User talk:MarioProtIV/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:MarioProtIV. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, MarioProtIV, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Getting Started
• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Acabashi (talk) 15:14, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Do you have a reference for that time? Because it should go in the timeline if true. Serendi^podous 20:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

New additions to this list have to be cited. Otherwise they can't be added, whether or not they are correct. If you have citations for any new information, please provide them, then the info can go in.Serendi^podous 20:13, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Kkj11210. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Poincaré recurrence theorem because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! KJ ^{click here} 23:16, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

In your edit summary, you said the following: "it has been stated that we are organizing it like this. please discuss on talk page." - Except it hasn't been stated anywhere. Please explain. Dustin (talk) 22:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Please make sure to properly attribute images when you upload them on the commons. Claiming images as your own work violates copyright laws if the image is protected, and is heavily frowned upon if it's in the public domain. Your recent upload of the RSI map for the January 2016 United States blizzard was listed as your own work when it was created by NOAA and released in news statement on January 26. I went ahead and corrected the information (as well as three other uploads which were NASA images: [1], [2], [3]) but please make sure to properly do this yourself in the future. If you need any assistance on how to attribute them, feel free to ask me any time. Regards, Cyclonebiskit (chat) 13:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 North American winter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East Coast. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:DopplerRadarDecember272015.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2015–16 North American winter

added a link pointing to East Coast

Early February 2016 nor'easter

added a link pointing to East Coast

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Early December 2014 nor'easter

added links pointing to East Coast and Jamesville

2014–15 North American winter

added a link pointing to East Coast

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

I warned you before about this nicely, but obviously that didn't work. Stop claiming material as your own work when it's clearly not yours (ex: File:Blizzard2016Radar.gif). I keep seeing you upload images to the commons that are from NOAA/NASA/etc and list yourself as the author and provide incorrect licensing. This is blatant plagiarism/theft and it is not tolerated on Wikipedia. I'll be forced to start deleting all of the improperly licensed/attributed images if you don't correct them soon. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 23:52, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 North American winter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Friday. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Late March 2016 North American blizzard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High Plains. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 North American winter, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sleet and Mid-Atlantic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 North American winter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sierra Mountains. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

I've been a bit inactive as of late for a few reasons. Among these reasons are schoolwork and lack of interest. Where I live, there was a historically low amount of winter storms and high temperatures, and when I am less affected by an event, I have less motivation. I just thought I'd leave a message thanking you for the additions you have made to the 2013–14, 2014–15, and 2015–16 North American winter articles. I had been meaning to pick up on those articles, so I appreciate the help. Since nobody else seems interested, I'd like to ask what you think about 2014–15 North American winter#Northeastern United States. I feel that it is too long and contains too many statistics. I haven't established any standards as to what is worth including in terms of records, but I can tell you that that section definitely is not following any standards. Do you have any ideas? I even tried to have the article peer reviewed at one time, but nobody ever responded to my request. If you have any suggestions, please let me know! Any help is appreciated; thanks! Dustin (talk) 01:13, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

No problem! I actually went as far as making one for the 2012–13 winter as there were quite a few interesting events during that winter such as the November nor'easter, the February nor'easter (aka Blizzard of 2013), and the March nor'easter. It's actually still in progress with the events, so any help or ideas would be acceptable. The other winter articles I spiced up since there wasn't much events in the 2013–14 article, and 2014–15 was lacking some of the major events.

For the records section in 2014–15, I'm thinking it could either be split into its own article, or it could just be coalesced into a table sorted in the order of "Record, Type, New Record, Location, Date". I am still thinking on how to sort it out. But yeah thanks for the compliment! --MarioProtIV (talk) 01:32, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

If you hadn't created the "2012–13" article, I likely would have, so I appreciate the effort. I hope we can sort out the "Records" section of the winter articles before too long. Thanks for responding! Dustin (talk) 02:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Early March 2015 United States winter storm

added links pointing to Schofield Pass and High Plains

2015–16 North American winter

added a link pointing to Central Plains

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

There are a number of issues with your addition that you have not addressed.

