User talk:Mike Selinker/Archive14

Please see my two proposals to create categories for English, Scottish & Irish politicians by century Discussion of 8 January 2016. Hugo999 (talk) 22:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:New Orleans Jazz, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ibadibam (talk) 00:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Alph Lyla members, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Slik, I played bridge against Seth Manfield a while ago, and in a recent social media comment, his mom mentioned that he was an MTG champ. I added a little bit of stuff to his article, but more importantly, there is a question of notability posted there. I'm wondering what you know about "reliable" coverage of MTG and Seth in particular. Ma^t_chups 16:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC) (Alf)[reply]

Sorry, despite working on Wizards' releases, I'm not an expert on the Magic pro scene.--Mike Selinker (talk) 03:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you can correct (copyedit) this article? I have translated this article to English Wikipedia from polish Wikipedia (some people helped me) Are you intrested in this article? Regards. Dawid2009 (talk) 20:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When do you will have got a time to help me? Dawid2009 (talk) 09:40, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Superheroes by animated series, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk) 20:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike,
While browsing the category tree I figured the outcome of Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 December 6#Category:Incidents has turned out to be rather disadvantageous and IMO need to be reversed. Student7's worst fears that the proposal would lead to mere "incidents" getting rolled up into the "accidents" and "disasters" categories, have largely come true. Furthermore, while participation was egregiously low, I believe the closure was at least unfortunate, if not procedurally incorrect. For the parent category, there was a single, not further substantiated merge !vote by an IP. For the child categories, there were substantiated and further discussed keep !vote by a rather experienced editor, but no support for the nomination. The nominator's rationale was based on considering an incident just any "event or occurrence". However, Wiktionary is no WP:RS, and professional dictionaries clearly disagree, see Merriam Webster, Cambridge. While Oxford and Collins emphasize a broader definition, there is agreement that "incidents" refer to unplanned, uncommon events, which is exactly why we used to have these categories. Notability of incidents of course has to be determined case-by-case, but incidents that are no accidents nor disastrous clearly may be notable. Further subcategorization may define the inclusion criteria more precisely.
I'm therefore asking you to please resubmit/relist the nomination, even though it was concluded more than 5 years ago. I would otherwise consider a WP:DELREV, as I consider the discussion's outcome a significant problem that needs to be reevaluated. Best regards, PanchoS (talk) 12:11, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Do whatever you like in this regard.--Mike Selinker (talk) 19:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's a new Categories for Renaming discussion going on about categories of US cities listed in the AP Stylebook. As you have participated in at least one of the more recent discussions in the subject, you may want to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 August 17#Seattle. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have just made a new nomination for renaming categories for those U.S cities where the article doesn't include the state name. Since you participated in a recent discussion about this, you may want to express your opinion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 September 6#Major US cities. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]