User talk:Mdann52/Archive 9

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Mdann52. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Mdann52. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi, when you used User:Equazcion/OneClickArchiver on 21 October, a lot of threads disappeared without making it to the archive. Would you mind taking a look? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:28, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Resolved

archived manually. --Mdann52talk to me! 08:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I'm new here and finding my way to create an acceptable article. Can you help me to figure out the thingss I may need to change or make some corrections? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Gulistan,_Dhaka Afrin.Danny (talk) 14:57, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Can you please review this article? And give me some feedback? Afrin.Danny (talk) 21:26, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

The lede is not in an appropriate tone for a Wikipedia article. Phrases like "every place in Gulistan is a market" is not appropriate for an article. --Mdann52talk to me! 13:12, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

13:04, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

User:Mdann52 Hi there. I changed the licence on Flickr as well, but couldn't work out which one corresponded with what licence I had been asked to change it to here. Flickr gives me to following options:

1. Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Creative Commons 2. Attribution-NonCommercial Creative Commons 3. Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Commons 4. Attribution Creative Commons 5. Attribution-ShareAlike Creative Commons 6. Attribution-NoDerivs Creative Commons

Which one should I select?

Thanks,

Edward

@Edwardmbishop: Number 5 is {{cc-by-sa}}, which is probable the best one to use. --Mdann52talk to me! 13:52, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

User:Mdann52 Thanks for the advice, I've changed it as you suggest. Edward — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.233.72.52 (talk) 11:14, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

User:Mdann52 Hi. I changed it as you suggested. What do I need to do now in order to change the picture on the specific page? Edward

@Edwardmbishop: the file page still states cc-nd-2.0, which we can't use on Wikipedia. Please can you update this on the Flickr page, then I will upload it. --Mdann52talk to me! 13:20, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

User:Mdann52 My mistake. I apologise. Amended as requested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwardmbishop (talk • contribs) 15:01, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

User:Mdann52 My photo has been uploaded, thank you. Is there a way that I can remove the Full Res version ‎(4,474 × 3,356 pixels) and leave the remaining versions? Thanks, Edward. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.120.206 (talk) 10:59, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

No, however you can manually change the size; eg. [[File:Ben Watt by Edward Bishop.jpg|thumb|100px]] produces the following.

--Mdann52talk to me! 11:04, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Mdann52, Firstly I'd like to apologize for taking longer than 7 days to come back after placing it on hold. However, you have made the fixes I felt were needed as well as many raised by others. While some weren't addressed, I felt these weren't appropriate to prevent GA (if it were an FA nomination, then they may have been) and I'm happy to tell you that I have granted the article Good Article status.

All the best and I hope to see the article up for FA in the not to distant future.

Oddbodz - (Talk) (Contribs) 23:23, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Mdann52 has given you a brownie! Brownies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a brownie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. This brownie is your reward for accepting two articles, Hof International Film Festival and William F. Banholzer, as part of the special unofficial 1-week mini-drive for ACCEPTING articles at WikiProject:Articles for creation. See also: [9] and [10]. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:52, 12 November 2013 (UTC)†

Not sure why my username is here! I'm guessing it must use a last editor system to place the name or something? Oddbodz - (Talk) (Contribs) 23:24, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

The template wasn't substed. Fixed. --Mdann52talk to me! 08:21, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

	Barnstar of Awesome
	You are hereby awarded the Barnstar of Awesome for your amazing work personalizing the talk page messages in The Wikipedia Adventure using your template magic. You. Are. Awesome. Check out your name in the game credits here: WP:TWA/About. Thank you again :) --User:Ocaasi 17:34, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Could you please specify your concerns? Actually this is a transformation of the German Wikipedia page of the internationally renown artist Markus Heinsdorff. If you have any specific suggestions of improvement please let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andreas.zei (talk • contribs) 08:49, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Phrases such as "Besides the material bamboo his work is dedicated to the element water" are puffery, and should be removed. The rules on the German Wikipedia are different to the ones on here, so an article on other Wikipedia's are not always suitable for here. --Mdann52talk to me! 11:04, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Mdann52. You have new messages at FrB.TG's talk page.
Message added 11:24, 15 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

FrB.TG (talk) 11:24, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

The article Oblivion (roller coaster) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Oblivion (roller coaster) for comments about the article. Well done!

Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Oddbodz -- Oddbodz (talk) 23:28, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations! Matty.007 06:49, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Good job Mdann! Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 12:34, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the cleanup. Unfortunately, I just tried the same basic edit (with a couple of additions) and the problem of losing all the footnotes still persists. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:20, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

When I edited your page, the edit history says that this was minus 24,000 bites! I added bites, and did not delete them. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:42, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

And viewing the edits, you really did lose data. I don't know how or why. I didn't do it, but I wanted you to know. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:44, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

08:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Moby you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SilkTork -- SilkTork (talk) 19:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello Mdann52. I believe that the thread on which closure was sought was this section: [14] in which there is a poll and discussion of the elderly vs. younger photo. Could you please address that question, so that we can get closure on this issue? Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 14:43, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

 Done Sorry, missed this; I meant to go back to it, but had to change computers and forgot to do it... --Mdann52talk to me! 15:06, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi, not to spend too much time on a photo, but I only see 4 for keeping the old man shot in the infobox, 4 for the younger photo in the infobox. It's hard to see consensus for the old man photo in the infobox, and at any rate the consensus wouldn't need to follow a vote count. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 15:41, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

You recently did this edit with a summary including the word "vandalism". It was a partial revert of this earlier edit. The earlier edit, although not explained, appears to me to be an attempt to follow MOS guidance, specifically Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks. The category changes are incorrect, unless the cats are renamed, but it wasn't mere vandalism. DES ^(talk) 15:56, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Ok; I misread the diff when I looked at it. I will leave a correcting summary ASAP. --Mdann52talk to me! 17:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. DES ^(talk) 17:27, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm not edit warring. Please refrain from such frivolous "warnings" on my Talk Page in the future. VictorD7 (talk) 17:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. You're being contacted as you're listed as an EdwardsBot user.

MassMessage has been deployed to all Wikimedia wikis. For help using the new tool, please check out its help page or drop a note on Meta-Wiki.

With over 400,000 edits to Wikimedia wikis, EdwardsBot has served us well; however EdwardsBot will no longer perform local or global message delivery after December 31, 2013.

A huge thanks to Legoktm, Reedy, Aaron Schulz and everyone else who helped to get MassMessage deployed. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:37, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

06:46, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi,

Briefly, I have two questions I hope you could help with: 1. Why was my article declined? 2. What should I change before I try to resubmit it?

In more detail, 1. you declined my Article for creation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Omegawave and I didn't find a reason for it being declined. Could you please provide a reason. Note - I've now added a Talk section to the bottom of the article that may clarify some things (I'm struggling to understand the Talk function even watching the help video on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SummarizeDiscussion). The text was present but hidden my the previous submission.

2. I'm a Wikipedia newbie, so I probably made more than one mistake trying to submit my article. One mistake was that I tried to submit it under Wikipedia namespace, as noted by Dodger67.

Drafts are supposed to be in the "Wikipedia Talk" namespace. The copy in the "Wikipedia" namespace will be deleted soon. Please continue working on the copy at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Omegawave. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Excirial actually declined that submission because it was a duplicate, rather than because it was in the wrong namespace.

However, I don't know if there was anything wrong with the actual article or in the way I submitted it in the Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ namespace. Could you please let me know what, if anything, needs to be changed or corrected.

Thanks for your time and help,

Peter Peter Cura (talk) 09:43, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

@Peter Cura: I have accepted the article; I declined the wrong version. The reason the other one was deleted was because it was a duplicate. The new article is at Omegawave. --Mdann52talk to me! 11:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Mdann User:Mdann52 Thanks, your help is much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Cura (talk • contribs) 11:11, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I understand that you have removed me from the reviewers list as i am not experienced enough. I dint understand why i was removed from the newsletter mailing list as well. Please explain.

falaknuma 13:42, 25 November 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanjeevchandrav (talk • contribs)

Hi User:Mdann52

I am not sure as to why a request for deletion has been put for the Sierra WiFi page. This is not an advert, but was intended to create a wikipedia page for Sierra WiFi. This is a very legit company in Sierra Leone and you can view our page here www.sierrawifi. com

Please help me as to what I should do next as I am very new to this.

Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sierra WiFi (talk • contribs) 13:36, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

@Sierra WiFi: Firstly, your username is not appropriate for Wikipedia; see WP:UN, so you need to choose a new one reperenting you personally. Also, as you appear to have a Conflict of interests, WP:AFC is the best way to write the article. --Mdann52talk to me! 13:42, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I have made the changes after reading the article and going through sources. All the edit that I have done have and edit summary explaining why I have performed the actions. I would like to request you to restore my article and rollback the reverting of article. In case if you don't understand any of my edits please leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikhilvp 5 (talk • contribs) 13:30, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

@Nikhilvp 5: You were also previously reverted by other users. Please see Talk:Narendra Modi for the reasons for the revert (I have not commented there, but other editors have). --Mdann52talk to me! 13:35, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

The talk on that page is about single edit and talk is still going on while you have reverted the whole article and all my edits without any proper reason as edit summary was specified in all the edits. So I request to rollback changes and restore the version. Thank You.Nikhilvp 5 (talk) 13:44, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

While discussion is ongoing, it is customary to leave the page how it was before the dispute began. Considering the history on this page, I am wary of reverting myself in the meantime. --Mdann52talk to me! 13:46, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Sir, I have told you that discussion is on single topic while all my edits were reverted. You haven't still provided the reason about reverting my OTHER changes. Hope for a reply. Thank you.Nikhilvp 5 (talk) 13:55, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

WP:V. You failed to cite any sources, and removed sourced material. --Mdann52talk to me! 13:59, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Hey, I put a lot of work into this and it is interesting information, that a lot of people are looking for. would you please revert the deletion of my texts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JessyBerg (talk • contribs) 14:57, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you. Can you please help by removing the sign/message in front of my page. Several have reviewed and in fact found all to be appropriate. Pls do anything that might be needed and please remove that message.

Deeply appreciated.

(Tnoova (talk) 17:14, 29 November 2013 (UTC))

Hello, Mdann52. You have new messages at Northamerica1000's talk page.
Message added 11:34, 2 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:34, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I put 'MODERATE' in some of my edit summaries because I wanted them specific ones moderated and reviewed incase I was wrong, thanks. Officialdrgamer (talk) 13:42, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Ok, thank you for the heads up :) Officialdrgamer (talk) 13:45, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

READ BEFORE POSTING!!

If you are looking for a post that has disappeared, It is probably in one of the archives.

Cheers, CapnZapp (talk) 16:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

 Done Good catch - only been sitting there for a year or so :P --Mdann52talk to me! 13:46, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

 ;-) CapnZapp (talk) 14:15, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Mdann52. You have new messages at Northamerica1000's talk page.
Message added 00:35, 3 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:35, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Mdann52:

WikiProject AFC is holding a two month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from December 1st, 2013 – January 31st, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2300 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. EdwardsBot (talk) 09:19, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) at 09:19, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

I've put the GAN on hold. There is a fair amount of work to be done on the article. This is a fairly major BLP, attracting nearly 50,000 readers a month, so I do think it's important that the article is improved, and well done for making that attempt. I'll keep the review open as long as I see positive progress being made, though I suspect that it may take some time unless there are others willing to help out, so it may be best to close the GAN, and nominate the article again later when it has been brought to GA standards. I'll check back in seven days to see what's happening. SilkTork' ^{✔Tea time} 14:55, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

The article Moby you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Moby for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SilkTork -- SilkTork (talk) 15:00, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Re the discussion you invited when you restored the close,[18] could you first address my edit summary when I reverted your first close? Here it is for reference, "undid close since the conclusion involves a relatively recently raised proposal discussed only by a few without showing support for any specific 'XXXX' ".[19] --Bob K31416 (talk) 14:32, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

@Bob K31416: I have acted on the discussion at the bottom of the page. --Mdann52talk to me! 17:03, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

There is still the matter of the close of the RfC. Please respond here to my message. --Bob K31416 (talk) 19:56, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi! As you closed the RfC at the Manual of Style, it might be best if you made any changes determined to the text itself. I think if anyone else does it, it may be contested as additional interpretation of your closing statements. Just a thought, but maybe you have a better idea of what's needed. __ E L A Q U E A T E 19:38, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

