheThickiest's block is: " Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text on your user talk page: <nowiki>{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}/<nowiki>. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal. ".

• Blocking administrator: ‪Drmies‬ (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: No. Stop messing about. Yamla (talk) 22:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

@Drmies: if both accounts are the only ones tracing to the IP, you’re correct but do a Whois to make sure it’s not a shared ip before making any assumptions.

Hi OnlyNano! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 17:59, Monday, January 29, 2024 (UTC)

Hi. I am the user who made edits of the game. I didn’t intend to remove the spoiler (at least that is what fans call it) of the game being a prequel. I moved it to the plot section. If there was something wrong with that please explain why. I understand that this should be an encyclopedia and should include as many details as possible which include spoilers. I did not delete the spoiler, put a warning or hide it withing scrolling lists or collapsing things. The reason I moved it to the plot section was if a person who has never played little nightmares 2 before and just searches its name up to se if was good or just wants a heads up on what it is, google will feature the snippet of it being a prequel. What i am saying is that they will know it is a prequel right when they search its name up. I was also about to replace it saying it is a prequel with “you may play this as a self-contained experience” with a citation of producer interview at gamescon. But if you really want to keep the old edits up you may do so. I am sorry i didn’t write any reasons of editing this page. But please restore my edits on the development page. 2600:1700:3820:1990:347F:6883:2419:509A (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Of course! I can see the logic there, and I commend you for thinking of how the article flows, which I overlooked. Just reverted it now for ya. Cheers! OnlyNano 18:17, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! 2600:1700:3820:1990:347F:6883:2419:509A (talk) 18:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Of course! You're a natural at editing, from what I can tell :) OnlyNano 18:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Welcome, welcome, welcome OnlyNano! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:53, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

	The Special Barnstar
	Thanks for using the Bi topicon i made. (checked the code, same one, ID's even the same, 1921[1][2]), i like ur signiature. Hope you have a good day! Babysharkboss2!! Green Day (Talk Page btw) 19:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Tysm! OnlyNano 16:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

no prob. signatures, and UBX's are neat. glad to have made your day! Babysharkboss2!! ^{AC/DC (Talk Page btw)} 19:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sirdog were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The "best" source currently present is from NewsBTC, as it appears independent and not routine, but searching the reliable sources noticeboard tells me seasoned editors were not being particularly impressed by it. Every other source appears routine, is sponsored, or otherwise does not meet the standards of the general notability criteria. In terms of neutrality, "and deemed legal by..." (why is it important to declare that the operation is legal) and "Duelbits was shelling out between..." ("shelling out" gives a negative connotation in Wikipedia's voice, which is not wanted) stood out the most to me.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Duelbits and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Sirdog (talk) 05:33, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Just curious. Why did you revert the edit to Thandeka (minister). It was sourced. I don't see a problem with changing the word "daughter" to "child." What was the potential vandalism? Jaireeodell (talk) 18:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Hey there, I should have marked it as unexplained removal of content. You removed all mentions of LGBT affiliation in that article, with the minister. OnlyNano 18:59, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

I removed the vandalism warning, and replaced it with Level 1 unexplained removal of content. OnlyNano 19:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I didn't make those edits. I'm just learning how these decisions work. I agree the edits that you reverted were unexplained. But ... actually, your reversion removed the content about LGBT affiliation. Was that you wanted to do? Jaireeodell (talk) 19:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

I am so sorry about that, it appears that it was on me. I think I saw the highlighting in the edit comparison incorrectly. I'll restore your edit, and remove the warning for ya. Thanks! OnlyNano 19:30, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

The NHL commissioner Gary Bettman has just confirmed that the NHL players will participate at the Olympics 2026 and 2030, as well as that there will be the World Cup of Hockey installments in 2028 and 2032. So, today and tomorrow there will be articles about it all over internet. You can add one or more sources, edit the Wikipedia page about the World Cup of Hockey and keep my changes of the page since what I added to the page is really true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.226.132.96 (talk) 19:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Sounds great, thank you! OnlyNano 15:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by UtherSRG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blake Orban and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 21:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

(show) Hello, OnlyNano!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

(show) Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

(show)Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:10, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

(show) Hi OnlyNano, I'm Vanamonde93. You'll likely not be pleased about this but I have removed some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thank you, and sorry for messing about with your edits! Vanamonde93 (talk) 00:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Vanamonde93 (talk) 00:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Of course, I'm very happy that you're looking out for me! OnlyNano 15:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

here .. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yelena_V%C3%A4lbe&diff=prev&oldid=11968611922603:7000:2101:AA00:A436:B9A2:44A7:8FDB (talk) 18:44, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Your revert was nonsensical. So I have reverted it. Your message was simply obviously false. --2603:7000:2101:AA00:A436:B9A2:44A7:8FDB (talk) 18:55, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Hey mate, sorry I got that revert wrong. I noticed that you added the 2010 date, not removed it. My mistake... cheers! OnlyNano 17:07, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

