User talk:One/Archive 12

Before Archive 12: Archive 11
After Archive 12: My current talk page

This is an archive of past discussions with User:One. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

These are the next forty-three messages after Archive 11 that appeared on my user talk page. If you'd like to respond to any of these messages, please do so on my current talk page.

You are welcome to comment in this deletion discussion. You are being contacted because you participated in the first AFD in 2007. Ikip (talk) 21:49, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello One! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 193 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Tony Fisher (American football) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Troy Hambrick - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Kip Carpenter - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:35, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Why the insistence that he is still a player? His own agent acknowledges his career is over. Saros136 (talk) 03:14, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

IM BACK TOO!!! EMAIL ME MIKE AT GOUI . CA

Hey man im back! Email me mike /at/ goui/dot/ca

Woah. One two three... 21:09, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

I see you ended the AfD on Siegel Suites and removed the tag. Will you remove it on the other two articles that were proposed along with it, Gold Spike Hotel and Casino and The Artisan Hotel? Michaelcox (talk) 21:09, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, One! You've listed yourself as an active member of WikiProject Macintosh, which is currently seeing very little activity. We are trying to revive the project and your help would be appreciated. To see who is active and who is not, we will be listing all active members under "status pending" in the project's participant list. Please move your name to either the "former members" section or "active" section. Hope to see you in the "active" column! For more information on how to help the project, visit the How to help section at our project page! · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:37, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Domtar.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Lucas Cruikshank. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 117Avenue (talk) 21:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Please undelete Make It Home, which is currently a redirect.--Lost Fugitive (talk) 20:11, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Sir, if you are not going to undelete the page, I have no other choice than to bring the matter to WP:DELETION REVIEW.--Lost Fugitive (talk) 01:58, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello One. Recently, the Amusement Parks WikiProject was reformatted and revived. As part of this process other related WikiProjects (such as Disneyland, Herschend Family Entertainment, Universal Parks & Resorts and Walt Disney World) were also revived and have now become part of the Amusement Park WikiProject as task forces. If you would like to remain listed as a member on these WikiProjects please re-add your name to the appropriate lists at the participants page. All names currently on the list have been cleared. If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Thank you for your cooperation, Themeparkgc  Talk  08:11, 6 November 2010 (UTC).

Thanks for uploading File:Amoco5.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:58, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Can I ask how you reached the conclusions that this was no-consensus. While the votes were evenly split the delete side referenced policy and clearly demonstrated the lack of in depth secondary sourcing outside trivial mentions, primary sources and press releases. The keep side were uniformly arguments to avoid such as unsourced assertions, and even confirming that references were mentions. Please can you expand how you weighed the votes or revisit the close? Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:41, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

I (Guoguo12) have withdrawn my nomination and would like to thank you personally for your opinons. But why you, seeing as your !vote wasn't all that enlightening by the time you wrote it? Let me elucidate: I am curious as to how one (pun not intended) can !vote oppose because of "time-related concerns" in one hand and claim that RfA is dead in the other. Was it not you that described how you passed with only 1,400 edits five years ago? Was it not you that said the following?

"We, as a community, need to look inside ourselves and remember that adminship continues to be "no big deal"."

And was it not you who so accurately claimed that "we almost expect prospective admins to be machines nowadays"?

Do believe me when I say that I am in no way irritated because of your !vote; I was bound to fail, and for reasons that I had already predicted. I am merely confused. So, I would be happy if you could enlighten me as to your opinions on the RfA system. Is it broken? Dead? Or is it merely changed, like I said in my withdrawl statement? And if the latter, ought we to fix it or not? Guoguo12--Talk--  02:51, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Upon further examination of the support and oppose sections, I find that the !votes mostly divided on the issue of whether or not content contribution really matters. So, what are your opinions on this issue? Guoguo12--Talk--  02:55, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your question. While I do agree that people get caught up over ludicrous details, I consider the amount of time contributed to Wikipedia to actually be quite important. I hope that even if you disagree that you have contributed here for too little time, you agree that it's a fair reason to object someone's RFA candidacy. Not to mention that I probably passed RFA by sheer luck and not because my record was sterling, exactly. In any case, it's definitely possible for you to become an admin one of these days -- a lot of people fail on the first try. Just keep on doing good things and I might consider supporting you in the future. One two three... 03:49, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Okay, I see. I find your argument concerning experience acceptable, but only because it is the best we have. After all, neither time nor edit counts nor GA counts can truly quanticize how capable an editor is; but then again, what can? There is no perfect system, no system devoid of biases. Man is inherently biased. People cannot take things for granted because that is how science works: one must prove things, often through numbers. And while the number of GAs I have (zero) could in fact correlate to my content contribution abilities, it may not. But, hey, that's what people want to see, isn't it? Numbers. Oy, it's a cruel world! "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em." Well, if people want to base their judgements on numbers, I guess I'll just have to go back in six months with ... numbers. Again, thanks for your input and speedy reply. Don't worry, I still enjoy editing ... they can't quanticize fun, can they? Guoguo12--Talk--  04:03, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day, One, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Logan Talk Contributions 20:22, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello, One/Archive 12! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 20:39, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi One,

I know the page "Gamma Beta" has been deleted a while back and I'm trying to see if it is possible if you could help me with this page. Hawee (talk) 18:34, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

United States National Archives WikiProject

Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts. There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

One, two, three, like a bird I sing / 'Cause you've given me the most beautiful set of wings... Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:45, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

lmao One two three... 01:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi,

I see that you deleted List of species of animals after closing the AFD for it. The article List of animal species and subspecies was also included in the same AFD, and I think it should also have been deleted as a result of that AFD. Calathan (talk) 21:08, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Aubrey Wentworth. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. RaintheOne ^BAM 23:44, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Per the request here by Flatscan (talk · contribs), please add a closing rationale to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aubrey Wentworth. Please add a closing rationale even if the DRV is closed before you can do so, so that participants will understand your close. Also, please add it as a separate comment from the close, so participants know that it is a post-closure rationale. Thank you, Cunard (talk) 00:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

The DRV has now been closed. The DRV closer wrote: "the closing administrator is advised to provide a closing statement explaining his rationale". Cunard (talk) 05:14, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

I have mentioned your not providing a closing rationale here. Cunard (talk) 09:53, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Dear One,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at [email protected] (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at [email protected]. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.206.39 (talk) 03:40, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jim Doyle sig.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:24, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Whitemencan'tjump.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:53, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Smlogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Smlogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:06, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Did you really make this [1]?

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gadsen Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gadsen Records (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:22, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 14:58, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:16, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno^talk 17:30, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Ii — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.130.160.50 (talk) 00:03, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nintendo 128. Since you had some involvement with the Nintendo 128 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:14, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Just wanted to see how you are doing my friend!

Thanks for uploading File:2006 World Series.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect NRev. Since you had some involvement with the NRev redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:35, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gotta go to work. Since you had some involvement with the Gotta go to work redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. DVdm (talk) 20:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Companies established in 578, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS (talk) 10:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)