User talk:Mindmatrix/2020

The article 2022 in Canada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

We don't normally have articles more than 1 year in advance for "[YEAR] in [country]" articles. See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2023_in_the_Philippines and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2022_in_the_Philippines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 23:59, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be the only '2022 in [country' article on the wiki (except the likely-to-be-deleted 2022 in the Philippines). The cutoff appears to have naturally developed as one year in advance; even then, those articles are usually only created towards the end of the preceding calendar year. 2021 in Canada is also an anomaly. I wonder if moving to draft or user space to await a more appropriate time for creation would be an acceptable compromise? — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 22:31, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 in Canada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 in Canada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 19:03, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Card games introduced in 1933 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:27, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Card games introduced in 1985 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:27, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sanctuaries, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2021 in Canada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 in Canada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 17:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mindmatrix, thank you so much for adding information to the Maria Sole Agnelli page! I just wanted to warn you that you said that she was the niece of Giovanni Agnelli when, in fact, she was the grand daughter. No hate at all, I’m just warning you I’m going to change it and wanted to avoid any confusion. Again, thank you very much for your help, Kind Regards RCdS Ranieri001 (talk) 09:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ranieri001: I only corrected your original writing: "...as she was the nephew of the deceased founder of FIAT, Giovanni Agnelli...", changing 'nephew' to 'niece', as the former is for males. I didn't change the context or meaning in any way. Mindmatrix 13:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, while scrolling through the page I noticed you made another error but I can understand I might have been unclear. This is because when I said her dead’s husband son, I didn’t mean Bernardino but rather Rovero, since Maria Sole’s husband had another son before marrying her, Rovero. Rovero is not her son but he did become mayor after her. I hope I cleared any misunderstanding before I do the edits. Sincerely RCdS - Ranieri001 (talk) 09:38, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that wasn't clear in the original phrasing. The word you should probably use is 'stepson'. Mindmatrix 13:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, maybe my attempt to create a new section in the page was not perfect, so tanks to point it. But now do you have a to fix the issue on the article ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ros975 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your Herculean effort to remove those silly flags from so many infoboxes. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:10, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Magnolia677: You're welcome, though this is going to take quite some time... Mindmatrix 23:55, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Canadian stations)#Go station naming regarding station naming conventions for GO Transit stations. BLAIXX 16:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FreeBSD, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Tonystewart14 (talk) 01:27, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The 100 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		Long overdue! --evrik (talk) 03:28, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Computer Science (art). Since you had some involvement with the Computer Science (art) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 10:19, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I proposed some changes to the Electronic Paper page per WP:COI but didn’t get a response. I saw that you have edited the page previously and was wondering if you would be willing to take a look. The suggested changes are shown here. They primarily have to do with mis-use of our trademark and some criticisms cited to a vendor blog. CDaignault1 (talk) 19:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:23, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Flags of cities in Slovenia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:05, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mindmatrix. I read your comments and respect your comments and decisions. I replied to what you wrote on my profile page. I'd value feedback on my comments there that I just wrote to you. Musa Isa 2020 (talk) 17:02, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mindmatrix, please undo the rollback for the minor edits made in good faith for Pascal's Wager. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.225.83.106 (talk) 04:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 122.57.48.153. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Canadian Toy Testing Council, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Canadian Toy Testing Council often had a waiting list of families wanting to test toys and games? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Canadian Toy Testing Council. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Canadian Toy Testing Council), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Mindmatrix 02:30, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Medalta Potteries at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:03, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Medalta Potteries, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the kilns of Medalta Potteries (pictured) were used as overnight accommodation by people travelling the country in search of work during the Great Depression? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Medalta Potteries. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Medalta Potteries), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! With 7,779 views, your Medalta Potteries hook is one of the most viewed hooks for the month of December. Accordingly, it has been included at DYKSTATS December. Even more impressive given that it appeared in a 12-hour queue. Keep up the good work! Cbl62 (talk) 21:02, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pre-game ceremony, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in a pre-game ceremony before the last game of the 1972 ice hockey Summit Series, the Canadian delegation presented a totem pole to the Soviet Union? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pre-game ceremony. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pre-game ceremony), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:44, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]