User talk:Nick.mon/Archive 6

Hello, Nick.mon. You have new messages at DonCalo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for uploading File:Social Democrats logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Progressive Camp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nick.mon, can you please explain why you reverted my edit without explanation? See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Five_Star_Movement&diff=769568534&oldid=769465386 Thank you, --Lommes (talk) 11:32, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Lommes: Hi, I explained it in it.Wiki, according to me the image is simply uncorrect because the red circle around the party's logo is too thick compared with the real symbol. However it isn't a big problem, but I prefer the previous version, which I consider more correct :) -- Nick.mon (talk) 11:37, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nick.mon: Thank you for the explanation. I changed File:Movimento5s.svg according to your suggestion, trying to match the outer border as closely as possible. Can you please re-check the file, and if you consider it correct now, please add the file to the article (also on it.wiki)? If there is still a problem with the file, please tell me what to change. Thank you again. --Lommes (talk) 15:44, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Lommes: Well, I think that this version is quite correct, but I don't understand why should we change a logo like the current one, which is taken from Beppe Grillo's blog, the official website of the party. Anyway I can't stop you to do it, but maybe we can discuss in the talk pages with other users about this issue. -- Nick.mon (talk) 17:46, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nick.mon: Thank you again. The reason for changing the file is that the one from the party blog is PNG Format, whereas the one I made is SVG format. SVG is not a pixel but a vector file, and only describes the shapes in the image. In PNG there are pixel and there is a fixed size (in our case 304x304px), at which size the image is properly displayed. But every other size shows a loss of quality (some in smaller versions, but quite a lot in larger versions). SVG, however, can render in any size or resolution without loss. See for example this huge 2000px version, which was created by the wikipedia software from my file. If there is a high-resolution "retina" display, the mediawiki-software is (at least theoretically) able to create a larger version within the article for these users. If the image is used in a table it can produce a tiny 40px version. And so on. As a bonus, the file size for SVG is usually smaller. Hope this makes it clearer. Indeed, producing SVGs from PNG files is my primary task at Wikipedia. :-D If you still have questions, I am happy to answer them.--Lommes (talk) 21:13, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Lommes: Ok thank you very much for the explanation, I must admit that I'm not an expert of SVG, PNG, JPG, ... files. However we can change the previous logo with your one. Maybe the only difference is the name of the party website "movimento5stelle.it", which in the "official" version is slightly thicker and bold, but also the current version is ok :) -- Nick.mon (talk) 23:07, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nick.mon: Always happy to help. I changed File:Movimento5s.svg again, made the text slightly bolder and put it on a curve more closely matching the original. you see the difference best when looking at the distance of the first "M" and the outer circle. in the previous version it was the same as every other letter, but in the "original" PNG and this new version, the text moves a bit outward (or downward?) at the edges. as a designer, i'd never do it like this, but i am just a copyist here. :-D Is the new version correct?--Lommes (talk) 23:38, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Lommes: Yes it's absolutley correct, greate job! Now I will insert your version in it.Wiki and en.Wiki. If I found some symbols to change or create, can I ask to you? -- Nick.mon (talk) 08:45, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For example this one File:Democrazia Cristiana.png, this File:Partito Radicale.jpg, or this File:MOVIMENTO PER LE AUTONOMIE - 3.jpg. There are many many logos to change in the section concerning Italian politics, and if you can do it, it will be great. Of course when you have time, it isn't urgent :) -- Nick.mon (talk) 08:58, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great. As to the other logos: I have already started. But I will be away for 10 days now, so please don't expect to hear back from me until 23rd or something. Best, Lommes (talk) 20:35, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Lommes: Ok don't worry I can wait, have a good week! Best, Nick.mon (talk) 20:45, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nick.mon , I saw that you have created many pages on the italian local elections, but in these pages there aren't any reference to the Municipalities where voting took place. Futhermore, in these pages there are indicated the number of Municipalities won by each party, but there are not sources for these informations. Where did you get those numbers? --Wololoo (talk) 23:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Wololoo: Hi, I took them from it.Wiki, counting the results in each comune, but I known that there isn't a clear reference. -- Nick.mon (talk) 07:56, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

