Share to: share facebook share twitter share wa share telegram print page

User talk:Nthep/Archive 88

Archive 85Archive 86Archive 87Archive 88Archive 89

Wikidata weekly summary #688

About Isaak Dore Draft Article

Hello Nthep, I see a warning to talk to you before I attempt to create another draft biographical article named Isaak Dore. The page was deleted previously for copyright of a slu.edu biographical site about Isaak Dore. I actually wrote both pages (the draft Isaak Dore article and the slu.edu source) as Isaak Dore, a now retired former professor of mine, asked me to write him an updated biography since he did not feel comfortable doing so himself. I did not think about copyright at the time when I submitted, since I wrote both pages. The article I want to create will be a biographical article, as I think it would be nice for him to have a biographical article on Wikipedia now that he is retired. Obviously, it will be redrafted as different as I can make it from the slu.edu source, but since they are both biographical in nature, I am afraid it will still be somewhat similar (although, not identical or copy and paste in accordance with the copyright rules). Am I allowed to attempt to draft this article again? Thanks in advance. Charlzs (talk) 23:28, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

@Charlzs Thanks for declaring your conflict of interest. I've looked at the latest draft and although there's a considerable overlap with the slu.edu page it's on the acceptable side as most of it is job titles and publication titles which can't be avoided. What's totally lacking at the moment are any sources other than slu.edu. Without those, there's no way the draft is going to be accepted. Nthep (talk) 10:06, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for the feedback! I will try and find as many sources/citations as I can before I submit the draft for review. Charlzs (talk) 11:57, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 July 2025

Endowment tax form, Wikimania, elections, U4C, fundraising and a duck!
And how do we know?
Five-year journey comes to healthy fruition.
Wikimedians from around the world will gather in person and online at the twentieth annual meeting of Wikimania.
As well as "hermeneutic excursions" and other scientific research findings.
The report covers the Foundation's operations from July 2023 - June 2024
A step towards objective and comprehensive coverage of a project nearly too big to follow.
Drawn this century!
How data from the Wikipedia "necessary articles" lists can shed new light on the gender gap
Annual plans, external trends, infrastructure, equity, safety, and effectiveness. What does it all mean?
Rest in peace.
Wouldn't it be nice without billionaires, scandals, deaths, and wars?
If you are too blasé for Mr. Blasé and don't give a FAC.

Wikidata weekly summary #689

Dosojin

Hello Nthep im George nice to meet you. Can I add every informations about dosojin but with details and a lot of words please??? 2A02:1388:209A:D3C9:0:0:BFBD:98D (talk) 08:13, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Yes, as long as it's your own words and not a cut and paste or close paraphrasing of the source(s). Nthep (talk) 08:37, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Ok 2A02:1388:209A:D3C9:0:0:BFBD:98D (talk) 08:53, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi Nthep, is it permissible to undo the revdel on the draft as the pages that were copied from are now licenced under CC BY-SA 4.0 and the GFDL? (For reference, 1 2 3 and 4 is the source material) — Tenshi! (Talk page) 19:19, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

@Tenshi Hinanawi yes. I'll undo the revdel. Nthep (talk) 19:29, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #690

revdel question

Hi. What should one do if a revdel template is added to an article, but it turns out that there is no copyright violation (for example, the overlap with the source is because the source copied the Wikipedia content at some point)? Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:23, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

@Ssilvers add {{Backwards copy}} to the talk page. If you want to really bring it to a reviewing admin's notice, you could add a {{comment}} after the {{revdel-copyvio}} template. Nthep (talk) 18:46, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:11, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - August 2025

Delivered August 2025 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

11:50, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #691

Administrators' newsletter – August 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2025).

Administrator changes

added
removed

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, a new speedy deletion criterion, G15, has been enacted. It applies to pages generated by a large language model (LLM) without human review.
  • Following a request for comment, there is a new policy outlining the granting of permissions to view the IP addresses of temporary accounts. Temporary account deployment on the English Wikipedia is currently scheduled for September 2025, and editors can request access to the permission ahead of time. Admins are encouraged to keep an eye on the request page; there will likely be a flood of editors requesting the permission when they realize they can no longer see IP addresses.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case Indian military history has been closed.
    • South Asia (WP:CT/SA) is designated a contentious topic. The topic area is specifically defined as All pages related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups.
    • The contentious topic designations for Sri Lanka (SL) and India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan (IPA) are folded into this new contentious topic.
    • The community-authorized general sanctions regarding South Asian social groups (GS/CASTE) are rescinded and folded into this new contentious topic.
  • The arbitration case Article titles and capitalisation 2 has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case closed on 31 July.
  • The arbitration case Transgender healthcare and people has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 11 August.

