User talk:Montestruc

Hello, Montestruc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tutorial to help get you oriented editing Wikipedia)
• Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! We're so glad you're here! Sadads (talk) 14:55, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Pearl Harbor advance-knowledge conspiracy theory, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 05:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I presented no orriginal research. Everyining I stated is fact already published on Wikipedia, such as the date of death of McCollum, and the date of declassification of the Memo. Others are common knowledge such as that it is illegal for an person sworn to secrecy by the US Government to discuss even the existence of classified documents publicly.

If you are of the opinion that I presented original information please cite what you think was "original".

(Montestruc (talk) 07:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Pearl Harbor advance-knowledge conspiracy theory. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 06:30, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Like what? What "original research" are you accusing me of adding? Please be specific.

 (Montestruc (talk) 16:26, 15 December 2016 (UTC))[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Acroterion (talk) 03:10, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Pearl Harbor advance-knowledge conspiracy theory. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Meters (talk) 06:28, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would encourage you to read Wikipedia:Disruptive editing so you can avoid some of the pitfalls that editors sometimes fall into which negatively impact Wikipedia. After reviewing your contribution history, it looks like you are working hard to improve Wikipedia in good faith. It looks like you are attempting to bring balance to potential systemic biases on Wikipedia. I thank you for your efforts, but I must insist that you take Meters's comment above very seriously. Daask (talk) 10:58, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is EXACTLY what I am staying Binksternet was doing. Disruptive editing, in which he is I think in fact driving good editors away. Montestruc (talk) 22:23, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Daask. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Meters (talk) 03:44, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Meters. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. You might want to read WP:DROPTHESTICK before you get yourself blocked. Meters (talk) 04:29, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stay off my page please. I'm not interested in seeing any more of your attacks on that editor. If you think there is a problem then take the editor to WP:ANI, but be aware that your actions will also be examined if you do so. Meters (talk) 04:33, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Montestruc! You created a thread called How to deal with an editor that is blatently lying about source material. at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]