@WikiAmateur303 I see you added the individual producer's name with citations, but you also removed a lot of the other content in the article. The "Cast", "Production", "Soundtrack", "Reception", and "Other media" sections are all deleted after your edit. Nubzor[T][C]18:27, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I came to your page from the Antivandal userbox linked pages link.
I am a newcomer and am exploring ways to contribute towards antivandalism and maintenance tasks.
I saw you use Huggle, Twinkle, Antivandal, and Ultraviolet.
@Kingsacrificer - Welcome. Each tool has areas it excels or falls short in. Some are better suited than others for certain tasks. I enjoy tinkering with the different tools, configuring and learning each, etc. I would say to get started Twinkle is the best to familiarize yourself with. It also has several applications outside of vandalism recent changes patrolling.
Huggle is my personal favorite for actively patrolling recent changes. It is an old program, but it's incredibly powerful, customizable, and has some really great features. I am a big fan of more detailed edit summaries when reverting (when applicable) and many of these are built right into the program.
AntiVandal is great when I am away from my desktop, at work, or otherwise am just wanting to patrol from a web browser. It's super light-weight and, while similar to Huggle, lacks many of the features I've come to prefer. That being said, they just released an update and it's looking fantastic so I am excited to try out all of the new features.
These are more advanced tools that will require rollback permissions and are only useful for looking at edits actively being made. Twinkle/Ultraviolet allow you to revert older edits and edits you stumble across while browsing. There will be times where you need to manually revert or warn a user, so you'll want one of these available alongside a tool like Huggle/AV.
There is a lot of overlap between Twinkle/Ultraviolet and you definitely don't need both. Since I prefer more detailed edit summaries, I will usually revert using Ultraviolet and select the appropriate summary but then warn the user using Twinkle. Twinkle has a better "search" when selecting warning templates and has templates not in UV. I also find UV to be a bit glitchier than Twinkle, especially when reporting to AIV.
Hello, I'm TonySt. I wrote a userscript called av-dark, which is currently in your common.js file. I'm writing to let you know that a new version of AntiVandal was recently released which includes a dark mode natively. Because av-dark does not work with the new version of AntiVandal, I recommend that you remove av-dark from your common.js file. You can easily do this by going to this page and clicking "Uninstall". Take care :) --tony00:58, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]