User talk:Mroxidizer1

Welcome!

Hello, Mroxidizer1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Neuttro, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 01:21, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Neuttro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 01:21, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Thanks Mroxidizer1 (talk) 12:42, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Mroxidizer[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neuttro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuttro until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 01:44, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The band Neuttro is active and selling albums physicly in th e same way online mostly iTunes. Im a new on wikipedia. Hope you can help me same as the album "Cirex" Album were on on Physical Stores in Puerto Rico, and right now you can still fimd it on online stores liken iTunes, Amazon, etc.. Songs recieved 250,000 plays on myspace and was categorized 3stars and a half by customers on iTunes, I have seen worst album allowed here. With all my respect. Sincerly Robert Mroxidizer1 (talk) 16:36, 25 July 2011 (UTC)MrOxidizer1[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Neuttro. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 01:49, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Neuttro. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. —Tommyjb (talk) 02:09, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Cirex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 21:54, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Cirex - The Lab requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nikthestoned 11:45, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The band Neuttro is active and selling albums physicly in th e same way online mostly iTunes. Im a new on wikipedia. Hope you can help me same as the album "Cirex" Album were on on Physical Stores in Puerto Rico, and right now you can still fimd it on online stores liken iTunes, Amazon, etc.. Songs recieved 250,000 plays on myspace and was categorized 3stars and a half by customers on iTunes, I have seen worst album allowed here. With all my respect. Sincerly Robert MrOxidizer1Italic text

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neuttro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuttro(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nikthestoned 12:05, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Thelab cover.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The image was created by Fernando Matos, he doesnt have a .com website, but have a facebook porfolio http://www.facebook.com/FJArtDesigns, it can be corroborated by him, was created in 2009 in Puerto Rico, FJ Art Design, San Juan. Not formal copyright (only a afidavit by a local lawyer) affirming with a sealed envelope that is their work...

A tag has been placed on File:Cirex thelab.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nikthestoned 13:11, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mroxidizer1. You have new messages at Nikthestoned's talk page. --15:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Neuttro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! My apologies — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mroxidizer1 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 12 July 2011

A tag has been placed on Eduardo Paniagua (Drummer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. — 72.75.57.223 (talk) 17:31, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ramon Ortiz (musician) has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Nikthestoned 10:58, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neuttro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuttro(3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Cirt (talk) 16:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mroxidizer1. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Neuttro, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

1. Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
2. Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
3. Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
4. Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Based upon your edit here: [2] it appears that you may have a conflict of interest. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 02:03, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Ramon Ortiz (musician). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nikthestoned 08:30, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mroxidizer1 (talk) 14:54, 24 July 2011 (UTC)No conflict interest with Neuttro, only that they are from Puerto Rico and not to many rock notable bands there. But is doesnt affect me if is eliminated, only that i spend time reasearching[reply]

On the Ramon Ortiz subject is different, I remove the "template" thinking that te two resources of a living person were enough, and are strong ones, one comes directly from "Fernandes Guitars" where he is soponsored, the other one of BMI where he is a member... He has also plyed as a backup guitar with other notable artist, but because has been things of day is not relevant, sorry about the template, but please let me know what else you neeed to have??? I can even contact the artist himself (even is pretty difficult now that he lives in Los Angeles), but all information is correct and before put it on wikipedia i show it to the artist himself and he approved. Thanks in advance, Mroxidizer1 (talk) 14:54, 24 July 2011 (UTC)MrOxidizer[reply]

Hi. Here's the message:

This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate.

Please click inline citations as I don't think i can explain it better! Is it unclear in any way? Reply here if you need any help ;o) Nikthestoned 21:11, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Ramon Ortiz (musician). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nikthestoned 07:50, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry was a Mistake when I edited a blank space on one of the parapraph but now on the topic, the list of references is not enough and reliable? I think incline citations are included Thanks for your help. Mroxidizer1 (talk) 09:54, 30 July 2011 (UTC)Mroxidizer[reply]

Yes, it has citations. They are not inline. If, as per the above, you click "Inline Citations", you'll see why this is a problem. All you need to do is place <ref>http://www.yourreference.com</ref> next to the claims that they support. That's it. Then you can remove the tag once done... Does any of this not make sense? Nikthestoned 11:53, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Sir now does it and so I apologize.. Mroxidizer1 (talk) 12:30, 1 August 2011 (UTC)MrOxidizer[reply]

