Why did you revert my improvements to Daniel Craig [1]? What is not neutral about what I added? Why do you consider wholesale reversion better than simply improving, or talking to me directly? And why do you have a picture of a hideously ugly woman on your user page? Korkotork (talk) 12:20, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. M D Potter. Any comments? 17:03, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
We're still at it. Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Refresh my memory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiwiser912 (talk • contribs) 17:13, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
I am not aware of an accessibility issue with 'rowspan'. It used to be the case that using it broke sortability of columns, but with the new release of MediaWiki software, it automatically populates cells with the correct data right before they are sorted. Are you aware of another accessibility issue that still prevents us from using rowspan? Elizium23 (talk) 05:34, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
This was not poorly sourced. I would appreciate it if you put back the other version, because Ms. Seberg's harassment by the FBI was one of the triggers for the Church Commission investigations, and her Wikpedia page makes it appear she just had a bad-casea of nerves. The woman moved to Paris to be left-along and they bothered her there. Have you read anything about her?
Thanks 194.230.159.67 (talk) 17:14, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this past month! 66.87.7.204 (talk) 00:36, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
I admit I'm only judging from 3 edits (at this point), but considering the subject matter of their edits (not to mention the questionable quality of them), User:1onei65 and their contributions: Special:Contributions/1onei65. Motaros? (I wanted to get your opinion before I go to SPI) MrMoustacheMM (talk) 00:46, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
I've been trying to improve the article based on the senior editors recommendations. I saw that you made one of the recent corrections and I was wondering if you could help me understand the other request. He has listed several corrections that need to be made to the ELs in the toolbox......is this just a reference to some deadlinks that need to be fixed, as I am working on those. Or is it more then that? I'm not clear on what else this is in reference to. Can you explain this to me so I can correct it. Thanks.Fsm83 (talk) 20:24, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Nymf, I've noticed that you've occasionally reverted this editor with a summary like this one. I've been having problems with the editor at the Jason Walker (musician) article. It would help if I understood why you think the editor is a sock or has been previously blocked or banned. Thanks much.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, it looks like the persistent banned user Excuseme99 has returned as Milancholiu. I'd like to avoid an edit war with him on the Clint Eastwood page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Micro2 (talk • contribs) 08:24, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Good catch both of you. Left a message regarding the last one on the SSP page. Nymf hideliho! 13:09, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
I'm a bit confused by your recent ItHysteria SPI cases. I've been blocking ItHysteria socks for years, and I wouldn't have chosen those as possibilities. Can you show me some blocked socks that match your behavioural pattern? I think that we must have crossed up some cases and it will probably help us make progress if we can get untangled.—Kww(talk) 02:37, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nymf! As you may have noticed, user Bananas Monkey has changed the name of the article about Gossip Girl by Gossip Girl (TV series) and created a disambiguation page. My question is, should we let it that way or rename the page as before and ask for the deletion of the disambiguation page? I'm asking that because there was a previous consensus on naming Gossip Girl (the series) as Gossip Girl only... See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gossip_Girl&oldid=402599906#Redirect_to_TV_series --Sofffie7 (talk) 18:35, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
ok so I figured this would be easier instead of going back and forth ;) ok so I won't disagree on the infobox thing, but the filmography is better than the way it used to be. I dont know if it's your version or what but I have noticed that even if you use 'rowspan', if you put 'sortable' at the beginning of the table, it still makes the table sortable, plus some of the film projects she's doing aren't on there and there is one that shouldn't be on there. PLUS the awards and nominations, maybe I'm sensitive cause it took me forever to that lol but the way it is now is hard to read and navigate. The way I had it made it easier to see, plus it separated the awards from the nominations. I know in manual of styles for tables it has "won" and "nom" next to it, but I dont see the point if the categories are separate. Any compromise at all towards the tables? They are cleaned up and just looked better I think and they are still within guidelines. Let me know :) xx Xpinkxcasualtyx (talk) 23:59, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
I was recently accused of be a sock of excuseme99. I went through some of their edits and noticed that you reverted Julie Christie. They seemed like good edits by the sock though. Is there a reason why you reverted them? I will bring it up on the talk page there as well.--Canoe1967 (talk) 13:51, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Do not revert the facts in this article. Facts are not good hope.--Cruks (talk) 11:21, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Why we don't have separate articles for Elena Gilbert and Stefan Salvatore? I don't know why but someone (maybe you) extirpated those pages without a clear reason and if you were that person let me know why you did it. Keivan.fTalk 08:57, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Could I revert your edit and redirect of the film to the books page once it starts production? Lady Lotus (talk)
Just alerting you, as per Community reassessment guidelines at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment ("please notify major contributing editors" to a given article) that a Good Article Reassessment has begun for Mila Kunis, at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Mila Kunis/1. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:36, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
[2] What do you think, another Motaros? I wasn't sure at first, it's not unreasonable for someone to start editing a bunch of articles about Swedish death metal bands, but then I saw this and this, another 2 edits for acronyms. Also, another MMA fighter edit. Additionally, checks of the edit histories for the articles User:Ingardot has edited include some variation of Motaros (October010 and M4pnt for the most part, including several articles M4pnt created). Not to mention the constant asking me of questions on my talk page. The more I look at the edit history, I think "quack!".