Miscellaneous

  • Wikimania 2025 is happening in Nairobi, Kenya, and online from August 6 to August 9. This year marks 20 years of Wikimania. Interested users can join the online event. Registration for the virtual event is free and will remain open throughout Wikimania. You can register here now.

The Signpost: 9 August 2025

Plus a mysterious CheckUser incident, and the news with Wikinews.
A review of June, July and August.
Who is this guy?
Threads since June.
And slop.
It's not a conlang, it's a crossword puzzle.
gang aft agley, an' lea'e us nought but grief an' pain, for promis'd joy!
Everybody's Somebody's Fool.

Dear Nthep - Thank you for putting hyperlinks into the Info Boxes on the entries for these two individuals, connecting them as brothers. The page for NFA currently carries a template saying that the content is over-reliant on primary sources of for validation. Please can you let me know if the comment in WTA’s entry ‘Astbury also had a younger brother, Norman, with whom he shared a love of music’ could be used as a tertiary source of validation for the references in NFA’s Personal Life to NFA’s involvement with music as a pastime? Kestrel2Zero (talk) 06:14, 1 August 2025 (UTC)Kestrel2Zero

@Kestrel2Zero No, as it's uncited in the article on WTA. The article on NFA has me wondering about something else. Like both of them I went to Longton High and one of the school houses was called Astbury. I've always assumed it was named after William but now I'm wondering if it might have been after Norman. Nthep (talk) 09:43, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Dear Nthep
Thank you so much for your feedback.
My understanding is that Astbury House at Longton High School was named after John Astbury (1688-1743) a successful potter and local benefactor. So there is quite possibly a family connection but not directly with either of the brothers WTA or NFA.
On a separate Potteries-related note, I have asked Lucideon if they can provide any further clarification of the copyright status of the photo of the old BCRA headquarters at Penkhull.
Kestrel2Zero (talk) 07:18, 3 August 2025 (UTC)Kestrel2Zero
@Kestrel2Zero the house is definitely named for William, his name and picture were in the stained glass window at the school showing all the house and who they were named for. Nthep (talk) 14:34, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Wow! Thank you so much for this first hand account. I am delighted to have my earlier (mis)understanding corrected. WTA was certainly an individual worthy of that honour.
On a separate issue, I seem to have run into a bit of a brick wall on the photo of the BCRA Headquarters in Penkhull. As you may have seen from the Teahouse or the Talk Page, Lucideon gave their permission on 07.08.25 to use the photo as follows:
QUOTE
Our Dear Nigel,
Please accept my apologies for the delayed reply.
I had looked in to the issue to the Penkhull photo copyright previously but wanted to double check to ensure that there are no misunderstandings and that you have the definitive answer to your query.
I can confirm that the Penkhull photo was taken by a member of the company which means that Lucideon owns the copyright. As you know , Lucideon has given you permission to use the photograph with attribution. Perhaps you just need to add to the photo: ‘Copyright Lucideon. Used with permission from Lucideon’.
I see that the photo has been removed from the page and I assume that this is connected with the enquiry.
As to the point about relying too much on primary sources, in the world of research , primary sources are excellent and the source of original data. I think that because of the way that Wikipedia works, they like to have corroboration from other sources .
I hope this helps.
It’s great to see your project come to fruition and to see your father’s achievements collated.
We still come across , and refer to, his work and it’s so nice to now know more about him.
Kind regards,
Karen
Karen Sutcliffe
Library and Digital Support Officer
(Redacted)
(Redacted)
www.lucideon.com
UNQUOTE
Unfortunatelly, if we were to use the photo I understand that Wikipedia would require Lucideon themselves to complete the relevant declaration. I don’t understand the form form I’ve looked at on the Wikipedia website and I am hesitant anyway about bothering Lucideon with it because firstly I am not confident I could explain it and secondly they have spent so much time helping with this project, I would be embarrassed to ask them for further assistance. It will be a shame not to use the photo, not least as we have Lucideon’s valid permission and it is highly relevant to the text concerned. Any suggestions you may have would be most welcome.
Thanks again for all your help.
Kestrel2Zero (talk) 19:58, 9 August 2025 (UTC)Kestrel2Zero
@Kestrel2Zero: They're not understanding and the permission they've given isn't sufficient to use the image as previously explained. It's a lost cause and the "simpler" solution is for someone to take their own photo of the building and upload that. Nthep (talk) 21:04, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Hi Nthep
Thanks for taking the trouble to reply; I understand that we have reached the point where it is indeed a lost cause. Sadly I no longer have friends or family in the area having left some 60 years ago. But I can see taking a new photo is the only practical solution. Thanks again.
Kestrel2Zero (talk) 07:11, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Prefix: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia

Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya