User talk:Muppet321

Welcome!

Hello, Muppet321, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Deconstructhis (talk) 20:49, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Whirlpool Aero Car, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 20:49, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you didn't know, I'm SeddieBerserker from Wikia. Just thought I'd say hi :) --Confession0791 ^talk 03:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I posted the real list on the article. I got them from TV.com (here, here, and here). –BuickCenturyDriver 17:11, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In The Puzzle Place, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Liberal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for removing a cited edit the other day to the StarKid Productions article. As you can appreciate, a lot of IP users are adding uncited information at the moment, and I had resorted to reverting multiple edits at once. Eladkse (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:21, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muppet321. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muppet321. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peter Pan Live!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Julian Koster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hedwig and the Angry Inch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Day 5, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Sadler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Furawi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gorillaz have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. --Furawi (talk) 00:22, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, nice, do you like my ultimate edition of Gorillaz? Greetings. --Furawi (talk) 18:36, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muppet321. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tick, Tick... Boom! (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chuck Cooper and Tom Kitt. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 9yz. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Source 2, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 9yz (talk) 07:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Superbia (musical). Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback, have adjusted citations accordingly. Muppet321 (talk) 15:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Superbia (musical), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Most Comfortable Chair 15:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muppet321,

Thank you for creating Superbia (musical).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The little numbers after the references, which I assume to be page numbers, should be inside of the reference using the "page" and "pages" parameters.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Meena}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

– DarkGlow • 08:06, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, thanks for that edit to Hamilton (2020 film)! I've done a WP:SELECTIVETRANSCLUSION on it instead. Happy editing! Aaron Liu (talk) 13:04, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Um, there is just certain sources placed, but there are some edits being pressed. CastJared (talk) 03:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:How to Defend Yourself (play). Thanks! Atlantic306 (talk) 23:37, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am a big fan of this musical, and I've actually been trying to look for someone with enough knowledge of this musical to help me out! so, if you could, please reply so we can discuss about this. Thanks in advance! 66.220.169.77 (talk) 07:37, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm no expert, I've just read a lot of the material re:it, but happy to answer questions if needed. How can I help? Muppet321 (talk) 14:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

well, you basically answered my question, haha! what is the material you've looked at? 66.220.169.77 (talk) 16:30, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately it's nothing substantial: The Boho Days oral history has the bulk of info I know, plus research from other people like Brandon from Wait in the Wings: I also directly asked J. Collis, the writer of Boho Days some questions about the show a while ago, but it was mostly regarding his personal opinions on the show. I personally haven't gone to the Library of Congress to view the Superbia material for myself (would need to make a trip out of that), anything that I have seen like audio recordings are just leaks. Muppet321 (talk) 16:36, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! Actually, a friend of mine is trying to get to the LOC in a month or two! If you have any other place we can communicate, (i.e., Instagram, Discord,etc.), I could get you two together so you can the things from the LOC when its time! No pressure, of course, but I think it would be great for the both of you! 66.220.169.77 (talk) 21:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to The Drowsy Chaperone, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 12:46, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PigPen Theatre Co., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 10:19, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muppet321. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Superbia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. Is there any way to present only one list of musical numbers, with footnotes indicating the major differences with the Korean version? -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:21, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drafted an attempt at something on my sandbox page. Let me know what you think. Muppet321 (talk) 00:26, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:43, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand the Japanese ref translation format throughout the article. Is the information as concise as it should be? -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:42, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not entirely sure (I can't read Japanese, my Korean is better). I will flag though that it looks like there's at least a few dead links. Muppet321 (talk) 01:10, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I meant to say Korean and Japanese. For example, ref #22: The ref does not give the article's author (Heo Mi-sun). What does [Biba 100] mean? My translator gives "Viva" 100, but what does that mean? Why is this line here?: 100세시대의 동반자 브릿지경제 And, indeed, what on earth does the title of the article mean? Also, why are some dates in this article mdy while others are dmy? It should be consistent throughout. See if you can do anything to fix at least the Korean refs. #19 (and others) doesn't have any translation. Does "creative musical" in these headline translations really mean "original musical"? -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:42, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

From what I can tell a good chunk of this article was originally written by an editor or multiple editors who did not speak English as a first language, based on some text that appears to have been literally translated. I did some clean-up where possible but haven't had a chance to go through the whole thing.

Yes, please do. -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:37, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1. Regarding "Biba 100" vs "Viva 100", Korean doesn't have a consonant for the "V" sound, so Vs tend to be translated into ㅂ which has the sound of "B." So in this case, Viva 100 is the official English name of that publication, but in Korean it sounds more like "Biba 100."

So, if it's the name of the publication, the title should go first, then the publication. See? -- they need to be really cleaned up so that they are concise, in a sensible order, and the translation makes sense. -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:37, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2. I suspect the editor who added that reference copy-pasted something into the reference that they did not mean to. The gist of the original article title is that it's announcing two musicals, one of which is the concert reunion of Maybe Happy Ending.

OK, so fix it to be what you think it should be. -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:37, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

3. Date inconsistency can be chalked up to past editors.

Yes, but we need to fix it. Lets make a decision: mdy (American) or dmy (Brit, etc.)? -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:37, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

4. Literal translation for 19 is [Cultural News] "Kim Dong-yeon 'This is a new musical'... Musical 'Maybe Happy Ending'"

Good, please add it so that it looks good. Why is [Cultural News] in brackets? If it is the name of the publication, it should be italics after the title. Please go ahead. -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:37, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Muppet321 (talk) 02:22, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note to thank you for all your hard work on the article. It is coming along nicely. Not only is it much more readable for English speakers, but I think it focuses much more clearly on what is important to general encyclopedia readers interested in the musical. The WP:MUSICALS article structure page may give you more ideas on what could be added to the article. Tomorrow are the Drama League Awards! -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:28, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Can Oliver put in his own replacement parts?
• The plot summary says "Oliver [claims] he is glad he will not have to deal with her anymore". Does he say this in front of Claire, or to himself?
• "The situation reminds Claire of her owners, the married couple Jiyeon and Suhan." -- Former owners? Or do you still have an owner when you are retired?
• I would move the footnote at the bottom of the plot summary to the Development section, with a source.
• I see that many of the references do not state the date of publication, only stating the less important date of retrieval. Do you have time to add some dates?

Thanks for any advice and help! -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:23, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good progress. Still need to add the dates of publication missing from the citations. BTW, I see that someone add the Playbill cover, but I don't think we can have two non-free images in the article. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:03, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The most important (or at least most urgent) thing to add at this point is a critical response section that briefly explains, in a WP:BALANCED manner, the response of the critics first to the Korean premiere (and any major changes seen in the critical response to the other Korean productions) and then the critical response to the Broadway debut. You could cite this and this, which is already footnote 44, for the B'way response, and maybe also include a couple of short, but incisive quotes from notable critics. Note that BroadwayWorld is usually not a good source to use (per Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources), but I would argue that its roundups are OK to cite. -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:38, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]