So do you think there's enough here to go to SPI again? MrMoustacheMM (talk) 21:12, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I see you have reverted Status' and mine edit on Christian Bale. As well known actor he has more than actually forty films and can have its own filmography. Filmographies on Wikipedia exist, see for example Brad Pitt filmography, Jennifer Lopez filmography and Gene Kelly filmography. I don't see the reason for your revert. Cheers!— Tomica (talk) 19:26, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Zac 14:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Do you care to explain this? InedibleHulk (talk) 21:37, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Is Twitter automatically an unreliable source that can never be used, or does it depend on who the Twitter-owner (source) is? A website (fan-based) tweet is automatically and always considered unreliable? If not automatically unreliable, how do you distinguish between reliable and unreliable information posted on Twitter? I've seen tweets used as references numerous times by people in the same industry (ex, performing arts) who might be correct on what they impart to their followers about someone else, but they could also be wrong. What level of higher-ups in any business or industry is needed to be considered reliable enough for a tweet to be allowed as a valid reference? Thanks. Blood Ties release date June 13, 2013 --Katydidit (talk) 15:32, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Grace of Monaco is currently a redirect to Grace Kelly. Perhaps we should consider using that name for the actual film article, or at least a disambiguation page now that the term is ambiguously referring to either Grace herself or the film? Elizium23 (talk) 19:53, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
there has been a recent debate on listing all children in the infobox instead of listing how many they have if they aren't notable. I saw your comment on the infobox template talk page about it and was wondering if there is an official rule or guideline where it says so. I edited a page recently to put "5" instead of all the non-notable children listed and was very much reverted by editors who thought all of the kids should be listed in infobox. I directed them to the part in the infobox where it says "only notable" but they didn't really think that was enough to undo it. Any advice? Lady Lotus (talk) 15:19, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dexter TV Series Title Card.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
I do not understand why my edits were reverted? Where is it ever specified that children's genders and names do not go in the lead? Most GAs and FAs I've read indeed show both. Spelling Style (talk) 21:52, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
I replied at ANI. Go Phightins! 20:46, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Nymph! I see you undid my changes I had added to the Nic Cage and his sister's page. I feel the page has wrongly been added to deletion as I had provided a source that referenced her, more than once. I plan on providing a more official source as soon as one comes available, so if you could, I ask you to undo the decision you made to signal the wiki for deletion. As I am affiliated with Baggott's eldest son, most of the research is original, but as he has a relatively close relationship with J. Levin, it is possible for some sort of interview to be set up. When proposed to this, Cage explained he was very busy lately due to an unnamed project, but would inform his chosen press releasers of the information.
Thank you (: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cthuluhoop (talk • contribs) 10:06, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
User:Xvon thinks you and I are socks of each other. That's so ridiculous it's hilarious! But as an FYI, he may start a (ridiculous/unnecessary) SPI thread, so be forewarned pbp 15:10, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
i am new to wikipedia so forgive me if i'm doing something wrong here. for the record i will not start an SPI thread, i don't even know how. Xvon (talk) 15:17, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
I noticed that you reverted my good faith edit on Drew Barrymore's marriage to Jeremy Thomas. I changed it from "1994" to "1994-1994" and you put it back to "1994." Take a walk over to Robert Walker (actor), and you will see that his marriage to Barbara Ford is shown as "1948-1948." I'm very careful with my edits, because I don't like to be overruled. We all make a mistake once in a while, but I think that "1994-1994" for Jeremy Thomas is OK. By the way, is that you in the picture?