A tag has been placed on Cirex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:28, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mroxidizer1. You have new messages at Phantomsteve's talk page.
Message added 22:08, 2 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Ok. If i can find at least two independent reliable sources, you can re-create the article? He can wait, actually it was me who has been trying put him here, he is cool to be here or not (but he would like ofcourse), so again, if I find two resource, you can up the article again? Regards (p,d, can't noot be #REDIRECTED to Puerto Rican rock music for the moment??Mroxidizer1 (talk) 22:59, 2 August 2011 (UTC)MrOxidizer1

The article Eduardo Paniagua (drummer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Artist only seems to be notable as part of Puya (band), not individually

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 22:21, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, the guy has recorded albums for Draco Rosa, has been in the cover of the Magazine Modern Drummer explaining the latino style and you just put a deletion tag.. grat!! I aprecciate Mroxidizer1 (talk) 22:25, 2 August 2011 (UTC)MrOxidizer1[reply]

Recording tracks for someone else's albums might justify a mention on their article (in this case Draco Rosa) - although you would need to provide independent and reliable sources which verify the information - but is generally not enough for a stand-alone article. Appearing on the cover of Modern Drummer is also not necessarily enough for notability - could you give us the issue and page details, so we can verify this information? The length of coverage and the details may or may not confirm notability, so they are important. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 22:32, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I should add that he does not appear to be listed at Modern Drummer's website's Artist Index here, and a search of the site does not show any mentions (see here for the site's own search results, and see here for a Google Search of their website for his name). Hence why we need more details of the issue that he featured in, as I was under the impression that all featured artists from the magazine were included in their artist index PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 22:45, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mroxidizer1. You have new messages at Phantomsteve's talk page.
Message added 22:08, 2 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

We are working on that, I call him he can provide me only "scanned" image of the Magazine (i was looking online and I can't find it), the issue of Modern Drummer was on December 2001... The Draco Rosa was two songs on one of his albums, so, once again, the only way is showing the booklet of the album. Mroxidizer1 (talk) 22:49, 2 August 2011 (UTC)MrOxidizer1[reply]

The artist is in Los Angeles right now but he will be back in 12 days, anyway, i found sopmewhere in the net one of the page of the "Modern Drummer Issue" that Eduardo was featured in 2002 here is the image :http://www.flickr.com/photos/puya/4038639818/in/photostream

page #2 inside the Magazine modern Drummer Mroxidizer1 (talk) 16:14, 3 August 2011 (UTC)MrOxidizer1[reply]

With respect, that doesn't appear to be the significant coverage required under the notability guidelines. Of course, we'd need to see a scan of the next page to see what else it says, but the bit showing there says about his influences and his kit - not enough coverage about him to show that he meets notability criteria. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 22:33, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, that again seems to indicate (from the couple of paragraphs before his bit) that he is notable as a member of Puya (band), not as an individual. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 22:35, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Danny Fraticelli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NMUSIC. Article continues to have had notability tags since August 2011, and upon another search I am still unable to locate significant reliable source coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:38, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danny Fraticelli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Fraticelli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 21:01, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at GorillaWarfare's talk page. Message added 20:09, 27 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Hi,

Please try to avoid adding links to social media and user created content, as you did in this edit: [3]. These are not considered reliable sources. Please focus your citations on reliable sources instead. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 00:11, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have moved your post at the AFC project talkpage to the AFC helpdesk. The project talk page is used by reviewers to discuss project administration. If you want to ask questions about your submission please use the help desk in future. Thanks Pol430 talk to me 22:46, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mroxidizer1, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 04:59, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mroxidizer1. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk.
Message added 14:31, 11 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 :- ) DCS 14:31, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mroxidizer1. You have new messages at Mabdul's talk page.
Message added 19:38, 17 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

mabdul 19:38, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

New references added (magazines) are reliable? thanks!! 18:47, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Don't know exactly what you're asking about.. elaborate, please? Because, if you're asking about the reliability of magazines, see Wikipedia:References.... Let me know if this is what you need or it's something else... Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 21:25, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on MY talkpage, see below:

Hello, Mroxidizer1. You have new messages at Theopolisme's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{Help me-helped}} on this page with {{Help me}}, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Regards; Please Modeators, what the article need to be up? A moderator mad ea little clean-up and retrieve one of the references, but few more were added after that. Hope you can help, Peace Mroxidizer1 (talk) 13:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

this is the draft: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Cirex Mroxidizer1 (talk) 17:27, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Given the below, I think that the issues with this article are being thoroughly covered. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 01:29, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cirex (musician), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://cirexlab.com.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 23:38, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was my friend mistake. Im very sorry for the action .My apologies Mroxidizer1 (talk) 23:57, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Cirex (musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 23:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Carlalune for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 00:08, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]