This is an archive of past discussions with User:Nableezy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
hi i’d love to speak to you about creating an article please. it’s on a controversial conflict so this is why i’d like to get it right. thanks Eatlandlords (talk) 17:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
All articles whose topic is strictly within the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area shall be extended confirmed protected by default, without requiring prior disruption on the article.
AndreJustAndre, BilledMammal, Iskandar323, Levivich, Makeandtoss, Nableezy, Nishidani, and Selfstudier are indefinitely topic banned from the Palestine-Israel conflict, broadly construed. These restrictions may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
Zero0000 is warned for their behavior in the Palestine-Israel topic area, which falls short of the conduct expected of an administrator.
Should the Arbitration Committee receive a complaint at WP:ARCA about AndreJustAndre, within 12 months of the conclusion of this case, AndreJustAndre may be banned from the English Wikipedia by motion.
Any AE report is limited to a max of two parties: the party being reported, and the filer. If additional editors are to be reported, separate AE reports must be opened for each. AE admins may waive this rule if the particular issue warrants doing so.
The community is encouraged to run a Request for Comment aimed at better addressing or preventing POV forks, after appropriate workshopping.
The Committee recognizes that working at AE can be a thankless and demanding task, especially in the busy PIA topic area. We thus extend our appreciation to the many administrators who have volunteered their time to help out at AE.
Editors are reminded that outside actors have a vested interest in this topic area, and might engage in behaviors such as doxxing in an attempt to influence content and editors. The digital security resources page contains information that may help.
Within this topic area, the balanced editing restriction is added as one of the sanctions that may be imposed by an individual administrator or rough consensus of admins at AE.
Details of the balanced editing restriction
In a given 30-day period, a user under this restriction is limited to making no more than one-third of their edits in the Article, Talk, Draft, and Draft talk namespaces to pages that are subject to the extended-confirmed restriction under Arab–Israeli conflict contentious topic procedures.
This will be determined by an edit filter that tracks edits to pages in these namespaces that are extended confirmed protected, or are talk pages of such pages, and are tagged with templates to be designated by the arbitration clerks. Admins are encouraged to apply these templates when protecting a page, and the clerks may use scripts or bots to add these templates to pages where the protection has been correctly logged, and may make any necessary changes in the technical implementation of this remedy in the future.
Making an edit in excess of this restriction, as determined at the time the edit is made, should be treated as if it were a topic ban violation. Admins should note that a restricted user effectively cannot violate the terms of this and above clauses until at least 30 days after the sanction has been imposed.
They are topic banned from the Arab–Israeli conflict, broadly construed, in all namespaces other than these four (except for their own userspace and user talkspace).
This sanction is not subject to the normal standards of evidence for disruptive editing; it simply requires a finding that it would be a net positive for the project were the user to lower their activity in the topic area, particularly where an editor has repeatedly engaged in conflict but is not being intentionally or egregiously disruptive.
Any admin finding a user in violation of this restriction may, at their discretion, impose other contentious topic sanctions.
If a sockpuppet investigations clerk or member of the CheckUser team feels that third-party input is not helpful at an investigation, they are encouraged to use their existing authority to ask users to stop posting to that investigation or to SPI as a whole. In addition to clerks and members of the CheckUser team, patrolling administrators may remove or collapse contributions that impede the efficient resolution of investigations without warning.
I don't actively edit topics related to A-I, but I follow it enough to understand that you've heavily contributed to the improvement of articles within it. It's a shame that things are playing out how they are, but here's to hoping you might be able to get back to doing so at some point. Neo Purgatorio (pester!) 16:33, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Thank you very much, thats very kind. But idk, guess we'll see how much more of my time I want to spend here. nableezy - 20:35, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
+1, I really appreciate your work on this conflict and think that your partial block was unfair. I hope to see you back at editing. Also اجدع ناس𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨Abo Yemen (𓃵)10:53, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Yeah, it's about time I added my thanks for all the work you've done on Wikipedia, especially on sockpuppets. Obviously I find the Arbcom decision above to ban some of Wikipedia's best editors totally bizarre. --NSH001 (talk) 22:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
It’s only bizarre if you think the point of this place was to make an encyclopedia. Hope you’re well Neil, nableezy - 15:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Healthwise I'm fine thanks. Sitting here with tears streaming down my face on learning about Marianne Faithfull, spotted a piece about her on an obscure French-language newpaper site while researching sources for an article I'm trying to re-write. Brings back memories of my teenage years, the happiest period of my life, 1960s music (nothing since is its equal), Beatles, etc. Nostalgia! 1950s were the years before TV, there were five cinemas we used to go to, spread around 3 towns, tried to remember their names but only got 2 of them right. I knew one of them (my parents called it the "flea-pit", but I couldn't see anything wrong with it) began with the letter "C", but couldn't remember its name. Was quite pleased I managed to track it down, see the Countess Cinema. All 5 of those cinemas have since closed, but some new ones have appeared. I think now it's only going to be a matter of time before they arrest me and throw me in prison for protesting against the genocide. The big demo on 18 Jan (I've only missed two so far, medical problems) really got my blood boiling (google it for all the horrors) and made me even more determined. --NSH001 (talk) 21:08, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
