User talk:Mindmatrix/2016

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Mindmatrix: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. North America1000 00:47, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

First, Happy new year. Concerning the subject I have reintroduced the modification (with a correction). Perhaps this looks wrong to you because you are not Italian. But I am and I can confirm that the real pronunciation in Italian are the ones I have written. You can realize directly this by hearing to the sounds of the words chiave and ghianda (and of whichever other words you try) here https://translate.google.it/#it/en/chiave https://translate.google.it/#it/en/ghianda You can easily realize that the sounds are not at all /kj/ and /gj/. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.36.255.237 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 5 January 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

You shouldn't assume anything about another individual's skills. Regarding the information you added to Italian phonology, it is wrong. The pronunciation of 'chiave', for example:

Una chiave: Audio^ⓘ

I don't assume anithing that the fact that the pronunciation is /tj/. Please listen carefully to the sound and you will clearly hear that he first fhoneme is a /t/ not a /k/. This doesn't mean that the word is clearly recognizable if spoken as /ky/, but actually thi is not the way Italians typically speak.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.36.255.237 (talk • contribs)

Note that the linked pronuciation is spoken by an Italian from Milano, who clearly enunciates it as /ˈkjave/. (See Information about that audio file.)

Please se your ears and not restrict yourself to other information; I repeat; the two sequences are certainly allophone but the pronunciation is tj — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.36.255.237 (talk • contribs)

The sound produced by /ʎ/, which you insist on placing in the article, is that which you would find in the 'gl' of "maglia" or "tagliare". No Italian speaker pronounces "ghianda" with a /ʎ/, and certainly not with /dʎ/, which would be approximated by the nonexistent nonsense word 'adglio' by slurring the d and gl together. Please read Help:IPA for Italian to understand the sounds associated with the phonetic symbols you're using. Mindmatrix 18:06, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I insist only because this is the reality, the word ghianda is pronounced with a /d/ sonore phoneme followed by another sonore phoneme /ʎ/ (which is the sonore phoneme corresponding to the non-sonore /j/. You can easily try yourself by pronouncing ghianda in the way Italians do by putting your fingers on the throat and you will distincltly realize that the vocal strings vibrate during both phonemes; this means that the second phoneme is just /ʎ/. This is what actually happens. Unfprtunately people are misleaded by the fact that in the dictionaries the sequences /kj/ and /gh/ are used bt this is not correct and perhaps this is the reason why almost no foreigner is able to speak correctly the above sequences.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.36.255.237 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 5 January 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

Can you cite any research by linguists who study the Italian language that supports your claim? What you're stating appears to be original research, which contravenes WP policies and guidelines. What you claim also contradicts reliable sources on Italian phonology. As I've said, /dʎ/ in no way represents the pronunciation of 'ghianda' (or 'ghiaccio', etc.), and I advise you to familiarise yourself with Help:IPA for Italian. That document clearly states that /d/ is the sound produced by Italian words such as 'dove', and /ʎ/ is the sound produced by Italian words such as 'maglia', which means /dʎ/ has a sound approximated by the Italian letter seqeuence 'dgl'. That's wrong. The onus is on you to provide reliable sources supporting your claim. Mindmatrix 19:10, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited University of Waterloo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Jenkins. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prisoner's dilemma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gotham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake sorry about that, I will watch what categories are used more closely to avoid future issues. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. Cheers Kyle1278 ^{(talk) (Ctb) (log)} 23:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My thought was when editing them the categories i.e.this one was

2002 disestablishments in Alberta → Disestablishments in Alberta → disestablishments in Alberta Disestablishments in Alberta by decade → Disestablishments in Alberta by year → Disestablishments in Canada by year

Since it alreay led back to the categories in Canada by year that it was redundant. I see now how that it can complicate categories if not properly broken down into other categories. Cheers Kyle1278 ^{(talk) (Ctb) (log)} 00:39, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FeelUs (talk) 21:07, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know that if you get a revert notice on this, it's not you, it's them. I'm trying to de-vandalize this completely random article and I apologize if you got a nastygram from being caught up in it; you were really just trying to make the table look better and get rid of some of the idiocy, and your contributions clearly had nothing to do with the puerility the folks on either side of you in the edit history have been trying to introduce for no discernible reason. (Eddie Zosky? huh?! I guess it's a funny name to say out loud but what did this poor shortstop ever do to the universe?!) Take care - Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No nastygrams so far... No worries though, I've been here a long time and have received everything from cordial requests to death threats. Mindmatrix 23:30, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Canoe Channel, Ontario, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Canoe Channel, Ontario and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Canoe Channel, Ontario during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. RES2773 (talk) 00:31, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Canoe Channel, Ontario requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
• disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 00:49, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Artist rendition of Mackenzie Vaughan Hospital.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mackenzie Vaughan Hospital, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that development of the Mackenzie Vaughan Hospital in Vaughan, Canada, was delayed four years because of a land use dispute? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mackenzie Vaughan Hospital. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mackenzie Vaughan Hospital), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:07, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated OpenBSD for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Tonystewart14 (talk) 15:03, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geek Pride Day, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meetup. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kristen French.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Look at calgary or Winnipeg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.161.21.21 (talk) 22:21, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Transit fleet data does not determine the type of geopolitical entity. Moreover, your opinion and observations are irrelevant given that they so utterly conflict with the facts. Mindmatrix 23:37, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My ip vandalizes a lot  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Autistic editor (talk • contribs) 23:43, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply] 

I read the article on Sixth man (fans) and noticed that the article has templates for the Orlando Magic and the Sacramento Kings on it. I also noticed that you removed the Toronto Blue Jays template for Bat flip. For consistency's sake, which course of action should you do? Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 02:53, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would probably delete those templates from that article. Unless there's an overwhelming association of the term to a particular fan base, I don't think such links are necessary. (One way to gauge this, although not as a final determining factor, is whether the article is included in the nav template.) Mindmatrix 14:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There may be a bit of sockpuppeting going on with Autistic editor and 142.161.21.21. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:03, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you find out that they are the same block them  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Autistic editor (talk • contribs) 15:19, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply] 

Thanks for uploading File:Kristen French.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Three years ago ...

wild strawberries
... you were recipient no. 509 of Precious, a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chloridometer, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mole, Conductance and Current. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paul Quantrill may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Since retirement, Quantrill lives in [[[Port Hope, Ontario|Port Hope]], [[Ontario]].<ref>http://www.northumberlandnews.com/sports-story/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chloridometer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a chloridometer is used to determine the concentration of chloride in biological fluids, including blood serum, cerebrospinal fluid, sweat, and urine? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chloridometer. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Chloridometer), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Role-playing video games by year, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AdrianGamer (talk) 13:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:José Bautista bat flip, 14 October 2015.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mindmatrix. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you for adding that category I missed to Meridian Bank (Canada). I greatly appreciate it!! Me-123567-Me (talk) 02:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are a sock puppet of Hwy43 Shark32322 (talk) 00:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can't argue this logic. Resolute 01:40, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm experiencing a certain déjà vu. Mindmatrix 04:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

With non-free/fair use images in particular, filing them in articlespace categories is essentially creating an image gallery (just in the category instead of in the article), and thus violates WP:IG's rules against gallerying fair-use images. Bearcat (talk) 02:52, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mindmatrix. I was going to prod Brutality (band) for deletion when I came across Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brutality (band). Are you able to tell whether this current version is basically a recreation of the one that AfD, and thus should be tagged for speedy per WP:G4? I've tried to find any significant coverage that this band might have received, but have had no luck. I also asked at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Metal#Brutality (band), but got no response. FWIW, I went with Prod instead of AfD because there was no {{Old AfD}} tag on the article's talk page and didn't think this would be a controversial deletion. Should this go to AfD if G4 is not applicable? Should it be listed as "2nd nomination"? Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:22, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article was recreated soon after that deletion discussion by Spearhead (talk · contribs), the same user that created the original version. The new version was more comprehensive; here's the text of the deleted version:

Brutality is a US death metal band. They were formed in Tampa, Florida in 1986. They split up after their third album, but re-united and disbanded again several times afterward. In April 2005, guitarist Larry Sapp died and the surviving members discontinued the band.

There was also a list of members and a discography with three entries. Frankly, an article that has been on Wikipedia for over 10 years with one (poor) reference needs to be removed, as do its sibling articles. Try CSD G4 as you suggest (for the band and its albums), and if someone objects, bring them all to AfD. As they stand, they don't belong on WP. Mindmatrix 09:40, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking a look. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:48, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mindmatrix.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Thumbprint cookie. Since you had some involvement with the Thumbprint cookie redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 06:02, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mindmatrix. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the OK Blue Jays page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Mackenzie Vaughan Hospital page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]