User talk:Miniapolis/Archives/2013/August
Editing to Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh wiki pageHi I am quite new to Wiki editing and contributions, so please bear with me. Regarding your comment on my editing to change the name from Rajneesh to Osho. I am not sure what is usual on Wiki, but in normal life, when a person changes their name the new name supersedes the old. E.g. Marilyn Monroe not Norma Jeane Mortensen, Joseph Stalin not Ioseb Besarionis je Zhugshvili, or when a woman changes her name by marriage. I agree that the personage in question should still be refereed to as Rajneesh in quotes (as they were published like that), but in all other contexts his last name and the name under which all his works are now published. To refer to someone by a name they no longer used is disrespectful, and seems to be prejudiced to me and not at all neutral. Otherwise I found the tone of the article to be quite balanced with pro and anti views. However throughout the article half the time his name was given as Rajneesh and half the time as Osho. So I want consistency and my editing brings clarity. Sarovara (talk) 19:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 July 2013One of the narratives I've heard a lot is that Wikipedia is unable to change, that it's too stagnant, too poorly resourced, too inherently resistant to change. I don't believe that at all.
An ArXiv preprint titled "Highlighting entanglement of cultures via ranking of multilingual Wikipedia articles" is about the Wikipedia articles on individuals and their position in the hyperlink network of the articles in each Wikipedia language edition, considering the whole hyperlink network.
Somewhat predictably, the birth of a new heir to the House of Windsor on 22 July led the English-speaking world to suddenly embrace Monarchism. In honour of this occasion, the Traffic report will be assiduously employing British spelling and dating conventions. Cheers.
This week, we visited the Turkish Wikipedia for an interview with VikiProje Siyaset (WikiProject Politics). The project began in April 2010 and has sustained a small but enthusiastic group of editors focusing on both the domestic politics of Turkey and international politics. The basics for article quality and importance ratings have been determined, but tracking this data has not yet become widespread on the Turkish Wikipedia. The project maintains a portal, a variety of resources, and a rotating selection of images to spruce up the project's page.
The ninth annual Wikimania conference will open in just over a week at the Jockey Club Auditorium, the Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Wikimania is for people worldwide who have an interest in Wikimedia Foundation projects. It features presentations and discussions on those projects, on free knowledge and content, and on related social and technical issues.
The case Race and politics was closed, while three other cases remain open.
Eight articles, five lists, seven pictures, and one topic were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week.
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia this week include...
Meta KnightThank you for your copy edit! Gabriel Yuji (talk) 23:58, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
WP:GOCE July backlog drive award
The Signpost: 07 August 2013
Fourteen editors have been proposed for a six-month page ban in the Tea Party movement case. In the Infoboxes and Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds cases, the workshop and evidence phases have closed, and proposed decisions are scheduled to be posted.
It's crickets and tumbleweeds this week, as the top 10 sees its lowest view-count since the project began. If Wikipedia were selling anything, we'd be having a fire sale by now.
The opening days of the annual Wikimania, referred to as the "pre-conference", are not typically newsworthy. This changed dramatically when the Chapters Association council met on Thursday.
This week, we journey into a WikiProject that focuses about what keeps Wikipedia running, the freedom of speech.
The week's newest featured content includes...
Recent discussions on the English Wikipedia include...
GOCE July 2013 copy edit drive wrap-up
Changing names of unitsThanks for you interest in copyediting the Battle of Beersheba. However, you should stop changing the names of units e.g. from guns to machine guns and its the Anzac Mounted Division not an army corps. Thanks --Rskp (talk) 02:09, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
[moved from my talk page, just to keep it all together]
No, I am not in the slightest dissatisfied with your work. In fact I very much admire you and your colleagues in the Guild for the fantastic work you do to improve the quality of Wikipedia. I made the above comments about the heavy guns being linked to heavy machine guns because it introduced different information to that given in the sources and reflected in the article. I appreciate that there is a redirect from heavy guns to the heavy machine gun article so I understand why you made the link, but its wrong. The Anzac Mounted Division is not the army corps. It has been agreed on the MILHIST discussion page twice that the block capitals are wrong, in this instance, when it refers to the Anzac Mounted Division. As I have corrected this name twice, I realised you didn't get the message and so contacted you on your talk page, after correcting the name for a third time, to explain. I hope that you will continue to edit this article, but I would appreciate it if you don't change the substance of the article, nor the names of the units involved. --Rskp (talk) 00:00, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Oops!Oops! I wasn't knowing about the July drive. I was thinking to expand What's Your Raashee? But, due to a busy schedule, I wasn't able to do so. I was thinking to replace it with Aitraaz but, saw you already copy-edited. I know you don't accept direct request but, could you please accept Aitraaz to copy edit after that list. Please, it would mean a lot if you can accept. Plus, it's a small article and it will take only one day!—Prashant 17:20, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Kellie LoderHi Miniapolis, Thank you for copyediting the Kellie Loder article. Because of your involvement with the article, I thought that you should be notified of the article's FAC. Any comments you would be willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated. Neelix (talk) 02:35, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 August 2013
About a thousand Wikimedians journeyed to Hong Kong this week for the annual Wikimania conference, the annual gathering of the Wikimedia movement. Wikimania, which has been held since 2005, serves as the principal physical meetup for Wikimedians around the world.
