User talk:Modussiccandi/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Modussiccandi. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Stuart Croft (academic), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 01:43, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Stuart Croft (academic), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:02, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Modussiccandi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for academics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stuart Croft (academic) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stuart Croft (academic), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 07:07, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Stuart Croft (academic), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Thsmi002 (talk) 12:59, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Stephen Harrison (classicist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I believe as soon as he plays a pro game this can be published

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Taylor Stallworth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Taylor Stallworth, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 16:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I believe he has to play to become notable for a page. Wait till he plays

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deon Yelder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Deon Yelder, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 20:12, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siegburger SV 04 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Siegburger SV 04, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:17, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by K.e.coffman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siegburger SV 04 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Siegburger SV 04, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

K.e.coffman (talk) 03:06, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Taylor Stallworth instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The existing article says that he played on 15 September 2018 and therefore satisfies gridiron football notability. This draft will be replaced by a redirect to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Taylor Stallworth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Taylor Stallworth, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:34, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Taylor Stallworth. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Geryoneis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 20:07, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Modussiccandi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Suzanne Frey-Kupper. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:21, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Hey, you do know that (~~~~~) five tidles make a new time and date in the infobox? It seems you are entering both manually. Kante4 (talk) 12:36, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Charles Segal (classicist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Cerebellum (talk) 20:59, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Pindar's First Pythian Ode, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 19:06, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Pindar's Eighth Nemean Ode, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 18:21, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Modussiccandi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siegburger SV 04".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 16:27, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SC Paderborn 07, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HSV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Achilleid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:23, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Ode to Polycrates, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 21:28, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of alumni of Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regius Professor of Hebrew (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:30, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Modussiccandi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Suzanne Frey-Kupper".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:41, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nemean Eight, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:39, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Modussiccandi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nemean Eight".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1. FC Köln, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HSV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

On 15 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article R. A. B. Mynors, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the English classicist Roger Mynors was discussing the death of Bede shortly before being killed in a car crash? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, R. A. B. Mynors), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article R. A. B. Mynors you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 09:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

On 28 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Epodes (Horace), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a hostile review of Uncle Tom's Cabin likened the book to a witch from Horace's Epodes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Epodes (Horace). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Epodes (Horace)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

The article R. A. B. Mynors you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:R. A. B. Mynors for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 13:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

The article R. A. B. Mynors you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:R. A. B. Mynors for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 13:22, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Modussiccandi I'm a new editor of Wikipedia, with my first Article about AliceVision Meshroom open source software. It seems that this Draft has met Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, because of the similarity of some text pieces with some pages of alicevision.org and alicevision.org/association websites. In fact, I am one of the main contributors of these websites, because I am the President of AliceVision association, and one of the founders of this open source project. Could you help us in solving that?

Thank you! Benoît75011 (talk) 21:21, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Benoît75011, thank you very much for taking up the issue. I proposed the article for speedy deletion because significant passages are copies or close paraphrases of a website. The fact that you are the creator of said website does not automatically change the situation: you would need to donate the material to Wikipedia (details can be found via this link). I should, however, alert you to another, equally important problem with the article: all articles on Wikipedia need to be sourced from reliable sources which are independent of their subject. Content which does not meet this threshold is likely to be removed from the website. The website in question is not independent of the subject, as you suggested in you message, and therefore should not be used as a source. My advice to you would be to find some independently published sources (scholarly article, newspaper report etc.) and write an article based on them. If you cannot finds such sources, AliceVision Meshroom should not be on Wikipedia and is liable to removal through other processes. Feel free to reply or ask any questions, best Modussiccandi (talk) 21:37, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Modussiccandi, thank you for your reply. Regarding the features of the software and the statutes of the organization, it's going to be difficult to change the wording as it is taken from official documents and statements that have been validated either by the 14 founding members of our association or by the legal authorities. Or even milestones, which a list of public events. As you may notice, we already have given external references - from Siggraph, FMX and Academy software organizations. I'm going to add a list other external publications to make it more consistent regarding independently published sources. Hope this helps. Thanks again for your help and support. Best Benoît75011