1. The runaway greenhouse evaporating the oceans is already described at 1 billion years. Since this event cannot happen twice, there would need to be some discussion as to which timeframe was more likely.

2. You mention that life will die out. But the article already says that life will completely die out in 2.8 billion years.

3. You say that the Sun's luminosity will be at 30-40 percent of its present value, which means it will have decreased, not increased. Serendi^podous 17:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Ok, for the 3 statements:

1. The runaway greenhouse effect commences around 3.5–4.5 billion years, then the atmosphere heats up as a result.

2. Any remaining life that somehow survived up to that point will die, but I'm likely to remove that actually.

3. That was a typo, I'll fix that to say "30–40% more then it is today". --MarioProtIV (talk) 18:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

The first point just restates what you wrote. It doesn't answer my question. How can the runaway greenhouse effect commence twice? If you're having trouble understanding this, let me quote the entry for 1 billion years:

"The Sun's luminosity has increased by 10 percent, causing Earth's surface temperatures to reach an average of ~320 K (47 °C, 116 °F). The atmosphere will become a "moist greenhouse", resulting in a runaway evaporation of the oceans.[53] Pockets of water may still be present at the poles, allowing abodes for simple life."

If this statement is true, then the statement you posted is false. If the statement you posted is true, then this statement is false. They cannot both be right. So either you misread the source, or the sources are contradicting each other. Serendi^podous 20:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

From what I understand, the greenhouse effect starts at 1 billion, and seemingly goes until 3.5–4.5 billion. If it bugs you still, I can just remove that first line and have it say the following:

"The amount of water vapor in the lower atmosphere increases to 40%. Combined with the luminosity of the Sun reaching 30–40% more then its present-day value, will result in the Earth's surface temperature skyrocketing to 1,000–2,400 °F (538–1,316 °C), enough to melt surface rock. This essentially makes the planet much like how Venus is today."

--MarioProtIV (talk) 21:17, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

That's fine. Serendi^podous 21:25, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Extragalactic planet page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the May 7–12, 2016 tornado outbreak sequence page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to List of potentially habitable exoplanets, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You removed then re-added information on that page, twice, without indicating the reasons in the edit summaries. In the future, please always make use of the edit summary. Dhrm77 (talk) 01:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your contribution to North American weather articles :D Jdcomix (talk) 11:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Template:United States spring storms has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. United States Man (talk) 20:48, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Hey there, this is just to let you know that I mostly reverted your recent edits to Kepler-62f. I feel bad about it because you obviously worked hard on it, but it seemed to me that the subsection you added violated the WP:OR policy. In other words, it seemed that the subsection was your own original thoughts that you based on information in the cited source. In writing articles, we aren't allowed to synthesize and extrapolate from sources - we have to stick to just the conclusions stated in the sources. I left the link you added to Habitability of K-type main-sequence star systems, which I think is really helpful and improves the article a lot. A2soup (talk) 06:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Timeline of the far future is a featured list; many people who are not you have reviewed it in depth. If you assume there is something fundamentally wrong with it that only you can see, you are probably wrong. Serendi^podous 20:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Just a quick suggestion. In the future WP:AIV might be a better forum it would also be a faster response. And in the future please remember to notify users with the ANI Notice template {{subst:ANI-notice}}). Generally administrators won't act if a user hasn't been warned though. I'd suggest in the future after reverting vandalism to place a user warning template on the user's talk page. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 23:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Got it, will do in the future. --MarioProtIV (talk) 23:44, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi there. When you speedy tag a page, as you did in this edit, it is a good idea to notify the user at their talk page. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for creating HD 240237 b, MarioProtIV!

Wikipedia editor Mooseandbruce1 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good job. Keep at creating these exoplanet articles!

