User talk:Morganfitzp

Archives

1, 2, 3

	The Original Barnstar
	For your article creations so far, most recently Harry Taussig, I award you this barnstar. Keep up the great work :). Ironholds (talk) 19:48, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Morganfitzp (talk) 21:49, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Morganfitzp!

Eddie891 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

I would like to thank you for your edit on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panoply Media page. It has done much to make me think twice, and oftentimes stop the angry replies I fire off both in life and Wikipedia.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

What a sweet cookie, Eddie891! And to be real, I often get tense and take stuff personally on Wikipedia. My AGF pep talk is as much a reminder to me as it is to anyone else. Anyway, nice work bringing the Panoply article up to snuff—Looks great! Morganfitzp (talk) 18:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"a rush of sadness coupled with paradoxical joy"

Thank you for quality articles such as Mecki Mark Men and They Spent Their Wild Youthful Days in the Glittering World of the Salons, for improving Half-rubber, for enlightening, - professional playful procrastinator, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:59, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh Gerda Arendt, I don't know what to say! Morganfitzp (talk) 14:40, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I remember the feeling (2010) ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:52, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1598 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And oh what a precious moment it was! Morganfitzp (talk) 23:45, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Remembered again, two years ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Let us all march forth on every March Fourth. Morganfitzp (talk) 15:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

... such as today, three years of it --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:23, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well with social distancing in vogue this year, I ain't marching anymore. Morganfitzp (talk) 22:39, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The 'Heartfelt Thank You' Award
	Thank you SO MUCH for developing the 'Tofu Curtain' article MaynardClark (talk) 01:38, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A heartfelt you're welcome, MaynardClark. And thank you for the soymilk! I'm going to go get some cookies now... Morganfitzp (talk) 15:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a bit of work on it. What d'you think needs doing next? Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:30, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chiswick Chap. I'll continue to comment on the the article's talk page and contribute edits as well. Also, I just added myself onto Wikiproject Yoga. Perhaps you'd like to as well? Morganfitzp (talk) 23:57, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, why not. Even if we're the only people there ;-} Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:40, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to find Mittra's poses sorted by category, but the Dharma Yoga site doesn't work properly (tried in Chrome, Edge, and Firefox). What it did do was to offer exactly 4 category headings: Sun Salutations, Balancing Poses, Seated Poses, and Inversions, unfortunately failing to populate them properly (it displayed some tag commands to its database). That means it did not even attempt to classify standing, reclining, or twist poses, so I wonder where you got your numbers from? All the other columns are populated using that school of yoga's own categorisation, which is what we should have for Mittra also. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:55, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Chiswick Chap. Pardon the delay, I've been on break from editing for a few days. My Dharma Mittra tally comes from his book, Asanas: 608 Yoga Poses (Novato: New World Library, 2003). In his introduction, Mittra writes that he'd photographed himself executing 1,300 asanas, and from that session he created his original 908 Asnans poster. While the asanas on the poster are categorized into sun salutes, followed by standing poses, inversions, and so on, the poster's categorization is not as explicit as the book, which organizes each pose category into a separate chapter. I'll say again, as I have on the asana talk page to quantify yoga poses for Mittra—or any other teacher—is an infinite task, as Mittra states in that same introduction, "There are an infinite number of poses—that's what makes yoga a living tradition." (Mittra, 2003, p. 13). And having practiced with Dharma Mittra, Darren Rhodes, and other teachers of asana who have published hundreds of photographs of themselves practicing so many poses, they often teach asanas that are not in their books. Morganfitzp (talk) 20:36, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back. It would I think be best to count the poses per chapter of his book rather than from the poster, then there can be an explicit ref for each total to a specific page range (or at least the chapter number) of the book. If you have it to hand ... Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:41, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have it right right here. Please hold... Morganfitzp (talk) 21:27, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here are Dharma Mittra's pose quantities, listed by chapter. Note that I list number of photographic plates rather than poses because some are repeated in myriad variations, others give different views of the same pose, and others are repeated in more than one section (e.g. the Sun Salutation & Hero Series, which are made up poses from other chapters). Tallying these plates up, I get 618, and I'm unsure which 10 don't count toward Mittra's tally of 608:

• Sun Salutation & Hero Series: 23 plates (pp. 21–46)
• Standing Poses: 95 plates (pp. 47–145). These include many standing backbends and twists.
• Inversions: 110 plates (pp. 145–257). These also include many poses I'd just call "backbends."
• Floor & Supine Poses: 267 plates (pp. 258–527). A wide variety of poses here, including lots of "prone" (belly-down) poses, lunges, seated folds, etc.
• Arm Balancing Poses: 67 (pp. 528–595)
• Twists & Seated Poses: 44 plates (pp. 596–641). There are actually more seated poses in his "Floor & Supine" chapter.
• Breathing & Cleansing Practices 5 plates (pp. 642–649). These are not necessarily asanas, but more like actions (pranayama and kriya) performed in asana.
• Resting Poses: 7 plates (pp. 650–659). Also "Floor & Supine Poses" but the stated action to be that of taking rest.

