This is an archive of past discussions with User:Nthep. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
If you want a bigger logo then fine but replace the non-free use rationale with a PD or CC licence and file information. Nthep (talk) 11:46, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
and left the NFR in place. It's one or the other. Make it unequivocal about which it is and if it's PD then I'll restore the larger image. Nthep (talk) 12:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
You should review image licensing when deleting versions. As I can't revert it anyway, I'll leave it with you. - hahnchen23:25, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand why you deleted some of my redirects. Those are perfectly plausible redirects; phonetic misspellings and such; many people don't know how to spell the word "backboard". Not everyone knows how to use autofill, either, so I think the redirects should stay. - A window cleaner me (talk) 16:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Seriously we don't create redirects to cover every possible eventuality. Also the search engine picks up grammatical similarities like "back board" and "back-board" in any event. Nthep (talk) 16:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
They are cheap but you don't need 40+ where the variations between each are so minor and the software will catch most searches that are close. Nthep (talk) 17:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 12,193 last month to 12,209 on October 30th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 118 is ahead of WP:GM who have 84. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 60 out of a total number of 3,534 articles.
Currently we have thirty seven Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The November 2015 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered November 2015 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
It must be and I'm sorry you got caught in the middle. Perhaps you'd consider creating an account then this sort of thing won't happen. Nthep (talk) 16:56, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
As i said previously, if you've find images with suitable licences then upload those and tag them accordingly. Nthep (talk) 16:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
William Winter
No strong opinions here, I don't know if there's a relevant style guide for military biographies. The current "William Winter (medical officer)" title was mine, and may not be ideal - I just moved it there from the original William Winter (Major William Winter ) yesterday. --McGeddon (talk) 12:45, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
looks like originator is going on a bit of a redirect spree about his relative. I think WAW avoids any need to distinguish and is an easy link on the William Winter disambig page. Nthep (talk) 12:49, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
which set of socks are you referring to? Sadly I see loads so if you can direct me to a specific article I'd be grateful. Nthep (talk) 21:51, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 12,209 last month to 12,218 on November 29th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 118 is ahead of WP:GM who have 84. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 60 out of a total number of 3,539 articles.
Currently we have thirty eight Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy Christmas
A Happy Christmas to all members of the project and a big thank you for all the hard work on Yorkshire related articles during the year.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The December 2015 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered December 2015 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
00:49, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill Winter (British Army officer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parish council. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Template messages/Deletion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Donald Duck On (talk) 14:27, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Just by way of further information, UnbiasedVictory/Amerijuanican/C_1_J_1_7_L_9_4 was outed as a recurring sock puppet for returning to pages he'd previously haunted and repeating the same behaviours that got him blocked in the first place. This is why he ran afoul and was blocked in progressively shorter spans of time. His contributions under his most recent user name amply demonstrate his insistence on edit-warring Natty10000 | Natter 03:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
I did look at his background and while I think the chances of persuading the stewards are small it doesn't hurt to apply a little bit of AGF and point them in the right direction. Nthep (talk) 13:56, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
The most generous way of describing his description of his behaviour is to say he was prevaricating a bit. In his UV persona, HLGallon and I (and others) cut him all sorts of slack when he introduced bias et al to various articles. That he would not stop as UV spoke to his insistence. That he continued the same path in new personas puts the lie to his claim of having learned from his past errors. IMHO, he abuses the ability to edit Wiki in a serial manner and will continue to haunt his previous articles and do the same again. Natty10000 | Natter 22:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
I'm trying to upload an image for the Glenn Ivey article. After seeing your tag of the initial upload as replaceable, I found a fair-use image of Glenn Ivey and added it to the article. The Flickr page [1] clearly specifies the license, and the licence states that You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.[2] The "No derivatives" aspect applies to transformations, not croppings. I specified, as required in the licence, that I had cropped the image. Thus, this image is fair use, and I request for it to be restored, or to be allowed to re-upload the image without you deleting it again. Thank you. Jw sheridan (talk) 20:08, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
@Jw sheridan: I agree that what you did isn't a derivative but Wikipedia policy is that images do allow others to create derivatives should they wish to do so. As a result any Creative Commons licence with the no derivatives attribute isn't an allowable licence on Wikipedia. Nthep (talk) 20:12, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
@Nthep: That seems surprising to me. I checked for that policy and couldn't find it. Could you please point me to a page that shows why this license isn't acceptable and what would be acceptable? In any case, I believe there is no freer image available, which as far as I understand it grants some leeway -- is that the case? Thanks. Jw sheridan (talk) 21:14, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
@Jw sheridan:Wikipedia:Image use policy#Free licenses is the main place and reinforced at Wikipedia:File copyright tags. Fair us is allowed but only if the image meets all ten of the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. The problem with any non-free image of Ivey is that it will fall foul of criterion 1 - "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose" (my emphasis added); while you might not be able to find a free image of Iver now, one could be created by someone. This is why so many Wikipedia articles about living people are lacking in images. Nthep (talk) 21:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrew Rissik, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Charles Gray and Time Out. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Final warning given. For future reference reports of vandalism are best directed to WP:AIV but you do need to warn the vandal first. Nthep (talk) 20:59, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 12,218 last month to 12,254 on January 4th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 120 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 60 out of a total number of 3,559 articles.
Currently we have thirty eight Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy New Year
A Happy New Year to all members of the project.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The January 2016 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered January 2016 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
13:41, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Challenge Cup, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kells and Nottingham Outlaws. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Why did you delete the article that I made? you never specified where was a problem so i could change it, you just delete it. I am trying to help and you just destroyed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kratosgeek (talk • contribs) 20:58, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
The article was deleted for the reason already given on your talk page - it was promotional in tone and did nothing to establish the notability of the company. Nthep (talk) 21:09, 2 February 2016 (UTC)