To reply, leave a comment on Mooseandbruce1's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

About italian-wiki and edits in italian.wiki, speak in italian.wiki, not here. Ok?--Kirk39 (talk) 03:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Lithopsian. MarioProtIV, thanks for creating Kepler-432!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. cite journal accepts an arxiv parameter which automatically formats a link for you. In addition, if you give a bibcode or doi, Citation Bot will automatically expand a complete citation.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Lithopsian (talk) 20:10, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

 Done --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 20:15, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

MarioProtIV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Requesting an IP address block exemption, because the location/IP range I am editing from (23.20.0.0/1) is blocked for a different reason, and this goes to affect my editing activities on here. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 14:47, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Done. Note that this exception may be revoked if it is no longer necessary or if it is abused. I see no reason to be remotely concerned that you'd abuse this, given your long history of productive edits here. Yamla (talk) 15:37, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

That IP address range belongs to Amazon AWS. We don't generally allow editing via a VPN or a webhost. Do you have a specific reason for needing to edit via a proxied connection? (Please understand the tone of this question is 'inquiring', certainly not 'accusational') --Yamla (talk) 14:57, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

I'm not actually at where I usually edit from (NJ), and I'm in DC rn (vacation xD). Anyways, I am really active on here (my edits say for themselves), and daily I make anywhere from 4–20 edits depending what page I'm working on. Not being able to because of an unfortunate IP range block is a bit nerve-wracking as I can't be there to add new info or revert an unsourced addition (or just plain vandalism). I mostly do my edits relating to exoplanets, as that is my area of interest. --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 15:20, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

On 24 August 2016, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Proxima Centauri b, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 23:49, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Black Kite (talk) 23:49, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

What's PHL? Banedon (talk) 02:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Planetary Habitability Laboratory. --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 02:22, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

I don't understand your rationale for removing the surface gravity calculation then: it wasn't based on PHL's calculator, but rather Newtonian mechanics (the formula for example was copied from the surface gravity article). Banedon (talk) 02:32, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

"Super typhoon" is not a classification used by the official Regional Specialized Meteorological Center (the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) here), so please stop inserting it as a storm title.--Jasper Deng (talk) 16:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

I noticed you added the word "frequently." I personally don't think it was a necessary addition, so I removed it. However, in immediate hindsight, I realize it may be better for me to ask you about it. What prompted you to make that change? Thanks. Dustin (talk) 02:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for cleaning up some of the IP's vandalism, but next time, please escalate the warning appropriately - i.e., don't just issue a level 1 warning when I already gave him one.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:48, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

I wasn't sure which one was the second warning xD but yeah I'll try not to mess up that again lol --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 00:53, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EoRdE6 was:

Not just yet. In a day or two it may need an article. Also before publishing this it will need more third party independent sources (news articles concerning the storm etc) instead of just NWS. That helps deem a storm notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tropical Storm Matthew (2016) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 00:13, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

2016 Hurricane Matthew, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fuortu (talk) 01:19, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi User:Mrio ProtIV,

I'm writing a blog post about the annual hurricane season and the effect of this on Wikipedia. Since you have created the article on Hurricane Matthew which is topping the news headlines these days, I was wondering if I can ask you a couple of questions and use your answers in my post? If you are interested, would you please send me an e-mail on selsharbatywikimedia.org, or provide me with an e-mail address that I can use to contact you? Thanks! --Selsharbaty (WMF) (talk) 20:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	For creating the Hurricane Matthew page. — JJBers (talk) 03:08, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

User:MarioProtIV/Hypercane Fay, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MarioProtIV/Hypercane Fay and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MarioProtIV/Hypercane Fay during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 00:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

User:MarioProtIV/2038 Atlantic hurricane season, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MarioProtIV/2038 Atlantic hurricane season and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MarioProtIV/2038 Atlantic hurricane season during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 06:17, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

User:MarioProtIV/Hurricane Katrina (2014), a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MarioProtIV/Hurricane Katrina (2014) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MarioProtIV/Hurricane Katrina (2014) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 06:17, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

User:MarioProtIV/Early December 2016 North American blizzard, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MarioProtIV/Early December 2016 North American blizzard and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MarioProtIV/Early December 2016 North American blizzard during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 06:18, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:MarioProtIV/Hurricane Katrina (2014), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 23:21, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:MarioProtIV/Hypercane Fay, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 23:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:MarioProtIV/2038 Atlantic hurricane season, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 23:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:MarioProtIV/Early December 2016 North American blizzard, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 23:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016 North American spring is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 North American spring until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 23:33, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

