User talk:Mason Doering

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback}} on your talk. Please click here to leave me a new message.

Hi Mason Doering! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:21, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	FK Komovi			.nu
	Montenegrin Second League of Men's Handball			Etiquette in the Middle East
	Modal (textile)			Domain name warehousing
	.sx		Merge
	FK Polimlje Murino			Gangnam Style
	Trichomonas			Enlargement of the Arab League
	Jelly Boy			Activision
	AlSaudiah		Add sources
	Emarat			.io
	KCAQ			.info
	Masr (domain name)			Country code top-level domain
	.si		Wikify
	.bq			Sidetic script
	Eidos Hungary			Ljubica Marić
	.hm			Coordination Center for TLD RU
	Enduro Racer		Expand
	Mithis Entertainment			.br
	.zr			.su
	.cw			ICANN

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:15, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

yes, you can delete that page, i miss use it, thanks Christian M. Nuñez 07:45, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Mason, I would like to know what's promotional material in the article? See also similar software: Glipper --Best Regards--Christopher Forster (talk) 13:19, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I couldn't help but notice.
You have about as many edits as I have fingers and toes. Plus or minus.
But you have the experience level of someone with 1000 times as many edits.
So, who did you use to be? Varlaam (talk) 18:03, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just an average user that wanted a fresh start. Mason Doering (talk) 21:54, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you know what this place is like. A place whose most active member was hounded into retirement.

The section below has naught to do with me.

Good luck, Varlaam (talk) 00:20, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wagner. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:18, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

;)

Hi Mason. Would you mind moving my newly-written article out of my user space? I'm not auto-confirmed so I apparently can't. And also, thanks for all your previous advice! --EM64T (talk) 21:26, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey EM64T, I can't move your article right now as the current Trouble in Terrorist Town redirect is getting in the way. I've marked it for speedy deletion so your userspace article can be moved. Mason Doering (talk) 21:41, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quite all right. Thanks! --EM64T (talk) 22:02, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your information is wrong. I don't know who your source is but some of it is incorrect. I am not sure if you are from Dillon or not, but I was born and raised there.If you are going to talk about Dillon, please be accurate with all the information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Badmoon1 (talk • contribs) 00:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Badmoon1. I was reverting your edits because you were removing sections without explanation. If any of the information is incorrect and needs removing, please explain what you're doing in the edit summary to avoid people reverting your edits. Mason Doering (talk) 00:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added a bonus to the offer. After adding it I realized it was actually your subpage. Sorry for the change. I hope you don't mind it, but if you do feel free to remove it. --Odie5533 (talk) 01:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind at all. I'm actually quite happy about your bonus, hopefully it will give people more of an incentive to improve those articles. Mason Doering (talk) 01:14, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mason, I wonder if you would please send me an email about a matter of some importance? I appreciate it. You can email me at [email protected] or using the Email this user feature on Wikipedia. I'd appreciate if you could do this fairly soon. Thanks, Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 11:31, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sumone10154. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Philippe (WMF) that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, –sumone10154^(talk) 22:24, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for personal attacks and harrassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:28, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mason Doering (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i haven't harassed anybody.

Decline reason:

Yes you have. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:38, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mason Doering (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

if you're just going to say i've harassed users, please can i have a link to the revision in which i harassed somebody

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:48, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• It was only like fifteen minutes ago, don't play like you don't know. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:46, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

if you mean this you can barely call that harassment. i guess it was wrong of me, but still not worthy of an indef block -- Mason Doering ^talk 23:11, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is; more so as you are a sockpuppet. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 23:34, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also a huge cunt! -- Mason Doering ^talk 23:36, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• • Note - confirmed sock account--Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 23:35, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you die? -- Mason Doering ^talk 23:39, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I've revoked your ability to edit this talk page - the admin who reviews your unblock request can choose to restore it if they consider it appropriate. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:42, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  To make further unblock requests, please see WP:UTRS -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:15, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]