Mittra and I will both attest that asanas are not quantifiable. It's like asking, "How many grains of sand are on this beach?" when any number of grains could be split into smaller grains or compounded with other grains to form a pebble of glass. While I'd altogether abandon the chart that you've so diligently created for the asana article, I also like being helpful and admire your efforts, and I do hope you enjoy this a count of something that cannot truly be counted. Morganfitzp (talk) 22:18, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, and all the other authors would agree; our duty is to provide the data that exist, as they directly indicate in the table what happens when 7 authors try to count and classify — you get wildly different estimates, which is your point, and mine. Many thanks for the numbers and notes, which I've used or adapted for the table. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:48, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, at this distance in time, I'm not sure the table of numbers says much, I may remove them in favour of a brief cited statement about numbers, and perhaps some dates. On a different matter, I noticed that what was missing was an article about modern postural yoga, i.e. the thing that is practised all over the world that isn't much to do with Hinduism. I've drafted it, met some opposition, and would be glad of your brief thoughts on the article's talk page. Happy New Year! Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:28, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article OK (gesture) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyS712 -- DannyS712 (talk) 00:40, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Very good. Or, should I say, "A-OK". Morganfitzp (talk) 23:27, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morganfitzp. You have new messages at Talk:OK (gesture)/GA1.
Message added 02:06, 2 January 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DannyS712 (talk) 02:06, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morganfitzp. You have new messages at Talk:OK (gesture)/GA1.
Message added 01:01, 4 January 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Its almost done. Just one more error... DannyS712 (talk) 01:01, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morganfitzp. You have new messages at Talk:OK (gesture)/GA1.
Message added 20:00, 4 January 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DannyS712 (talk) 20:00, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article OK (gesture) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:OK (gesture) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyS712 -- DannyS712 (talk) 00:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just got home and am working on it now, DannyS712. Morganfitzp (talk) 00:50, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article OK (gesture) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:OK (gesture) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyS712 -- DannyS712 (talk) 03:21, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well OK! Morganfitzp (talk) 03:40, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 22:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes. That makes sense. Please excuse the confusion. Morganfitzp (talk) 15:18, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morganfitzp. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Taina Asili.
Message added 11:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Taina Asili at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Kaldari (talk) 00:12, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of OK (gesture) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 18:42, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article OK gesture, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the OK gesture (pictured) can stand for the evil eye, the letter F, the number 9, the rising and setting of the sun, or to signal that a scuba diver is safe? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, OK gesture), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Taina Asili, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that musician Taina Asili studied opera and fronted a hardcore punk band before starting the Afro-Caribbean group La Banda Rebelde? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Taina Asili. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Taina Asili), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Congrats for getting OK gesture to GA status and promoting it to DYK! Very interesting article (and well-written too)! Happy editing, MX (✉ • ✎) 01:33, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Golly! Thank you. Morganfitzp (talk) 16:44, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Luther Standing Bear you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 20:00, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Luther Standing Bear you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Luther Standing Bear for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 09:22, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, hope you're keeping well. We discussed [Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Yoga#Asana_and_related_articles back in December] how to group the asanas, and we sort of agreed to go under major headings. I've implemented this for around 100 major poses, each (I hope) with a Variations section listing some of the other things that are rather similar, or failing that with a See also section, suitably annotated.

There's also a completely rewritten List of asanas with a bit of classification of types (goes some way to resolving the how-many-are-there question, but only covers the major poses), a radically reworked Asana now with , and a completely new Modern yoga that has languished in the GAN queue for months (if you're at all interested...), along with its own Template:Modern yoga. I've stripped out the sales talk and guff about health benefits from all the asana articles, and have added basic sources and a bit of history to each of them. They remain inconsistently named, some still with diacritics.