 Done I got distracted by events IRL, so I forgot I didn't do it.... :/ --Mdann52talk to me! 19:53, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

With your last switch of reasoning, I fear you've made Identity a majority rules popularity contest, instead of weighting it toward respecting the people being named, an opinion found in the discussion, aposition held by people worried identity decisions would be decided by majority votes. "Most common in sources" will not lead to choosing better expert sources over the general gut feelings of editors in any naming disputes to come. I was also surprised you could switch a found consensus to its opposite. __ E L A Q U E A T E 20:48, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

08:38, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

08:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Dear Mdann52, A big hello from Wikiproject Bangladesh Premier League. We have a discussion going on at project's talkpage. Due to inactivity and problems this discussion is inactive for more than 1 months. Now we heartily request you to come and share your thinkings. Your arrival and thinking is much needed for us and we'll really appreciate it if you come and give us some of your precious times. Thanks in advance. Pratyya ^(Hello!) (Project Co-ordinator) and Sourov0000 (talk) (Project Vice Co-ordinator) 12:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi! Thank's for the tip. Yes I'm new for editing and the Wikipedia Website is quite hard to work with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GrafSpee65 (talk • contribs) 14:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi Mdann52 -

I dislike it when people give me grief about my AfC reviews, so I promise to be brief. I was just wondering if you had any suggestions for the submitter of the Granger Westberg AfC. When I found the article a few days ago, the references were a little scarce, but I feel like that's a lot better now. While not a nurse, Westberg created a significant nursing specialty and was fairly broadly covered because of that. Is there anything you would suggest to make this a successful article? Thanks! EricEnfermero ^HOWDY! 15:53, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

@EricEnfermero: rereviewing the article, it looks ok. It turned out I looked at the wrong history page, so I didn't see the changes.... I have reverted, so feel free to accept if you feel like it. --Mdann52talk to me! 16:45, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

I appreciate your quick response. I ended up contributing to the article, so I'm not sure if I'll accept it, but I appreciate your revert. Cheers! EricEnfermero ^HOWDY! 21:14, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

I will go back to it tomorrow - ATM, I am on a mobile device, so can't really use the script reliability. --Mdann52talk to me! 21:20, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Actually someone just accepted it. I appreciate your help! EricEnfermero ^HOWDY! 21:34, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Pistol Auto 9mm 1A page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Hey man! You're soo good in writting articles! Good job and keep it up!!! The Game Expert 11:05, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Right.... I have never actually written an article on my own. In addition, forging signatures on barnstars or any comment is frowned upon. --Mdann52talk to me! 11:09, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Since it ceased to exist at the end of 1993, few links to it are available. Two have been added to its published form and a few former (surviving) authors have been asked to help. Effort will continue after Christmas in order to remove its "orphan" label. - Mentioning of the "Studies of Food Microstructure" would have shown that the journal was based on a previous experience with publishing papers of that kind. "Scanning Microscopy International" had published very many books on all kinds of electron microscopy but there are almost no links to it either, since it also ceased to exist. In 2013, the interest in food structure has been revived and a new "Food Structure" journal has been established by Elsevier. The dates 1982-1993 had initially been added to distinguish the earlier journal from the recent publication. In spite of severe Wikipedia editing, younger food microscopists are getting access to important information in this new Wikipedia article. Thank you. MKalab (talk) 18:11, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello! I wanted to check with you about your reason for reverting Tom Alciere's edits to the Chester, New Hampshire article. Is it because it's poorly written, or do you think it was cut and pasted directly from the source, or did you have some other reason? If it's just that it's poorly written, I could take a stab at fixing it up, but if it's because of misappropriation, he should probably be told. He's been editing New Hampshire towns alphabetically with an 1875 source and has gotten up to towns starting with "C", so will probably be doing a lot more edits. I'd be happy to send him a message. --Ken Gallager (talk) 14:25, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

@Ken Gallager: bit of both... I misread the year as being 1975... Feel free to reinstate and cleanup as needed; I did feel it was a bit too linebreaky :) --Mdann52talk to me! 18:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations on your increased German proficiency, as indicated by a recent change to your user page's babel status. I don't speak German but I do appreciate people who take the time and effort to learn additional languages. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:09, 21 December 2013 (UTC)