User talk:NDCompuGeek/archive-2007 May

This is an archive of past discussions with User:NDCompuGeek. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I'll see what I can do. Best wishes! Kirill Lokshin 04:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Removed cfdnotice, cfd has completed. --Kbdank71 16:37, 9 May 2008 (UTC) In fact, the discussion covers whether the main category and all of its sub-categories should be Category:Tubaists, Category:Tubists or Category:Tuba players, and so on. Please take any views you have to the discussion page there.
I think that people that know what they are talking about should comment, because there are things being written like, "'tubists' seems clearly incorrect ... to judge by the ... comments."
In the absence of knowledgeable discussion, an outcome based on ignorance can result.
I'm not getting the impression that most of the participants are serious tubists. -- Rico 04:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello. This is just a friendly notice that Wikipedia Weekly episode 19 has been released!

In this episode:

• New Mission and Vision statements for the WMF
• The Chaser springs Jimmy Wales
• new uses for categories
• vandalism studies
• Unreferenced BLPs.

.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.com/2007/05/05/wikipedia-weekly-19/ and as always, you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.

Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!

For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 20:57, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to receive such notifications please remove yourself from the list.

The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello, NDCompuGeek. The Adopt-a-User program is looking for new ideas and input on the program. If you are still interested please stop by the talk page and read some of the ideas being floated and give a comment. If you want to update or change your information on the adopter's list page, now would be a great time! Thanks! V60 ^{干什么？ · VDemolitions} 03:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

I noticed that you created the USAF Administrative Organization main article, and I was wondering if you could help reduce the size of this section, as it doesn't seem to have been trimmed at all since you added the "main" template. johnpseudo 19:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

I can do that! I have a question for you though - there is an article devoted solely to the organization of the US Air Force (Organizational structure and hierarchy of the United States Air Force). Should I go for less content in the USAF article, relying on the content in the Org. of the USAF article, or try for a balanced approach, or what? (Serious question, BTW....) I'm wide open to suggestions!! - NDCompuGeek 19:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

The USAF article definitely needs to be trimmed. If there is useful information in USAF, I would suggest bringing it into the Org. main article- otherwise I would just cut it. Are there any major conflicts between the two? johnpseudo 19:39, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Not that I know of, but I'll need to copyedit and make sure of the information. I'm currently working on some of the "On This Day" information for the USAF portal (Portal:United States Air Force/otd), so if you can wait a few, I'll make sure to get to it TODAY in just a bit... - NDCompuGeek 22:30, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello, NDCompuGeek. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:DetroitShock 100.png) was found at the following location: User:NDCompuGeek. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 00:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello, NDCompuGeek. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Mislignition.gif) was found at the following location: User:NDCompuGeek. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 22:38, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Are you still playing in this sandbox? If not could you please clear it? Thanks Adam McCormick 05:57, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me.... I'm done (for now), so it's cleared! - NDCompuGeek 08:11, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey. I do not know you, but i see you are a member of North Dakota Wikiproject. Please, could you answer my question. I would like to point out that in 1992, Kent Conrad retired, and Byron Dorgan won. Dorgan is still in the Senate. And then Conrad ran and won a few years later. Wouldn't this make Dorgan senior senator from North Dakota??

Thanks,

Politics rule 23:05, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

你好 - Erica, I'm in the process of creating a boilerplate text for inviting others to WP:MUSINST. I'm not sure if it's appropriate, in good "wiki-form", or even allowed.... What are your thoughts about it? (The work-in-progress invite is here). Thanks! - NDCompuGeek 12:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

When I created the figure skating project, I made this invitation. If I saw that a user editing figure skating articles a lot, I would drop them that template. I recommend you keep these things short and to the point, and don't use them a lot--just when you're pretty sure the user is interested in the subject matter and not just wiki-gnoming. Cheers, Fang Aili ^talk 14:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)