(show)Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OpenBullet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors

Chetsford (talk) 05:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

(show)

Hello, OnlyNano! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 05:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

(show)

metro boomin' make it boom

ILuvMad (talk) 20:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

(show) You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on AFM Gousal Azam Sarker. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Polyamorph (talk) 20:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Good morning. For over 37 years, I have been teaching visual optics at the university. Therefore, my expertise in visual acuity and optotypes is extensive. I'm not sure if this applies to you, but it seems rather unlikely. Upon noticing that your image of the Sloan letters, specifically the letter D, is incorrect, I couldn't help but try to communicate this to you. Since I couldn't find a way to do so, I wanted to change the image to the correct one. I am a very busy person and don't have time to engage in creating and/or modifying Wikipedia entries, as you can understand. However, I cannot overlook such a glaring error. Furthermore, you haven't even provided the reference to the original article by Louise L. Sloan. If you had done so and looked at it, you wouldn't have made the mistake of drawing the D incorrectly. Instead, you have cited a webpage that lacks any credibility compared to a scientific article. I kindly ask you to please remove this erroneous image as it is detrimental to the academic and research community. Shisheta (talk) 19:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I sincerely apologize for the oversight. I did not revert the changes due to me believing that your image was incorrect, it was because you removed an infobox, with appeared to remove more bytes than it should have to change an image. Upon further review, I noticed the original author of the page used an infobox for a diagnostic, which isn't necessary, and appears just to be there for styling. I have reverted the page back to your edit.

You have done the right thing by contacting me on my talk page to discuss it, before reverting the edit (this is something I have missed several times myself). I am glad that you have taken the time to edit Wikipedia, and I hope you find the time to contribute more, as your experience is valuable to the encyclopedia. Regards, and have a great day! OnlyNano 20:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi. But your wrong image still appears in google search: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sloan_letters.svg

Please, delete it definitely. Bye Shisheta (talk) 09:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Draft:Trevor Connelly, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DahSound (talk) 19:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

OnlyNano/Archives/2024 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

OnlyNano (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "ILuvMad". The reason given for ILuvMad's block is: "Persistent unconstructive editing".

• Blocking administrator: ‪JBW‬ (talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: Autoblock cleared. PhilKnight (talk) 18:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Message from OnlyNano:

Hello, I really need help fixing this issue. Other users sharing my IP address (see notice on my user page) are continuing to get me blocked from editing. Is it possible an administrator could block further registration of Wikipedia accounts on this IP address? The computers at my school clear all the cookies upon signing out, so I don't believe the cookie blocks are working. I, once again, confirm that I am not using any other accounts, and I am not the owner of User:ILuvMad, User:NickysTheThickiest, or the other one that I can't find on my talk page or archives (possibly because the autoblock was lifted).

At this point, I cannot do anything about being blocked, unless an admin can block registration on this IP, or come up with another idea to solve this issue. I really would like to edit Wikipedia tomorrow, and continue some of the articles I've been working on. I humbly ask that an administrator remove the autoblock, and help find a solution to this issue.

I would like to complement the above administrators, who declined/accepted the autoblock requests, for not blocking me permanently, even though it appears the evidence is not in my favor. Your understanding has really shown a lot to me, and it keeps me going every day, just the principal of WP:AGF. OnlyNano 23:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

• I have removed the autoblock from the current block, which should enable you to edit. I know what it's like being unable to edit because of a block intended for someone else, as it once happened to me, many years ago, and I apologise for having inadvertently imposed that situation on you. I am leaving the unblock request open, in the hope that a CheckUser will look at it and decide whether to give you IP block exemption, to prevent the problem coming back again. JBW (talk) 10:19, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