It would be in your best interest to copy the material from your nominated-for-deletion subpages to a third-party site such as Hypothetical Hurricanes Wiki. The pages will end up being deleted from Wikipedia, but you can at least keep what you wrote at Wikia. That way, you won't be receiving constant notifications on your talk page and claims of hoax-creating. Dustin (talk) 00:45, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

I already did. --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 00:47, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Okay. I know you may not want to, but if you go to those subpages' MfDs and support their deletion, then you can stop the template notices from flowing in and the hoax allegations. From my point of view, it is extremely unlikely those pages would survive anyway. In honesty, I did support their deletion as they don't belong on Wikipedia, but I don't think you ever intended Dustin (talk) 00:53, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

I have not been paying enough attention! I just saw the comment you left at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MarioProtIV/Hypercane Fay (I had only been looking at the other two since you made that comment). So you approve of deletion now. You should still leave similar messages at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MarioProtIV/2038 Atlantic hurricane season and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MarioProtIV/Early December 2016 North American blizzard for visibility, but I'm glad to see that you actually partly carried out my recommendation before I even made it. Dustin (talk) 01:15, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Hey there! I noticed your edits lately, and it's clear you have a passion for meteorology. However, some of your edits may be slightly less productive than you intended, like your article on Tropical Storm Karl (2016). The storm was weak, and unlikely to be remembered, and it's not the sort of storm Wikipedia usually has articles on. With so many articles already on Wiki in need of work, have you considered editing some older articles? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

I meant to add an edit summary in there. The Hillary Clinton article does not suffer from recentism. A more apt template might be the {{current}} template, which indicates that the subject is in the midst of a current event. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:58, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, MarioProtIV. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Hey there, thanks for adding the info into Otto's article! I see it's live now, so I'd love if we could keep developing the article. I noticed you copy and pasted from the temporary page to the main article in this edit. I just wanted to let you know that this is technically against Wiki policy (see WP:CUTPASTE), as it disrupts the page history. If you click on the "history" of the article, you'll see every single edit attributable to each person. Just an FYI in case you didn't know that. But thanks again for helping keep the article up to date! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:16, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Oh ok. I didn't actually realise that :P but yeah no problem! --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 23:24, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Is there any chance you could add some of the info on Panama damage? You can find it easily on Google news. You just need to summarize (general description of the damage). Just make sure you cite which sources you use. That would be an amazing help, especially to me. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Regarding this edit here, while I have been rather quiet in terms of editing that page, I actually am planning to write that section (or at least get it started) in the near future (before the end of this weekend). That said, it doesn't seem to do any good to expose an empty section. Dustin (talk) 21:07, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Tropical Depression Eight (2016). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --219.79.180.7 (talk) 09:16, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jason Rees (talk) 21:08, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Tell HHW my activity is about to decrease. My parents caught me, and said they'd break my tablet if they caught me again. Thanks Brickcraft1 (talk) 00:12, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Will do, sorry to hear that :/ --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 00:37, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Sorry to hear this, I hope you can come back soon :/ Jdcomix (talk) 00:51, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

I hope everything is ok with you. 😐 Hurricane Darren (talk) 00:49, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

I'm fine. I'll try to be on as much as I can. Also, what was Sass's Wikipedia account again? Thanks for your concerns Brickcraft1 (talk) 04:08, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

User:Vedanara2 I think. --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 04:11, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop! You should learn better! We have already agreed to create this article by April. If your not satisfied please talk about it in the talk page. I have informed other users about this. I know you're new in this project but please learn. Thank you. Typhoon2013 (talk) 11:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Also perhaps to stop reverting my edits for the edit war of TS Julia's image? I have therefore, made another image and a much better image to end the edit war. Typhoon2013 (talk) 12:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Ok I'll stop. The new image you put does look better tbh so.. --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 12:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)