However these pages should be implemented, currently are quite unusual without any reference to the Municipalities... Furthermore I am not sure if the infobox in these cases should contain also the leader of the parties, what do you think?--Wololoo (talk) 23:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Wololoo: Yes you are right, those articles must be absolutely improved. I insert the parties' leaders because we had them also in the local elections which took place in recent years, but I think that they aren't fundamental. We should, at least, insert the election results in the main cities -- Nick.mon (talk) 08:34, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we could insert the results for the capital cities and a table with the seats for all other important Municipalities. I see what I can do, maybe with your help ;) And personally, I think that at least the leaders should be removed... --Wololoo (talk) 21:59, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes of course, I will help you. Maybe we can ask also to other users what they think about the images of the leaders -- Nick.mon (talk) 14:37, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Democratic Party (Italy) leadership election, 2017, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of official trips made by Matteo Renzi. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 18:38, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Dl2000: Excuse me, but what are you talking about? I insert the flags of the countries which were visited by Renzi during his premiership, as for ALL the other articles about presidential trips (List of presidential trips made by Barack Obama, for example). Is this vandalism? -- Nick.mon (talk) 20:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Dl2000: If you were talking about the sentence "56th and current PM", of course you are right, I simply didn't noticed it, but we should insert the flags of the countries :) -- Nick.mon (talk) 20:16, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you have a source that indicates that Renzi is back on as PM which means some other articles need to be updated. In any case, a massive change like this should have an edit summary. Dl2000 (talk) 20:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Dl2000: You are right, but I simply noticed that someone removed all the flags without a reason and so I copied an old version of the article, unfortunately in that version Renzi was still Prime Minister -- Nick.mon (talk) 20:49, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Centristi per l'Italia.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:12, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Bologna massacre into Francesco Cossiga. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: Hi, I have done what you said and I hope I did it well, excuse me but I'm not an expert in these procedures :) -- Nick.mon (talk) 07:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bettino Craxi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlo Carli. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nick.mon. I saw that you created List of Secretaries of the National Fascist Party, and I really liked how you did it. Also, it gave me an idea - there should be a list which would contain all secretaries of Mussolini-led fascist organizations (namely FIC, PNF and PRF). As you can see, there is already a template on Italian Wikipedia which contain all secretaries at the same place - it:Template:Segretari del PNF... Anyway, I'm looking forward to hear your thoughts and ideas about this. Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 16:28, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundostund: Hi, and thank you so much for your words! Regarding your question, I think you are absolutely right, we can include in the article also the secretaries of FIC and PRF. -- Nick.mon (talk) 17:01, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really glad you think so! Of course, it wouldn't be any problem to include the secretaries of FIC and PRF in the article (either you or me can do that; just tell me would you prefer to do it by yourself, or should I take care of that). I have this dilemmas - should we rename the article when we remodel it? I'm not sure whether it should keep the name List of Secretaries of the National Fascist Party (since it wouldn't contain just the secretaries of PNF anymore), or should we find some other name for it? Also - are there precise dates of terms of office for the secretaries of FIC? I know there are for the secretaries of PNF and PRF, but I'm not sure about FIC. --Sundostund (talk) 17:36, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundostund: No problem, you can do it if you want :) Well, it's a good dilemma... Probably "List of Secretaries of the National Fascist Party" is a bit uncorrect, maybe we can use the title "List of Fascist Secretaries", what do you think? -- Nick.mon (talk) 17:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all, I can do it later today... I think we can use something like "List of Italian Fascist Secretaries", with an explanation in the lead section that the article contains the secretaries of Mussolini-led fascist organizations, without the leaders of post-1945 far right Italian movements. --Sundostund (talk) 17:49, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundostund: Yes I like this title, I think it's the most correct one for that page :) -- Nick.mon (talk) 17:58, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alright! Now, as I said before, my last concern are dates of terms of office for the secretaries of FIC. Are they already included somewhere in Italian Wikipedia? --Sundostund (talk) 18:02, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundostund: Well, I read here that Pasella served as FIC Secretary from August 1919 to November 1921, when the PNF was founded. So Bianchi and Longoni were party's secretaries from March 1919 until August 1919. -- Nick.mon (talk) 18:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! That should be all the data necessary to remodel the list. As I said, I'll do it later today or tonight. --Sundostund (talk) 18:40, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundostund: Yes of course, it isn't urgent. Thank you too! -- Nick.mon (talk) 18:47, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Its done, you can check it out now at List of Secretaries of Italian Fascist parties. As you can see, I used a different name for the remodeled article, instead of the one which we mentioned earlier ("List of Italian Fascist Secretaries") — this one sounded better to me... Of course, if you see a need to change something in the article, you're more than free to do it. --Sundostund (talk) 02:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundostund: Perfect, great job! And you are right, the current name sounds better :) -- Nick.mon (talk) 13:18, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