  Thank you, thank you! I'm glad you could help me figure out who could solve the shared IP issue! Regards :) OnlyNano 15:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. PhilKnight (talk) 19:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC) PhilKnight (talk) 19:04, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
23		Hesperia Unified School District (talk)	Add sources
509		Western Sahara conflict (talk)	Add sources
53		Gotham Group (talk)	Add sources
4,128		Western Sahara (talk)	Add sources
301		Legal affairs of Donald Trump as president (talk)	Add sources
2,923		Gasoline (talk)	Add sources
19		Foreign policy of Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential election (talk)	Cleanup
105		Timeline of Mars 2020 (talk)	Cleanup
677		Secret Wars (talk)	Cleanup
46,632		Reneé Rapp (talk)	Expand
56		Features new to Windows XP (talk)	Expand
1,044		Samsung Galaxy S21 (talk)	Expand
2,928		Common law (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
38		Illegal sports (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
68		Booting process of Windows NT (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,388		Standard Chinese (talk)	Merge
93		Emotional competence (talk)	Merge
6,384		Chinese language (talk)	Merge
4,560		Richard Ayoade (talk)	Wikify
68		Callum Roberts (footballer) (talk)	Wikify
320		Cats and the Internet (talk)	Wikify
16		Timeline of motorsport on UK television (talk)	Orphan
2		Chak Shafi Khurd (talk)	Orphan
3		Jan Frank (talk)	Orphan
51		Sahrawi nationalism (talk)	Stub
57		Yellow Leaf Hammocks (talk)	Stub
10		Fabian de Keijzer (talk)	Stub
65		La Passion (talk)	Stub
6		Estadio José Pérez Colmenares (talk)	Stub
10		Royal Canadian Henley Regatta (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:27, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), with one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, and two DYKs;
• Vami_IV (submissions), with one FA on Doom (2016 video game), one GA on Boundary Fire (2017), and 11 reviews;
• MaranoFan (submissions), with one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and two DYKs;
• Skyshifter (submissions), with one FA on OneShot and one DYK;
• Sammi Brie (submissions), with five GAs and five DYKs on television and radio stations;
• voorts (submissions) and Elli (submissions), both with one FA and one DYK each.

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
25		Aspen Strategy Group (talk)	Add sources
255		Cam Cameron (talk)	Add sources
19		2011 Western Saharan protests (talk)	Add sources
499		Polisario Front (talk)	Add sources
354		Display size (talk)	Add sources
731		Camp Half-Blood Chronicles (talk)	Add sources
102		Drug-facilitated sexual assault (talk)	Cleanup
2,117		Samsung Galaxy (talk)	Cleanup
7		Raphaella Spence (talk)	Cleanup
527		Magnus Chase and the Gods of Asgard (talk)	Expand
76		Michele J. Sison (talk)	Expand
1,177		Qajar Iran (talk)	Expand
56		B. Sohanlal (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
232		Affect theory (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,262		Pinyin (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
221		Stanley Quencher (talk)	Merge
1,540		Ligma joke (talk)	Merge
9		Hurricane Octave (1989) (talk)	Merge
20		Sayes Court (talk)	Wikify
4		2000 New Zealand rugby union tour of France and Italy (talk)	Wikify
8		Robert Neffson (talk)	Wikify
8		Charles D'Angelo (talk)	Orphan
6		Digital Dera (talk)	Orphan
6		Elio Morillo (talk)	Orphan
117		The D'Amelio Show (talk)	Stub
3		Pladaroxylon (talk)	Stub
8		Eagles Fly Early (film) (talk)	Stub
18		Gaddiannaram (talk)	Stub
23		Andrew Rippin (talk)	Stub
51		The Stretchers (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Operation SpecTor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Encoded Talk to me! 09:10, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Carter George instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has information that is not in the article and should be added to the article. Please compare and combine the draft and the article. You may ask for advice about comparing and combining a draft and an article at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carter George and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello, OnlyNano! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
101		Transnational organized crime (talk)	Add sources
192		Bad Hat Harry Productions (talk)	Add sources
50		Video game writing (talk)	Add sources
4,920		Godzilla (franchise) (talk)	Add sources
500		Eye chart (talk)	Add sources
108		Africans in Poland (talk)	Add sources
32		Monkey-baiting (talk)	Cleanup
817		Danny Cadamarteri (talk)	Cleanup
29		Secret × Heroine Phantomirage! (talk)	Cleanup
9,499		Danny Masterson (talk)	Expand
905		Tornado records (talk)	Expand
54		Nine West Holdings (talk)	Expand
666		Universalism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
99		Vintage (design) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
77		United States foreign policy toward the People's Republic of China (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,950		David Letterman (talk)	Merge
23		Ministry of Domestic Trade and Costs of Living (talk)	Merge
8		Military Orbital Development System (talk)	Merge
16		Dpath (talk)	Wikify
176		Sex and gender differences in autism (talk)	Wikify
114		African-American folktales (talk)	Wikify
4		Nathan Walsh (talk)	Orphan
14		Adriana Brownlee (talk)	Orphan
2		Operation DRYER (talk)	Orphan
3		Josaiah Ndubuisi Wachuku (talk)	Stub
10		Mount Morrison (California) (talk)	Stub
2		Rhopalogaster (talk)	Stub
3		Aracoma, West Virginia (talk)	Stub
93		Urreligion (talk)	Stub
1		Boyarsky, Republic of Buryatia (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 20 February 2024 (UTC)