User talk:MarkSweep

This user may have left Wikipedia. MarkSweep has not edited Wikipedia since August 9, 2009 (5879 days ago). As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

I have nominated Exploding chicken, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploding chicken. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Habanero-tan (talk) 11:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Spliced speech.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:45, 1 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 11:45, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LC-cwpbh has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 06:20, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:David Herold.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:03, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stephen Colbert TDS.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(delivered by mabdul 23:36, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

User:ChildofMidnight/Exploding chicken, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ChildofMidnight/Exploding chicken and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:ChildofMidnight/Exploding chicken during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:36, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I would like to create an Association of Pedantic Wikipedians, as you put on your UP. Would you like to be involved, or just simply an "emeritus"? If I don't hear from you, I will just assume the latter. Have a wonderful day. TheOneSean | Talk to me 02:32, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Rome episode has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you happen to be around, would you take a look at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Pardon request: Guanaco, MarkSweep, et al? I don't have any plans of becoming an administrator, and you probably won't see this, but there it is. —Guanaco 08:45, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MarkSweep, this is a courtesy message to inform you that the Arbitration Committee has voted on a motion allowing Guanaco to seek adminship via WP:RFA. You can view the archived discussion here. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 14:04, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Rome episode has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:46, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Rome episode has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:18, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Duplicate has been nominated for merging with Template:Db-f1. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 23:25, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Transport in China (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation is not required. The primary topic has a hatnote to the Taiwan article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Education in China (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Education in China (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GFDL-OpenGeoDB has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 17:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cassius Longinus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassius Longinus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 22:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]