De Gasperi IV Cabinet

added a link pointing to Giuseppe Grassi

De Gasperi V Cabinet

added a link pointing to Giuseppe Grassi

Democratic Front (Italy)

added a link pointing to Regionalism

Romano Prodi

added a link pointing to Profit

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Noi con Salvini.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Direzione Italia.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nick.mon, about the results of the general elections, I would keep all the results, also because many parties have their own page... About the local elections, maybe I had already proposed it to you, I think that it would be better to remove the infobox, maybe replacing it with the template "Politics of Italy". Same speech for the regional election pre-1995. Indeed I think that the infobox with the national leaders is appropriate only for the national elections and not for the local election, where candidates are other people. For example, with reference to the local elections in 2016/2017, I think that Berlusconi can't no more represent the entire centre-right coalition... What do you think? --Wololoo (talk) 22:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Wololoo: Hi! I thought that very few people want to know how many votes "Democrazia Atea" gains, so I removed all the parties which gain less than 0.1% of votes, as in it.Wiki and other article regarding general elections (for example Spanish ones), but if you think that they are useful informations, we can keep it. Regarding the local election, I think we should mantain an infobox, with the party leaders (even if I think that coalition leaders should be more correct, but by now is very difficult to determinate the coalitions and their leaders). However, as I said, I will keep the infobox as, for example, in the United Kingdom local elections, 2017. -- Nick.mon (talk) 07:43, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that in the infobox Forza Italia is second, but this is a mistake, Also considering Berlusconi as the current leader of the coalition (while he can be considered at most co-leader). So, the parties should be replaced with the coalitions, also if I prefer the model of the french local elections, for example French municipal elections, 2014 because the national leader are not so important for the local election... Furthermore, the pages about the old local election should be integrated with the results! In the current state they don'ot make much sense...--Wololoo (talk) 21:23, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Wololoo: Ok, I will change the results of the elections, removing the parties and keeping the coalitions. About the infobox, I remain by my opinion, we should keep it, but we can discuss about that :) -- Nick.mon (talk) 13:09, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I probably didn't explain it well... The problem isn't the presence of the parties in the table with the Mayoral results (in this case I think that the party is necessary) but in the infobox: while the presence of PD can be considered correct, it isn't so for Forza Italia. We also can simulate that Berlusconi is currently the only leader of the centre-right coalition, but Forza Italia can't be considered the leader party of the coalition, this would be a forcing. I have edited the page of 2017 local election, replacing the parties with the coaltions as example. Tell me what you think, I know that the party is attributed to the leader, but putting Forza Italia in the infobox gives an incorrect impression...--Wololoo (talk) 22:47, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Wololoo: I understood what you said, but Forza Italia was always in the infobox because many of its members were elected mayors. Renzi and Berlusconi represent in the infobox their own parties, not the two coalitions. We can absolutely remove them, but I think that we should keep the table with the results for coalitions, as in it.Wiki, which is more correct, because PD, FI, LN and the other parties did not run alone. -- Nick.mon (talk) 08:17, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's exactly for this reason that I proposed to remove the infobox with from the local elections, it's reductive to attribute all the municipal victories of a coalition to a party, above all in the case of the centre-right. The UK system is different from the italian one, in UK each party runs alone, in Italy there are variable coalitions in the different municipalities. I share the model of page that you set for the 2017 election, I think it is the best setting for the local elections and that we can do the same with the other pages :) --Wololoo (talk) 21:08, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Wololoo: Ok, perfect, in the next few days I'll do it :) -- Nick.mon (talk) 21:19, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect, for the pages on the old local elections I'll help to integrate them with the results ;) --Wololoo (talk) 21:26, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Alleanza Nazionale.