You mentioned you were happy to sort things out - there's still much to do, not least to add some of the real benefits and risks in a standard format (probably all using the same sources), and to indicate which major schools use which asanas. We could, for instance, provide things like a Bikram yoga navbox for its studiously limited set of asanas... All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:24, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiswick Chap: That's super. Congrats on getting Asana up to GA status and thanks for the hard work you've done on yoga articles. If there are specific tasks that you'd like me to help tackle, or sections you'd like me to look at, I'm happy to do so. Best! Morganfitzp (talk) 02:08, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'd say the number one task would be to identify the key sources on the benefits and risks of asana practice, and to update the Health/Benefits sections of Asana and Modern yoga accordingly. If the sources point up specific asanas that are specially beneficial or specially risky, say so in the articles on those asanas also. We know, for instance, that the knees of Westerners not accustomed to long sitting cross-legged are in danger from hastily attempting padmasana, but this would need to be WP:MEDRS-ishly sourced. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:27, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiswick Chap: Cool. I can commit to doing this gradually. Authors sometimes use the word "contraindications" in place of "risks," and I'd aim to keep language consistent across these articles. What do think about these terminologies? Morganfitzp (talk) 18:48, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. Not a matter I've worked on; perhaps contraindications sounds more medical, and risks more like engineering? I'm cautious about medical-sounding terms but if it's suitably cited it should be fine. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:01, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add Audience scores to articles.

• MOS:TVRECEPTION specifically warns against adding audience scores.
• WP:USERGENERATED warns against adding user generated content, such as scores from user voted web polls.
• WP:RS audiences scores are not a reliable source.

Please do not add Audience scores to articles. -- 109.77.232.82 (talk) 18:50, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you really think Rotten Tomatoes is being unfair (it very often is, especially for tv shows) the first thing you should do is check the reviews being used. You should find out how many reviews were given to critics as a preview, or even if the reviewer was only reviewing the first episode. Even if a critic has only reviewed one episode Rotten Tomatoes might still used that review to create their score which is supposed to represent the entire season.

People place too much trust in Rotten Tomatoes. It is also good to improve the article with actual quotes from reviews, especially if you can find a reliable critic who particularly like the series.

To summarize, please don't add audience scores. There are always better ways to improve the article. -- 109.77.232.82 (talk) 18:58, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, User:109.77.232.82. Your stern warning has been noted and added to my education as a Wikipedia editor. Morganfitzp (talk) 19:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1936, The Spanish Revolution (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ronald Fraser

History Is What's Happening (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Janowska

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited We Got the Beat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beauty and the Beat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:50, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And may we all march forth in preciousness. Morganfitzp (talk) 22:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 June 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Robert Rutman, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 03:48, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Puppetista is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puppetista until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Happyecheveria (talk) 04:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that sure was one speedy deletion. Morganfitzp (talk) 18:18, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Breakmaster Cylinder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reply All.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Erik Greatest American Hero.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:43, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:51, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March forth, Gerda. Morganfitzp (talk) 23:21, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Das Fürlines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East Village.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Morganfitzp. I'm sorry if you are seeing notifications about edits to this page being reverted. Belteshazzar (see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Belteshazzar if you are curious) was using sockpuppets to try to trick you into editing on his behalf. He is de-facto banned from Wikipedia and should not be bothering other people with his tedious nonsense. You can review recent edits to Das Fürlines, if you want to, but don't need to do anything, if you don't want to, and you certainly don't have to take any notice of what he says. DanielRigal (talk) 17:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I notcied the reverts. Wikipedia is an odd enough hobby without all that! Morganfitzp (talk) 18:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This revert is worth examining. Note that the "issue" parameter causes "No." to appear, suggesting that that parameter wants a number rather than a date. I don't know whether the People Weekly quote said "they're" or "they are". The Mark E. Smith wikilink is obviously missing a ]. Near the end, there seems to be something missing after "fellow New York City". 174.62.207.69 (talk) 15:19, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Morganfitzp! Apologies for the super odd solicitation, but I'm a student in Western Mass researching the Tofu Curtain for a journalism class. I was quite surprised to see there was a Wiki page for it, and I'd love to speak with you as the mastermind behind its creation.

If you're willing, please reach out to doingresearch739// @ //gmail.com and we can set up a time to call! (I know this might feel sketchy, but I can email you back via my academic email if that helps.)

Thank you, Student in need of sources Doing some research (talk) 13:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Don't Slander Me, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBS Records.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Killed by Death KBD logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

obsolete, unused, replaced by file:Killed by Death KBD logo.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Ирука¹³ 11:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:26, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Instrument Soundtrack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Score (music).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Franchise activism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

ı cannot find enough sources to show notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:36, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]