Benoît75011 Thank you for trying to include more third-party sources. When you use them (or any other sources) make sure to reference them with inline citations, of which the article does not have any at the moment. If you do not yet know how do create inline citations, take a look at this page. A list of external references is not sufficient because readers of Wikipedia need to be able to trace exactly where the information comes from. With regards to the copyright problem: if it is truly the case that the content of the article must be closely based on the website in question, I think you should consider in earnest making your copyrighted material free for to reproduce. Instructions for this can be found here. Apart from that, I do not think it is advisable to insist on using the material from said website. The majority of any article must be based on reliable, third-party sources. The website in question is not a third-party source. Therefore it is not suited to be the main source for the article. Again, if you come to the conclusion that you cannot find sources independent of the subject to act as the majority source, AliceVision Meshroom is not fit for inclusion in Wikipedia. Modussiccandi (talk) 22:24, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Modussiccandi, thanks again for your help! We've been doing a lot of rewriting now and add a lot of inline citations and external references. And regarding potential copyright infringement with AliceVision Project and AliceVision Association websites, they are both now published under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Benoît75011 (talk) 18:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do delete Pol098/js/webRef.js ASAP (per your post on the Pol098 Talk page) - I first contested this, before realising I meant User:Pol098/js/webRef.js. Sorry and thanks. Pol098 (talk) 15:42, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Pol098, thanks for letting me know. Best Modussiccandi (talk) 15:42, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

(I hope it doesn't add complication that the Pol098 page and its nested subpages need deleting.) Pol098 (talk) 17:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Denys Page, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alcaeus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Denys Page you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 21:41, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

I have a feeling that the sources I find about Brian Hull may not be enough for Wikipedia. Will you help me find some reliable sources? Thanks. WikiTimmy (talk)

Hi WikiTimmy, thank you for your interest in improving the article Brian Hull (impressionist). You are right, the source you provided (the subject's YouTube channel) is not enough to demonstrate the subject should be included in Wikipedia. What is needed are sources that are 1) from reputable publications with a good-fact checking record (e.g. national newspapers or scholarly publications, more at WP:R) and 2) independent from the subject, which means they are not written by him or by someone connected to him (more at WP:IS). If none such sources can be found, the subject may not be suitable for Wikipedia. Modussiccandi (talk) 20:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

PS: You can sign your posts on talk pages by using four (~) symbols.

Hello, just wanted to say thanks for your comment on the RfD regarding WP:NOTBIBLIOGRAPHY. I do agree with your AfD, the bibliography you nominated shouldn't have a stand alone article, the RfD wasn't to stop the AfD, it was intended to discuss the redirect. Best wishes from Los Angeles,   // Timothy :: talk  03:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi TimothyBlue, don't worry about it. I agree the redirect needs fixing. My comment under the RfD was meant to describe the lack of clarity I felt when weighing wether to nominate Bibliography of Tirana. Having seen some of the other !votes under the RfD, I am starting to think the redirect should be deleted to reflect the fact that we actually have lots of bibliographies. Bibliography of Tirana, as you say, is a different issue and should probably be merged. Best Modussiccandi (talk) 03:42, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

The article Denys Page you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Denys Page for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 18:41, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

The article Denys Page you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Denys Page for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 16:22, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Epodes (Horace) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ffranc -- Ffranc (talk) 11:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

The article Epodes (Horace) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Epodes (Horace) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ffranc -- Ffranc (talk) 13:42, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Cornelia Ewigleben, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 00:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

On 30 October 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Denys Page, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the English classicist Denys Page was both master of Jesus College, Cambridge, and president of the university's cricket club? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Denys Page. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Denys Page), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 12:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I promoted your hook to prep, but then I started to see the problem that a first-time reader might have connecting the Spanish name with the Spanish name of the battle, which isn't exactly the same thing. This is the version I came up with:

• ... that the unusual given name of Chilean travel writer Maipina de la Barra commemorates the Battle of Maipú, in which her father fought?

Is that all right with you? Yoninah (talk) 22:55, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, Yoninah, your version is fine with me. How considerate of you! Thanks again and best, Modussiccandi (talk) 23:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! Yoninah (talk) 23:07, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

On 14 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dámasa Cabezón, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dámasa Cabezón was contracted by the Bolivian government to establish a school for girls in La Paz after having done so in Santiago de Chile? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dámasa Cabezón. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Dámasa Cabezón), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

On 17 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maipina de la Barra, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the unusual given name of Chilean travel writer Maipina de la Barra commemorates the Battle of Maipú, in which her father fought? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maipina de la Barra. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Maipina de la Barra), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Eva Forest, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:40, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

I assume you may know this already, but you don't have to use AFC to create articles! You can just create articles directly in the main encyclopedia. Let me know if you need any help with this, or the Teahouse volunteers would be happy to assist. In my view, AFC is not a useful process for good-faith editors who have been around a while... Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:44, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Calliopejen1, thanks for the message. Yes, I know I shouldn't create articles via AfC. The reason I did it this time is because of the the New Page Patrol school. Their final exams asks editors to submit an article via AfC. I'm sorry for clogging up to process. Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 14:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Modussiccandi, oh, no problem! I just see good editors get ensnared in AFC problems and wanted to male sure it didnt happen to you!! Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:26, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

On 20 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kirsten Boie, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that German children's author Kirsten Boie has published more than 100 books? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kirsten Boie. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kirsten Boie), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Modussiccandi. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.