Anthony22 (talk) 16:21, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Hey there! First off, thanks for catching this. If you're still looking for new things to focus on... I could use additional input at Template talk:Infobox person#Spouse and Partner parameters. Thanks again, --213.168.108.17 (talk) 07:59, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Please stop ! Mind your own stuff and do not delete at all a thing I edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony.al (talk • contribs) 13:19, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
He is the son of Agnes, the daughter of Albanian immigrants and Adam Belushi (1918–1996), an Albanian immigrant and restaurant operator who left his native village, Qytezë, in 1934 at the age of sixteen.[1][2][3] look by article Jim Belushi in wikipedia. Overall is write that.
Soo .. and now stop please ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony.al (talk • contribs)
Aha, okay you delete so much and than as ground you say : 'not reliabe source' . You have not earned at all to take part sensibly here in Wikipedia. You always extinguish everything without grounds. a much of user in wikipedia see it like me.
Albanianp 15:08, 30 December 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony.al (talk • contribs)
First off, the page contents are different, which disqualifies it from the letter of the law. It's also not in line with the spirit of G4, which is to prevent people from reposting deleted content: this was clearly created in a good-faith attempt to narrow some other categories. With other namespaces, we don't delete a page with a deleted name when the contents are different, so it's not a good idea to apply a different standard to categories — especially because categories work differently from other pages. If several-year-old CFDs were to prevent the existence of a category under that name ever again, we could easily end up with categories being bound by 20-year-old CFDs ten years from now. It's much better to leave it alone or to take it to CFD again. Nyttend (talk) 18:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
[[Category:LGBT people by occupation|Scientists]][[Category:Scientists]]
You nominated my page for The Most Popular Girls in School, for literally no reason. On it's talk page, I mentioned that the creators noticed what I done and had even sent me Facebook messages as well as answered my ask on Tumblr saying they appreciated what I had done for the series, and I also mentioned I made the page not as a trolling effort or not in a malicious way to disturb the peace that is Wikipedia, but I added it because the show is growing in popularity, and at some point someone was going to create it and I wanted it to be me. I did my research, I listed my references and sources, and yet the page was deleted, and now it has been deleted twice. What is wrong with you? Why NOMINATE my page when you could help it by pointing out to me my errors, oh and don't forget I'm new to writing on this site so I don't know fully what I'm doing just yet, but I just wanted to add a page for the series because I've seen YouTube videos, that are literally seconds long, that have pages longer than some historical events. And you're telling me this web series can't have a page? Please explain yourself because I am quite confused. Matt723star —Preceding undated comment added 00:10, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
See I don't even know what that means! This is unfair. Really unfair. Matt723star —Preceding undated comment added 19:57, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
As an editor who has worked on the article Gemma Arterton, you're invited to a discussion at Talk:Gemma Arterton#Infoxbox image change without consensus regarding an anon IP. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:34, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Re:This edit summary. Of who?—Kww(talk) 21:23, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I just wanted to explain my additions to her page... her upcoming film, "Man Under" (not "Man Down"), starts production next month (March 2013) in NYC. Requests for extras and info on production went out last week. The script for "Man Under" has been reviewed, thus the character names are known. Also, while the film shoots next month (directed by Tim Robbins), we don't have an estimated release date. It could be released this year or in 2014, thus the '?' in the filmography grid. The Hollywood Reporter put out the news that the film has picked up a distributor. As you can probably deduce, I'm a big fan of Michelle's. ;) BTW, IMDB.com also has an entry for "Man Under." Everything is now in place. The film is ready to go, so it's not being 'predicted' in any way, shape, or form. Partyclams (talk) 21:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
You undid a slew of table format changes that had recently been introduced by another editor, with the rather cryptic edit summary WP:Accessibility. Can you please indicate what part of WP:Accessibility was being violated by having row-spanning table elements? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:19, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you commented on the Isla Fisher talk page and Naomi Watts talk page regarding WP:OPENPARA a while back. I would really appreciate it if you could please take the time to offer a third party opinion to help resolve a similar issue on this talk page so consensus could be reached, thanks. Tanbircdq (talk) 19:30, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Listen, I'd like to apologize for when I was dumb trying to make that TMPGiS page, when I moved it constantly even though I didn't have references and stuff. I was a wiki n00b and I didn't have a clue what I was doing, I just thought you made a page, then moved it to be an article, and that was that. But now that I know you're supposed to leave it in your sandbox, get references for it, and edit it for a time, I've been doing that. I think it's better than ever (even though I can't add a picture to it just yet), but I need your advice on it, and I need to know when it could potentially be made into a legitimate page. I just need help with some of the glitches the references have, for some reason they show up as red links. Could you look at my sandbox and help out or just let me know if it's of any good? Thanks! --Matt723star (talk) 16:32, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Care to weigh in on the Infobox image discussion? Dismas|(talk) 06:08, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you once again for nominating my page for deletion. You know, in the past I was very abrasive in creating the page for The Most Popular Girls in School, I didn't follow the rules and I decided to take it upon myself to move it without the knowledge of what could happen, and it happened 3 times. That's when i decided to take it maturely, and submit it for creation. I waited about 3 or so weeks and finally yesterday it got created, and I was extremely happy that finally I had my own legitimate page here, and I edited a few words this morning to my satisfaction. And then, I get nominated for deletion, again, but this time it's unjust, because this time I followed the rules, and for NO REASON WHAT SO EVER, my page that I've spend longer than a month on perfecting get's deleted, deleted before anyone could consider my contestment which I wrote on the talk page. So thank you Nymf, thank you for ripping the happiness I had yesterday about my page right out of my hand, like you've done in the past. I could understand before why you did it, but this time there was literally no reason, and you can tell me all you want "guidelines this and that" even though I followed them completely. Thank you. I'll be sure to never try writing a page ever again, if it means people like you will delete it for no just other than the fact that it's about a web series. Thanks. --Matt723star (talk) 15:17, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
This edit confuses me, since the uploader isn't blocked, and I don't see evidence that he's a sock of someone who is blocked. Did you perhaps mean to tag it under some other criterion? Nyttend (talk) 18:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
The mentality of an IP is that if they feel they're right, they'll keep coming in and forcing their view on everyone. Then other IP's will come in to support. I'm trying to avoid that by placing a neutral picture in place that isn't the one that's being forced in or the one that gets reverted back. Get what I'm saying?Rusted AutoParts 21:53, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Sofffie7 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
If you believe that User:Rachel Berry12 is a sock of User:Nika1234 - and I can understand why you do - perhaps you should file a report at WP:SPI. I'm almost prepared to block the Rachel account based on WP:DUCK, but there's been an almost two-month space between the two accounts, and a CU, if endorsed, might nail it. It also might bring up any sleepers.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:43, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Sofia News Agency(www.novinite.com) wrote about Nina "Bulgarian-Canadian actress".This is the link to this site: http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=122426 Another article from Sofia News Agency(www.novinite.com): http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=126487 This is reference N:7 from the wikipage of Nina Dobrev:"^ Finke, Nikki (2011-04-15). "Nina Dobrev Goes From 'Vampire Diaries' To 'The Perks Of Being A Wallflower'". Deadline.com. Retrieved 2011-04-17."This is the link: http://www.deadline.com/2011/04/123303/ In this article it is written again: "Bulgarian-Canadian actress" --Dvrt09 (talk) 16:58, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, you recently rolled back a series of changes I made at Mila Kunis, with the edit explanation that there was an accessibility issue with rowspan. I've never come across this, could you please let me know a bit more about it? I'm just trying to understand why my edit was reverted. Thank you! Euchrid (talk) 02:26, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I would say that when a relationship has been rumoured ceaselessly for two years to the point where most major publications just report it as fact and moreover pictures of the two people going out hand-in-hand abound and the dude buys the girl a ranch and two frickin' horses, it really is a rumour in name only. As for the fact that rumours don't belong on Wikipedia....um, sure they do, as long as they are clearly labeled as such and source appropriately. Happy Evil Dude (talk) 17:04, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Please don't revert changes to Michelle Pfeiffer's entry claiming unreliability, which would be subjective. If this is in regards to Pfeiffer's ethnicity, she is indeed Swiss-Italian. Her mother's maiden name, Taverna is Italian, which lends more credence to the documentation. If you have a source that details another type of Swiss for her (French, German), by all means add it. Partyclams (talk) 06:01, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like to ask why you removed Pirates of the Caribbean 5 from his filmography. I understand you justified by 'crystal balling' but that leaves me then wondering why Transendence or The Lone Ranger weren't removed - all three of them have Johnny confirmed to be in and are in the future.
Thanks Cathairawr✝ 20:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey, Nymf. After I made this revert at the Scarlett Johansson article, I was compelled to click on File:Scarlett Johansson in Kuwait 01b-tweaked.jpg; it states that you are the uploader of it. Its description also states that Johansson was age 23 at the time the picture was taken, and the date given for it is 2010, but I see that her Wikipedia article states that she is age 28 this year. As you can see, the 2010 age doesn't add up to present day. Did someone get the date you uploaded the picture, which was in 2010, confused with the date the image was taken and therefore list the former date in the caption? Or did you simply get the age wrong? Flyer22 (talk) 21:29, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
It was already in at least two other LGBT-related film categories before I ever touched it. So either it leaves all of them or it stays in all of them — as long as the ones that were already there are still there, the ones I added just now do not merit reversion. Bearcat (talk) 07:29, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Nymf, hopefully I am doing the talk thing correctly. I'll admit Wiki-naivety may have played a role in my mistake on execution.