One major story that came out of Wikimania was Jimmy Wales' statements at the conference that he would prefer to have Wikipedia banned entirely in mainland China than censored as it is currently.
The week's newest featured content includes seven articles, four lists, and twelve pictures.
Jimmy Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia and its public face to most of the media, has declared that media organizations are missing out on the "opportunity of the century" by not conducting true investigative reporting into American surveillance practices, a debate kindled by information leaked by Edward Snowden.
Recent discussions on the English Wikipedia include...
The Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds case has closed, with a unanimous decision to desysop a Wikimedia Foundation employee and indefinitely ban another editor. The Tea Party movement case has stalled yet again, in the wake of a controversial proposal to ban 14 editors. A proposed decision in the Infoboxes case was scheduled to be posted on 14 August.
A kitten for you!![]() a guardian copyeditor, a watchful protector:-) Sammyjankis88 (talk) 11:31, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
August 2013
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:30, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:44, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:20, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:51, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:33, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:19, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:25, 18 August 2013 (UTC) RequestHey Miniapolis! Well I nominated Kaminey for GA last month and is currently being reviewed by Dr. Blofeld. He has demanded a thorough copy edit and prose condensing. It's very interstating article and one of the most important films of Indian cinema. Can you help. He has given me a time of 2 weeks that I should get someone to Copy edit it.—Prashant 08:31, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
GOCE August blitz barnstar
Limca
My first copy-editGreetings. I note that you are a copy-editing mentor, so I thought I'd ask for your input. I'm a long-time Wikipedian, and I frequently perform GAN and FAC reviews, but I've never done any copy-editing for GOCE until today. My first foray was Bangladeshis in India, with my comments left at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests#Bangladeshis in India. So how'd I do? Was I too detailed, or not thorough enough? Did I overstep the bounds of what a copy-editor is expected to do? Thanks for any feedback, – Quadell (talk) 15:01, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your copy edit, I appreciate it! I'm very pleased with the corrections, and look forward to soon bring this article to FAC. WikiRedactor (talk) 19:29, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
GOCE Blitz wrap-up and September 2013 drive invitation
The Signpost: 21 August 2013Wikipedia's gender identity MOS section and its effect on Chelsea Manning was both praised and emulated in the media this week. ... Coverage of the distributed open collaborative course called "Storming Wikipedia" continued this week.
98 registered participants attended the annual WikiSym+OpenSym conference from August 5-7 at Hong Kong's Cyberport facility.
This week, we secured free admission for WikiProject Amusement Parks, the project dedicated to amusement rides, roller coasters, theme parks, traveling carnivals, and funfairs.
The debt that Wikipedia owes sites like Reddit or Google often goes unacknowledged around here. If the purpose of Wikipedia is to bring knowledge to the world, then it is sites like these that are actually doing it.
The 2013 WikiCup competition is entering its final round. Eleven articles and nine pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week.
Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM), Wikimedia's annual volunteer-driven and the world largest photo contest, is gearing up to be conducted throughout September 2013. The event, originally developed in the Netherlands in 2010, has gone global with 34 countries taking part last and 49 this year.
Wikipedia's traditional image gallery format, produced by the markup, has remained largely unchanged for years. The resulting layout, seen below, does not adapt well to variations in image size, and has been characterized by some critics as aesthetically unappealing.
My recent RfAI should have said thanks for your support sooner. ```Buster Seven Talk 03:26, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 August 2013Wikipedia's gender identity MOS section and its effect on Chelsea Manning was both praised and emulated in the media this week. ... Coverage of the distributed open collaborative course called "Storming Wikipedia" continued this week.
98 registered participants attended the annual WikiSym+OpenSym conference from August 5-7 at Hong Kong's Cyberport facility.
This week, we secured free admission for WikiProject Amusement Parks, the project dedicated to amusement rides, roller coasters, theme parks, traveling carnivals, and funfairs.
The debt that Wikipedia owes sites like Reddit or Google often goes unacknowledged around here. If the purpose of Wikipedia is to bring knowledge to the world, then it is sites like these that are actually doing it.
The 2013 WikiCup competition is entering its final round. Eleven articles and nine pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week.
Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM), Wikimedia's annual volunteer-driven and the world largest photo contest, is gearing up to be conducted throughout September 2013. The event, originally developed in the Netherlands in 2010, has gone global with 34 countries taking part last and 49 this year.
Wikipedia's traditional image gallery format, produced by the markup, has remained largely unchanged for years. The resulting layout, seen below, does not adapt well to variations in image size, and has been characterized by some critics as aesthetically unappealing.
|