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Governments of Italy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:35, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Please note that United States presidential election, 2020 (and many other articles in the topic area) are under various page restrictions, including 1RR/consensus required. Check the talk page on any article to determine what, if any, restrictions are in effect on the page. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)}  If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply.  02:10, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you have time, could you check edits by IP 151.65.126.186 to many Italian connected articles, e.g. Gentiloni, Mattarella. Thanks Denisarona (talk) 14:45, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Denisarona: Ok I will do it :) -- Nick.mon (talk) 15:40, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2017 Ischia earthquake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS, relatively small tremor, one dead. Not really the stuff encyclopedias are made of.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kleuske (talk) 21:38, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:21, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Northamerica1000. I noticed that you recently removed content from History of the United States Democratic Party without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yesterday, the zimbabwean justice retroactively cancelled the dismissal of Emmerson, so Emmerson was interim president or the office was vacant ?--Panam2014 (talk) 15:26, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Panam2014: Well, sincerely I don't know, maybe de jure Mnangagwa was interim President, but de facto the office was vacant or Mphoko was the Acting President. Probably we had to wait for other informations. -- Nick.mon (talk) 22:04, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is we have no source that Mphoko was acting president. I think Mphoko (or Emmerson) was de jure acting president but the facto the office was vacant, no ? --Panam2014 (talk) 22:06, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Panam2014: Yes probably you are right, de facto the military ruled the country in that days, so I think the office was vacant. -- Nick.mon (talk) 22:11, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For me we should replace his name in the infobox by unclear or vacant and add a footnote. --Panam2014 (talk) 22:12, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Panam2014: Ok you are right, but we don't have reliable sources so we should start a discussion in the related talk pages :) -- Nick.mon (talk) 22:15, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is we have any source for any option. I have opened a RfC in Talk:President of Zimbabwe. Your opinion is welcome. --Panam2014 (talk) 22:16, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Panam2014: Ok, we have some problems with Zimbabwe 😅. Thank you, I will try to give an hand -- Nick.mon (talk) 22:20, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have another answer. Emmerson's dismissal as VP has been cancelled. So, we can consider that him term ended on 6 or 24 November. So, Mphoko, who is the second VP, should became VP after the dismissal of Emmerson or when he took oat as president. But we have no source that Emmerson became VP. What does we write ? --Panam2014 (talk) 22:24, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Panam2014: Well, the situation is very complicated... Probably the better thing to do is to leave the office vacant in the days after the coup and Mugabe's fall. Anyway, even if Emmerson dismissal has been declared illegal, was de facto legal until today. It's a real mess -- Nick.mon (talk) 22:30, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi A young contributor does not know that primary sources (WP: PRIMARY) are not eligible to know which person holds a political office. The only admissible sources are secondary sources (WP: SECONDARY) whose purpose is to report facts. Could you give him a reminder? --Panam2014 (talk) 19:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nick.mon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prodi II Cabinet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alessandro Bianchi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:27, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fratelli d'Italia logo 2017.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Gian Luca Galletti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to EU Council

Roberta Pinotti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Modern literature

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:31, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Più Europa.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:03, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Checco, Autospark, I wish a happy Christmas to you and your families 😊 -- Nick.mon (talk) 10:06, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I hope you and your family are having an enjoyable festive season too.--Autospark (talk) 21:52, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lega Salvini.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Movimento Nazionale Sovranità.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]