It was not my intention contravene Wikipedia policy. Knowing the effort that the source put into researching celebrity weddings and uncovering details that many others do not, in addition to a number of rare/exclusive photos, it was my thought that it would be of public interest to link those. I am sure IMDB consider themselves as a fantastic primary source for movies I thought to share the same about Celebrity Weddings.
I do think dedicated contributors like yourself do a sterling job, and would like for the contributions I had made to be re-instated however I will defer to your judgement. Sumobaby talk to me —Preceding undated comment added 12:18, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, re your WP:CSD#G5 noms of a large number of categories - is a bot going to be tasked with depopulating the categories? Or should we amend each page manually, so as to put the pages into equivalent cats that are not up for deletion? --Redrose64 (talk) 16:11, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
The problem is that administrators have started acting on the nominations and deleting the categories without repopulating the articles into appropriate parent categories. Perhaps you could remove the nomination tags until we have a mechanism for dealing with this without losing a huge amount of categorisation information? Also, some of the categories nominated definitely ought to exist, for example the by-country subcats of Category:Gay villages (which I have now re-created). htonl (talk) 23:38, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
I saw in this edit that you removed the names of parents and children from a {{Infobox person}} because they are not independently notable. That condition is not listed on the documentation page. It does say for children, "For privacy reasons, consider omitting the names of children of living persons, unless the children are independently notable." bit 1. that is only a suggestion, and 2. only for children, not for parents. Please explain here, I am watching your talk. Debresser (talk) 17:39, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Regarding your revert at Stellan Skarsgård, more than just what might sound like your own concern ("WP:Accessibility issues with rowspan") you can point to WP:FILMOGRAPHY as consensus. DMacks (talk) 15:34, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Having some trouble there too, if you could keep an eye on it. Thanks for the help at Waters. Joefromrandb (talk) 22:32, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Care to join in? Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 13:11, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Apologies. I was just baffled as to why Lady Lotus, the creator of the poll, would decide to close the poll only hours after starting it, without allowing others to voice their opinions other than the ones who agreed with her. Rusted AutoParts 00:04, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Can you tell me why IMDb is not a reliable name source? 192.115.235.2 (talk) 10:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Hallo! Please, discuss before you fix information! I can not understand which is this source of information that is more reliable than the constitution of an independent country? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumatro (talk • contribs) 21:34, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello! It has appeared that u deleted what I wrote on Gwen Stefani wiki. I have heard the news on Facebook via or radio station official page. If it doesn't bother u to revert to last night's edit, I would be happy enough! — Preceding unsigned comment added by CandyNovaAW (talk • contribs) 08:39, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
I see you added an edit summary about a sockpuppet but could you tell me where this investigation is? I looked through open cases but did not find an entry that included Mildredd. Thanks, Dismas|(talk) 14:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
It was not a copyvio, the picture was from Commons, so it was already on here. It was not a copyvio. Please keep the discussion here. Thanks. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dste (talk • contribs) 20:28, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello Nymf, you have recently removed refs from The Longest Journey article claiming they were spam. In the same edit, you have removed the review scores from Adventure Gamers and GameSpot from the review overview table. And in your previous edit, you have broken another reference (which you then removed) whose URL an anonymous editor has previous fixed. I would like to hear from you why, in your opinion, updating reference URLs is a bad idea and since when do Adventure Gamers and GameSpot reviews and news now qualify as spam in video game articles. Thanks. --Koveras ☭ 07:38, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Nymf, you recently reverted my edits on Aaron Paul; the reason you gave for doing so made me think of a question I hope you can answer. What would the term be, if not "stage name", for the name used by an entertainer who does not use their birth name? Every other article I've seen where an entertainer uses their middle name as their surname, without legally dropping any part of their birth name, is formatted the way I tried to format Paul's intro paragraph. So I wanted to know if there's a term I should be using, because I don't think his birth name should be the only one mentioned in the intro when he doesn't use it professionally. Also, I think you could help me with something that's been bugging me for a while; why was his stage name given as Aaron Michael Paul before I edited it out, with no explanation as to where "Michael" came from? It's obviously not part of his birth name and I've never seen him credited as Aaron Michael Paul. Just something I've been trying to figure out for a while. Cheers. - MisterMorton (talk) 15:14, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
